[Therapeutic management of irritable bowel syndrome in the family doctor's practice - probiotics and phytotherapeutics are often used successfully]

[Diverticular disease: treatment and management by general practitioners in Germany - high importance of probiotics in primary care]

INTRODUCTION

The symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease (SUDD) is often difficult to treat and guidelines only provide few evidence-based treatment options.

METHOD

For the German-wide survey, a questionnaire was sent to 13790 physicians. It contained questions concerning the status of medical care for patients with diverticula and queried their individual option in regards to current treatment options and challenges for the daily medical routine.

RESULTS

In total, 526 questionnaires were sent back for analysis. The biggest challenge for doctors handling patients with chronic diverticular disease (SUDD) is to make the correct diagnosis (17%) and the distinction to the irritable bowel syndrome (22%). Despite the high abundance of SUDD pathology, only 6% of the medical practitioners feel themselves sufficiently informed about it. The support for general practitioners by medical specialists (gastroenterologists) is limited: In the case of a SUDD or a diverticulitis diagnosis, the physicians sometimes receive an acute therapy plan (27%), but rarely get recommendations for diverticulitis pre- and post-care (11% and 18%), or assisting information for patient education (4%). For primary prophylaxis for persons with asymptomatic diverticula, practitioners give nutrition (41%) and life style (37%) recommendations, as well as probiotics (18%). After an acute diverticulitis, 42% recommend life style and nutrition modifications and 26% the intake of probiotics. For the treatment of SUDD symptoms, they advise mostly life style and nutrition modifications (45%) and probiotics (30%). About 60% of the doctors are satisfied with the efficacy of probiotics. Another 15% stated that they have not yet used them to treat SUDD. The main reasons for it seem to be the lack of reimbursability for probiotics (31%), the poor adherence of patients to therapy (20%) due to the slow onset of positive effects, and the difficulty of finding an evidence-based probiotic (16%).

CONCLUSION

In the daily medical routine the correct diagnosing of SUDD is a major challenge and supporting information by medical specialist is scarce. Physicians frequently choose life style and nutrition recommendations and the use of probiotics as treatment options. The majority of the general practitioners is thereby satisfied with the efficacy of probiotics for patients with chronic diverticular disease, even though the choice of an evidence-based probiotic is an obstacle.

Factors affecting the use of herbal products in patients with Irritable Bowel Syndrome and their results: case-control study

Background

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a functional bowel disease that is characterized by abdominal pain, discomfort, and changes in the frequency and form of stool without any organic pathology. In this study, the factors that affect the herbal treatment choices of IBS patients and their results were investigated.

Methods

Included in the study were 248 IBS patients who were over the age of 18. A questionnaire that comprised 25 questions was applied to the participants. Survey questions were asked to the participants regarding their age, place of birth, gender, educational status, demographic details, social standing, socioeconomic status and job, place of residence, and marital status. In addition, The participants were asked about which IBS symptoms they had, from whom they had received the recommendation for use of herbal products, whether the media had an effect on their selection of herbal products, and whether they had benefited from herbal products.

Results

It was observed that 41.1% of the patients with IBS who participated in the study used herbal medicine, 9.8% of whom used them regularly. It was found that the IBS patients participating in the study made their decision to use herbal products mostly based on the recommendations that they were given by acquaintances (57%) and the media (34%). When the patients were evaluated according to their gender, IBS was found to be more common in unemployed women who had a low level of education, while it was more common in working men (p = 0.015, P < 0.001, respectively). The IBS patients who were single used more herbal products that those who were married (P = 0.036). While the use of herbal herbs and oils was predominant in patients whose recommendation content comprised the media/internet and acquaintances, the herbal treatment content recommended by healthcare professionals consisted of traditional treatments and mixtures (P = 0.012). It was determined that a higher percentage of those who used herbal treatments lived in city centers when compared to those who did not (P < 0.001). In addition, it was determined that patients with constipation used herbal products more than those without (P < 0.001). Among the IBS patients, those who had diarrhea and those who were receiving medical treatment preferred to use significantly less herbal products (P = 0.007 and P = 0.041, respectively). It was found that the patients who visited the Gastroenterology Outpatient Clinic mostly used herbal therapy, while those who visited a family doctor used herbal therapy the least (P = 0.029 and P < 0.001, respectively).

Conclusion

The IBS patients revealed whose recommendations they followed when purchasing herbal products, which of the products they preferred, and how useful/beneficial they felt that these products were. In this regard, the addition of training curricula related to herbal treatment for professional healthcare workers will further raise awareness on this topic.