Eczematous Drug Eruptions

Differential diagnosis of contact dermatitis: A practical-approach review by the EADV Task Force on contact dermatitis

The diagnosis of eczema ('dermatitis') is mostly clinical and depends on the clinical history and exploratory objective findings (primary lesions, patterns). Contact dermatitis remains as an important condition in the group of eczematous disorders, with important socioeconomic and occupational relevance. Although irritant and allergic contact dermatitis have a different pathogenesis, both are characterized by a rather typical morphology, are triggered by external factors and tend to occur primarily in the area of contact with the exogenous agent. In addition, allergic and irritant dermatitis may also co-exist. The importance of diagnosing contact dermatitis, especially when allergic in nature, is both due to the possibility of avoiding the trigger, and due to its role in aggravating other skin conditions. Nevertheless, the heterogeneity of clinical presentations in daily practice may pose an important challenge for the suspicion and correct diagnosis of contact dermatitis. Furthermore, other conditions, with different pathogenesis and treatment, may clinically simulate contact dermatitis. The Task Force aims to conduct a review of the unifying clinical features of contact dermatitis and characterize its main clinical phenotypes, and its simulators, in order to contribute to an early suspicion or recognition of contact dermatitis and enable a correct differential diagnosis.

Management of cutaneous adverse events caused by antineoplastic therapies: a single-center experience

INTRODUCTION

Cutaneous adverse events can occur in patients treated with antineoplastic treatments, albeit their incidence has not been defined yet. The clinical presentation of CAEs related to anticancer treatments can vary. The purpose of our study is to characterize skin toxicities during oncological treatments, manage such adverse events to improve patients' quality of life, and ensure therapeutic adherence.

METHODS

We conducted a single-center prospective study which provided the enrollment of all patients referred to the Skin Toxicity Outpatient Clinic for the occurrence of cutaneous adverse events secondary to an ongoing antineoplastic treatment, between July 2021 and June 2023. We analyzed clinical features, and we described our therapeutic approach.

RESULTS

Based on the type of drug assumed, chemotherapy-induced skin toxicity in 24 (38.7%) of the 62 evaluated patients, target therapies in 18 (29.0%), CDK4/6 cyclin inhibitors in 12 (19.4%), and immunotherapy in 6 (9.7%), while skin adverse events secondary to hormone therapy were seen in two patients. The most common cutaneous adverse event in our experience was rosaceiform rash of the face, followed by eczematous rash, hand-foot syndrome, and folliculitis.

CONCLUSION

The present study is aimed at describing the variability and heterogeneity of clinical manifestations of different pharmacological classes used in oncological patients, as well as the different pathogenesis of skin damage. Chemotherapy very frequently causes skin toxicities that are often underestimated by clinicians. Their adequate recognition and optimal treatment lead to total recovery and allow better adhesion to chemotherapy.

Atopic dermatitis in skin of colour. Part 2: considerations in clinical presentation and treatment options

Recent advances in atopic dermatitis (AD) present the condition as a heterogeneous disease of distinct endotypes across ethnic groups. AD in people with skin of colour may appear psoriasiform, lichenoid, scaly or papular, with a violaceous colour and there is a higher prevalence of post-inflammatory dyspigmentation compared with affected individuals of White ethnicity. These differences in clinical presentation may limit the use of AD assessment tools in people with skin of colour, leading to the potential for misdiagnosis and underestimation of severity, particularly in relation to assessment of erythema. Recent targeted therapies for AD have been studied in multiple ethnic groups; however, ethnicity-based subgroup analysis is often not performed. Further research is required to understand whether treatment responses or safety may differ among ethnic groups.

Author reply to: Comment on: 'Eczematous drug eruption in patients with psoriasis under anti-interleukin-17A: does interleukin-22 play a key role?'

Eczematous drug eruption during biological treatments represents novel and difficult-to-manage reactions, with a still unexplained pathogenesis

In patients treated with IL-17 inhibitors for psoriasis, eczematous drug eruptions skin lesions mainly express Th2/Th22 features, with a central role played by IL-22.

Treatment of paradoxical eczematous eruption in psoriasis treated with secukinumab: A case report

RATIONALE

Eczematous eruption is an increasingly recognized form of drug-related eruption, typically reported in association with interleukin 17 (IL-17)A inhibitors. However, severe paradoxical eczematous eruption due to IL-17A inhibitors has been rarely reported. Herein, we reported a case of a man with severe psoriasis with erythematous scaly plaques on the scalp, trunk, and arms and legs after the administration of secukinumab was initiated.

PATIENT CONCERNS

We reported a case of a 20-year-old man with severe psoriasis with erythematous scaly plaques on the scalp, trunk, and arms and legs after the administration of secukinumab was initiated. A skin biopsy was performed. It revealed spongiotic dermatitis consistent with eczematous reaction. Direct and indirect immunofluorescence assays were negative.

DIAGNOSES

He was diagnosed with eczematous eruption.

INTERVENTIONS

Discontinuation of secukinumab and administration of cyclosporine and prednisone were considered.

OUTCOMES

Significant improvement was observed, with no adverse events.

CONCLUSION

Our case shows that eczematous eruption can paradoxically occur in patients on IL-17A inhibitors and this report is expected to increase awareness of the rising number of cutaneous eruptions related to biological agents.

Eczematous drug eruption in patients with psoriasis under anti-interleukin-17A: does interleukin-22 play a key role?

BACKGROUND

Eczematous drug eruption (EDE) is a spongiotic skin reaction in response to systemic medications. To date, EDE has been described in patients treated with anti-interleukin (IL)-17A monoclonal antibodies with a prevalence of 2.2%-12.1%.

AIM

To describe the clinical and histological features and the skin cytokine milieu in patients with EDE induced by anti-IL-17A biologics.

METHODS

This was a prospective study, enrolling patients with psoriasis who developed EDE during treatment with two anti-IL-17 biologics, ixekizumab and secukinumab, from June 2019 to April 2021. Skin biopsies were taken from all patients: a 5-mm lesional biopsy (LB) and a 3-mm nonlesional biopsy (NLB). The LB sample was split into two parts, one for histological examination and the other for cytokine profile evaluation.

RESULTS

During the study period, treatment with an anti-IL-17A drug was given to 289 patients of whom 8 (2.8%) developed EDE during the treatment. Histopathological evaluation suggested a diagnosis of spongiotic dermatitis in all eight patients. Cytokine gene expression showed a predominance of T helper (Th)2/Th22 cytokines in EDE lesions with a large increase in IL-4, IL-22 and S100A7 levels in both LB and NLB samples compared with healthy skin. IL-4, IL-22 and S100A7 were significantly higher in LB compared with NLB samples. IL-26 levels were also significantly increased in both LB and NLB compared with healthy skin, whereas low levels of IL-23A were found in both LB and NLB.

CONCLUSION

Eczematous drug eruption skin lesions have mainly Th2/Th22 features, with IL-22 playing a major role in their pathogenesis. EDE seems to be the result of an imbalance towards a Th2/Th22 response, secondary to the blockade of IL-17A activity.

Pompholyx as a side effect of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg)

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) is increasingly used across multiple specialties for the treatment of inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. Cutaneous reactions to IVIg are generally minor. Pompholyx is a common eruption of small vesicles on the palms, soles, and/or lateral aspects of the fingers. It has a multifactorial aetiology but is rarely attributed to being a drug-related side effect. We describe a 43-year-old woman presenting with peripheral sensory neuropathy who developed pompholyx eczema on both palms following treatment with IVIg.

Exanthematous Drug Eruption to Intravenous Iron: A Case Report

The authors present a rare case of an exanthematous drug reaction to intravenous iron. Exanthematous drug eruptions, also called morbilliform or maculopapular drug rashes, can occur in first-time drug exposures and represent a subtype of delayed-type IV hypersensitivity reactions. 

This patient is a 49-year-old female with a history of iron deficiency anemia and hypothyroidism who presented to the emergency department after experiencing a diffuse whole-body maculopapular rash following ferumoxytol 510 mg intravenously received once two days prior to her presentation. A clinical examination was suspicious of an exanthematous drug eruption. The patient was treated with methylprednisolone 40 mg intravenously twice a day for three days, followed by prednisone 40 mg orally twice a day for two days with a steroid taper upon discharge. The patient’s rash resolved within five days of steroid treatment.

There is a high global prevalence of iron deficiency anemia for which intravenous iron replacement may be required. However, there is limited research addressing its adverse effects, particularly those that include delayed hypersensitivity reactions. This paper aims to alert healthcare professionals of a rare type of delayed hypersensitivity reaction to intravenous iron to better guide management in the clinical setting.