Effect of Rifampin on the Pharmacokinetics of Apixaban, an Oral Direct Inhibitor of Factor Xa

Understanding the Stress Testing Characteristics of Apixaban, Structural Elucidation of a Novel Degradation Impurity, and Stability-Indicating Method Development for Quantification of Related Substances

BACKGROUND

People who have non-valvular atrial fibrillation may benefit from taking a new oral anticoagulant called apixaban, which has recently been given the green light by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. During stress testing, apixaban was found to have a high degree of degradability when subjected to both acidic and basic conditions, and one significant unknown impurity was observed in addition to the major known impurities.

OBJECTIVE

Our aim is the isolation and characterization of degradation product observed in stress/forced degradation studies, and also the development of a single HPLC method that is both reliable and accurate for quantifying all 10 related impurities of apixaban.

METHODS

Preparative HPLC was used to isolate the degradation product, and 1H NMR, 13C NMR, and MS were used to elucidate the structure of the product. Additionally, a single reverse-phase (RP) HPLC method was developed for quantification of all related impurities of apixaban.

RESULTS

Based on the spectral characterization data, the identified unknown degradation impurity was found to be a pH-independent hydrolysis degradation impurity of apixaban. The developed method is specific, linear, accurate, robust, and rugged.

CONCLUSION

The isolated and characterized impurities were the same as those found during stress testing. The developed method has been validated for its intended purpose in accordance with the regulatory requirements that were outlined.

HIGHLIGHTS

The unknown impurity is a new apixaban degradation impurity that helps us understand its toxicity. The scientific community will benefit from the developed analytical method information as it relates to understanding drug product impurity profiling.

2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The "2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Atrial Fibrillation" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from May 12, 2022, to November 3, 2022, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through November 2022, during the guideline writing process, were also considered by the writing committee and added to the evidence tables, where appropriate.

STRUCTURE

Atrial fibrillation is the most sustained common arrhythmia, and its incidence and prevalence are increasing in the United States and globally. Recommendations from the "2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation" and the "2019 AHA/ACC/HRS Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation" have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians. In addition, new recommendations addressing atrial fibrillation and thromboembolic risk assessment, anticoagulation, left atrial appendage occlusion, atrial fibrillation catheter or surgical ablation, and risk factor modification and atrial fibrillation prevention have been developed.

2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The "2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from May 12, 2022, to November 3, 2022, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through November 2022, during the guideline writing process, were also considered by the writing committee and added to the evidence tables, where appropriate.

STRUCTURE

Atrial fibrillation is the most sustained common arrhythmia, and its incidence and prevalence are increasing in the United States and globally. Recommendations from the "2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation" and the "2019 AHA/ACC/HRS Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation" have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians. In addition, new recommendations addressing atrial fibrillation and thromboembolic risk assessment, anticoagulation, left atrial appendage occlusion, atrial fibrillation catheter or surgical ablation, and risk factor modification and atrial fibrillation prevention have been developed.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of direct oral anticoagulants

INTRODUCTION

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have overtaken vitamin K antagonists to become the most widely used method of anticoagulation for most indications. Their stable and predictable pharmacokinetics combined with relatively simple dosing, and the absence of routine monitoring has made them an attractive proposition for healthcare providers. Despite the benefits of DOACs as a class, important differences exist between individual DOAC drugs in respect of their pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles with implications for dosing and reversal in cases of major bleeding.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes the state of knowledge relating to the pharmacokinetics of dabigatran (factor IIa/thrombin inhibitor) and apixaban, edoxaban and rivaroxaban (factor Xa) inhibitors. We focus on pharmacokinetic differences between the drugs which may have clinically significant implications.

EXPERT OPINION

Patient-centered care necessitates a careful consideration of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic differences between DOACs, and how these relate to individual patient circumstances. Prescribers should be aware of the potential for pharmacokinetic drug interactions with DOACs which may influence prescribing decisions in patients with multiple comorbidities. In order to give an appropriate dose of DOAC drugs, accurate estimation of renal function using the Cockcroft-Gault formula using actual body weight is necessary. An increasing body of evidence supports the use of DOACs in patients who are obese, and this is becoming more routine in clinical practice.

Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modeling to predict drug-drug interaction of enzalutamide with combined P-gp and CYP3A substrates

Enzalutamide is known to strongly induce cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4). Furthermore, enzalutamide showed induction and inhibition of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) in in vitro studies. A clinical drug-drug interaction (DDI) study between enzalutamide and digoxin, a typical P-gp substrate, suggested enzalutamide has weak inhibitory effect on P-gp substrates. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), such as apixaban and rivaroxaban, are dual substrates of CYP3A4 and P-gp, and hence it is recommended to avoid co-administration of these DOACs with combined P-gp and strong CYP3A inducers. Enzalutamide's net effect on P-gp and CYP3A for apixaban and rivaroxaban plasma exposures is of interest to physicians who treat patients for venous thromboembolism with prostate cancer. Accordingly, a physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) analysis was performed to predict the magnitude of DDI on apixaban and rivaroxaban exposures in the presence of 160 mg once-daily dosing of enzalutamide. The PBPK models of enzalutamide and M2, a major metabolite of enzalutamide which also has potential to induce CYP3A and P-gp and inhibit P-gp, were developed and verified as perpetrators of CYP3A-and P-gp-mediated interaction. Simulation results predicted a 31% decrease in AUC and no change in Cmax for apixaban and a 45% decrease in AUC and a 25% decrease in Cmax for rivaroxaban when 160 mg multiple doses of enzalutamide were co-administered. In summary, enzalutamide is considered to decrease apixaban and rivaroxaban exposure through the combined effects of CYP3A induction and net P-gp inhibition. Concurrent use of these drugs warrants careful monitoring for efficacy and safety.

Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants (NOACs) Versus Warfarin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Using P-gp and/or CYP450-Interacting Drugs: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are excreted by P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and some are metabolized by CYP450 enzymes such as CYP3A4. Although fewer drug interactions are present with NOACs, it is unclear whether NOACs should also be preferred over vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) using pharmacokinetically interacting drugs. Therefore, the benefit-risk profile of NOACs versus VKAs was investigated in AF patients treated with P-gp and/or CYP450-interacting drugs.

METHODS

Using PubMed and Embase, randomized controlled trials and observational studies on the effectiveness and safety of NOACs versus VKAs in AF patients using P-gp and/or CYP450-interacting drugs were included. A meta-analysis was performed, calculating relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) with the Mantel-Haenszel method.

RESULTS

Twelve studies were included, investigating 10,793 NOAC and 10,096 VKA users treated with P-gp/CYP3A4 inhibitors, whereas no studies on P-gp and/or CYP450-inducing drugs were identified. Compared to VKAs, NOACs were associated with a borderline non-significantly lower stroke or systemic embolism (stroke/SE) risk (RR 0.85, 95%CI (0.72-1.01)), significantly lower intracranial bleeding (RR 0.47, 95%CI (0.34-0.65)) and all-cause mortality risks (RR 0.87, 95%CI (0.79-0.95), but significantly higher gastrointestinal bleeding risk (RR 1.74, 95%CI (1.06-2.86)). Among AF patients using amiodarone, NOACs were associated with significantly lower stroke/SE (RR 0.71, 95%CI (0.54-0.93)) and intracranial bleeding risks (RR 0.51, 95%CI (0.29-0.88)), but significantly higher gastrointestinal bleeding risk (RR 2.15, 95%CI (1.24-3.72)) than VKAs.

CONCLUSION

The benefit-risk profile of NOACs compared to VKAs was preserved in AF patients using P-gp/CYP3A4 inhibitors, including amiodarone.

Pharmacokinetic Interactions Between Abiraterone, Apalutamide, Darolutamide or Enzalutamide and Antithrombotic Drugs: Prediction of Clinical Events and Review of Pharmacological Information

PURPOSE

Abiraterone, apalutamide, darolutamide and enzalutamide are second-generation hormone therapies used for advanced prostate cancer; the majority of patients receiving these treatments are elderly, poly-medicated patients. Since their first market authorizations, their pharmacokinetic (PK) characteristics are increasingly well known. A potential risk of drug-drug interaction (DDI), especially with cardiovascular drugs, needs to be considered. In the case of antithrombotics, treatment imbalance can lead to severe consequences.

OBJECTIVES

To describe PK profiles of hormone therapies and antithrombotics and to predict DDIs and potentially related clinical events.

METHODS

PK profiles (CYP450 and P-gp substrate, inducer or inhibitor) are described by cross-referencing data sources (summary of product characteristics, European public assessment reports, PubMed database, Micromedex^®, etc.); a description of the potential interactions with anti-cancer drugs for each DDI and related clinical events is provided. We discuss management recommendations, including those set out in international guidelines.

RESULTS

Antithrombotics are mainly metabolized by CYP 2C9, 2C19 or 3A4. For abiraterone (CYP 2C8, 2D6 inhibitor) and darolutamide (CYP 3A4 inducer), no interaction was identified with antithrombotics. For apalutamide (CYP 2C9, 2C19, 3A4 and P-gp inducer) and enzalutamide (CYP 2C9, 2C19, 3A4 inducer and P-gp inhibitor), several PK interactions were identified with antithrombotics, which could lead to various clinical events (haemorrhage or thromboembolism).

CONCLUSION

Numerous interactions are expected between enzalutamide or apalutamide and antithrombotics, for which management should be deployed on a case-by-case basis. PK and pharmaco-epidemiological studies could shed light on whether or not there are clinically significant events related to DDIs with antithrombotics.

Oral anticoagulants and concurrent rifampin administration in tuberculosis patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Evidence and guidelines for Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) use when prescribing concurrent rifampin for tuberculosis treatment in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) are limited.

METHODS

Using the Korean National Health Insurance Service database from January 2009 to December 2018, we performed a population-based retrospective cohort study to assess the net adverse clinical events (NACE), a composite of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism and major bleeding, of NOACs compared with warfarin among NVAF patients taking concurrent rifampin administration for tuberculosis treatment. After a propensity matching score (PSM) analysis, Cox proportional hazards regression was performed in matched cohorts to investigate the clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Of the 735 consecutive patients selected, 465 (63.3%) received warfarin and 270 (36.7%) received NOACs. Among 254 pairs of patients after PSM, the crude incidence rate of NACE was 25.6 in NOAC group and 32.8 per 100 person-years in warfarin group. There was no significant difference between NOAC and warfarin use in NACE (hazard ratio [HR], 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.48-1.14; P = 0.172). Major bleeding was the main driver of NACE, and NOAC use was associated with a statistically significantly lower risk of major bleeding than that with warfarin use (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.40-1.00; P = 0.0499).

CONCLUSIONS

In our population-based study, there was no statically significant difference in the occurrence of NACE between NOAC and warfarin use. NOAC use may be associated with a lower risk of major bleeding than that with warfarin use.

Preparation of Apixaban Solid Dispersion for the Enhancement of Apixaban Solubility and Permeability

(1) Background: Solid dispersion (SD) can help increase the bioavailability of poorly water-soluble drugs. Meanwhile, apixaban (APX)—a new anticoagulation drug—has low water solubility (0.028 mg/mL) and low intestinal permeability (0.9 × 10−6 cm/s across Caco-2 colonic cells), thus resulting in a low oral bioavailability of <50%; (2) Methods: To solve the drawbacks of conventional APX products, a novel SD of APX in Soluplus® was prepared, characterized by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy techniques and evaluated for its solubility, intestinal permeability and pharmacokinetic performance. (3) Results: The crystallinity of the prepared APX SD was confirmed. The saturation solubility and apparent permeability coefficient increased 5.9 and 2.54 times compared to that of raw APX, respectively. After oral administration to the rats, the bioavailability of APX SD was improved by 2.31-fold compared to that of APX suspension (4) Conclusions: The present study introduced a new APX SD that potentially exhibits better solubility and permeability, thus increasing APX’s bioavailability.

[Human immunodeficiency virus and venous thromboembolism: Role of direct oral anticoagulants]

Nowadays, thanks to highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection is transforming into a chronic disease. The life expectancy of people living with HIV (PWH) has increased, as well as their risk of developing several co-morbidities, in particular cardiovascular diseases. In addition, the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is increased in PWH with a 2 to 10 times higher incidence when compared to the general population. Over the last decade, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been widely used in the treatment and prevention of VTE and non-valvular atrial fibrillation. DOACs are characterized by a rapid onset of activity, a predictable response and a relatively wide therapeutic window. Nevertheless, drug interactions exist between HAART and DOACs, exposing PWH to a theoretically increased bleeding or thrombotic risk. DOACs are substrates of the transport protein P-glycoprotein and/or of isoforms of cytochromes P450 pathway, which can be affected by some antiretroviral drugs. Limited guidelines are available to assist physicians with the complexity of those drug-drug interactions. The aim of this paper is to provide an updated review on the evidence of the high risk of VTE in PWH and the place of DOAC therapy in this population.

Interactions Between Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) and Antiseizure Medications: Potential Implications on DOAC Treatment

The use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) is increasing because of their superior efficacy and safety compared with vitamin K antagonists. Pharmacokinetic drug interactions, particularly those involving cytochrome P450- mediated metabolism and P-glycoprotein transport, significantly affect the efficacy and safety of DOACs. In this article, we assess the effects of cytochrome P450- and P-glycoprotein-inducing antiseizure medications on DOAC pharmacokinetics in comparison to rifampicin. Rifampicin decreases to a varying extent the plasma exposure (area under the concentration-time curve) and peak concentration of each DOAC, consistent with its specific absorption and elimination pathways. For apixaban and rivaroxaban, rifampicin had a greater effect on the area under the concentration-time curve than on peak concentration. Therefore, using peak concentration to monitor DOAC concentrations may underestimate the effect of rifampicin on DOAC exposure. Antiseizure medications that are cytochrome P450 and P-glycoprotein inducers are commonly used with DOACs. Several studies have observed a correlation between the concomitant use of DOACs and enzyme-inducing antiseizure medications and DOAC treatment failure, for example, ischemic and thrombotic events. The European Society of Cardiology recommends avoiding this combination, as well as the combination of DOACs with levetiracetam and valproic acid, owing to a risk of low DOAC concentrations. However, levetiracetam and valproic acid are not cytochrome P450 or P-glycoprotein inducers, and the implications of their use with DOACs remain to be elucidated. Our comparative analysis suggests DOAC plasma concentration monitoring as a possible strategy to guide dosing owing to the predictable correlation between DOACs' plasma concentration and effect. Patients taking concomitant enzyme-inducing antiseizure medications are at risk for low DOAC concentrations and subsequently, treatment failure and thus can benefit from DOAC concentration monitoring to prophylactically identify this risk.

Safety and effectiveness of anticoagulation with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants and warfarin in patients on tuberculosis treatment

Anti-tuberculosis treatment can cause significant drug-drug interaction and interfere with effective anticoagulation. However, there is a lack of evidence and conflicting data on the optimal oral anticoagulation in patients treated for tuberculosis. We investigated the safety and effectiveness of anticoagulation with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) and warfarin in patients on anti-tuberculosis treatment. Patients on concomitant oral anticoagulation and anti-tuberculosis treatment including rifampin were identified from the Korean nationwide healthcare database. Subjects were censored at discontinuation of either anticoagulation or rifampin. The outcomes of interest were major bleeding, death, and ischemic stroke. A total 2090 patients (1153 on warfarin, 937 on NOAC) were included. NOAC users, compared to warfarin users, were older, had a lower prevalence of hypertension, heart failure, ischemic stroke, and aspirin use and a higher prevalence of cancer, with no significant differences in CHA₂DS₂-VASc or HAS-BLED scores. There were 18 major bleeding events, 106 deaths, and 50 stroke events during a mean follow-up of 2.9 months. After multivariable adjustment, the use of NOAC was associated with a lower risk of incident ischemic stroke (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.27-0.94), while there was no significant difference in risk for major bleeding or death compared with warfarin. These results suggest that NOACs have better effectiveness for stroke prevention and similar safety compared with warfarin in patients on concomitant anti-tuberculosis treatment. This is the first study assessing the safety and effectiveness of NOACs compared to warfarin in this clinical scenario.

Effect of ABCB1 Gene Carriage and Drug-Drug Interactions on Apixaban and Rivaroxaban Pharmacokinetics and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Deep Vein Thrombosis

Aim. To investigate the effect of ABCB1 gene carriage and interdrug interactions on apixaban pharmacokinetics and clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation and deep vein thrombosis.

Material and methods. Patients hospitalized at Yudin State Clinical Hospital participated in the study. A total of 92 patients (50 patients received apixaban and 42 – rivaroxaban) with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and deep vein thrombosis were included. Genotyping was performed by real-time polymerase chain reaction. Direct oral anticoagulants concentrations were measured using an electrospray ionization mass spectrometer in positive ionization mode.

Results. In our study we found that in patients carrying the CT+TT ABCB1 (rs4148738) C>T genotype encoding the carrier protein (P-gp), the plasma concentration of rivaroxaban was statistically significantly higher p= 0.026. In addition, we found that patients taking apixaban together with a CYP3A4/P-gp inhibitor were 3.5 times more likely to have hemorrhagic complications than those without inhibitors p = 0.004.

Conclusion. Our study revealed that the plasma concentration of rivaroxaban was higher in patients carrying the ABCB1 (rs4148738) C>T polymorphism T allele. And patients taking apixaban together with CYP3A4/P-gp inhibitor had higher risk of hemorrhagic complications in comparison with patients not taking such drugs. Further studies are needed on the influence of pharmacogenetics and pharmacokinetics on the safety and efficacy profile of apixaban and rivaroxaban, taking into account the trend of systemic approach to optimization of anticoagulant therapy of direct oral anticoagulants based on pharmacokinetic, pharmacogenetic biomarkers.

Pharmacokinetics of a microdosed cocktail of three direct oral anticoagulants in children with congenital heart defects: study protocol for a single-centre clinical trial (DOAC-Child)

INTRODUCTION

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are direct inhibitors of coagulation factor Xa and are frequently used in adults for different indications such as deep vein thrombosis or non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Paediatric patients might benefit as well from DOACs because the simplicity and convenience of their use is likely to decrease physical and psychological stress related to invasive procedures associated with phenprocoumon and heparin therapy. Thus, it is expected that the future use of DOACs will ultimately improve compliance and overall safety of anticoagulant therapies in paediatric populations. To assure safe and effective use the clinical pharmacology and pharmacokinetics (PK) of these drugs need to be evaluated in children.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This study is a single-centre, open-label, clinical trial in a paediatric population with non-cyanotic congenital heart defects. After having obtained informed consent from the parents, each participant will receive a single oral administration of a drinkable solution of a microdose cocktail of three FXa inhibitors consisting of apixaban (12.5 µg), rivaroxaban (12.5 µg), edoxaban (50 µg), plus a microdose of the two probe drugs midazolam (10 µg) and yohimbine (25 µg). Serial blood samples (n=up to 20) will be collected at specified time points before and up to 25 hours after cocktail administration. The primary PK endpoint will be the area under the plasma concentration time curve of apixaban, rivaroxaban and edoxaban. Secondary PK outcomes will be C_max, t_max, t_1/2, Cl/F and V_ss/F. Safety and tolerability of the microdose cocktail will be evaluated as well by a collection of adverse events.

ETHICS

This study has been approved by the responsible Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty of Heidelberg University.

DISSEMINATION

Study results will be presented at international scientific meetings and published in peer-reviewed journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

EudraCT 2019-001759-38 16, DRKS00021455.

Esomeprazole and apixaban pharmacokinetic interactions in healthy rats

Esomeprazole is used in various clinical settings where a decrease in gastric acid production is desired since it is a proton pump inhibitor. Apixaban, an anticoagulant, is used to reduce the risk of stroke in patients with certain cardiovascular diseases. This research aims to examine the effects of giving esomeprazole and apixaban to rats simultaneously, as well as to measure their pharmacokinetics and look for statistical differences or interactions. A method for the simultaneous determination of esomeprazole and apixaban in rat plasma was developed using HPLC/MS and validated by ICH guidelines. Five groups of Wistar rats were created, and the drugs were administered as follows: esomeprazole (5 mg/kg) intravenously, apixaban (125 mcg/Kg) intravenously, esomeprazole (5 mg/kg) orally, apixaban (250 mcg/kg) orally, and esomeprazole (5 mg/kg) and apixaban (250 mcg/kg) both orally. Both drugs' concentrations were measured in plasma samples collected on a predetermined schedule. The pharmacokinetics of both drugs were calculated and statistically analyzed using a 90% confidence interval and non-compartmental analysis. When the two drugs were combined, apixaban's C_max and AUC increased while esomeprazole's C_max and AUC decreased. On the other hand, Apixaban's T_max decreased with an increase in esomeprazole's T_max, indicating a possible interaction between the two drugs. When both drugs were taken together, their bioavailability was reduced, implying that less esomeprazole was absorbed over time.

Drug Interactions Affecting Oral Anticoagulant Use

Oral anticoagulants (OACs) are medications commonly used in patients with atrial fibrillation and other cardiovascular conditions. Both warfarin and direct oral anticoagulants are susceptible to drug-drug interactions (DDIs). DDIs are an important cause of adverse drug reactions and exact a large toll on the health care system. DDI for warfarin mainly involve moderate to strong inhibitors/inducers of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C9, which is responsible for the elimination of the more potent S-isomer of warfarin. However, inhibitor/inducers of CYP3A4 and CYP1A2 may also cause DDI with warfarin. Recognition of these precipitating agents along with increased frequency of monitoring when these agents are initiated or discontinued will minimize the impact of warfarin DDI. Direct oral anticoagulants are mainly affected by medications strongly affecting the permeability glycoprotein (P-gp), and to a lesser extent, strong CYP3A4 inhibitors/inducers. Dabigatran and edoxaban are affected by P-gp modulation. Strong inducers of CYP3A4 or P-gp should be avoided in all patients taking direct oral anticoagulant unless previously proven to be otherwise safe. Simultaneous strong CYP3A4 and P-gp inhibitors should be avoided in patients taking apixaban and rivaroxaban. Concomitant antiplatelet/anticoagulant use confers additive risk for bleeding, but their combination is unavoidable in many cases. Minimizing duration of concomitant anticoagulant/antiplatelet therapy as indicated by evidence-based clinical guidelines is the best way to reduce the risk of bleeding.

A Literature Review of Liver Function Test Elevations in Rifampin Drug-Drug Interaction Studies

Although rifampin drug–drug interaction (DDI) studies are routinely conducted, there have been instances of liver function test (LFT) elevations, warranting further evaluation. A literature review was conducted to identify studies in which combination with rifampin resulted in hepatic events and evaluate any similarities. Over 600 abstracts and manuscripts describing rifampin DDI studies were first evaluated, of which 30 clinical studies reported LFT elevations. Out of these, 11 studies included ritonavir in combination with other drug(s) in the rifampin DDI study. The number of subjects that were discontinued from treatment on these studies ranged from 0 to 71 (0–100% of subjects in each study). The number of subjects hospitalized for adverse events in these studies ranged from 0 to 41 (0–83.67% of subjects in each study). LFT elevations in greater than 50% of subjects were noted during the concomitant administration of rifampin with ritonavir‐boosted protease inhibitors and with lorlatinib; with labeled contraindication due to observed hepatotoxicity related safety findings only for saquinavir/ritonavir and lorlatinib. In the lorlatinib and ritonavir DDI studies, considerable LFT elevations were observed rapidly, typically within 24–72 h following co‐administration. A possible sequence effect has been speculated, where rifampin induction prior to administration of the combination may be associated with increased severity of the LFT elevations. The potential role of rifampin in the metabolic activation of certain drugs into metabolites with hepatic effects needs to be taken into consideration when conducting rifampin DDI studies, particularly those for which the metabolic profiles are not fully elucidated.

Biopharmaceutics considerations for direct oral anticoagulants

Vitamin K antagonists (VKA) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been clinically used in the treatment of coagulation disorders. There are four DOACs approved since 2010 (dabigatran etexilate, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban), and they were designed to overcome the practical limitations of VKA. This review summarized biopharmaceutics considerations about DOACs, which are critically discussed, applying risk analyses to subside the further classification of these drugs according to the Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS). These discussions included data compiled about physicochemical properties, equilibrium solubility, permeability, and drug dissolution of DOACs. From the biopharmaceutics characteristics is possible to identify critical variables related to the absorption process, which can help in the design of new formulations. The data were compared with the criteria recommended by regulatory agencies for the biopharmaceutics classification according to the BCS. From that, these data may be used to discuss the approval of generic medicines by the BCS-based biowaiver, and the clinical risks arising from novel formulations with DOACs. However, although there are indications of biopharmaceutics classifications for DOACs, conclusive information to classify these compounds according to the BCS is lacking, requiring more experimental studies to achieve this aim. Conclusive information is essential for a safe decision about the biowaiver, as well as to guide the development of new formulations containing the DOACs.

The impact of advanced age on anticoagulant therapy for acute venous thromboembolism

INTRODUCTION

Management of venous thromboembolic events (VTE) has been completely changed after the introduction of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC). VTE is common in the geriatric population, but the management of DOACs remains complex because of the lack of specific data in this polymedicated fragile population.An exhaustive search of anticoagulants in the indication of VTE was performed on PubMed, including data from clinical trials, observational studies, real-world data, drug-drug interaction studies, as well as various guidelines from scientific societies.

AREAS COVERED

The present review aims to summarize our current knowledge on the era of DOACs in the management of VTE in the elderly. This involves learning the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of drugs specific to geriatrics, the problem of drug-drug interactions, and the main randomized clinical trials validating the use of DOACs.

EXPERT OPINION

DOACs have become an essential part of the management of VTE in the elderly, both for their efficacy and safety. However, we are faced with a list of unmet needs, such as the relevance of DOACs in the very elderly, cancer patients, and those with renal impairment. Clinicians and pharmacists must remain cautious about comedications, as well as about the patient's comorbidities.

Drug interactions of direct oral anticoagulants in elderly patients with cardiometabolic diseases

In the present review we summarized current knowledge about significant interactions (DIs) of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) with other medications frequently prescribed to elderly patients with cardiometabolic diseases.

Literature search was performed using PubMed from 1990 to October 2020. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs), subgroup analyses from RCTs, longitudinal studies, case series and case reports were included. Only studies in humans were considered. Elderly was defined as ≥75 years.

Assessment of DIs with DOACs is often tricky because of the lack of validated tools to routinely assess magnitude of their anti-coagulation effect. Most of reports in the cardiometabolic area regarded the classes of anti-antiarrhythmic, lipid-lowering and platelet-inhibitors drugs, namely drugs that are widely used to reduce cardiovascular risk in patients with common metabolic diseases. Reports about elderly are limited in general, and it is not known whether certain types of DIs occur more frequently in elderly subjects. DIs were more frequently reported in association with dabigatran, which however has been available for a longer period of time compared with other DOACs. In most cases, no complete information about dosages of medications was available. DIs of DOACs leading to adverse events (both ischemic and bleeding ones) were generally facilitated by older age, polymedication and impaired renal function.

Further studies should be carried out to properly investigate DIs of DOACs with cardiometabolic drugs in elderly patients, with particular focus on differences between DOACs and the influence of different dosages.

A liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for the determination of apixaban in human plasma and its application to pharmacokinetics studies in the Indian population

Apixaban is a novel oral anticoagulant intended to treat and prevent blood clots and to prevent strokes in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. The development and validation of a fast, selective, accurate, and precise method using high-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry is described for the estimation of apixaban in human plasma, with apixaban ¹³CD₃ as an internal standard (IS). Using a reverse phase Gemini C18 column (50 mm × 4.6 mm, 3 μm) and a mixture of acetonitrile (2 mM) and ammonium formate buffer (50 : 50 v/v) as the mobile phase, chromatographic separation was achieved following extraction via a solid-phase extraction process. To track multiple reaction monitoring transitions set at 460/443 (m/z) and 464/447 (m/z) for apixaban and apixaban ¹³CD₃, respectively, liquid chromatography coupled with triple quadrupole mass spectrometry was employed. A concentration linearity range between 1.01 and 280.00 ng mL^-1 was validated with regression ≥0.99, and the method was successfully applied to apixaban pharmacokinetics analysis. At a flow rate of 1.0 mL min^-1, the run time was around 1.8 min, which is short. With an extraction recovery of >73% for both apixaban and apixaban ¹³CD₃, the method was sensitive, with a limit of quantitation of 1.01 ng mL^-1. The inter-day/between-run precision ranged from 1.21% to 3.21%, while the accuracy ranged from 96.5% to 102%. For pharmacokinetics analysis, the validated method was applied. The percentage difference between findings from samples that were reanalyzed and samples that were initially analyzed was within ±20%. With high-quality assay specificity and accuracy in relation to apixaban analysis in human plasma under the experimental conditions used, the method provided is accurate.

Prediction of potential drug interactions between repurposed COVID-19 and antitubercular drugs: an integrational approach of drug information software and computational techniques data

Introduction:

Tuberculosis is a major respiratory disease globally with a higher prevalence in Asian and African countries than rest of the world. With a larger population of tuberculosis patients anticipated to be co-infected with COVID-19 infection, an ongoing pandemic, identifying, preventing and managing drug–drug interactions is inevitable for maximizing patient benefits for the current repurposed COVID-19 and antitubercular drugs.

Methods:

We assessed the potential drug–drug interactions between repurposed COVID-19 drugs and antitubercular drugs using the drug interaction checker of IBM Micromedex®. Extensive computational studies were performed at a molecular level to validate and understand the drug–drug interactions found from the Micromedex drug interaction checker database at a molecular level. The integrated knowledge derived from Micromedex and computational data was collated and curated for predicting potential drug–drug interactions between repurposed COVID-19 and antitubercular drugs.

Results:

A total of 91 potential drug–drug interactions along with their severity and level of documentation were identified from Micromedex between repurposed COVID-19 drugs and antitubercular drugs. We identified 47 pharmacodynamic, 42 pharmacokinetic and 2 unknown DDIs. The majority of our molecular modelling results were in line with drug–drug interaction data obtained from the drug information software. QT prolongation was identified as the most common type of pharmacodynamic drug–drug interaction, whereas drug–drug interactions associated with cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) and P-glycoprotein (P-gp) inhibition and induction were identified as the frequent pharmacokinetic drug–drug interactions. The results suggest antitubercular drugs, particularly rifampin and second-line agents, warrant high alert and monitoring while prescribing with the repurposed COVID-19 drugs.

Conclusion:

Predicting these potential drug–drug interactions, particularly related to CYP3A4, P-gp and the human Ether-à-go-go-Related Gene proteins, could be used in clinical settings for screening and management of drug–drug interactions for delivering safer chemotherapeutic tuberculosis and COVID-19 care. The current study provides an initial propulsion for further well-designed pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic-based drug–drug interaction studies.

Plain Language Summary

Apixaban Single-Dose Pharmacokinetics, Bioavailability, Renal Clearance, and Pharmacodynamics Following Intravenous and Oral Administration

This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, ascending single intravenous (IV) bolus-dose study evaluated safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of apixaban, a direct factor Xa (FXa) inhibitor approved for multiple indications. Eight healthy subjects were randomized 3:1 (apixaban:placebo) within each IV dose cohort (0.5, 1.25, 2.5, 3.75, and 5 mg). The 2.5-mg IV panel also received 5 mg of oral apixaban or placebo. Blood samples were collected for PK and PD, including international normalized ratio, modified prothrombin time (mPT), and anti-FXa activity. Apixaban had 66.2% oral bioavailability, dose-proportional exposure, 17 to 26 L steady-state volume of distribution, and 3.2 to 3.5 L/h total plasma clearance. Renal clearance was ≈27%. Anti-FXa activity and mPT changes followed the apixaban plasma concentration-time profile; both were highly correlated with concentration (R² = 0.99 and R² = 0.93 for anti-FXa activity and mPT, respectively). International normalized ratio remained within reference range (0.9-1.3). There were no serious or bleeding-related adverse events. Overall, an apixaban single IV bolus was safe and well tolerated over a 10-fold dose range by these subjects. Apixaban had good oral bioavailability, dose-proportional exposure, and constant plasma clearance over a broad dose range, with modest renal clearance. Apixaban PD were consistent with reversible FXa inhibition.

Drug interactions with apixaban: A systematic review of the literature and an analysis of VigiBase, the World Health Organization database of spontaneous safety reports

Apixaban, a direct oral anticoagulant, has emerged over the past few years because it is considered to have a low risk of drug‐drug interactions compared to vitamin K antagonists. To better characterize these interactions, we systematically reviewed studies evaluating the drug‐drug interactions involving apixaban and analyzed the drug‐drug interactions resulting in an adverse drug reaction reported in case reports and VigiBase. We systematically searched Medline, Embase, and Google Scholar up to 20 August 2018 for articles that investigated the occurrence of an adverse drug reaction due to a potential drug interacting with apixaban. Data from VigiBase came from case reports retrieved up to the 2 January 2018, where identification of potential interactions is performed in terms of two drugs, one adverse drug reaction triplet and potential signal detection using Omega, a three‐way measure of disproportionality. We identified 15 studies and 10 case reports. Studies showed significant variations in the area under the curve for apixaban and case reports highlighted an increased risk of hemorrhage or thromboembolic events due to a drug‐drug interaction. From VigiBase, a total of 1617 two drugs and one adverse drug reaction triplet were analyzed. The most reported triplet were apixaban—aspirin—gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Sixty‐seven percent of the drug‐drug interactions reported in VigiBase were not described or understood. In the remaining 34%, the majority were pharmacodynamic drug‐drug interactions. These data suggest that apixaban has significant potential for drug‐drug interactions, either with CYP3A/P‐gp modulators or with drugs that may impair hemostasis. The most described adverse drug reactions were adverse drug reactions related to hemorrhage or thrombosis, mostly through pharmacodynamic interactions. Pharmacokinetic drug‐drug interactions seem to be poorly detected.

Potential Dexamethasone-Direct Oral Anticoagulant Drug Interaction: Is This a Concern in COVID?

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the literature on a potential dexamethasone-direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) drug interaction and provide management considerations with COVID hypercoagulability.

DATA SOURCES

A search of EMBASE, PubMed, and Google Scholar (January 1990 to May 2021), limited to the English language, using applicable search terms resulted in 137 articles, with 21 relevant articles included. Regulatory agency and clinical guidance documents were also reviewed.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Included articles describe in vitro or in vivo animal or human data for dexamethasone induction of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 or P-glycoprotein (P-gp).

DATA SYNTHESIS

Dexamethasone has the potential to interact with the DOACs via CYP3A4 and/or P-gp induction. Only apixaban and rivaroxaban have CYP3A4 metabolism. Dexamethasone can increase CYP3A4 activity by up to 70% and reduce the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of CYP3A4 substrates by >40%, which is consistent with criteria for a weak CYP inducer. In rodents, dexamethasone P-gp induction is associated with AUC reductions of 20% to 50%. Human data are lacking.

RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE

Severe COVID-19 infection is associated with hypercoagulability. Although heparins are the preferred anticoagulants for hospitalized COVID-19 patients, DOACs are being utilized. Dexamethasone is recommended for hospitalized COVID-19 patients requiring supplemental oxygen. The concurrent use of dexamethasone and apixaban or rivaroxaban in such patients carries the potential for reduced anticoagulant effect during a state of heightened thrombotic risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Concurrent use of dexamethasone and apixaban or rivaroxaban in hospitalized COVID-19 patients with laboratory evidence of COVID coagulopathy should be avoided until higher-quality data are available.

Intestinal Excretion, Intestinal Recirculation, and Renal Tubule Reabsorption Are Underappreciated Mechanisms That Drive the Distribution and Pharmacokinetic Behavior of Small Molecule Drugs

Drug reabsorption following biliary excretion is well-known as enterohepatic recirculation (EHR). Renal tubular reabsorption (RTR) following renal excretion is also common but not easily assessed. Intestinal excretion (IE) and enteroenteric recirculation (EER) have not been recognized as common disposition mechanisms for metabolically stable and permeable drugs. IE and intestinal reabsorption (IR:EHR/EER), as well as RTR, are governed by dug concentration gradients, passive diffusion, active transport, and metabolism, and together they markedly impact disposition and pharmacokinetics (PK) of small molecule drugs. Disruption of IE, IR, or RTR through applications of active charcoal (AC), transporter knockout (KO), and transporter inhibitors can lead to changes in PK parameters. The impacts of intestinal and renal reabsorption on PK are under-appreciated. Although IE and EER/RTR can be an intrinsic drug property, there is no apparent strategy to optimize compounds based on this property. This review seeks to improve understanding and applications of IE, IR, and RTR mechanisms.

Developing a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model of apixaban to predict scenarios of drug-drug interactions, renal impairment and paediatric populations

AIMS

To develop a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model for apixaban, an oral anticoagulant with a narrow therapeutic index, and to predict PK profiles and potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs) in patients with renal impairment and paediatrics.

METHODS

A whole-body apixaban PBPK model was developed and validated in SimCYP for healthy adults with or without interacting drugs. The model was extended to renal impairment and paediatrics. Observed PK data in adults were compared with predicted data. The effect of renal function, age and DDIs on apixaban PK was investigated.

RESULTS

The PBPK model successfully predicted the PK of apixaban alone and under the influence of interacting drugs. For patients with renal impairment, the PBPK model successfully predicted the fold change in each impairment group; inhibitory DDI and renal impairment had a synergistic effect on the increase of apixaban exposure (e.g., almost 3-fold increase of AUC in ketoconazole + severe renal impairment group). For infants younger than 1 year, the exposure of apixaban decreased with increased weight-normalized clearance. For newborn infants, AUC of apixaban was >2-fold higher than that in children older than 1 year. Meanwhile, the effect of DDI seems to be weakened while the effect of renal impairment might be enhanced in infants younger than 1 year.

CONCLUSION

Our study provides a reasonable approach to estimate the dose adjustment for the first use of apixaban in special populations with complex situations, which has the opportunity to make the clinical practice much safer.

Using Pharmacogenetics of Direct Oral Anticoagulants to Predict Changes in Their Pharmacokinetics and the Risk of Adverse Drug Reactions

Dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban are direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) that are increasingly used worldwide. Taking into account their widespread use for the prevention of thromboembolism in cardiology, neurology, orthopedics, and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID 19) as well as their different pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetics dependence, it is critical to explore new opportunities for DOACs administration and predict their dosage when used as monotherapy or in combination with other drugs. In this review, we describe the details of the relative pharmacogenetics on the pharmacokinetics of DOACs as well as new data concerning the clinical characteristics that predetermine the needed dosage and the risk of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). The usefulness of genetic information before and shortly after the initiation of DOACs is also discussed. The reasons for particular attention to these issues are not only new genetic knowledge and genotyping possibilities, but also the risk of serious ADRs (primarily, gastrointestinal bleeding). Taking into account the effect of the carriership of single nucleotide variants (SNVs) of genes encoding biotransformation enzymes and DOACs metabolism, the use of these measures is important to predict changes in pharmacokinetics and the risk of ADRs in patients with a high risk of thromboembolism who receive anticoagulant therapy.

Laboratory Monitoring of Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs)

The introduction of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), such as dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban, and betrixaban, provides safe and effective alternative to previous anticoagulant therapies. DOACs directly, selectively, and reversibly inhibit factors IIa or Xa. The coagulation effect follows the plasma concentration-time profile of the respective anticoagulant. The short half-life of a DOAC constrains the daily oral intake. Because DOACs have predictable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic responses at a fixed dose, they do not require monitoring. However in specific clinical situations and for particular patient populations, testing may be helpful for patient management. The effect of DOACs on the screening coagulation assays such as prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), and thrombin time (TT) is directly linked to reagent composition, and clotting time can be different from reagent to reagent, depending on the DOAC's reagent sensitivity. Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) is considered the gold standard method for DOAC measurement, but it is time consuming and requires expensive equipment. The general consensus for the assessment of a DOAC is clotting or chromogenic assays using specific standard calibrators and controls. This review provides a short summary of DOAC properties and an update on laboratory methods for measuring DOACs.

Anticoagulation in sub-Saharan Africa: Are direct oral anticoagulants the answer? A review of lessons learnt from warfarin

Warfarin has existed for >7 decades and has been the anticoagulant of choice for many thromboembolic disorders. The recent introduction of direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) has, however, caused a shift in preference by healthcare professionals all over the world. DOACs have been found to be at least as effective as warfarin in prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation and in treatment of venous thromboembolism. In sub-Saharan Africa, however, the widespread use of DOACs has been hampered mainly by their higher acquisition costs. As the drugs come off patent, their use in sub-Saharan Africa is likely to increase. However, very few trials have been conducted in African settings, and safety concerns will need to be addressed with further study before widespread adoption into clinical practice.

The real world use of combined P-glycoprotein and moderate CYP3A4 inhibitors with rivaroxaban or apixaban increases bleeding

The use of direct oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation continues to rise. Certain populations may be at higher risk for increased drug exposure and adverse events. Pharmacokinetic studies suggest increased exposure of rivaroxaban and apixaban with combined P-gp and moderate CYP3A4 inhibitors but the clinical relevance of this is unknown. This retrospective cohort study included patients receiving rivaroxaban or apixaban from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2016 with a moderate inhibitor (amiodarone, dronedarone, diltiazem, verapamil) for at least 3 months in the drug-drug interaction (DDI) group. Propensity matching was used to identify similar control patients without the presence of the DDI. The primary outcome was a time to event analysis of any bleeding episode as defined by the International Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis. After propensity matching, 213 patients with similar baseline characteristics were included in each group. The mean CHA2DS2-VASc score was 3.0 and median duration of follow-up was 1.45 years. The primary outcome occurred in 26.4% of patients in the DDI group and 18.4% in the control group (hazard ratio 1.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.19 to 2.73; p-value = 0.006). There was no difference in bleeding rates based on type of inhibitor. Use of a combined P-gp and moderate CYP3A4 inhibitor with rivaroxaban or apixaban increased bleeding risk compared to patients without the DDI in this real world, retrospective study. Analysis in a larger patient population is needed to confirm these findings.

Effect of Enzyme-Inducing Antiseizure Medications on the Risk of Sub-Therapeutic Concentrations of Direct Oral Anticoagulants: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Stroke and thromboembolic events occurring among patients taking direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been associated with low concentrations of DOACs. Enzyme-inducing antiseizure medications (EI-ASMs) are associated with enhanced cytochrome-P450-mediated metabolism and enhanced P-glycoprotein-mediated transport.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of concomitant EI-ASM use on DOAC peak concentrations in patients treated in clinical care.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients treated with DOACs for atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolic disease in an academic general hospital. In total, 307 patients treated with DOACs between August 2015 and January 2020 were reviewed. Clinical characteristics and peak DOAC plasma concentrations of patients co-treated with an EI-ASM were compared with those of patients not treated with an EI-ASM. An apixaban dose score (ADS) was defined to account for apixaban dosage and the number of apixaban dose-reduction criteria.

RESULTS

In total, 177 peak DOAC plasma concentrations (including apixaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran) from 131 patients were measured, including 24 patients co-treated with an EI-ASM and 107 controls not treated with an EI-ASM. The proportion of patients with DOAC concentrations below the expected range was significantly higher among EI-ASM users than among patients not taking an EI-ASM (37.5 vs. 9.3%, respectively; p = 0.0004; odds ratio 5.82; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.03-16.66). Most of these patients were treated with apixaban (85%); however, sensitivity analysis results were also significant (p = 0.031) for patients with non-apixaban DOACs. In patients co-treated with apixaban and an EI-ASM, median apixaban peak concentration was 106 ng/mL (interquartile range [IQR] 71-181) compared with 150 ng/mL (IQR 94-222) in controls (p = 0.019). In multivariable analysis, EI-ASM use was associated with 6.26-fold increased odds for apixaban concentration below the expected range (95% CI 2.19-17.90; p = 0.001). Apixaban concentrations were significantly associated with EI-ASM use, moderate enzyme inhibitor use, and ADS.

CONCLUSIONS

Concurrent EI-ASM and DOAC use presents a possible risk for DOAC concentrations below the expected range. The clinical significance of the interaction is currently unclear.

Safety and Efficacy of Apixaban For Therapeutic Anticoagulation in Critically Ill ICU Patients with Severe COVID-19 Respiratory Disease

Introduction  Despite the use of unfractionated heparin (UFH) or low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), rates of thromboembolic disease, and subsequent morbidity and mortality remain unacceptably high in patients with severe novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) disease. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), such as apixaban, have numerous purported benefits although the safety and efficacy of their use in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with severe COVID-19 has yet to be evaluated.

Materials and Methods  Single-center, retrospective cohort study of 21 ICU patients with severe COVID-19 respiratory disease treated with apixaban for atrial fibrillation (AFib), venous thromboembolism (VTE), catheter-induced thrombosis, and/or COVID-19-induced coagulopathy. The primary objective was to evaluate the incidence of bleeding events and secondary objectives included thromboembolic events, coagulation parameters, and mortality.

Results  Ninety percent of patients were non-White, 43% were obese, 90% had acute respiratory distress syndrome, and 76% required mechanical ventilation. Nearly half of (47.6%) also experienced renal dysfunction and required renal replacement therapy. Eighty-six percent of patients received prophylaxis or treatment with UFH or LMWH within the 24-hour period prior to apixaban initiation. Patients were initiated on apixaban for the treatment of suspected or confirmed VTE (67%) or AFib (33%). All coagulation parameters remained abnormal but stable throughout the 10-day monitoring period. No patients experienced any major bleeding events or thrombosis throughout the study period. There were four deaths during the follow-up period, all deemed unrelated to coagulopathy or bleeding.

Conclusion  Apixaban appeared safe and efficacious in ICU patients with severe COVID-19 disease. These data encourage future trials seeking to optimize anticoagulation strategies in patients with severe COVID-19.

Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling for the Prediction of a Drug-Drug Interaction of Combined Effects on P-glycoprotein and Cytochrome P450 3A

Direct oral anticoagulants, such as apixaban and rivaroxaban, are important for the treatment and prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism and to reduce the risk of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Because apixaban and rivaroxaban are predominantly eliminated by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A and P‐glycoprotein (P‐gp), concomitant use of combined P‐gp and strong CYP3A4 inhibitors and inducers should be avoided. Physiologically‐based pharmacokinetic models for apixaban and rivaroxaban were developed to estimate the net effect of CYP3A induction, P‐gp inhibition, and P‐gp induction by rifampicin. The disposition of rivaroxaban is more complex compared with apixaban because both hepatic and renal P‐gp is considered to contribute to rivaroxaban elimination. Furthermore, organic anion transporter‐3, a renal uptake transporter, may also contribute the elimination of rivaroxaban from systemic circulation. The models were verified with observed clinical drug–drug interactions with CYP3A and P‐gp inhibitors. With the developed models, the predicted area under the concentration time curve and maximum concentration ratios were 0.43 and 0.48, respectively, for apixaban, and 0.50–0.52 and 0.72–0.73, respectively, for rivaroxaban when coadministered with 600 mg multiple doses of rifampicin and that were very close to observed data. The impact of each of the elimination pathways was assessed for rivaroxaban, and inhibition of CYP3A led to a larger impact over intestinal and hepatic P‐gp. Inhibition of renal organic anion transporter‐3 or P‐gp led to an overall modest interaction. The developed apixaban and rivaroxaban models can be further applied to the investigation of interactions with other P‐gp and/or CYP3A4 inhibitors and inducers.

Drug interactions and pharmacogenetic factors contribute to variation in apixaban concentration in atrial fibrillation patients in routine care

Factor Xa-inhibitor apixaban is an oral anticoagulant prescribed in atrial fibrillation (AF) for stroke prevention. Its pharmacokinetic profile is known to be affected by cytochrome P450 (CYP)3A metabolism, while it is also a substrate of the efflux transporters ATP-binding cassette (ABC)B1 (P-glycoprotein) and ABCG2 (breast cancer resistance protein, BCRP). In this study, we assessed the impact of interacting medication and pharmacogenetic variation to better explain apixaban concentration differences among 358 Caucasian AF patients. Genotyping (ABCG2, ABCB1, CYP3A4*22, CYP3A5*3) was performed by TaqMan assays, and apixaban quantified by mass spectrometry. The typical patient was on average 77.2 years old, 85.5 kg, and had a serum creatinine of 103.1 µmol/L. Concomitant amiodarone, an antiarrhythmic agent and moderate CYP3A/ABCB1 inhibitor, the impaired-function variant ABCG2 c.421C > A, and sex predicted higher apixaban concentrations when controlling for age, weight and serum creatinine (multivariate regression; R² = 0.34). Our findings suggest that amiodarone and ABCG2 genotype contribute to interpatient apixaban variability beyond known clinical factors.

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacogenetics of Apixaban

Apixaban is oral anticoagulant, it is widely used in prevention of stroke in non-valvular atrial fibrillation and treatment of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Its main mechanism of action is through reversible inhibition of factor Xa. It specifically binds and inhibits both free and bound factor Xa which ultimately results in reduction in the levels of thrombin formation. Apixaban is mainly metabolized by CYP3A4 with minor contributions from CYP1A2, CYP2C8, CYP2C9, CYP2C19 and CYP2J2 isoenzymes. Some of the major metabolic pathways of apixaban include o-demethylation, hydroxylation, and sulfation, with o-demethylapixabansulphate being the major metabolite. The aim of this review is analysis of associated researches of single nucleotide variants (SNV) of CYP3A5 and SULT1A1 genes and search for new candidate genes reflecting effectiveness and safety of apixaban. The search for full-text publications in Russian and English languages containing key words “apixaban”, “pharmacokinetics”, “effectiveness”, “safety” was carried out amongst literature of the past twenty years with the use of eLibrary, PubMed, Web of Science, OMIM data bases. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetics of apixaban are considered in this review. The hypothesis about CYP и SULT1A enzymes influence on apixaban metabolism was examined. To date, numerous SNVs of the CYP3A5 and SULT1A1 genes have been identified, but their potential influence on pharmacokinetics apixaban in clinical practice needs to be further studies. The role of SNVs of other genes encoding beta-oxidation enzymes of apixaban (CYP1A2, CYP2C8, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2J2) and transporter proteins (ABCB1, ABCG2) in its efficacy and safety are not well understood, and ABCB1 and ABCG2 genes may be potential candidate genes for studies of the drug safety.

Drug-drug interactions with direct oral anticoagulants associated with adverse events in the real world: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have emerged as safe and effective alternatives to Vitamin-K antagonists for treatment and prevention of arterial and venous thrombosis. Due to their novelty, pharmacokinetic DOAC drug-drug interactions (DDIs) that result in clinical adverse events have not been well-documented.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to systematically review reported pharmacokinetic DDIs resulting in clinical adverse events through documented observational evidence to better inform clinicians in clinical practice.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature review of EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Ovid HealthStar was conducted through March 10th, 2020. Two independent reviewers screened and extracted data from eligible articles according to pre-established inclusion and exclusion criteria. Articles reporting bleeding or thrombotic outcomes in non-controlled (observational) settings resulting from suggested pharmacokinetic DOAC DDIs were included.

RESULTS

A total of 5567 citations were reviewed, of which 24 were included following data extraction. The majority were case reports (n = 21) documenting a single adverse event resulting from a suspected DOAC DDI, while the remaining papers were a case series (n = 1) and cohort studies (n = 2). The most commonly reported interacting drugs were amiodarone and ritonavir (bleeding), and phenobarbital, phenytoin, and carbamazepine (thrombosis). Bleeding events more often resulted from a combined mechanism (P-glycoprotein AND CYP3A4 inhibition), whereas thrombotic events resulted from either combined OR single P-glycoprotein/CYP3A4 induction.

CONCLUSION

Current literature evaluating the real-world risk of DOAC DDIs is limited to few case reports and retrospective observational analyses. Clinicians are encouraged to continue to report suspected drug interactions resulting in adverse events.

Intestinal Efflux Transporters P-gp and BCRP Are Not Clinically Relevant in Apixaban Disposition

PURPOSE

The involvement of the intestinally expressed xenobiotic transporters P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and Breast Cancer Resistance Protein (BCRP) have been implicated in apixaban disposition based on in vitro studies. Recommendations against co-administration of apixaban with inhibitors of these efflux transporters can be found throughout the literature as well as in the apixaban FDA label. However, the clinical relevance of such findings is questionable due to the high permeability and high solubility characteristics of apixaban.

METHODS

Using recently published methodologies to discern metabolic- from transporter- mediated drug-drug interactions, a critical evaluation of all published apixaban drug-drug interaction studies was conducted to investigate the purported clinical significance of efflux transporters in apixaban disposition.

RESULTS

Rational examination of these clinical studies using basic pharmacokinetic theory does not support the clinical significance of intestinal efflux transporters in apixaban disposition. Further, there is little evidence that efflux transporters are clinically significant determinants of systemic clearance.

CONCLUSIONS

Inhibition or induction of intestinal CYP3A4 can account for exposure changes of apixaban in all clinically significant drug-drug interactions, and lack of intestinal CYP3A4 inhibition can explain all studies with no exposure changes, regardless of the potential for these perpetrators to inhibit intestinal or systemic efflux transporters.

Apixaban: A Clinical Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Review

Apixaban is an oral, direct factor Xa inhibitor that inhibits both free and clot-bound factor Xa, and has been approved for clinical use in several thromboembolic disorders, including reduction of stroke risk in non-valvular atrial fibrillation, thromboprophylaxis following hip or knee replacement surgery, the treatment of deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism, and prevention of recurrent deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. The absolute oral bioavailability of apixaban is ~ 50%. Food does not have a clinically meaningful impact on the bioavailability. Apixaban exposure increases dose proportionally for oral doses up to 10 mg. Apixaban is rapidly absorbed, with maximum concentration occurring 3–4 h after oral administration, and has a half-life of approximately 12 h. Elimination occurs via multiple pathways including metabolism, biliary excretion, and direct intestinal excretion, with approximately 27% of total apixaban clearance occurring via renal excretion. The pharmacokinetics of apixaban are consistent across a broad range of patients, and apixaban has limited clinically relevant interactions with most commonly prescribed medications, allowing for fixed dosages without the need for therapeutic drug monitoring. The pharmacodynamic effect of apixaban is closely correlated with apixaban plasma concentration. This review provides a summary of the pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, biopharmaceutical, and drug–drug interaction profiles of apixaban. Additionally, the population-pharmacokinetic analyses of apixaban in both healthy subjects and in the target patient populations are discussed.

Microdosed Cocktail of Three Oral Factor Xa Inhibitors to Evaluate Drug-Drug Interactions with Potential Perpetrator Drugs

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to prove the suitability of simultaneously administered microdoses of the factor Xa inhibitors (FXaIs) rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban (100 µg in total). To evaluate drug-drug interactions, the impact of ketoconazole, a known strong inhibitor of cytochrome P450 3A4 and P-glycoprotein, was studied.

METHODS

In a crossover clinical trial, 18 healthy volunteers were randomized to the two treatments using microdoses of rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban alone and when coadministered with ketoconazole. Plasma and urine concentrations of microdosed apixaban, edoxaban and rivaroxaban were quantified using a validated ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry assay with a lower limit of quantification of 2.5 pg/ml.

RESULTS

The microdosed FXaI cocktail showed similar pharmacokinetic parameters compared with published data, using normal therapeutic doses of each FXaI. Ketoconazole significantly increased exposure, with geometric mean AUC ratios of 1.90 (apixaban), 2.35 (edoxaban) and 2.27 (rivaroxaban).

CONCLUSION

The microdosed FXaI cocktail approach was able to precisely predict the drug interaction with ketoconazole. This is the first study that has been conducted to evaluate drug-drug interactions with a drug class, and the low administered doses also allow evaluation in vulnerable target populations.

STUDY PROTOCOL

EudraCT 2016-003024-23.

The Necessity of Using Changes in Absorption Time to Implicate Intestinal Transporter Involvement in Oral Drug-Drug Interactions

INTRODUCTION

In drug discovery and development, it is of high interest to characterize the potential for intestinal drug-drug interactions to alter bioavailability of a victim drug. For drugs that are substrates of both intestinal transporters and enzymes, estimating the relative contribution of each process has proved challenging, especially since the susceptibility of drug to uptake or efflux transporters in vitro does not always translate to clinically significant in vivo involvement. Here we introduce a powerful methodology to implicate intestinal transporters in drug-drug interactions based on the theory that clinically relevant intestinal transporter interactions will result in altered rate of absorption of victim drugs.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We present exemplary clinical drug-drug interaction studies that utilize well-characterized clinical substrates and perpetrators to demonstrate how mean absorption time (MAT) and time to maximum concentration (t_max) are expected to change (or remain unchanged) when either intestinal transporters or metabolic enzymes were/are altered. Apixaban was also selected to demonstrate the utility of the methodology, as the purported involvement of both intestinal enzymes and transporters has been suggested in its FDA package insert.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Acute inhibition of gut efflux transporters resulted in decreased MAT and t_maxvalues, induction increased these values, while inhibition of intestinal metabolic enzymes did not result in altered MAT or t_max. Involvement of intestinal efflux transporters in apixaban disposition is unlikely.

CONCLUSION

Utilization of this simple but powerful methodology to implicate intestinal transporter involvement will have significant impact on how drug-drug interactions are interpreted.

A Simple Methodology to Differentiate Changes in Bioavailability From Changes in Clearance Following Oral Dosing of Metabolized Drugs

Accurately discriminating changes in clearance (CL) from changes in bioavailability (F) following an oral drug-drug interaction is difficult without carrying out an intravenous interaction study. This may be true for drugs that are clinically significant transporter substrates; however, for interactions that are strictly metabolic, it has been recognized that volume of distribution remains unchanged between both phases of the interaction study. With the understanding that changes in volume of distribution will be minimal for metabolized drugs, the inverse of the change in apparent volume of distribution can provide adequate estimates of the change in bioavailability alone. Utilization of this estimate of F change in tandem with the observed apparent clearance (CL/F) change in an oral drug-drug interaction can provide an estimate of the change in clearance alone. Here, we examine drug-drug interactions involving five known inhibitors and inducers of cytochrome P450 3A4 isozyme on victim drugs midazolam and apixaban for which the interaction was carried out both orally and intravenously, allowing for evaluation of this methodology. Predictions of CL and F changes based on oral data were reasonably close to observed changes based on intravenous studies, demonstrating that this simple yet powerful methodology can reasonably differentiate changes in F from changes in CL for oral metabolic drug interactions when only oral data are available. Utilization of this relatively simple methodology to evaluate DDIs for orally dosed drugs will have a significant impact on how DDIs are interpreted from a drug development and regulatory perspective.

Drug-Drug Interactions with Direct Oral Anticoagulants

A large body of evidence suggests that not only direct anticoagulant effects but also major bleeding events and stroke prevention depend on plasma concentrations of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Concomitant drugs that cause drug–drug interactions (DDIs) alter DOAC exposure by increasing or decreasing DOAC bioavailability and/or clearance; hence, they might affect the efficacy and safety of DOAC therapy. Patients with renal impairment already receive smaller DOAC maintenance doses because avoidance of elevated DOAC exposure might prevent serious bleeding events. For other causes of increased exposure such as DDIs, management is often less well-defined. Considering that DOAC patients are often older and have multiple co-morbidities, polypharmacy is highly prevalent. However, the effect of multiple drugs on DOAC exposure, and especially the impact of DDIs when concurring with drug–disease interactions as observed in renal impairment, has not been thoroughly elucidated. In order to provide effective and safe anticoagulation with DOACs, understanding the mechanisms and magnitude of DDIs appears relevant. Instead of avoiding drug combinations with DOACs, more DDI trials should be conducted and new strategies such as dose adjustments based on therapeutic drug monitoring should be investigated. However, dose adjustments based on concentration measurements cannot currently be recommended because evidence-based data are missing.

The Effects of Clarithromycin on the Pharmacokinetics of Apixaban in Healthy Volunteers: A Single-Sequence Crossover Study

BACKGROUND

This was an open-label, phase I, nonrandomized, single-sequence, crossover study to evaluate the effect of concomitant administration of multiple doses of clarithromycin on the single-dose exposure, safety, and tolerability of apixaban in healthy subjects.

METHODS

In total, 19 subjects received a single oral dose of apixaban 10 mg on day 1. On day 4, subjects began receiving oral clarithromycin immediate release (IR) 500 mg twice daily (bid) for 4 days. On day 8, subjects received oral apixaban 10 mg and oral clarithromycin IR 500 mg bid. Oral clarithromycin IR 500 mg bid was given alone on days 9 and 10.

RESULTS

Compared with apixaban alone, coadministration of apixaban with clarithromycin resulted in increased apixaban exposure. The adjusted geometric mean ratio (GMR) was 1.299 (90% confidence interval [CI] 1.220-1.384) for peak plasma concentration (C_max), whereas the adjusted GMR for the area under the concentration curve (AUC_(INF)) was 1.595 (90% CI 1.506-1.698). The mean half-life and median time to C_max of apixaban were comparable with and without concomitant administration of clarithromycin. Administration of apixaban and clarithromycin concomitantly did not result in increased adverse events compared with administration of either agent alone. All adverse events were mild in intensity.

CONCLUSIONS

Apixaban C_max and AUC_(INF) increased 30% and 60%, respectively, when multiple doses of clarithromycin were coadministered with apixaban versus administration of apixaban alone. The increase in apixaban C_max and AUC_(INF) with concomitant clarithromycin was less than that which has been observed when apixaban was given with ketoconazole. Administration of apixaban alone and in combination with clarithromycin bid was safe and generally well-tolerated by the healthy adult subjects in this study.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier number NCT02912234.

Ischemic and Thrombotic Events Associated with Concomitant Xa-inhibiting Direct Oral Anticoagulants and Antiepileptic Drugs: Analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS)

INTRODUCTION

Factor Xa-inhibiting direct oral anticoagulants (FXa-DOACs) undergo hepatic metabolism via cytochrome P-450 (CYP450). Concomitant use of rifampicin, an inducer of these enzymes, with FXa-DOACs, has been shown to decrease FXa-DOAC concentrations in healthy subjects. Several common antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are known to induce CYP450 enzymes as well. However, little is known regarding the impact of this potential interaction on treatment outcomes with FXa-DOACs.

METHODS

We analyzed adverse event cases submitted to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) from January 2013 to December 2018. We compared the proportion of cases reporting thromboembolic and ischemic adverse events (TAIAEs) with the concomitant use of FXa-DOACs and enzyme-inducing AEDs to the proportion of cases with FXa-DOACs and other AEDs.

RESULTS

During this period, 9693 adverse event cases reported concomitant use of FXa-DOACs and AEDs. Almost all reports (> 99%) involved the use of rivaroxaban or apixaban. Compared with other AEDs, enzyme-inducing AEDs were associated with an 86% increase in the odds of reporting TAIAEs [reporting odds ratio (ROR) 1.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.61-2.15; p < 0.0001]. In secondary separate analyses of rivaroxaban and apixaban, enzyme-inducing AEDs were similarly associated with increased reporting of a TAIAE (ROR 1.79, 95% CI 1.50-2.12, and ROR 1.88, 95% CI 1.41-2.48, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Using real world data, we observed an increase in the odds of reporting anticoagulation treatment failure among patients treated with FXa-DOACs and concomitant enzyme-inducing AEDs compared to those treated with other AEDs.

The 2018 European Heart Rhythm Association Practical Guide on the use of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation

The current manuscript is the second update of the original Practical Guide, published in 2013 [Heidbuchel et al. European Heart Rhythm Association Practical Guide on the use of new oral anticoagulants in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Europace 2013;15:625-651; Heidbuchel et al. Updated European Heart Rhythm Association Practical Guide on the use of non-vitamin K antagonist anticoagulants in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Europace 2015;17:1467-1507]. Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are an alternative for vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) to prevent stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and have emerged as the preferred choice, particularly in patients newly started on anticoagulation. Both physicians and patients are becoming more accustomed to the use of these drugs in clinical practice. However, many unresolved questions on how to optimally use these agents in specific clinical situations remain. The European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) set out to coordinate a unified way of informing physicians on the use of the different NOACs. A writing group identified 20 topics of concrete clinical scenarios for which practical answers were formulated, based on available evidence. The 20 topics are as follows i.e., (1) Eligibility for NOACs; (2) Practical start-up and follow-up scheme for patients on NOACs; (3) Ensuring adherence to prescribed oral anticoagulant intake; (4) Switching between anticoagulant regimens; (5) Pharmacokinetics and drug-drug interactions of NOACs; (6) NOACs in patients with chronic kidney or advanced liver disease; (7) How to measure the anticoagulant effect of NOACs; (8) NOAC plasma level measurement: rare indications, precautions, and potential pitfalls; (9) How to deal with dosing errors; (10) What to do if there is a (suspected) overdose without bleeding, or a clotting test is indicating a potential risk of bleeding; (11) Management of bleeding under NOAC therapy; (12) Patients undergoing a planned invasive procedure, surgery or ablation; (13) Patients requiring an urgent surgical intervention; (14) Patients with AF and coronary artery disease; (15) Avoiding confusion with NOAC dosing across indications; (16) Cardioversion in a NOAC-treated patient; (17) AF patients presenting with acute stroke while on NOACs; (18) NOACs in special situations; (19) Anticoagulation in AF patients with a malignancy; and (20) Optimizing dose adjustments of VKA. Additional information and downloads of the text and anticoagulation cards in different languages can be found on an EHRA website (www.NOACforAF.eu).