An atypical case of tularemia presented with pseudoptosis

Tularemia treatment: experimental and clinical data

Tularemia is a zoonosis caused by the Gram negative, facultative intracellular bacterium Francisella tularensis. This disease has multiple clinical presentations according to the route of infection, the virulence of the infecting bacterial strain, and the underlying medical condition of infected persons. Systemic infections (e.g., pneumonic and typhoidal form) and complications are rare but may be life threatening. Most people suffer from local infection (e.g., skin ulcer, conjunctivitis, or pharyngitis) with regional lymphadenopathy, which evolve to suppuration in about 30% of patients and a chronic course of infection. Current treatment recommendations have been established to manage acute infections in the context of a biological threat and do not consider the great variability of clinical situations. This review summarizes literature data on antibiotic efficacy against F. tularensis in vitro, in animal models, and in humans. Empirical treatment with beta-lactams, most macrolides, or anti-tuberculosis agents is usually ineffective. The aminoglycosides gentamicin and streptomycin remain the gold standard for severe infections, and the fluoroquinolones and doxycycline for infections of mild severity, although current data indicate the former are usually more effective. However, the antibiotic treatments reported in the literature are highly variable in their composition and duration depending on the clinical manifestations, the age and health status of the patient, the presence of complications, and the evolution of the disease. Many patients received several antibiotics in combination or successively. Whatever the antibiotic treatment administered, variable but high rates of treatment failures and relapses are still observed, especially in patients treated more then 2-3 weeks after disease onset. In these patients, surgical treatment is often necessary for cure, including drainage or removal of suppurative lymph nodes or other infectious foci. It is currently difficult to establish therapeutic recommendations, particularly due to lack of comparative randomized studies. However, we have attempted to summarize current knowledge through proposals for improving tularemia treatment which will have to be discussed by a group of experts. A major factor in improving the prognosis of patients with tularemia is the early administration of appropriate treatment, which requires better medical knowledge and diagnostic strategy of this disease.

Water-borne oculoglandular tularemia: Two complicated cases and a review of the literature

BACKGROUND

In this study, we presented two cases of late diagnosed complicated oculoglandular tularemia and reviewed the clinical features of oculoglandular tularemia in cases reported in the last ten years.

METHOD

Tularemia was diagnosed when serum microagglutination test (MAT) was ≥ 1/160 titer or when there was at least a four-fold increase in MAT titers measured over a two-week interval. We searched the oculoglandular tularemia cases reported in the last 10 years in the PubMed and Google Academic engines.

RESULTS

Case 1 (19 M) and case 2 (15 M) had complaints of fever and burning in the eye. In both cases, the diagnosis of tularemia was delayed. Lymph node suppuration developed in both cases. A total of 19 cases of tularemia were found within the search. In the cases of oculoglandular tularemia reported in the last 10 years, submandibular and preauricular lymphadenopathy were most common after ocular findings and fever. The mean time to diagnosis was 41 ± 94 days, and the complication rate was 31.5%.

CONCLUSION

Tularemia should definitely be considered in cases of fever and ocular findings, especially in endemic areas. In non-endemic areas, a good anamnesis and clinical suspicion can help diagnose the disease early and reduce the complication rate.