1
|
Chen QW, Meng RT, Ko CY. Modulating oxidative stress and neurogenic inflammation: the role of topiramate in migraine treatment. Front Aging Neurosci 2024; 16:1455858. [PMID: 39416954 PMCID: PMC11480567 DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2024.1455858] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2024] [Accepted: 09/19/2024] [Indexed: 10/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Migraine is a chronic, recurrent neurovascular disorder characterized by episodes closely associated with neurovascular hypersensitivity. Oxidative stress can worsen the hypersensitive state of the central nervous system, which in turn can trigger pro-inflammatory factors that result in neurogenic inflammation. Topiramate is frequently used as a preventative measure for migraines, but there is currently little empirical data to support its efficacy through pathways related to neurogenic inflammation and oxidative stress. This review provides an overview of current knowledge regarding the etiology, inducements, pathophysiology, and available treatments for migraine, with a focus on the clinical and experimental evidence of neurogenic inflammation and oxidative stress in migraine. It also delves into the antioxidant and anti-inflammatory qualities of topiramate, clarifying the possible ways in which topiramate affects these pathways to lessen migraine symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiao-Wen Chen
- Department of Clinical Nutrition, Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China
- The School of Public Health, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Run-Tian Meng
- Department of Clinical Nutrition, Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China
- The School of Public Health, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Chih-Yuan Ko
- Department of Clinical Nutrition, Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yang Z, Wang X, Niu M, Wei Q, Zhong H, Li X, Yuan W, Xu W, Zhu S, Yu S, Liu J, Yan J, Kang W, Huang P. First real-world study on the effectiveness and tolerability of rimegepant for acute migraine therapy in Chinese patients. J Headache Pain 2024; 25:160. [PMID: 39333875 PMCID: PMC11438109 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-024-01873-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2024] [Accepted: 09/20/2024] [Indexed: 09/30/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rimegepant, a small molecule calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonist, is indicated for acute and preventive migraine treatment in the United States and other countries. However, there is a lack of prospective real-world evidence for the use of rimegepant in Chinese migraine patients. METHODS This was a single-arm, prospective, real-world study. While taking rimegepant to treat migraine attacks as needed, eligible participants were asked to record their pain intensity, functional ability, and accompanying symptoms for a single attack at predose and 0.5, 1, 2, 24, and 48 h postdose via a digital platform. Adverse events (AEs) during the rimegepant treatment period were recorded and analysed. The percentages of participants who experienced moderate to severe pain at predose and 0.5, 1, 2, 24, and 48 h postdose were assessed. Additionally, the percentages of participants who reported better/good outcomes in terms of pain intensity, functional ability, and accompanying symptoms at 0.5, 1, 2, 24, and 48 h postdose were analysed. In addition, the total cohort (full population, FP) was stratified into a prior nonresponder (PNR) group to observe the effectiveness and safety of rimegepant for relatively refractory migraine and a rimegepant and eptinezumab (RE) group to observe the effectiveness and safety of the combination of these drugs. RESULTS By November 24th, 2023, 133 participants (FP, n = 133; PNR group, n = 40; RE group, n = 28) were enrolled, and 99 participants (FP, n = 99; PNR group, n = 30; RE group, n = 23) were included in the analysis. Rimegepant was effective in treating migraine in the FP and both subgroups, with a significant decreasing trend in the percentages of participants experiencing moderate to severe pain postdose (p < 0.05) and a marked increase in the percentages of participants who reported better/good outcomes in terms of pain intensity, functional ability, and accompanying symptoms at 0.5, 1, 2, 24, and 48 h postdose compared with predose. AEs were reported by 6% of participants in the FP, and all AEs were mild. CONCLUSIONS In the real world, rimegepant is effective in the acute treatment of migraine patients in China. The low incidence rate of AEs highlighted the favourable tolerability profile of rimegepant. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov NCT05709106. Retrospectively registered on 2023-02-01.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhao Yang
- Department of Neurology, Institute of Neurology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No 197, Ruijin Second Road, Huangpu District, Shanghai, 20025, China
| | - Xiaodan Wang
- Department of Neurology, Institute of Neurology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No 197, Ruijin Second Road, Huangpu District, Shanghai, 20025, China
| | - Mengyue Niu
- Department of Neurology, Institute of Neurology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No 197, Ruijin Second Road, Huangpu District, Shanghai, 20025, China
| | - Qiao Wei
- Department of Neurology, Hainan Branch, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No 41, Kangxiang Road, Qionghai, 517434, China
| | - Huizhu Zhong
- Department of Neurology, Hainan Branch, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No 41, Kangxiang Road, Qionghai, 517434, China
| | - Xiaoyan Li
- Department of Neurology, Hainan Branch, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No 41, Kangxiang Road, Qionghai, 517434, China
| | - Weihong Yuan
- Hainan Lecheng Institute of Real World Study, Qionghai, China
| | - Wenli Xu
- Department of Neurology, Institute of Neurology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No 197, Ruijin Second Road, Huangpu District, Shanghai, 20025, China
| | - Shuo Zhu
- Department of Neurology, Institute of Neurology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No 197, Ruijin Second Road, Huangpu District, Shanghai, 20025, China
| | - Shengyuan Yu
- Department of Neurology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Jun Liu
- Department of Neurology, Institute of Neurology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No 197, Ruijin Second Road, Huangpu District, Shanghai, 20025, China
| | - Jianzhou Yan
- School of International Pharmaceutical Business, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China
- The Research Center of National Drug Policy and Ecosystem, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Wenyan Kang
- Department of Neurology, Institute of Neurology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No 197, Ruijin Second Road, Huangpu District, Shanghai, 20025, China.
- Department of Neurology, Hainan Branch, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No 41, Kangxiang Road, Qionghai, 517434, China.
| | - Peijian Huang
- Department of Neurology, Hainan Branch, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No 41, Kangxiang Road, Qionghai, 517434, China.
- Hainan Lecheng Institute of Real World Study, Qionghai, China.
- Department of Neurology, Hainan General Hospital, Hainan Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, No 19, Xiuhua Road, Xiuying District, Haikou, 570311, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yu S, Guo A, Wang Z, Liu J, Tan G, Yang Q, Zhang M, Yibulaiyin H, Chen H, Zhang Y, Croop R, Sun Y, Liu Y, Zhao Q, Lu Z. Rimegepant orally disintegrating tablet 75 mg for acute treatment of migraine in adults from China: a subgroup analysis of a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 clinical trial. J Headache Pain 2024; 25:57. [PMID: 38627638 PMCID: PMC11020209 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-024-01731-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2023] [Accepted: 02/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rimegepant orally disintegrating tablet (ODT), an oral small-molecule calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist, is indicated for acute and preventive treatment of migraine in the United States and other countries. Previously, a large clinical trial assessed the efficacy and safety of rimegepant ODT 75 mg for the acute treatment of migraine in adults living in China or South Korea. A post hoc subgroup analysis of this trial was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rimegepant for acute treatment of migraine in adults living in China. METHODS Eligible participants were ≥ 18 years of age and had a ≥ 1-year history of migraine, with 2 to 8 attacks of moderate or severe pain intensity per month and < 15 headache days per month during the 3 months before screening. Participants self-administered rimegepant ODT 75 mg or matching placebo to treat a single migraine attack of moderate or severe pain intensity. The co-primary endpoints were pain freedom and freedom from the most bothersome symptom (MBS) at 2 h post-dose. Key secondary endpoints included pain relief at 2 h post-dose, ability to function normally at 2 h post-dose, use of rescue medication within 24 h post-dose, and sustained pain freedom from 2 to 24 h and 2 to 48 h post-dose. All p values were nominal. Safety was assessed via treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), electrocardiograms, vital signs, and routine laboratory tests. RESULTS Overall, 1075 participants (rimegepant, n = 538; placebo, n = 537) were included in the subgroup analysis. Rimegepant was more effective than placebo for the co-primary endpoints of pain freedom (18.2% vs. 10.6%, p = 0.0004) and freedom from the MBS (48.0% vs. 31.8%, p < 0.0001), as well as all key secondary endpoints. The incidence of TEAEs was comparable between the rimegepant (15.2%) and placebo (16.4%) groups. No signal of drug-induced liver injury was observed, and no study drug-related serious TEAEs were reported in the rimegepant group. CONCLUSIONS A single dose of rimegepant 75 mg rimegepant was effective for the acute treatment of migraine in adults living in China, with safety and tolerability similar to placebo. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04574362 Date registered: 2020-10-05.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Aihong Guo
- Xianyang Hospital, Yan'an University, Xianyang, China
| | - Zhen Wang
- Changsha Central Hospital, Changsha, China
| | | | - Ge Tan
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Qian Yang
- Shaanxi Provincial Hospital, Xi'an, China
| | | | - Hasiyeti Yibulaiyin
- The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Wulumuqi, Xinjiang Province, China
| | - Huisheng Chen
- General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, District, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Yongbo Zhang
- Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | | | - Yanhui Sun
- Pfizer (China) Research and Development Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China
| | - Yu Liu
- Pfizer Inc, Beijing, China
| | | | - Zhihong Lu
- Pfizer (China) Research and Development Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|