Fundamental Principles of Cancer Biology: Does it have relevance to the perioperative period?

Signal processing and machine learning algorithm to classify anaesthesia depth

BACKGROUND

Poor assessment of anaesthetic depth (AD) has led to overdosing or underdosing of the anaesthetic agent, which requires continuous monitoring to avoid complications. The evaluation of the central nervous system activity and autonomic nervous system could provide additional information on the monitoring of AD during surgical procedures.

METHODS

Observational analytical single-centre study, information on biological signals was collected during a surgical procedure under general anaesthesia for signal preprocessing, processing and postprocessing to feed a pattern classifier and determine AD status of patients. The development of the electroencephalography index was carried out through data processing and algorithm development using MATLAB V.8.1.

RESULTS

A total of 25 men and 35 women were included, with a total time of procedure average of 109.62 min. The results show a high Pearson correlation between the Complexity Brainwave Index and the indices of the entropy module. A greater dispersion is observed in the state entropy and response entropy indices, a partial overlap can also be seen in the boxes associated with deep anaesthesia and general anaesthesia in these indices. A high Pearson correlation might be explained by the coinciding values corresponding to the awake and general anaesthesia states. A high Pearson correlation might be explained by the coinciding values corresponding to the awake and general anaesthesia states.

CONCLUSION

Biological signal filtering and a machine learning algorithm may be used to classify AD during a surgical procedure. Further studies will be needed to confirm these results and improve the decision-making of anaesthesiologists in general anaesthesia.

Prognostic implications of surgical specimen quality on the oncological outcomes of open and laparoscopic surgery in mid and low rectal cancer

Purpose

Determine differences in pathologic outcomes between laparoscopic (LAP) and open surgery (OPEN) for mid and low rectal cancer and its influence in long-term oncological outcomes.

Methods

Retrospective case matched study at a tertiary institution. Adults with rectal cancer below 12 cm from the anal verge operated between January 2005 and September 2018 were included. Primary outcomes were quality of specimen, overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and local recurrence (LR).

Results

The study included 311 patients, LAP = 108 (34.7%), OPEN = 203 (65,3%). A successful resection was accomplished in 81% of the LAP group and in 84.5% of the OPEN (p = 0.505). No differences in free distal margin (LAP = 100%, OPEN = 97.5%; p = 0.156) or circumferential resection margin (LAP = 95.2%, OPEN = 93.2%; p = 0.603) were observed. However, mesorectum quality was incomplete in 16.2% for LAP and in 8.1% for OPEN (p = 0.048). OS was 91.1% for LAP and 81.1% for OPEN (p = 0.360). DFS was 81.4% for LAP and 77.5% for OPEN (p = 0.923). Overall, LR was 2.3% without differences between groups.

Conclusions

Laparoscopic approach could affect the quality of surgical specimen due to technical aspects. However, if principles of surgical oncology are respected, minor pathologic differences in the quality of the mesorectum may not influence on the long-term oncologic outcomes.

Application value of thromboelastography in perioperative clinical blood transfusion and its effect on the outcome of patient

Application value of thromboelastography (TEG) in perioperative clinical blood transfusion and its effect on the outcome of patient were investigated. Seventy-four patients, admitted to The Surgical Department of the First Hospital of Zibo from March 2015 to March 2018, were selected for this study. Among them, 34 patients took only the traditional coagulation function testing method as the blood transfusion guide during the perioperative period and they were regarded as the control group. The other 40 patients used TEG as the blood transfusion guide during the perioperative period, and they were regarded as the TEG group. The coagulation function indicators in 2 h before the operation and in 24 h after the operation, the transfusion amount and blood loss during the operation, the condition of the blood transfusion during the perioperative period, the occurrence rate of the postoperative rebleeding, the length of hospital stay and mortality of the patients in the two groups were compared. The coagulation function indicators of the patients in the two groups in 2 h before the operation and in 24 h after the operation showed that there was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.050). However, APTT and Pt of the patients in the two groups both increased when compared with those before the treatment (P<0.050) and Hb, Hct, Plt and Fib all decreased (P<0.050). The suspended erythrocytes, Plt, fibrinogen and plasma in the TEG group were both significantly lower than those in the control group (P<0.001). Compared with the traditional coagulation function test, TEG was more accurate for estimating the coagulation function of patient and was more suitable for estimating the condition of blood transfusion of patient in the perioperative period; also, it could shorten the recovery period of patient and it is worthwhile to promote it in the clinic.

The Use of Normal Stem Cells and Cancer Stem Cells for Potential Anti-Cancer Therapeutic Strategy

BACKGROUND

Despite recent advance in conventional cancer therapies including surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy to reduce tumor size, unfortunately cancer mortality and metastatic cancer incidence remain high. Along with a deeper understanding of stem cell biology, cancer stem cell (CSC) is important in targeted cancer therapy. Herein, we review representative patents using not only normal stem cells as therapeutics themselves or delivery vehicles, but also CSCs as targets for anti-cancer strategy.

METHODS

Relevant patent literatures published between 2005 and 2017 are discussed to present developmental status and experimental results on using normal stem cells and CSCs for cancer therapy and explore potential future directions in this field.

RESULTS

Stem cells have been considered as important element of regenerative therapy by promoting tissue regeneration. Particularly, there is a growing trend to use stem cells as a target drug-delivery system to reduce undesirable side effects in non-target tissues. Noteworthy, studies on CSC-specific markers for distinguishing CSCs from normal stem cells and mature cancer cells have been conducted as a selective anti-cancer therapy with few side effects. Many researchers have also reported the development of various substances with anticancer effects by targeting CSCs from cancer tissues.

CONCLUSION

There has been a continuing increase in the number of studies on therapeutic stem cells and CSC-specific markers for selective diagnosis and therapy of cancer. This review focuses on the current status in the use of normal stem cells and CSCs for targeted cancer therapy. Future direction is also proposed.