Remifentanil Target-Controlled Infusion for Conscious Sedation in Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration (EBUS-TBNA): A Case Series

Remifentanil Target-controlled Infusion Versus Standard of Care for Conscious Sedation During Ultrasound-guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration and Biopsy: A Randomized, Prospective, Control Study

BACKGROUND

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is a minimally invasive procedure that has become an important tool in the diagnosis and staging of mediastinal lymph node lesions in lung cancer. Adequate sedation is an important part of the procedure as it provides patient comfort and potentially increases diagnostic yield. The sedation modality varies among centers and includes moderate sedation/conscious sedation, deep sedation, and general anesthesia. The object of this study will be the evaluation of patient's comfort and level of satisfaction with the involved health care providers (bronchoscopist and anesthesiologist) of remifentanil administration in target-controlled infusion (TCI) for conscious sedation in patients undergoing EBUS‑TBNA, with a prospective randomized study design versus the of standard sedation protocol with midazolam and/or fentanest and/or propofol.

METHODS

This study was carried out at the "Campus Biomedico di Roma" University Hospital between September 2021 and November 2021, with a total number of 30 patients enrolled who met the eligibility criteria, randomly divided into 2 groups: group 1 "REMIFENTANIL TCI" (experimental group) where the patients performed the EBUS-TBNA procedure under conscious sedation with infusion of remifentanil TCI with a target between 3 ng/mL and 6 ng/mL and group 2 "STANDARD" (control group) with patients undergoing conscious sedation with the association of midazolam and/or fentanest and/or propofol in refracted boluses based on clinical needs. Complications, safety, and level of satisfaction of the operator, the anesthesiologist, and the patient were evaluated.

RESULTS

The results show that sedation with remifentanil in TCI can improve the comfort level of patients, reducing the risks associated with the procedure (lower frequency of oversedations and hypotension), allowing for greater intraprocedural safety. Furthermore, the level of satisfaction of the anesthesiologist and that of the operator appears to be significantly higher in the Remifentanil group.

CONCLUSION

The execution of a mild to moderate sedation with Remifentanil in TCI in patients undergoing EBUS is safe, tolerated, and allows to obtain greater intraprocedural comfort. Further studies and larger and more representative samples are obviously needed to confirm and strengthen the validity of a remifentanil TCI-based sedation in endoscopic diagnostics.

Effect-site concentrations of remifentanil for smooth emergence from combined epidural-general anesthesia or general anesthesia in patients using video double-lumen tube: A randomized trial

Objective

The present study aimed to determine the effect-site concentration of remifentanil of 90% (EC90) for smooth emergence in patients with a video DLT (VDLT) under sevoflurane-maintained general anesthesia and to investigate whether the EC90 was affected by epidural anesthesia.

Methods

One hundred and twenty patients who underwent video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) were enrolled. Patients received either general anesthesia combined with epidural anesthesia (PEA group, n = 60) or general anesthesia (GA group, n = 60). The primary outcome was the EC90 for smooth emergence in both groups. The secondary outcomes were intraoperative emergence, smooth emergence, recovery, and hemodynamic profiles in both groups.

Result

The EC90 values for smooth emergence in patients using VDLT were 3.5 ng/ml (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.3-4.4 ng/ml) in the PEA group and 2.7 ng/ml (95% CI, 2.5-3.2 ng/ml) in the GA group. The total amount of remifentanil infusion during emergency was significantly higher in the PEA group (164.6 ± 47.9 μg) than in the GA group (127.1 ± 30.4 μg) (P < 0.001). The number of patients who experienced hypotension during emergency in the PEA group was higher than that in the GA group (46.7% versus 13.3%, P < 0.001).

Conclusion

The EC90 of remifentanil for smooth emergence in patients with VDLT under general anesthesia combined with epidural anesthesia (3.5 ng/ml) was higher than that under general anesthesia (2.7 ng/ml).

Trial registration

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2100054230.

Is endobronchial ultrasound-transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) reliable and safe procedure in geriatric patients?

BACKGROUND

Even though studies have indicated the usefulness and safety of endobronchial ultrasound-transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA), elderly patient data are limited due to the small sample sizes.

AIM

We aimed to evaluate usage and safety of EBUS-TBNA in elderly population.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective study was conducted with patients who underwent an EBUS-TBNA procedure between September 2011 and December 2019. The patients were categorized into two groups: those aged 65 years or older (elderly group) and those younger than 65 years (younger group).

RESULTS

2444 patient data, 1069 of which were in the elderly group, were analyzed. The cytological examination of EBUS-TBNA identified specimen adequacy in 96.8% of patients. One hundred and thirty patients (5.3%) experienced complications, with similar complication rates recorded in both the elderly and younger groups (5.4% vs 5.2%, p: 0.836). Logistic regression analyses revealed that age, and presence of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease and malignancy are associated significantly with complication-related EBUS-TBNA. For the lymph nodes with a final diagnosis of malignancy, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of EBUS-TBNA revealed a diagnostic performance in excess of 90% except for metastasis and lymphoma.

CONCLUSION

EBUS-TBNA can be considered a safe and effective technique in patients aged 65 years and over.