Treatment Discontinuation, Adherence, and Real-World Effectiveness Among Patients Treated with Ledipasvir/Sofosbuvir in the United States

Treatment of chronic hepatitis C infection: strategies to address poor therapy adherence

INTRODUCTION

Non-adherence to any therapy may be related to skipping drug doses, discontinuation of therapy, or loss of follow-up. It leads to the ineffectiveness of treatment, which is associated with obvious individual health losses, significant social and financial costs, and, in the case of infectious diseases, epidemiological consequences resulting from the possibility of further spread of infection.

AREAS COVERED

This review article analyses the causes and effects of non-adherence to treatment in patients infected with the hepatitis C virus (HCV). It also presents strategies to reduce the risk of non-adherence, which can be implemented by simplifying the treatment process, improving the flow of information between the doctor and the patient, as well as improving patients' knowledge about hepatitis C infection, and facilitating the understanding of the risks associated with non-adherence.

EXPERT OPINION

Since the treatment of HCV infections is highly effective in almost all patients who complete medication, no new drugs are to be expected in the coming years. Therefore, the primary attention in the global elimination of HCV will be focused on screening programs, improving the availability of drugs, and reducing the risk of non-adherence.

Treatment of Hepatitis C Genotypes 1 to 5 in Sub-Saharan Africa Using Direct-Acting Antivirals

There is limited knowledge of the use of direct acting antivirals (DAAs) for the treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) in sub-Saharan Africa. We prospectively evaluated individuals infected with HCV genotypes 1 to 5 in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Liver fibrosis was assessed by AST-platelet ratio index score and cirrhosis by imaging and laboratory values. All 164 individuals completed treatment. The majority of patients had genotype 4 (76%), and 19% of participants showed evidence of cirrhosis. Sustained virologic response (SVR) across all genotypes was 98.8%. In those with cirrhosis, SVR was 93.5% and in non-cirrhotics 100%. Our study demonstrates broad genotype successful treatment of HCV with DAAs in sub-Saharan Africa, demonstrating the feasibility of HCV elimination in resource-limited settings.

Impact of a digital medicine programme on hepatitis C treatment adherence and efficacy in adults at high risk for non-adherence

BACKGROUND

Direct-acting anti-virals (DAA) are highly effective for hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment, but perceived risks of medication non-adherence may restrict access to care. Digital medicine programme (DMP) has improved adherence and outcomes for some conditions.

AIMS

To conduct a prospective, single-arm, open-label study across the United States to assess the impact of DMP on adherence and efficacy in adults with chronic HCV infection at high risk for non-adherence.

METHODS

Eligible participants were placed on the DMP to evaluate real-time adherence; primary outcome was sustained virological response (SVR) at ≥10 weeks post-treatment.

RESULTS

Between August 2017 and April 2019, 288 participants (Medicaid, 64.9%; psychiatric disorders, 61.1%; homeless, 9.4%) received DAAs for 8-12 weeks (sofosbuvir/velpatasvir or ledipasvir, 45%; glecaprevir/pibrentasvir, 55%). SVR was achieved in 99.1% of 218 participants who had HCV RNA assessed at ≥10 weeks post-treatment; of the 70 participants who did not have SVR assessed, 17 had SVR4 with HCV RNA assessed at a median (IQR; interquartile range) 5.6 weeks (4.1, 7.9) post-treatment; one completed treatment but did not have HCV RNA assessed, and 52 discontinued treatment early without assessment. Overall, the primary analysed participants (n = 218) actively used the DMP for median (range) 92.9% (12.5%, 100%) of their prescribed treatment time, and overall pill-taking adherence was 95.0% (57.1%, 100%). Participants reported the programme was useful and easy to use through satisfaction surveys.

CONCLUSIONS

HCV treatment with DMP was accepted by patients and clinicians and may support HCV treatment outcomes among patients at high risk for treatment non-adherence (Clinical trials.gov NCT03164902).

Effect on the adherence to concomitant medications after initiation of treatment with direct-acting antiviral agents against hepatitis C virus

INTRODUCTION

Many patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) have associated comorbidities that require complex treatments. We sought to determine the impact of treatment with direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) for HCV on adherence to prescribed concomitant medications for associated comorbidities and to identify predictors of non-adherence to comedications.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

HCV-infected patients treated with DAAs in a Spanish hospital between January 2015 and December 2016 and followed-up by the pharmacy unit were included in the study. Adherence to concomitant comedication prescribed before and during HCV therapy with DAAs was compared to adherence during the same number of weeks before DAA initiation. Demographic, clinical and pharmacotherapy variables were analyzed to determine factors associated with non-adherence. A multivariate regression model was created for prediction of non-adherence to concomitant medication.

RESULTS

Data from 214 patients using prescribed concomitant therapies were analyzed. Significant reduction on adherence to comedications was observed after initiation of DAA treatment compared with a similar period before therapy initiation (29.9% vs. 36.9%, p=0.032). The univariate analysis showed that polypharmacy and presence of vascular disease were associated negatively with adherence to concomitant medications (87.8%, p=0.006 and 84.7%, p<0.001, respectively). Multivariate analysis indicated that HIV/HBV coinfection was associated with adherence (OR 0.19; 95% CI 0.09-0.39), while polypharmacy was a predictor for non-adherence (OR 4.54; 95% CI 1.48-13.92).

DISCUSSION

Adherence to concomitant medications decreases in HCV-infected patients when DAA therapy is initiated. Polypharmacy is a predictor for non-adherence, while HIV/HBV coinfection reduce non-adherence rates. Polymedicated patients on DAAs might benefit from close follow-up and educational programmes to improve their adherence.

Hepatitis C Virus Epidemiology and the Impact of Interferon-Free Hepatitis C Virus Therapy

The public health impact of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has been realized only recently. Globally, 71 million people are living with HCV chronic infection. HCV prevalence is higher in some regions and countries, as well as in some subpopulations such as people who inject drugs, prisoners, or people living with HIV. In 2017, an estimated 580,000 people died from HCV, largely because of long-term complications of the disease. The advent of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs), which are highly effective in treating the infection and are well tolerated, led the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2016 to call for the elimination of HCV by 2030, which would be possible by meeting the numerical targets laid down by the organization. However, at present, only 12 countries are on track. Overall, only 20% of people with HCV have been diagnosed and only 7% of people diagnosed have initiated treatment, with major differences among countries. Underdiagnoses, a general lack of awareness, poor surveillance, and the prices of diagnostics and treatment remain major barriers to achieving the elimination goals. Comprehensive strategies, which include innovative models of care and the removal of reimbursement restrictions for treatment, are needed to overcome these public health and health system obstacles.

Comparative effectiveness of 8 versus 12 weeks of Ombitasvir/Paritaprevir/ritonavir and Dasabuvir in treatment-naïve patients infected with HCV genotype 1b with non-advanced hepatic fibrosis

PURPOSE

Since 2017 treatment-naïve patients infected with genotype 1b of hepatitis C virus and minimal or moderate fibrosis can be treated with Ombitasvir/Paritaprevir/ritonavir + Dasabuvir (OPrD) for 8 weeks according to updated Summary of Product Characteristics. The aim of our study was to assess the comparative efficacy of 8 and 12-weeks therapy with OPrD in large cohort of patients eligible for 8 weeks regimen treated in real-world setting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analysed data of 3067 HCV genotype 1b infected patients treated with OPrD between 2015 and 2017. Final analysis included patients with none, minimal or moderate fibrosis (F0-F2).

RESULTS

A total of 771 patients were enrolled in the study, including 197 (26%) treated for 8-weeks and 574 patients fulfilling criteria for 8-weeks but assigned to 12-weeks regimen. Majority of patients had no or minimal fibrosis (F0-F1). Longer treatment duration was more often administered in patients with moderate fibrosis, comorbidities, concomitant medications. SVR was achieved in 186 (94%) patients treated for 8 weeks and 558 (97%) for 12 weeks (p = 0.07). After exclusion of lost to follow-up patients, sustained virological response (SVR) rate reached 95% and 99%, respectively (p = 0.01). We were not able to identify factors associated with non-response.

CONCLUSIONS

This real-word experience study confirmed similar, high effectiveness of 8 and 12-weeks regimens of OPrD in genotype 1b HCV infected patients with non-advanced fibrosis. Despite of reduced SVR rate after 8-weeks regimen, there is no need to extend therapy to 12-weeks in vast majority of such patients and no need to add ribavirin.

Impact of pill burden on adherence to hepatitis C medication

Objective: To describe pill burden before and after hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment initiation among patients newly treated for HCV infection, and to evaluate the association between HCV pill burden and gaps in HCV therapy. Methods: This was a retrospective administrative claims study of patients treated with direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) for HCV from 1 November 2013 to 31 July 2016. HCV pill burden was defined as the pill count per day for the index HCV regimen. Mean overall pill burden (HCV medications plus non-HCV medications) was calculated in the 90 days before and after DAA initiation. Gaps in the index HCV regimen were assessed in the 6 months after DAA initiation. Multivariable logistic regression was used to compare the odds of a gap in HCV therapy across HCV pill burden categories (1 pill/day, 2 pills/day, and ≥3 pills/day). Results: Among 9815 patients who met the study criteria, mean overall pill burdens before and after DAA treatment initiation were 5.4 and 7.7, respectively (p < .001). The adjusted odds ratio (OR) of a ≥15-day gap in HCV therapy was 1.75 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.38-2.22) for patients with 2 HCV pills/day and 2.11 (95% CI = 1.78-2.51) for patients with ≥3 pills/day, compared with patients with 1 HCV pill/day. Conclusions: Patients with HCV have a substantial pill burden even before initiating HCV treatment. As higher HCV pill burden was associated with lower medication adherence, pill burden should be an important consideration in HCV treatment selection.

Measure of adherence to direct-acting antivirals as a predictor of the effectiveness of hepatitis C treatment

Background Adherence to direct-acting antivirals could be a predictor response to these treatments in hepatitis C. Objective To assess the ability of three methods of measuring adherence to direct-acting antivirals [pill counts, pharmacy dispensing record and Simplified Medication Adherence Questionnaire (SMAQ)] as predictors of their effectiveness. Setting Study conducted by the pharmacy department of the hospital. Methods: A retrospective study was performed. Patients ≥ 18 years with hepatitis C that started and completed treatment with direct-acting antivirals between the 1st-April-2015 and 28st-February-2016 were enrolled. To evaluate the predictive ability to obtain a response to treatment, Chi squared test, Mann-Whitney-U test and ROC-curves were used. Main outcome measure Adherence to antivirals was assessed by three methods and response to treatment, which was defined as obtaining a viral load of hepatitis C virus ≤ 15UI/ml at week 12 after the end of treatment. Results 128 patients were enrolled. The overall average adherence obtained with SMAQ (99.09%) was similar to the pill counts (96.40%, p = 0.043) and pharmacy dispensing record (91.10%, p = 0.02). There was no correlation between the percentage of patients considered as adherent by SMAQ (99.09%) and the achievement of response to treatment (96.40%, p = 0.999). The ROC-curve obtained for the pill count method shows a global area under the curve of 0.53. For pharmacy dispensing record method, patients with an adherence ≤ 66.66% have a high probability of not achieving response (sensitivity and specificity of 79.00% and 100.00%, respectively). Conclusions Pharmacy dispensing record is shown as the best indicator of adherence to predict therapeutic failure in our study.

Initial uptake, time to treatment, and real-world effectiveness of all-oral direct-acting antivirals for hepatitis C virus infection in the United States: A retrospective cohort analysis

Background

Data on initiation and utilization of direct-acting antiviral therapies for hepatitis C virus infection in the United States are limited. This study evaluated treatment initiation, time to treatment, and real-world effectiveness of direct-acting antiviral therapy in individuals with hepatitis C virus infection treated during the first 2 years of availability of all-oral direct-acting antiviral therapies.

Methods

A retrospective cohort analysis was undertaken using electronic medical records and chart review abstraction of hepatitis C virus-infected individuals aged >18 years diagnosed with chronic hepatitis C virus infection between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2015 from the Indiana University Health database.

Results

Eight hundred thirty people initiated direct-acting antiviral therapy during the 2-year observation window. The estimated incidence of treatment initiation was 8.8%±0.34% at the end of year 1 and 15.0%±0.5% at the end of year 2. Median time to initiating therapy was 300 days. Using a Cox regression analysis, positive predictors of treatment initiation included age (hazard ratio, 1.008), prior hepatitis C virus treatment (1.74), cirrhosis (2.64), and history of liver transplant (1.5). History of drug abuse (0.43), high baseline alanine aminotransferase levels (0.79), hepatitis B virus infection (0.41), and self-pay (0.39) were negatively associated with treatment initiation. In the evaluable population (n = 423), 83.9% (95% confidence interval, 80.1–87.3%) of people achieved sustained virologic response.

Conclusion

In the early years of the direct-acting antiviral era, <10% of people diagnosed with chronic hepatitis C virus infection received direct-acting antiviral treatment; median time to treatment initiation was 300 days. Future analyses should evaluate time to treatment initiation among those with less advanced fibrosis.

Obstacles to successful treatment of hepatitis C in uninsured patients from a minority population

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment regimens (DAAs) are well tolerated, efficacious but costly. Their high cost and restricted availability, raises concerns about the outcome of treatment in uninsured patients. This study investigated sustained virologic response (SVR) outcomes in a predominately uninsured patient population and completion of four steps along the HCV treatment cascade.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted to characterize the patient population and analyze covariates to determine association with insurance status, attainment of SVR and progression through the HCV treatment cascade.

RESULTS

Out of a total of 216 patients, 154 (71%) were uninsured. Approximately 50% of patients (109 of 216 patients) were male and 57% were Hispanic (123 of 216 patients). Sex, race, ethnicity, treatment compliance, and rates of complications were not associated with insurance status. Insured patients were older (median 60 years vs 57 years, p-value < 0.001) and had higher rates of cirrhosis: 32 out of 62 patients (52%) vs 48 out of 154 patients (31%) (p-value = 0.005). Insured patients were tested for SVR at similar rates as uninsured patients: 84% (52 of 62 patients) vs 81% (125 of 154 patients), respectively. Of those tested for SVR, the cure rate for insured patients was 98% (51 out of 52 patients) compared to 97% (121 out of 125 patients) in the uninsured. Out of those who completed treatment, 177 of 189 (94%) were tested for attainment of SVR. Compliance rates were significantly different between tested and untested patients: 88% (156 of 177 patients) vs 0% (0 of 12 patients), respectively (p-value < 0.001). However, insurance status, race ethnicity, cirrhosis, and complications were not associated with being tested for SVR.

CONCLUSIONS

These results demonstrate that insured and uninsured patients with chronic HCV infection, with access to patient assistance programs, can be treated and have comparable clinical outcomes. In addition, testing for SVR remains an important obstacle in completion of the HCV treatment cascade. Nevertheless, patient assistance programs remove a significant barrier for treatment access in real-world HCV infected populations.