Meta-Analysis of Efficacy and Safety of Coformulated Bictegravir, Emtricitabine, and Tenofovir Alafenamide Among People Living with HIV

Real-life data of immune recovery using bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide in virologically suppressed people living with HIV. Results at 48-96 weeks of RETROBIC Study

BACKGROUND

Switching strategy with bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (B/F/TAF) has become a gold standard for people living with HIV (PLWH), achieving high efficacy and safety rates. However, data regarding immune status in long-term real-life cohorts of pretreated patients are needed.

METHODS

We performed a multicentre, non-controlled, retrospective study in virologically suppressed PLWH switching to B/F/TAF. We evaluated CD4+, CD8+ and CD4+/CD8+ ratio, efficacy and safety at weeks 48 and 96.

RESULTS

The study comprised 1966 PLWH from 12 hospitals in Spain, of whom 80% were men, and the median age was 51.0 [42.0-57.0] years. The median time of HIV infection was 18.0 [10.0-27.0] years. No significant changes in CD4+, CD8+ T cells, or CD4+/CD8+ were observed after 96 weeks. Nevertheless, in women at weeks 48 and 96, we found a significant increase of CD4+ T cells and a significant decrease in CD8+ T cells. In patients ≥60 years at week 96, CD4 T cells significantly increased and CD8+ T cells significantly decreased at week 48. The on-treatment analysis revealed HIV-RNA <50 copies/mL in 95.6% (1700/1779) and 96.7% (1312/1356) of patients at weeks 48 and 96, respectively. The rates increased to 99.2% (1765/1779) and 99.7% (1352/1356) when considering HIV-RNA <200 copies/mL. No resistance mutations were detected in virologic failures. B/F/TAF discontinuations accounted for 10.2% (200). Simplification was the most common reason for discontinuation in 3.8% (74) of patients.

CONCLUSION

In long-term virologically controlled PLWH, B/F/TAF achieved high efficacy rates and slightly improved immune status in women and individuals aged 60 and over after 48 and 96 of switching.

Bictegravir/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide in a Multicentre Cohort: Real-Life Experience From Spain

BACKGROUND

The evaluation of bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide (BIC/FTC/TAF) in clinical trials has shown high rates of virological suppression but information about its use in real-life settings is scarce.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness, safety, durability, and predictive variables of therapeutic failure of BIC/FTC/TAF in a real-life cohort.

METHODS

This observational, retrospective, multicentered cohort study included treatment-naive (TN) and treatment-experienced (TE) adult patients living with HIV (PLWH) who started treatment with BIC/FTC/TAF from January 1, 2019, to January 31, 2022. Treatment effectiveness (based on intention-to-treat [ITT], modified ITT [mITT], and on-treatment [OT]), tolerability, and safety were evaluated in all patients who started BIC/FTC/TAF antiretroviral therapy.

RESULTS

We included a total of 505 PLWH of whom 79 (16.6%) were TN and 426 (83.4%) were TE. Patients were followed up for a median (interquartile range [IQR]) of 19.6 (9.6-27.3) months, and 76% and 56% of PLWH reached month 6 and month 12 of treatment, respectively. Rates of TN PLWH with HIV-RNA <50 copies/mL in the OT, mITT, and ITT groups were 94%, 80%, and 62%, respectively, after 12 months of BIC/FTC/TAF treatment. Rates of TE PLWH with HIV-RNA <50 copies/mL were 91%, 88%, and 75% at month 12. The multivariate analysis revealed that neither age, sex, CD4 cell count <200 cells/μL, or viral load >100 000 copies/mL were associated with therapeutic failure.

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

Our real-life data showed that BIC/FTC/TAF is effective and safe for use in the treatment of both TN and TE patients in clinical practice.

Real-Life Experience With Bictegravir/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide in Turkey

INTRODUCTION

Single-tablet regimens (STRs) can increase treatment success and even improve the quality of life of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) patients. In this study, we aim to analyze the real-life efficacy and tolerability data of people living with HIV (PLWH) initiated on or switched to bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide fumarate (BIC/FTC/TAF) as first-line treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective analysis was performed in HIV-1-positive patients who were initiated BIC/FTC/TAF in the HIV clinic between June 2020 and June 2022. Patients who received BIC/FTC/TAF for at least 12 months were included in this study. Virological suppression, laboratory parameters, side effects, and immunological response were analyzed at one, three, six, nine, and 12 months.

RESULTS

A total of 116 patients, 66 (56.9%) treatment-experienced and 50 (43.1%) naive, were evaluated within the scope of the study. In the naive patient group, baseline HIV-RNA, CD4+ and CD8+ T cell counts, CD4/CD8 ratio, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) values were significantly different in different follow-up months. The number of patients with HIV-1 RNA levels below 50 copies/mL was 55.9% in the first month, 73.7% in the third month, 90.2% in the sixth month, and 100% in the ninth and 12th months.

CONCLUSION

In our real-life observational study, BIC/FTC/TAF treatment achieved rapid viral suppression, maintained viral suppression in virally suppressed patients, and was effective for immunological recovery in both treatment-experienced and naive HIV patients. No serious side effects were observed. Our study has proved the potential of BIC/FTC/TAF as an important option in the treatment of HIV patients.

Effectiveness, durability and safety of dolutegravir and lamivudine versus bictegravir, emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide in a real-world cohort of HIV-infected adults

OBJECTIVE

Dolutegravir plus lamivudine (2-DR) is suggested as an initial and switch option in HIV-1 treatment. The aim of this study was to analyze the effectiveness, durability, and safety of 2-DR compared to bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (3-DR).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was an observational, ambispective study that included all treatment-naïve (TN) and treatment-experienced (TE) people living with HIV/AIDS (PLWH), who started 2-DR or 3-DR between 01 July 2018, and 31 January 2022. The primary endpoint was non-inferiority, at 24 and 48 weeks, of 2-DR vs 3-DR regarding the percentage of PLWH with viral load (VL)<50 and 200 copies/mL in TN (12% margin) and VL≥50 and 200 copies/mL in TE (4% margin). Durability of response and safety were also measured.

RESULTS

292 PLWH were included (39 TN and 253 TE). In TN PLWH, non-inferiority was not achieved at 24 weeks (17; 95% CI -17 to 51 p = 0.348). By week 48, all PLWH on 3-DR maintained VL<50 copies/mL compared to 70% of PLWH on 2-DR although without reaching statistical significance (-33; 95% CI -60 to -10 p = 0.289). Non-inferiority was not achieved in TE PLWH either at 24 (0.4; 95% CI -9 to 10 p = 1) or at 48 weeks (4.5; 95% CI -0.5 to 9 p = 0.132). In TN, the risk of treatment discontinuation was similar between groups (HR: 0.31, p = 0.07); similar rates were also found in TE (HR: 1.3, p = 0.38). TE PLWH on 2-DR showed a better safety profile compared to 3-DR (p = 0.017).

CONCLUSION

Our results did not show non-inferiority in terms of virological effectiveness. Additionally, durability and safety of 2-DR were confirmed to be similar to 3-DR.

Prevalence and Patterns of Adverse Drug Events Among Adult Patients with Human Immune Virus Infection on Dolutegravir-Based Antiretroviral Drug Regimens in Amhara Comprehensive Specialized Hospitals, Northwest Ethiopia: A Multicenter Retrospective Follow-Up Study

Background

Antiretroviral therapy (ART) refers to any HIV treatment that uses a combination of two or more drugs to suppress viral load and preserve immunofunction. Despite the success of ART, adverse events persist, in particular in patients with baseline viral loads >100,000 copies/mL. Apart from premarketing surveillance, the safety and risk profile of dolutegravir has not been thoroughly researched in Ethiopia. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the prevalence and patterns of adverse drug events among HIV-infected adult patients on dolutegravir-based ART regimens at Amhara comprehensive specialized hospitals, northwest Ethiopia.

Methods

A retrospective follow-up study was conducted from January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2021 at Amhara comprehensive specialized hospitals, with a sample size of 423. Simple random sampling was employed and data collected using kobo tool box software by four trained BSc nurses from March to April, 2022. SPSS 25 was used for analysis. Descriptive summary statistics are used and data presented using tables and text.

Results

A total of 372 patient charts were included in the final analysis, and the prevalence of adverse events associated with dolutegravir was found to be 37.6% (95% CI 32.1%-42.1%). Nearly two-thirds (60.7%) of the participants had neuropsychiatric symptoms, followed by gastrointestinal symptoms (23.6%) and hepatic problems (7.14%). All recorded adverse events were mild.

Conclusion

Dolutegravir adverse events were relatively low compared to previous studies. Common adverse events reported were neuropsychiatric symptoms and gastrointestinal symptoms, followed by hepatic and renal events. All adverse events were mild and none was severe or life-threatening events. Therefore, we recommend the use of dolutegravir in clinical settings.

Bictegravir-Induced Drug Reaction With Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms in a Patient With Acute Human Immunodeficiency Virus

Although drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) is associated with antiretrovirals, there are no published reports of bictegravir-induced DRESS. Bictegravir is recommended as first-line treatment for patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Recognition of DRESS, its skin manifestations, and potential complications is vital for appropriate care and management of acute HIV.

Patient-reported outcomes among virally suppressed people living with HIV after switching to Co-formulated bictegravir, emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide

BACKGROUND

While some evidence has suggested the benefits of co-formulated bictegravir, emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide (B/F/TAF) in improving the quality of life of people living with HIV (PLWH), patient-reported outcome studies that focus on Asian population remain scarce. We aimed to determine the changes in HIV-related symptom burden in virally-suppressed PLWH switching to B/F/TAF in a real-world setting.

METHODS

PLWH on stable antiretroviral therapy (ART) for ≥6 months with plasma HIV RNA <200 copies/mL who decided to switch to B/F/TAF were eligible for the study. Participants' experience with 20 symptoms were assessed using HIV Symptom Index at baseline and weeks 24 and 48. Responses were dichotomized in two ways: 1) present vs. not present; and 2) bothersome vs. not bothersome, and compared across time points.

RESULTS

Six hundred and thirty participants (prior regimen, 94.4% integrase inhibitor-based) who completed week 48 visit were included in the analysis. Forty-eight weeks after switching to B/F/TAF, six symptoms were significantly less prevalent, and seven symptoms were significantly less bothersome. Improvement was more pronounced in participants whose prior regimen was elvitegravir-based versus dolutegravir-based. Logistic regression results showed that prior dolutegravir-based ART and pre-existing diabetes independently predicted improvement in diarrhea/loose bowels and muscle aches/joint pain, respectively. Despite the overall improvement, some symptoms persisted in a substantial proportion of participants.

CONCLUSIONS

Virally-suppressed PLWH might benefit from a regimen switch to B/F/TAF to reduce the prevalence and level of bother of HIV-related symptoms. Nevertheless, additional multidisciplinary interventions are warranted to further alleviate the symptom burden of PLWH.

Comparison of the design and methodology of Phase 3 clinical trials of bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (BIC/FTC/TAF) and dolutegravir-based dual therapy (DTG) in HIV: a systematic review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

Current recommended antiretroviral regimens include a combination of two (dual; DT) or three (triple; TT) antiretroviral drugs. This study aims to determine whether the quality of evidence from clinical trials of dolutegravir (dolutegravir/lamivudine [DTG/3TC] or dolutegravir/rilpivirine [DTG/RPV]) is methodologically comparable to that of clinical trials conducted with bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (BIC/FTC/TAF).

AREAS COVERED

A systematic review of the medical literature was carried out in PubMed without date or language restrictions, following the PRISMA guidelines. All aspects of the methodological design of phase 3 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of DT and TT, evaluated by the European Medicines Agency (registration trials), were reviewed. The quality of clinical trials was assessed using the Jadad scale.

EXPERT OPINION

The search identified 5, 3 and 2 phase 3 RCTs with BIC/FTC/TAF, DTG/3TC and DTG/RPV, respectively, that met the inclusion criteria. The designs would not be comparable due to differences in pre-randomization losses, blinding, patient recruitment, as well as differences in methodological quality, with the average score of the RCTs conducted with BIC/FTC/TAF, DTG/3TC and DTG/RPV being 4.2 (high quality), 3.0 (medium quality) and 3.0 (medium quality), respectively. Due to methodological differences between the BIC/FTC/TAF, DTG/3TC and DTG/RPV RCTs, the results of these are not comparable.

Switching to coformulated bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide maintained viral suppression in adults with historical virological failures and K65N/R mutation

OBJECTIVES

Real-world experience with coformulated bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide (BIC/FTC/TAF) is sparse as a switch regimen among people living with HIV (PLWH) having achieved viral suppression after previous virologic failures with the emergence of K65N/R.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, PLWH aged ≥20 years who had previous virologic failures with emergent K65N/R were included for switching to BIC/FTC/TAF after having achieved plasma HIV RNA load (PVL) <200 copies/ml for ≥3 months. PLWH were excluded if integrase inhibitor resistance-associated mutations were detected. The primary end point was losing virologic control (PVL >50 copies/ml) at week 48 using a modified US Food and Drug Administration snapshot algorithm.

RESULTS

A total of 72 PLWH with K65N/R who switched to BIC/FTC/TAF were identified. A total of 42 (59.7%) had concurrent M184V/I, and 9 (12.5%) had ≥1 thymidine analog mutations. The median duration of viral suppression was 4.7 years (interquartile range 2.3-5.8), and 97.2% (n = 70) had PVL <50 copies/ml before switching. After a median observation of 98.6 weeks (interquartile range 77.9-120.3), 94.4% (n = 68) continued BIC/FTC/TAF. At week 48, the rate of losing virologic control was 2.8% (2/72). M184V/I was not associated with viral rebound.

CONCLUSION

Despite the emergence of K65N/R +/- M184V/I after virologic failures, BIC/FTC/TAF could be an option for simplification after viral suppression.

Low-level viremia and virologic failure among people living with HIV who received maintenance therapy with co-formulated bictegravir, emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide versus dolutegravir-based regimens

BACKGROUND

Real-world experience with low-level viremia (LLV) and its impact remain less reported among people living with HIV (PLWH) who receive antiretroviral therapy (ART) containing second-generation integrase strand transferase inhibitors (INSTIs), including dolutegravir and bictegravir.

METHODS

Virally suppressed PLWH who had achieved plasma HIV RNA load (PVL) <50 copies/mL for ≥6 months and were switched to either dolutegravir- or bictegravir-based ART were included in this retrospective cohort study. The incidence rates of developing LLV events (PVL, 50-199 copies/mL) and virologic failure (VF) (PVL ≥1000 copies/mL) were compared between the dolutegravir and bictegravir cohorts.

RESULTS

A total of 623 and 862 PLWH switched to dolutegravir-based and bictegravir-based ART, respectively, were included. The incidence rates of developing LLV were 6.2 per 100 person-years of follow-up (PYFU) in the bictegravir cohort and 3.8 per 100 PYFU in the dolutegravir cohort (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 1.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.90-2.95, p=0.08), while the rates of VF were 0.69 per 100 PYFU and 0.95 per 100 PYFU, respectively, in the bictegravir and dolutegravir cohort (IRR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.12-3.39, p=0.34). Presence of LLV events was not associated with subsequent VF in multivariate analysis. Secondary analysis also demonstrated that resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) to nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors before switch were not associated with adverse virologic outcomes in either cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Among virally suppressed PLWH, the incidences of developing LLV or VF were similar after switch to dolutegravir- or bictegravir-based ART. Preexisting RAMs to nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors or the LLV events were not associated with subsequent VF.

Real-life experience with bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide in a large reference clinical centre

BACKGROUND

The use of bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (BIC/FTC/TAF) is mainly based on robust, pivotal clinical trials.

OBJECTIVES

To provide data on clinical use of BIC/FTC/TAF in real life.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was an observational, retrospective and single-centre study. We included all adult, treatment-naive (TN) and treatment-experienced (TE) people living with HIV (PLWH) starting BIC/FTC/TAF from 8 June 2018. We evaluated effectiveness [on treatment (OT), modified intention-to-treat (mITT) and intention-to-treat (ITT)], tolerability and safety in those patients who reached 6 months of follow-up (M6).

RESULTS

We included 1584 PLWH [213 TN (13%) and 1371 TE (87%)]. The median (IQR) follow-up was 16 (7-21) months, with 81% and 53% of PLWH reaching M6 and M12, respectively. By OT, mITT and ITT, HIV-RNA <50 copies/mL was 77%, 70% and 62% at M6 and 92%, 77% and 63% at M12 for TN PLWH and 94%, 89% and 83% at M6 and 93%, 85% and 78% at M12 for TE PLWH, respectively. In PLWH carrying an M184V/I substitution, OT RNA <50 copies/mL was 89.5% at M6. The median CD4 cell count increased from 329 to 511/μL in TN PLWH and from 630 to 683/μL in TE PLWH at M6. Of the total, 1148 (88%) PLWH continued on BIC/FTC/TAF at M6. The most frequent known reason for discontinuation was toxicity [42 (69%) cases]; only 7 cases were considered virological failures (0.6% of the total OT cohort at M6), with no emerging resistance substitutions.

CONCLUSIONS

In real life, BIC/FTC/TAF showed high rates of virological suppression and also in PLWH carrying lamivudine/emtricitabine resistance substitutions. The tolerability and safety of BIC/FTC/TAF were good, with high persistence observed for patients on this regimen at M6.

Treatment initiation or switch to BIC/FTC/TAF - real-world safety and efficacy data from two HIV centers in Romania

INTRODUCTION

Development of highly active antiretroviral therapy marked an important step forward in the management of people living with HIV and fixed dose combinations are now available to be used as modern antiretroviral regimens. The single-tablet regimen bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (BIC/FTC/TAF) was recently approved in Europe and included in international guidelines and recommendations. It became available in Romania in early 2021. We present the real-world results from a retrospective analysis of patients initiating BIC/FTC/TAF in two HIV centers in Romania.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis included patients treated with BIC/FTC/TAF (first-line or switch) in two HIV centers in Romania, one in Bucharest and one in Iași. We collected data on baseline patient characteristics, reasons for initiation of BIC/FTC/TAF and preliminary clinical and laboratory efficacy, safety and tolerability data. All assessments had been performed according to local practice. Statistical analyses were mostly descriptive and association analysis was performed to assess changes in laboratory parameters from baseline to data cut-off (October 2021).

RESULTS

In total, 122 patients were initiated on BIC/FTC/TAF in routine clinical practice from February to October 2021 in the two HIV centers, either as first-line or switch. The majority of patients were male (71%). The median age at baseline was 35.0 years (IQR 32.0-50.8 years). Overall, 91 patients (75%) were treatment-experienced and the most frequent reason for switch was treatment simplification (79%). The mean ± standard deviation follow-up duration on treatment with BIC/FTC/TAF was 101.6 ± 64.2 days until the cut-off date for this analysis. We found no significant changes in lipid values, blood glucose or liver enzymes, coupled with a significant decrease in viral load (p=0.001). A low number of adverse events occurred during the treatment period (n=4): two cases of fatigue and two gastrointestinal reactions. No patient discontinued BIC/FTC/TAF and the overall tolerability was good.

CONCLUSIONS

The insights of the first report on BIC/FTC/TAF use in routine clinical practice in Romania provide an overview of effectiveness and safety to local clinicians treating this patient population.

Short-course daily isoniazid and rifapentine for latent tuberculosis infection in people living with HIV who received coformulated bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide

INTRODUCTION

Short-course preventive therapy with 1-month course of daily administration of isoniazid (300-mg) plus rifapentine (600-mg) (1HP) and 3-month course of weekly administration of isoniazid (900-mg) plus rifapentine (900-mg) (3HP) has higher completion rates than 9-month course of daily isoniazid (9H) for individuals with latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI). We aimed to evaluate the effect, safety and tolerability of 1HP in people living with HIV (PLWH) and LTBI who received coformulated bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (BIC/FTC/TAF).

METHODS

PLWH testing positive by interferon-gamma release assay and having received BIC/FTC/TAF for >2 weeks with plasma HIV RNA load (PVL) <200 copies/ml were enrolled. BIC trough plasma concentrations and cytokine profiles were determined before the first dose (day 1/baseline), 24 h after the 14th (day 15) and 28th (day 29) doses of 1HP. PVL were determined on days 15 and 29 of 1HP and every 3 months subsequently after discontinuation of 1HP.

RESULTS

From November 2019 to December 2020, 48 PLWH with LTBI were enrolled. One participant (2.1%) discontinued 1HP on day 15 due to fever and generalized rashes with PVL of 72 copies/ml, which was <50 copies/ml in three subsequent determinations while on BIC/FTC/TAF over the 12 months of follow-up. The percentages of BIC trough plasma concentrations above the protein-adjusted 95% effective concentration (paEC₉₅ = 162 ng/ml) were 56.3% and 37.0% on days 15 and 29, respectively. The percentage of PVL <200 copies/ml was 91.7% on day 15, 97.8% on day 29 and 100% at both months 3 and 6. After a median observation of 52 weeks (interquartile range, 51-55), all participants continued BIC/FTC/TAF with a median PVL of 20 copies/ml (range 20-331). Except for the participant who discontinued 1HP because of allergic reactions, none of the participants had relevant symptoms or increases of the cytokine levels assessed between baseline and days 15 and 29 of 1HP.

CONCLUSIONS

BIC/FTC/TAF in combination with 1HP was well tolerated with a high completion rate. BIC trough plasma concentrations were significantly decreased with concurrent use of 1HP among PLWH with LTBI. While transient viral blips were observed during 1HP without causing subsequent treatment failure, such combination should be applied with caution.