Cardiac Safety Profile of First Dose of Fingolimod for Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis in Real-World Settings: Data from a German Prospective Multi-Center Observational Study

Current understanding of cardiovascular autonomic dysfunction in multiple sclerosis

Autoimmune diseases, including multiple sclerosis (MS), are proven to increase the likelihood of developing cardiovascular disease (CVD) due to a robust systemic immune response and inflammation. MS can lead to cardiovascular abnormalities that are related to autonomic nervous system dysfunction by causing inflammatory lesions surrounding tracts of the autonomic nervous system in the brain and spinal cord. CVD in MS patients can affect an already damaged brain, thus worsening the disease course by causing brain atrophy and white matter disease. Currently, the true prevalence of cardiovascular dysfunction and associated death rates in patients with MS are mostly unknown and inconsistent. Treating vascular risk factors is recommended to improve the management of this disease. This review provides an updated summary of CVD prevalence in patients with MS, emphasizing the need for more preclinical studies using animal models to understand the pathogenesis of MS better. However, no distinct studies exist that explore the temporal effects and etiopathogenesis of immune/inflammatory cells on cardiac damage and dysfunction associated with MS, particularly in the cardiac myocardium. To this end, a thorough investigation into the clinical presentation and underlying mechanisms of CVD must be conducted in patients with MS and preclinical animal models. Additionally, clinicians should monitor for cardiovascular complications while prescribing medications to MS patients, as some MS drugs cause severe CVD.

Risk of cardiovascular disease in patients with multiple sclerosis treated with fingolimod compared to natalizumab: A nationwide cohort study of 2095 patients in Denmark

BACKGROUND

Fingolimod may be associated with risk of developing cardiovascular disease (CVD). Studies including reference groups and long follow-up are scarce.

OBJECTIVES

We hypothesized that patients treated with fingolimod would be at higher risk of developing CVD compared to patients treated with natalizumab.

METHODS

A nationwide 12-year cohort study linking individual-level data from the Danish Multiple Sclerosis Registry with health registries on 2095 adult patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) without any health records of CVD at follow-up start. Exposure to fingolimod and natalizumab was defined by the first treatment of at least 3 months. Cohort entry was from 2011 to 2018. We defined CVD as a composite measure, including hypertension, ischemic heart disease, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, and stroke. We used multivariable adjusted Cox regression.

RESULTS

There were 28.8 and 17.4 CVD events per 1000 person-years in fingolimod and natalizumab groups, respectively. Compared to natalizumab-treated patients, fingolimod-treated patients had a higher risk of CVD (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.57; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.18-2.08). Hypertension comprised 200 of 244 CVD events.

CONCLUSION

We found an increased risk of CVD in patients with MS treated with fingolimod. This increased risk was mainly due to hypertension.

Risk for Cardiovascular Adverse Events Associated With Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Receptor Modulators in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis: Insights From a Pooled Analysis of 15 Randomised Controlled Trials

Background

All agents engaging sphongosine-1-phospate receptors (S1PRs) will have some cardiovascular effect. This study aimed to elucidate the risk of cardiovascular adverse events (AEs) in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) treated with S1PR modulators (S1PRMs).

Methods

We systematically searched the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published through January 5, 2021. Relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the random-effects model. Sensitivity analyses and meta-regression were performed.

Results

Seventeen RCTs (12 for fingolimod; 3 for ozanimod; 2 for siponimod) involving 13,295 patients were included. Compared with the control treatment, S1PRMs significantly increased the risk of cardiovascular AEs (RR, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.58–3.10; I², 75.6%). Notably, the high-risk cardiovascular AEs associated with S1PRMs were primarily bradyarrhythmia (RR, 2.92; 95% CI, 1.91–4.46; I², 30.8%) and hypertension (RR, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.49–2.67; I², 56.5%). Subgroup analysis results were consistent with the primary outcomes except that ozanimod was associated with a higher risk of hypertension only (RR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.10–2.82; I², 0.0%), while siponimod was associated with a higher risk of bradyarrhythmia only (RR, 2.75; 95% CI, 1.75–4.31; I², 0.0%). No significant inter-subgroup differences were observed (P_interaction > 0.05).

Conclusions

S1PRM use increased the risk of cardiovascular AEs by 1.21 times in patients with MS, and increased risks for bradyarrhythmia and hypertension were at 2.92- and 2.00-fold, respectively. These findings can help clinicians assess the risk of cardiovascular AEs in patients treated with S1PRMs.

Systematic Review Registration

The PROSPERO ID is CRD42020183215.

A Comprehensive Monitoring Study on Electrocardiographic Assessments and Cardiac Events After Fingolimod First Dose-Possible Predictors of Cardiac Outcomes

Background: First dose observation for cardiac effects is required for fingolimod. Previous results in patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) suggest that transient bradycardia and conduction abnormalities during the observation phase are rare, benign and reversible. Prior analyses corroborate these findings. The present large scale dataset allows subgroup analyses for differences in the incidence of cardiac findings depending on patient characteristics.

Methods: START was an open-label, multi-center study that enrolled 6,998 RRMS patients. Primary endpoints were incidence of bradycardia (heart rate < 45 bpm) and second-/third-degree atrioventricular (AV) block during treatment initiation. Subgroup analyses were performed according to age, gender, body mass index (BMI), baseline expanded disability status scale (EDSS), and concomitant medication to determine the impact of these variables on cardiac outcomes parameters.

Results: 63 patients (0.9%) developed bradycardia (<45 bpm), 120 patients (1.7%) had a second-degree Mobitz I (Wenkebach) block and/or 2:1 AV block. One case of an asymptomatic third-degree AV block occurred. No Mobitz II AV block was observed. After 1 week, no second-/third-degree AV block was observed. The incidence of second- or third-degree AV blocks was significantly higher in older patients (≥50 years; p = 0.014 vs. patients 35–49 years). Second- or third-degree AV blocks were more frequent in females (87.5% of all patients with a second- or third-degree AV block; p < 0.001), while bradycardia occurred more often in males (58.7% of all bradycardia events; p < 0.001). Furthermore, patients with a BMI below 25 had a higher incidence of second- or third-degree AV block.

Conclusions: In summary, transient bradycardia and AV conduction abnormalities after the first dose of fingolimod were rare and asymptomatic. When compared to females, male patients might have a higher risk for bradycardia during treatment initiation, presumably due to a lower resting heart rate. Furthermore, a low heart rate before treatment initiation, low body weight, or low BMI possibly increases the risk for bradycardia. Second- or third-degree AV blocks were more frequent in females, older patients and patients with a low BMI. Nevertheless, these cardiac events remained rare and benign, confirming the favorable cardiac safety profile of fingolimod upon treatment initiation in MS patients without cardiovascular comorbidities.

Do clinical trials for new disease modifying treatments include real world patients with multiple sclerosis?

We often see that clinical and demographic characteristics of real-world studies (RWS) do not differ from patients included in randomized controlled trials (RCT).

OBJECTIVE

to compare clinical and demographic aspects of patients included in RCT and RWS that evaluated new disease modifying treatment in multiple sclerosis (MS).

METHODS

a systematic non-language-restricted literature search of RCT and RWS that evaluated new disease modifying treatments (natalizumab, alemtuzumab, ocrelizumab, fingolimod, teriflunomide, dimethyl fumarate and cladribine) from January 2005 to January 2019. Demographic and clinical data were extracted, described and compared.

RESULTS

18 RCT and 73 RWS were included. We found no differences in clinical and demographic aspects between RCT and RWS except in the frequency of naïve patients included in RCT vs. RWS 65.6% (95%CI 52-74) vs. 36.4% (95%CI 21-46), respectively, (p = 0.013) at study entry, as well as for the inclusion of patients that used previous treatment 34.4% (95%CI 22-41) vs. 63.6% (95%CI 53-74) in RCT and RWS, respectively,(p = 0.007) at study entry.

CONCLUSION

We did not observe significant differences in most clinical and demographic aspects of included patients in RCT and RWS. Studies that include the full spectrum of MS patients followed in clinical practice are needed.

Comprehensive review of cardiovascular toxicity of drugs and related agents

Cardiovascular diseases are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in most developed countries of the world. Pharmaceuticals, illicit drugs, and toxins can significantly contribute to the overall cardiovascular burden and thus deserve attention. The present article is a systematic overview of drugs that may induce distinct cardiovascular toxicity. The compounds are classified into agents that have significant effects on the heart, blood vessels, or both. The mechanism(s) of toxic action are discussed and treatment modalities are briefly mentioned in relevant cases. Due to the large number of clinically relevant compounds discussed, this article could be of interest to a broad audience including pharmacologists and toxicologists, pharmacists, physicians, and medicinal chemists. Particular emphasis is given to clinically relevant topics including the cardiovascular toxicity of illicit sympathomimetic drugs (e.g., cocaine, amphetamines, cathinones), drugs that prolong the QT interval, antidysrhythmic drugs, digoxin and other cardioactive steroids, beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, female hormones, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory, and anticancer compounds encompassing anthracyclines and novel targeted therapy interfering with the HER2 or the vascular endothelial growth factor pathway.

Roles and regulation of protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) in the heart

Reversible protein phosphorylation is central to a variety of cardiac processes including excitation-contraction coupling, Ca²⁺ handling, cell metabolism, myofilament regulation, and cell-cell communication. While kinase pathways linked with elevated adrenergic signaling have been a major focus for the cardiovascular field over the past half century, new findings support the critical role of protein phosphatases in both health and disease. Protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) is a central cardiac phosphatase that regulates diverse myocyte functions through a host of target molecules. Notably, multiple mechanisms have evolved to dynamically tune PP2A function, including modulation of the composition, phosphorylation, methylation, and localization of PP2A holoenzyme populations. Further, aberrations in this regulation of PP2A function may contribute to cardiac pathophysiology. In summary, PP2A is a critical regulatory molecule in both health and disease, with a myriad of targets in heart. Based on their unique structure, localization, and regulatory properties, PP2A subunits represent exciting therapeutic targets to modulate altered adrenergic signaling in cardiovascular disease.