1
|
Vehreschild MJ, Fätkenheuer G, Sander LE, Lübbert C, Rieg S, Ertl G, Salzberger B. [Infectious Diseases - a new specialty for postgraduate training in Germany]. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2024; 149:533-536. [PMID: 38499041 PMCID: PMC11018382 DOI: 10.1055/a-2258-7265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/20/2024]
Abstract
Medicine in Germany is currently facing major structural and economic challenges. Infectious Diseases, with the recent introduction of a new specialty in "Internal Medicine and Infectious Diseases" and with the existing additional training for almost all specializations, will make an important contribution to overcoming these challenges. Expertise in infectious diseases has to be very broad and requires high interdisciplinarity, which makes infectious diseases an attractive and demanding specialty. The complex fundamentals of infectious diseases must now be quickly conveyed to as many physicians as possible in a short period of time, as part of their specialization or as additional training. Until this is achieved, transitional solutions will be necessary for some time. The adaptation of the current billing and reimbursement system for infectious diseases services and improved intersectoral cooperation are of the utmost importance for the further development of the specialty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria J.G.T. Vehreschild
- Goethe Universität Frankfurt, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Zentrum für Innere Medizin, Infektiologie, Frankfurt am Main
| | - Gerd Fätkenheuer
- Klinik I für Innere Medizin, Schwerpunkt Infektiologie, Universitätsklinikum Köln
| | - Leif Erik Sander
- Klinik für Infektiologie und Intensivmedizin, Charité – Universitätsmedizin, Berlin
| | - Christoph Lübbert
- Bereich Infektiologie und Tropenmedizin, Department für Innere Medizin, Neurologie und Dermatologie, Universitätsmedizin Leipzig
| | - Siegbert Rieg
- Abteilung Infektiologie, Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg
| | - Georg Ertl
- Deutsche Gesellschaft für Innere Medizin (DGIM), Wiesbaden
- Deutsches Zentrum für Herzinsuffizienz, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg
| | - Bernd Salzberger
- Abteilung Krankenhaushygiene und Infektiologie, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg,
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Meyer-Schwickerath C, Weber C, Hornuss D, Rieg S, Hitzenbichler F, Hagel S, Ankert J, Hennigs A, Glossmann J, Jung N. Complexity of patients with or without infectious disease consultation in tertiary-care hospitals in Germany. Infection 2024; 52:577-582. [PMID: 38277092 PMCID: PMC10955003 DOI: 10.1007/s15010-023-02166-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Patients seen by infectious disease (ID) specialists are more complex compared to patients treated by other subspecialities according to Tonelli et al. (2018). However, larger studies on the complexity of patients related to the involvement of ID consultation services are missing. METHODS Data of patients being treated in 2015 and 2019 in four different German university hospitals was retrospectively collected. Data were collected from the hospitals' software system and included whether the patients received an ID consultation as well as patient clinical complexity level (PCCL), case mix index (CMI) and length of stay (LOS) as a measurement for the patients' complexity. Furthermore, a comparison of patients with distinct infectious diseases treated with or without an ID consultation was initiated. RESULTS In total, 215.915 patients were included in the study, 3% (n = 6311) of those were seen by an ID consultant. Patients receiving ID consultations had a significantly (p < 0.05) higher PCCL (median 4 vs. 0), CMI (median 3,8 vs. 1,1) and deviation of the expected mean LOS (median 7 days vs. 0 days) than patients in the control group. No differences among hospitals or between years were observed. Comparing patients with distinct infectious diseases treated with or without an ID consultation, the differences were confirmed throughout the groups. CONCLUSION Patients receiving ID consultations are highly complex, frequently need further treatment after discharge and have a high economic impact. Thus, ID specialists should be clinically trained in a broad spectrum of diseases and treating these complex patients should be sufficiently remunerated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Meyer-Schwickerath
- Department I of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - C Weber
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - D Hornuss
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medicine II, Division of Infectious Diseases, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - S Rieg
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medicine II, Division of Infectious Diseases, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - F Hitzenbichler
- Department of Infection Prevention and Infectious Diseases, University Hospital of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - S Hagel
- Institute for Infectious Diseases and Infection Control, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - J Ankert
- Institute for Infectious Diseases and Infection Control, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - A Hennigs
- I. Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - J Glossmann
- Center of Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - N Jung
- Department I of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Nicolaus S, Crelier B, Donzé JD, Aubert CE. Definition of patient complexity in adults: A narrative review. JOURNAL OF MULTIMORBIDITY AND COMORBIDITY 2022; 12:26335565221081288. [PMID: 35586038 PMCID: PMC9106317 DOI: 10.1177/26335565221081288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2021] [Accepted: 01/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Background Better identification of complex patients could help to improve their care. However, the definition of patient complexity itself is far from obvious. We conducted a narrative review to identify, describe, and synthesize the definitions of patient complexity used in the last 25 years. Methods We searched PubMed for articles published in English between January 1995 and September 2020, defining patient complexity. We extended the search to the references of the included articles. We assessed the domains presented in the definitions, and classified the definitions as based on (1) medical aspects (e.g., number of conditions) or (2) medical and/or non-medical aspects (e.g., socio-economic status). We assessed whether the definition was based on a tool (e.g., index) or conceptual model. Results Among 83 articles, there was marked heterogeneity in the patient complexity definitions. Domains contributing to complexity included health, demographics, behavior, socio-economic factors, healthcare system, medical decision-making, and environment. Patient complexity was defined according to medical aspects in 30 (36.1%) articles, and to medical and/or non-medical aspects in 53 (63.9%) articles. A tool was used in 36 (43.4%) articles, and a conceptual model in seven (8.4%) articles. Conclusion A consensus concerning the definition of patient complexity was lacking. Most definitions incorporated non-medical factors in the definition, underlining the importance of accounting not only for medical but also for non-medical aspects, as well as for their interrelationship.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefanie Nicolaus
- Department of General Internal Medicine, Biel Hospital, Biel, Switzerland
| | - Baptiste Crelier
- Department of General Internal Medicine, Bern University Hospital, Inselspital, University of Bern, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Jacques D Donzé
- Department of Medicine, Neuchâtel Hospital Network, Neuchâtel, Switzerland
- Division of General Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Division of Internal Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Carole E Aubert
- Department of General Internal Medicine, Bern University Hospital, Inselspital, University of Bern, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland
- Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Center for Clinical Management Research, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zimmermann N, Allen R, Fink G, Först G, Kern WV, Farin-Glattacker E, Rieg S. Antimicrobial Stewardship with and without Infectious Diseases Specialist Services to Improve Quality-of-Care in Secondary and Tertiary Care Hospitals in Germany: Study Protocol of the ID ROLL OUT Study. Infect Dis Ther 2021; 11:617-628. [PMID: 34751941 PMCID: PMC8576457 DOI: 10.1007/s40121-021-00552-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2021] [Accepted: 10/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programs aim to secure the rational prescription of antibiotics through implementing department- or hospital-level activities. Infectious disease (ID) specialists improve the quality of care and outcomes in infection patients predominantly by individual consultations and patient-level interventions. While hospital AMS programs are established to various extents in Germany, ID specialist services are rarely available in this country. In the ID ROLL OUT study, we will implement and evaluate hospital-level AMS tools with and without ID specialist services in secondary and tertiary care hospitals. We aim to identify means to comprehensively and sustainably improve the quality of care of patients with infectious diseases. METHODS This project is a clustered, two-armed intervention study, which will be conducted in ten secondary and tertiary (non-university) care hospitals in Germany. The intervention groups are stratified by key characteristics of the hospitals. We will compare two interventional strategies: implementation of AMS teams and implementation of AMS teams combined with the activities of ID specialists (AMS + IDS). PLANNED OUTCOMES The primary outcome is the quality of care as measured in changes in a Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) score (as an indicator of difficult-to-treat infections) and a community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) score (as an indicator of common infections) compared to a baseline pre-interventional period. Our secondary outcomes comprise patient- and hospital-level outcomes, such as the quality and frequency of antibiotic treatment, in-hospital mortality, duration of hospitalization, and C. difficile incidence (associated diarrhea episodes). The study may provide urgently needed key information for the aspired advancement of ID care in Germany. TRIAL REGISTRATION DRKS00023710 (registered on 9th April 2021).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Zimmermann
- Section of Health Care Research and Rehabilitation Research, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Centre, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 49, 79106, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Rebekka Allen
- Section of Health Care Research and Rehabilitation Research, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Centre, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 49, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
| | - Geertje Fink
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine II, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79106, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Gesche Först
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine II, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79106, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Winfried V Kern
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine II, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79106, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Erik Farin-Glattacker
- Section of Health Care Research and Rehabilitation Research, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Centre, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 49, 79106, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Siegbert Rieg
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine II, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79106, Freiburg, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Otto-Lambertz C, Yagdiran A, Schmidt-Hellerau K, Meyer-Schwickerath C, Eysel P, Jung N. Establishment of an interdisciplinary board for bone and joint infections. Infection 2021; 49:1213-1220. [PMID: 34339039 PMCID: PMC8613086 DOI: 10.1007/s15010-021-01676-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2021] [Accepted: 07/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The incidence of bone and joint infections is increasing while their treatment remains a challenge. Although guidelines and recommendations exist, evidence is often lacking and treatment complicated by complex clinical presentations and therapeutic options. Interdisciplinary boards shown to improve management of other diseases, seem potentially helpful. We describe the establishment of an osteomyelitis board to show the existing demand for such a platform. METHODS All patients discussed in the board for bone and joint infections between October 2014 and September 2020 were included in this retrospective study. Data were extracted from patient records and analyzed descriptively. RESULTS A total of 851 requests related to 563 patients were discussed in the board during the study period. After a run-in period of 3 years, a stable number of cases (> 170/year) were discussed, submitted by nearly all hospital departments (22 of 25). Recommendations were mainly related to antibiotic treatment (43%) and to diagnostics (24%). Periprosthetic joint infections were the most frequent entity (33%), followed by native vertebral osteomyelitis and other osteomyelitis. In 3% of requests, suspected infection could be excluded, in 7% further diagnostics were recommended to confirm or rule out infection. CONCLUSIONS A multidisciplinary board for bone and joint infections was successfully established, potentially serving as a template for further boards. Recommendations were mainly related to antibiotic treatment and further diagnostics, highlighting the need for interdisciplinary discussion to individualize and optimize treatment plans based on guidelines. Further research in needed to evaluate impact on morbidity, mortality and costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Otto-Lambertz
- Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Medical Faculty, University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
| | - Ayla Yagdiran
- Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Medical Faculty, University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Kirsten Schmidt-Hellerau
- Department I of Internal Medicine, Medical Faculty, University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Charlotte Meyer-Schwickerath
- Department I of Internal Medicine, Medical Faculty, University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Peer Eysel
- Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Medical Faculty, University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Norma Jung
- Department I of Internal Medicine, Medical Faculty, University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
[Organisational and staff requirements for antimicrobial stewardship activities in hospitals : Position paper of the Commission on Anti-Infectives, Resistance and Therapy (Commission ART) at the Robert Koch Institute, with advice from professional associations]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz 2020; 63:749-760. [PMID: 32468301 DOI: 10.1007/s00103-020-03152-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Increased awareness of the rising antimicrobial resistance problem and impending loss of suitable treatment options for infectious diseases have changed patient care. Antimicrobial/antibiotic stewardship (ABS) activities aiming to optimize antimicrobial treatment were specified in international (WHO, ECDC) and national programmes and evidence-based practice guidelines. In Germany, ABS in hospitals is enshrined in the Infection Protection Act §23 and in a national guideline. The position paper presents the goals and tasks of ABS as well as the necessary organisational and staff requirements.Qualified training and education, mandates and support from hospital directors, and the provision of sufficient resources are essential prerequisites for the successful work of the ABS team. The ABS team should work hospital-wide across clinical services. Their main tasks are developing and implementing an ABS programme tailored to local needs and the conditions of the hospital, taking into account anti-infective drug prescribing, the resistance situation and case mix. Their tasks also include drafting and implementing in-house recommendations for diagnosis, prophylaxis and treatment of important infectious diseases. The ABS team should be interdisciplinary and include specially qualified doctors and pharmacists. Doctors commissioned for ABS should support this team and take the department-specific concerns into account. The document specifies a minimum ABS staff of one full-time equivalent (FTE) per 500 beds. Depending on the case mix and specialties, additional staff may be required. It proposes that there should be 0.1 FTE doctors commissioned for ABS per 100 beds.
Collapse
|
7
|
Epidemiology of candidemia and impact of infectious disease consultation on survival and care. Infection 2020; 48:275-284. [PMID: 32052287 DOI: 10.1007/s15010-020-01393-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2019] [Accepted: 01/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to analyse temporal changes in the epidemiology of candidemia assessing patient's characteristics, risk factors, diagnostic management, treatment, and outcome in a tertiary care hospital in South Eastern Germany. METHODS In this retrospective cohort study patients with blood cultures positive for Candida spp. were identified from the microbiological database in the years 2006-2018. A detailed collection of patients' characteristics was obtained for the time periods 2006-2008 and 2016-2018. Risk factors for survival were analysed in a logistic regression analysis. RESULTS In the years 2006-2018, a total of 465 episodes of candidemia were identified. An increase in candidemia cases was evident in the period of 2016-2018 compared to 2006-2015 and to 2006-2008 in absolute numbers and adjusted to patient-days. C. albicans was responsible for 62.8% of cases in 2006-2008 and 51.2% of all cases in the years 2016-2018, respectively, whereas there was a significant increase of C. glabrata in the latter period (16.3-31.5%). Overall mortality was not significantly different in the two periods. Infectious diseases consultation led to a lower mortality of patients with candidemia and to a higher adherence to guidelines. In multivariate analysis, only complete change or extraction of intravascular indwelling material and female gender were independent predictors for survival. CONCLUSION We observed an increase in candidemia rates and rates of non-albicans spp. over time. A complete change of all catheters and/or indwelling devices improved survival. ID consultation led to a better guideline adherence.
Collapse
|
8
|
Practices, organisation, and regulatory aspects in advising on antibiotic prescription: the international ESCMID AntibioLegalMap survey. Infection 2019; 47:749-760. [PMID: 30903590 DOI: 10.1007/s15010-019-01298-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2018] [Accepted: 03/16/2019] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Giving advice about antibiotic prescription through dedicated consultations is a cornerstone of antibiotic stewardship programmes. Our objective was to explore practices, organisation, and regulatory requirements related to antibiotic advising. METHODS We performed an international, exploratory, Internet-based, cross-sectional survey targeting infectious diseases and clinical microbiology specialists. It was disseminated through ESCMID and ESGAP networks. RESULTS Answers from 830 participants (74 countries, 77% of participants from Europe) were collected. Consultations were mostly given on demand (81%, 619/764), while unsolicited consultations targeting specific conditions (e.g., positive blood culture) were less frequent (66%, 501/764). Consultations usually included indications on diagnostic work-up and follow-up (> 79%). Curbside consultations (i.e., without examining the patient) were reported by 82% (598/733) of respondents, mainly by phone (89%, 531/598). The referring physician was considered authorised not to follow the advice by 57% (383/676). Direct consultations (i.e., after examining the patient) were recorded in the medical file more frequently than curbside consultations (69%, 472/689 vs 35%, 206/592). Concerning legal liability, the majority of respondents considered that it is shared between the adviser and the referring physician, who, however, is considered primarily responsible. The advisers' liability was considered to be lower in cases of curbside and unrecorded consultations. Significant inter-countries and intra-country variability were identified, suggesting that the setting markedly influenced practices. CONCLUSION Significant variability exists in the practice of antibiotic advising. This concerns both the organisation of care and how advisers perceive regulatory requirements. These elements must be taken into account when implementing antibiotic stewardship programmes and when training stewards.
Collapse
|