Low-dose Rituximab in the treatment of anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis with antibody superposition syndrome: a case report

Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody and N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor antibody overlapping syndrome: insights from the recent case reports

The overlapping of two or more types of neural autoantibodies in one patient has increasingly been documented in recent years. The coexistence of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) and N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) antibodies is most common, which leads to a unique condition known as the MOG antibody and NMDAR antibody overlapping syndrome (MNOS). Here, we have reviewed the pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, paraclinical features, and treatment of MNOS. Forty-nine patients with MNOS were included in this study. They were young males with a median onset age of 23 years. No tumors were observed in the patients, and 24 of them reported prodromal symptoms. The most common clinical presentations were psychiatric symptoms (35/49) and seizures (25/49). Abnormalities on magnetic resonance imaging involved the brainstem (11/49), cerebellum (9/49), and parietal lobe (9/49). Most patients mostly responded to immunotherapy and had a good long-term prognosis. However, the overall recurrence rate of MNOS was higher than that of mono antibody-positive diseases. The existence of concurrent NMDAR antibodies should be suspected in patients with MOG antibody-associated disease having psychiatric symptoms, seizures, movement disorders, or autonomic dysfunction. Similarly, serum MOG antibody testing should be performed when patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis present with atypical clinical manifestations, such as visual impairment and limb weakness, and neuroradiological findings, such as optic nerve, spinal cord, or infratentorial involvement or meningeal enhancement. Early detection of the syndrome and prompt treatment can be beneficial for these patients, and maintenance immunosuppressive therapy is recommended due to the high overall recurrence rate of the syndrome.

Recent research on immunotherapy for anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis

Anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis is a central nervous system disease characterized by neurological and psychiatric symptoms. Immunotherapy is the basic treatment for this disease, including first- and second-line therapies for the acute stage and the long-course therapy for the chronic stage. Anti-NMDAR encephalitis often has a good prognosis, but some patients may still have neurological dysfunction due to poor response to current immunotherapy. In addition, the adverse reactions and economic burden of drugs are practical problems in clinical practice. To solve the above problems, continuous improvements have been made in immunotherapy regimens in terms of dose, route of administration, and course of treatment, and some new immunotherapy drugs have emerged. This article reviews the recent research on immunotherapy for anti-NMDAR encephalitis.

Influential Factors, Treatment and Prognosis of Autoimmune Encephalitis Patients With Poor Response to Short-Term First-Line Treatment

Objective

This study was performed to assess the potential factors for poor short-term first-line treatment response, the appropriate further treatment options, and the prognosis in patients with autoimmune encephalitis (AE).

Methods

This retrospective study consisted of 135 patients with AE. According to their short-term first-line treatment response, patients were divided into the response group and the non-response group. The demographics, clinical characteristics, main accessory examinations, immunotherapy, and outcomes of patients were compared between the two groups. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to analyze whether non-responders have poor long-term outcomes. Further treatment and prognosis of non-responders were also analyzed.

Results

Of the 128 patients who were treated with first-line immunotherapy, 59 (46.1%) were non-responders. Patients in the non-response group had more symptoms and exhibited a higher proportion of mental behavior disorder, central hypoventilation, and autonomic nervous dysfunction. The modified Rankin scale (mRS) scores and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) levels were significantly higher and albumin, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), apolipoprotein A (apoA) levels were significantly lower in the non-response group (p < 0.05, all). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the number of clinical symptoms, mental behavior disorder, central hypoventilation, maximum mRS score, and albumin level was independently associated with non-response to short-term first-line treatment. Non-responders had poor long-term outcomes compared with the responders at all times of followed-up (p < 0.05, all). In multivariable analysis, initial first-line treatment response was independently associated with the long-term prognosis, both at 12-month [odds ratio (OR), 4.74, 95% CI, 1.44–15.59, and p=0.010] and 24-month follow-ups (OR, 8.81, 95% CI, 1.65–47.16; and p = 0.011). Among the non-responders, a higher improvement of mRS scores was observed in those who received second-line treatment than those who had no further treatment or repetition of first-line immunotherapy in the follow-up. However, the rate of a good outcome and median mRS scores were not significantly different among the three groups.

Conclusion

Disease severity, clinical features, anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor subtypes, antibody titers, NLR, albumin, HDL-C, and apoA levels were all associated with non-response to short-term first-line treatment. The short-term first-line treatment response is a valuable predictor of long-term outcomes in patients with AE. Second-line immunotherapy may be a more aggressive treatment option for patients who failed short-term first-line immunotherapy.