Ferromagnetic Detectors for MRI Safety: Toy or Tool?

Exploring the role of CT scouts in expediting MRI in acute stroke

PURPOSE

For acute stroke patients requiring MR examination and unable to provide a reliable history, screening for potentially MRI-incompatible objects (PMIOs) typically necessitates the use of plain-film radiographs (PFRs). However, using a whole body CT scout at the time of non-contrast head CT scans can preclude critical delays. Here, we aim to compare the effectiveness of PFRs and CT scouts in detecting PMIOs.

METHODS

A case-control study was conducted at a tertiary care institution, involving 408 imaging studies from 200 patients, half of which contained PMIOs. The diagnostic performances of CT scouts and PFRs were evaluated by six blinded readers, including two board-certified neuroradiologists, one neuroradiology fellow, and three radiology residents.

RESULTS

2448 interpretations from the 6 readers were analyzed. The diagnostic performance of combined CT scout images (full-body and regional) was not significantly different from that of PFRs for all six readers (p = 0.06). However, PFRs outperformed full-body CT scouts in PMIO detection (p = 0.01), with no significant differences observed between PFRs and regional CT scouts (p = 0.4). Notably, the diagnostic accuracy of the radiology residents was found to be equivalent to radiologists across all imaging techniques.

CONCLUSION

Integrating CT scouts in acute stroke protocols may help expedite MRI screening. The scouts should include the head, neck, chest, upper arms, abdomen, pelvis, and thighs. Including radiology residents in the screening process for PMIOs may be an avenue for resource optimization in acute care settings.

Assessment of MRI Safety Practices in Saudi Arabia

Aim

The aim of this study is to investigate the safety practices used by MRI departments in Saudi Arabia.

Methods

A cross-sectional study across 113 private and public hospitals was conducted in Saudi Arabia. A survey questionnaire was designed and sent to 113 MRI units. The questionnaire consisted of 43 items under 14 sections for the assessment of MRI safety practices. These 14 sections are related to (i) MRI and its safety, (ii) MRI usage and its safety, and (iii) safety of the MRI technologists and reporting of adverse effects during the usage. The American College of Radiology (ACR) guidance document on MRI safety practices was used as a template for this survey. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistical software for Windows version 26.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).

Results

Of the 43 items assessed, only 3 items' binary responses (Yes & No) did not differ much. A greater proportion of positive responses for 40 items (93%) regarding MRI safety practices. More than 50% of the participants claimed that their departments lacked a Magnetic Resonance Safety Officer (MRSO). Regarding regular safety training programs, less than 50% received training in MRI safety. Handheld metal detectors were found in only 39% of the MRI units.

Conclusion

The majority of MRI units in Saudi Arabia have demonstrated compliance with majority of ACR MRI safety recommendations; nonetheless, there are two main items for which the guidelines may not be attained: MRSO and regular MRI safety training programs. By taking into account the limitations of this study, it is strongly recommended to assign MRSO and implement annual MRI safety training to improve MRI safety practices for both patients and healthcare workers.

A 3-year review of MRI safety incidents within a UK independent sector provider of diagnostic services

A review of MRI safety incidents conducted over a 3-year period for a large independent sector diagnostic imaging provider in the UK. The review took a systematic approach using reports logged on an internal incident reporting system that were then categorised and analysed for themes and trends. Notable cases and actions taken are also described from within the period. MRI safety-related events made up 7.5% of the total number of incident reports submitted and 15.5% of all MRI-related reports. The MR safety-related incidence report rate was 0.05% (1 per 1987 patients), which is relatively low considering the number of patients seen in our facilities each day. Internal MRI safety events indicated the main trends to be around referral of contraindicated devices (32% of reports) and failure in the screening process (21.5%-either due to unexpected implants or being unable to confirm safety). To improve practice and work to reduce incidents, advice and instructional materials were developed. The review suggests a potential approach to categorisation of MRI-related safety events which could allow comparisons to be made across organisations, helping to look for trends and guide learning. It also provides insight into the state of MRI safety within the organisation, a rationale for some of the interventions introduced to improve safety, and discussion around common issues arising in MRI safety.