Effectiveness of Simvastatin Versus Gemfibrozil for Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Events: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 223,699 Primary Care Patients

Comparative Effectiveness of Anti-Hyperlipidemic Drugs Monotherapy in Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease

Purpose

Anti-hyperlipidemic drug treatments are effective in reducing the risk of cardiovascular disease. In a long-term retrospective inception cohort study, we aimed to assess the real-world comparative effectiveness of anti-hyperlipidemic monotherapies for primary prevention of cardiovascular events.

Patients and Methods

Patients aged 18 years and older, who initiated primary prevention with anti-hyperlipidemic monotherapy, were selected from the University of Groningen IADB.nl dispensing database. In intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis we included all patients, whereas in per-protocol (PP) analysis we included both all patients independent of adherence (PPIA) and adherent patients (PPA). Study outcome was the time to first prescription of acute cardiac drug therapy measured by valid drug proxies to identify a first major cardiovascular event. We applied inverse probability of treatment-weighted (IPTW) analysis using Cox regression and time-varying Cox regression with simvastatin as the reference category to estimate the average treatment effect hazard ratios (HR) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Results

Atorvastatin users had significantly higher hazards compared to simvastatin users (HR range: 1.27 to 1.47, 95% CI: 1.15 to 1.69). Similarly, Pravastatin users also exhibited increased hazards compared to simvastatin users (HR range: 1.41 to 1.56, 95% CI: 1.14 to 2.04). Similar patterns were observed in patients with diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, and asthma/COPD. No differences were found in the hazards of rosuvastatin, fluvastatin, fibrates, and simvastatin.

Conclusion

Atorvastatin and pravastatin users had higher long-term rates of cardiovascular events compared to simvastatin monotherapy in primary prevention, the difference may be attributed to the confounding by severity, but also possibly due to differences in drug mechanisms or patient response. These findings could influence current guideline recommendations, suggesting a potential preference for simvastatin in primary prevention, underscoring the need for further research to explore long-term impacts and underlying mechanisms, especially in diverse populations.

Fenofibrate's impact on cardiovascular risk in patients with diabetes: a nationwide propensity-score matched cohort study

BACKGROUND

The beneficial effects of fenofibrate on atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) outcomes in patients with diabetes and statin treatment are unclear. We investigated the effects of fenofibrate on all-cause mortality and ASCVD in patients with diabetes, high triglyceride (TG) levels and statin treatment.

METHODS

We performed a nationwide propensity-score matched (1:1) cohort study using data from the National Health Information Database in the Republic of Korea from 2010 to 2017. The study included 110,723 individuals with diabetes, TG levels ≥ 150 mg/dL, and no prior diagnoses of ASCVD who used statins and fenofibrate, and an equal matched number of similar patients who used statins alone (control group). The study outcomes included newly diagnosed myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, both (MI and/or stroke), and all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

Over a mean 4.03-year follow-up period, the hazard ratios (HR) for outcomes in the fenofibrate group in comparison to the control group were 0.878 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.827-0.933] for MI, 0.901 (95% CI 0.848-0.957) for stroke, 0.897 (95% CI 0.858-0.937) for MI and/or stroke, and 0.716 (95% CI 0.685-0.749) for all-cause death. These beneficial effects of fenofibrate were consistent in the subgroup with TG 150-199 mg/dL but differed according to low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels.

CONCLUSION

In this nationwide propensity-score matched cohort study involving individuals with diabetes and TG ≥ 150 mg/dL, the risk of all-cause death and ASCVD was significantly lower with fenofibrate use in conjunction with statin treatment compared to statin treatment alone. However, this finding was significant only in individuals with relatively high LDL-C levels.

Effects of Hyperlipidemia on Osseointegration of Dental Implants and Its Strategies

Hyperlipidemia refers to the abnormal increase in plasma lipid level exceeding the normal range. At present, a large number of patients require dental implantation. However, hyperlipidemia affects bone metabolism, promotes bone loss, and inhibits the osseointegration of dental implants through the mutual regulation of adipocytes, osteoblasts, and osteoclasts. This review summarized the effects of hyperlipidemia on dental implants and addressed the potential strategies of dental implants to promote osseointegration in a hyperlipidemic environment and to improve the success rate of dental implants in patients with hyperlipidemia. We summarized topical drug delivery methods to solve the interference of hyperlipidemia in osseointegration, which were local drug injection, implant surface modification and bone-grafting material modification. Statins are the most effective drugs in the treatment of hyperlipidemia, and they also encourage bone formation. Statins have been used in these three methods and have been found to be positive in promoting osseointegration. Directly coating simvastatin on the rough surface of the implant can effectively promote osseointegration of the implant in a hyperlipidemic environment. However, the delivery method of this drug is not efficient. Recently, a variety of efficient methods of simvastatin delivery, such as hydrogels and nanoparticles, have been developed to boost bone formation, but few of them were applied to dental implants. Applicating these drug delivery systems using the three aforementioned ways, according to the mechanical and biological properties of materials, could be promising ways to promote osseointegration under hyperlipidemic conditions. However, more research is needed to confirm.

Population-Based Clinical Studies Using Routinely Collected Data in Hong Kong, China: A Systematic Review of Trends and Established Local Practices

Background: Routinely collected health data are increasingly used in clinical research. No study has systematically reviewed the temporal trends in the number of publications and analyzed different aspects of local research practices and their variations in Hong Kong, China, with a specific focus on research ethics governance and approval.

Methods: PubMed was systematically searched from its inception to March 28, 2023, for studies using routinely collected healthcare data from Hong Kong.

Results: A total of 454 studies were included. Between 2000 and 2009, 32 studies were identified. The number of publications increased from 5 to 120 between 2010 and 2022. Of the investigator-led studies using the Hospital Authority (HA)’s cross-cluster data (n = 393), 327 (83.2%) reported receiving ethics approval from a single cluster/university-based REC, whereas 50 studies (12.7%) did not report approval from a REC. For use of the HA Data Collaboration Lab, approval by a single hospital-based or University-based REC is accepted. Repeated submission of identical ethics applications to different RECs is estimated to cost HK$4.2 million yearly.

Conclusions: Most studies reported gaining approval from a single cluster REC before retrieval of cross-cluster HA data. Substantial cost savings would result if repeated review of identical ethics applications were not required.