Innovator Versus Biosimilar Ranibizumab in Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy: Real-World Evidence

Biosimilars of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor for ophthalmic diseases: A review

The development of intravitreally injected biologic medicines (biologics) acting against vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) substantially improved the clinical outcomes of patients with common VEGF-driven retinal diseases. The relatively high cost of branded agents, however, represents a financial burden for most healthcare systems and patients, likely resulting in impaired access to treatment and poorer clinical outcomes for some patients. Biosimilar medicines (biosimilars) are clinically equivalent, potentially economic alternatives to reference products. Biosimilars approved by leading health authorities have been demonstrated to be similar to the reference product in a comprehensive comparability exercise, generating the totality of evidence necessary to support analytical, pre-clinical, and clinical biosimilarity. Anti-VEGF biosimilars have been entering the field of ophthalmology in the US since 2022. We review regulatory and scientific concepts of biosimilars, the biosimilar development landscape in ophthalmology, with a specific focus on anti-VEGF biosimilars, and discuss opportunities and challenges facing the uptake of biosimilars.

Ranibizumab Biosimilars in Treating Retinal Disorders: A Cost-Effective Revolution?

Ranibizumab, is a humanized, monoclonal antibody fragment that binds and inactivates vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A) and VEGF-B. One of the main indications for an intravitreal treatment with ranibizumab is age-related macular degeneration (AMD), which is a retinal disease with a high worldwide socioeconomic impact. Biosimilars constitute biological products that demonstrate similar pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic characteristics with a reference product, as well as comparable clinical efficacy, safety and immunogenicity. Since the approval of the first biosimilar Razumab, there has been a variety of new biosimilars available on the market. They offer the advantage of the same good clinical and safety results at a better price. All Ranibizumab biosimilars that have gained approval were tested in double masked Phase 3 clinical studies. The use of Ranibizumab biosimilars in neovascular AMD is well reported in the bibliography. Nevertheless, over the last few years, there is a tendency of using biosimilars in other retinal diseases like retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), diabetic macular edema (DME) or polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV). In conclusion, ranibizumab biosimilars offer a promising avenue for the management of retinal diseases, especially in countries with lower socioeconomic status, where there is lack of availability of innovator ranibizumab. However, further research is required to fully explore their efficacy, safety, and long-term outcomes in a plethora of retinal diseases.

Efficacy of an Indian Bevacizumab BIOSimilar (BEVATAS) for Type 1 and Aggressive Posterior Retinopathy of Prematurity (BIOS-ROP Study)

Purpose

To evaluate the role of an Indian bevacizumab biosimilar (Bevatas®), for the management of type 1 retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) and aggressive posterior ROP (APROP) over 24-weeks.

Patients and Methods

A retrospective, single-center, interventional study of 144 eyes of type 1 (100 eyes) and APROP (44 eyes). All eyes received a single dose of 0.625mg Bevatas injection, and were advised additional laser therapy for suboptimal response.

Results

The study population had a mean gestational age of 28.94 (±2.32) weeks, an average birth weight of 1.2 (±0.34) kg, and modest male predominance (52.05%). Complete regression of ROP was seen in 65.97% of 144 eyes after 24 weeks of bevacizumab monotherapy, and in 97.22% of eyes (140 eyes) after adding laser photocoagulation. The remaining four eyes (all had APROP) developed Stage 4 ROP and needed vitreous surgery. After monotherapy with bevacizumab biosimilar, type 1 ROP eyes had significantly higher rate of complete ROP regression than APROP eyes (87% vs 18.18%; P<0.00001). All eyes with type 1 ROP, and 90.91% of eyes with APROP, regressed after receiving additional laser therapy. The study population experienced no ocular or systemic adverse effects.

Conclusion

The BIOS-ROP study demonstrates that intravitreal bevacizumab biosimilar monotherapy offers significant benefit for type 1 ROP, but not APROP. Low-cost biosimilars can help sustain healthcare systems in lower-middle income countries (LMICs) with escalating healthcare expenditures. They can also improve healthcare equity by making vision-saving therapies like bevacizumab more affordable and accessible.