Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Asunaprevir in Subjects with Hepatitis C Virus Infection

Recent advancement in small molecules as HCV inhibitors

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) has caused a considerable threat to human health. To date, no treatments are without side effects. The proteins and RNA associated with HCV have specific functions during the viral life cycle. The vulnerabilities to virus are associated with those proteins or RNA. Thus, targeting these proteins and RNA is an efficient strategy to develop anti-HCV therapeutics. The treatment for HCV-infected patients has been greatly improved after the approval of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs). However, the cost of DAAs is unusually high, which adds to the economic burden on patients with chronic liver diseases. So far, many efforts have been devoted to the development of small molecules as novel HCV inhibitors. Investigations on the inhibitory activities of these small molecules have involved the target identification and the mechanism of action. In this mini-review, these small molecules divided into four kinds were elaborated, which focused on their targets and structural features. Furthermore, we raised the current challenges and promising prospects. This mini-review may facilitate the development of small molecules with improved activities targeting HCV based on the chemical scaffolds of HCV inhibitors.

Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Daclatasvir, Asunaprevir, and Beclabuvir Combination in HCV-Infected Subjects

A fixed-dose combination of daclatasvir (pangenotypic NS5A inhibitor), asunaprevir (NS3/4A protease inhibitor), and beclabuvir (nonnucleoside NS5B inhibitor) was approved for hepatitis C virus treatment in Japan. The objectives of the analyses were to develop the daclatasvir, asunaprevir, and beclabuvir population pharmacokinetic models for the combination regimen. First, an original population pharmacokinetic model was developed using the data in non-Japanese hepatitis C virus-infected subjects. The model was subsequently updated after a phase 3 study in Japanese hepatitis C virus-infected subjects was available. A total of 11,382, 11,300, and 10,728 pharmacokinetic records from 1,228 subjects were included for daclatasvir, asunaprevir, and beclabuvir in the updated model, respectively. Daclatasvir and beclabuvir pharmacokinetics (PK) were described by a 1-compartment model with linear elimination and asunaprevir PK was described by 2-compartment model with linear elimination. Cirrhosis, baseline, and time-varying ALT were significant covariates on asunaprevir apparent oral clearance. Asian subjects had greater asunaprevir and beclabuvir exposures than white subjects. The effects of all covariates on daclatasvir PK were modest and not considered clinically significant. With the exception of race on asunaprevir and beclabuvir PK, no other parameters for daclatasvir, asunaprevir and beclabuvir population PK models were meaningfully impacted during the refinement with Japanese subjects.

Safety Exposure-Response Analysis for Daclatasvir, Asunaprevir, and Beclabuvir Combinations in HCV-Infected Subjects

The combination regimen of daclatasvir, asunaprevir, and beclabuvir has been developed for the treatment of hepatitis C virus infection. The objectives of this analysis were to characterize the relationship between the exposures of the daclatasvir, asunaprevir, and beclabuvir regimen and liver‐related laboratory elevations (Grade 3 or 4 alanine aminotransferase [ALT] and total bilirubin [Tbili]), and to evaluate the impact of selected covariates on the exposure‐response relationships. The exposure‐response analysis was performed with data from 1 phase 2 and 3 phase 3 studies in hepatitis C virus–infected subjects. The probability of liver‐related laboratory elevations were modeled using linear logistic regression. Selected covariates were tested using a forward‐addition and backward‐elimination approach. The final model for ALT elevation included Asian race, body weight in non‐Asian subjects, and asunaprevir exposure. The final model for Tbili elevation included Asian race, fibrosis score (F0‐F3 or F4) and asupanprevir exposure. Asian subjects had greater the Grade 3 or 4 ALT and Tbili elevation rates than non‐Asians. The Grade 3 or 4 ALT elevation rate increased with decreasing body weight in non‐Asian subjects. Subjects with F4 fibrosis score had a higher rate of Grade 3 or 4 Tbili elevation compared to subjects with F0 to F3 fibrosis score. Higher asunaprevir exposure was associated with increases in Grade 3 or 4 ALT and Tbili elevation rates; however, the impact on the ALT elevation was not clinically relevant and the effect on Tbili elevation was smaller than the other significant covariates.

Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis for Daclatasvir and Asunaprevir in Japanese Subjects With Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Infection

Daclatasvir is a nonstructural protein 5A replication complex inhibitor, and asunaprevir is a nonstructural protein 3 protease inhibitor for hepatitis C virus (HCV). In 2014, the combination therapy of daclatasvir and asunaprevir received the first global approval in Japan as the first nonribavirin, all‐oral therapy for HCV treatment. The population pharmacokinetics (popPK) of daclatasvir and asunaprevir were characterized by nonlinear mixed‐effects modeling using 3801 and 2626 concentration data from 336 and 265 Japanese HCV subjects, respectively. The plasma pharmacokinetic profiles of daclatasvir and asunaprevir were described by a 1‐compartment model. Parameter estimates (interindividual variability) of daclatasvir apparent clearance (CL/F) and apparent volume of the central compartment (V/F) were 5.29 L/h (39.4%) and 64.2 L (38.1%). The effects of all statistically significant covariates on daclatasvir PK parameters were within or overlapped the 80% to 125% boundaries, suggesting a lack of clinical relevance. Parameter estimates (interindividual variability) of asunaprevir CL/F and V/F were 52.1 L/h (41.5%) and 75.1 L (93.4%), respectively. Baseline and time‐varying aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and cirrhosis on CL/F and formulation (soft‐gel capsule or tablet) on F were included as significant covariates in the asunaprevir popPK model. The effects of all covariates exceeded the 80% to 125% boundaries, indicating that the asunaprevir soft‐gel capsule had higher bioavailability than the tablet and that asunaprevir exposure increased with cirrhosis and increasing baseline and time‐varying AST values. The popPK models adequately described the PK profiles of daclatasvir and asunaprevir in Japanese HCV subjects.