Population Pharmacokinetics and Optimal Sampling Strategy for Model-Based Precision Dosing of Melphalan in Patients Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Melphalan 140 mg/m2 is Safe and Effective for Frail and Older Multiple Myeloma Patients With Comparable Rates of Minimal Residual Disease Negativity

BACKGROUND

Despite therapeutic advances, multiple myeloma (MM) remains challenging to treat effectively. High-dose melphalan (Mel200) with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is the standard treatment for transplant-eligible patients. Reduced-dose melphalan (Mel140) is an alternative for older or frail patients, yet its efficacy data remain unclear.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 233 MM patients undergoing first ASCT between 2014 and 2022, comparing outcomes between Mel140 (n = 82) and Mel200 (n = 151). We assessed patient demographics, disease characteristics, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). In an exploratory subset analysis achievement of MRD from bone marrow samples after ASCT was compared between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

As expected, patients who received Mel 140 were significantly older with a higher KPS. Median follow-up was 47.7 months. Both groups had similar rates of readmissions and infections within the first 100 days after transplant despite Mel140 group being older with more comorbidities. No significant difference in PFS or OS was observed between Mel140 and Mel200 groups (P > .05). MRD negativity rates at sensitivity levels of 10-5 and 10-6 were comparable (64% vs. 60%, P = .7). Patients achieving sustained MRD negativity demonstrated improved PFS regardless of melphalan dose.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest equivalent efficacy and safety profiles between Mel140 and Mel200, supporting Mel140 as a viable option for older or frail MM patients. In a subset analysis equivalent rates of MRD were achieved between the groups and remained a highly significant predictor of PFS, highlighting its relevance regardless of dosing strategies.

Optimizing high dose melphalan

Melphalan, has been a major component of myeloma therapy since the 1950s. In the context of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), high dose melphalan (HDM) is the most common conditioning regimen used due to its potent anti-myeloma effects and manageable toxicities. Common toxicities associated with HDM include myelosuppression, gastrointestinal issues, and mucositis. Established approaches to reduce these toxicities encompass dose modification, nausea prophylaxis with 5HT3 receptor antagonists, cryotherapy, amifostine use, and growth factors. Optimization of melphalan exposure through personalized dosing and its combination with other agents like busulfan, or bendamustine show promise. Propylene glycol-free melphalan (Evomela) represents a novel formulation aiming to enhance drug stability and reduce adverse effects. This review explores strategies to enhance the efficacy and mitigate the toxicity of HDM in multiple myeloma. Future directions involve exploring these strategies in clinical trials to improve the safety and efficacy of HDM, thereby enhancing outcomes for multiple myeloma patients undergoing autologous HCT.

A rapid and sensitive LC-MS/MS method for simultaneous determination of melphalan and its monohydroxy and dihydroxy metabolites in human plasma

As a hydrolysis mediated drug in vivo, the pharmacokinetics of melphalan are highly variable in patients. Few methodologies could simultaneously measure the concentrations of melphalan and its hydrolyzed metabolites in plasma. The aim of this study was to develop a simple, rapid and sensitive liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method for simultaneous determination of melphalan and its hydrolyzed metabolites, monohydroxy melphalan (MOH melphalan) and dihydroxy melphalan (DOH melphalan). A simple protein precipitation was employed for sample preparation and melphalan-d8 was used as internal standard. Baseline separation of target analytes was achieved using an XSelect HSS T3 column (2.1 × 50 mm, 5 µm) with a gradient elution at a flow rate of 0.5 mL/min in 5 min. The monitored transitions were m/z 305.1 → 287.7 for melphalan, m/z 287.1 → 228.0 for MOH melphalan, m/z 269.3 → 251.8 for DOH melphalan, and m/z 313.1 → 295.7 for melphalan-d8. The method was fully validated in accordance with the FDA guideline. The calibration curves were established over the range of 5.22-5220 ng/mL for melphalan, 7.94-1588 ng/mL for MOH-melphalan, and 15.0-3000 ng/mL for DOH-melphalan with the regression coefficients greater than 0.99. The intra- and inter-day coefficients of variation for the analytes were ≤11.0% and all the biases were less than 8.3%. The method has been successfully applied to the quantification of melphalan and its metabolites in clinical plasma samples obtained from hematopoietic stem cell transplantation patients who received a dose of melphalan for pre-transplant conditioning.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Melphalan in a Large Cohort of Autologous and Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Recipients: Towards Individualized Dosing Regimens

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

High-dose melphalan is an integral part of conditioning chemotherapy prior to both autologous and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. While underexposure may lead to relapse, overexposure may lead to toxicities include mucositis, diarrhea, bone marrow suppression, and rarely sinusoidal obstruction syndrome. In this study, we describe the population pharmacokinetics of high-dose melphalan as a first step towards individualized dosing.

METHODS

Melphalan samples were collected in patients receiving an allogeneic or autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation between August 2016 and August 2020 at the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. A population-pharmacokinetic model was developed using NONMEM.

RESULTS

Based on a total of 3418 samples from 452 patients receiving a median cumulative dose of 140 mg/m2, a two-compartment population-pharmacokinetic model was developed. Fat-free mass was a covariate for clearance, central volume of distribution, and inter-compartmental clearance, while glomerular filtration rate predicted clearance. Simulation studies showed that based on fixed body surface area-based dosing, renal impairment has a higher impact in increasing melphalan exposure compared with obesity.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed model adequately describes the population pharmacokinetics of melphalan in adult patients receiving a hematopoietic cell transplantation. This model can be used to define the therapeutic window of melphalan, and subsequently to develop individualized dosing regimens aiming for that therapeutic window in all patients.

Test-dose pharmacokinetics guided melphalan dose adjustment in reduced intensity conditioning allogeneic transplant for non-malignant disorders

AIMS

We studied melphalan pharmacokinetics (PK) and feasibility of melphalan full-dose adjustment based on test-dose PK in children and young adults with non-malignant disorders (NMD) undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) using reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) containing alemtuzumab, fludarabine and melphalan.

METHODS

Patients received test-dose melphalan (10% of planned full-dose) prior to conditioning. Blood samples for PK were obtained around test and full-dose melphalan (140 mg/m² or 4.7 mg/kg in patients <10 kg). Melphalan concentration was measured by liquid chromatography electrospray ionization tandem mass-spectrometry assay and data were analysed using a population-PK model and Bayesian estimation. Test and full-dose melphalan clearance estimates were evaluated by pairwise Wilcoxon test and Bland-Altman plot.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients undergoing 25 transplants were included in the final analysis. Patients received standard full-dose melphalan in 17 transplants, with median area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of 5.5 mg*h/L (range, 3.0-9.5 mg*h/L). Patients received test-dose melphalan in 23 transplants with a test-dose PK predicted full-dose AUC range of 2.9-16.8 mg*h/L. In seven transplants where patients had baseline organ impairment, test-dose PK predicted higher exposure for standard full-dose (median AUC 13.8 mg*h/L). Melphalan full-dose was adjusted in these patients, with achievement of desired target AUC (3.6-5.4 mg*h/L) and no excess toxicity. Mean ratio of test-dose clearance to full-dose clearance was 1.03. Twenty of 22 patients (91%) were within the 95% confidence intervals of the clearance ratio.

CONCLUSION

Melphalan test-dose PK reliably predicts full-dose PK and allows for accurate adjustment of full-dose melphalan in RIC-HCT for NMD. This approach can avoid excess toxicity from increased systemic exposure, especially in patients with organ impairment.

Development of a method for clinical pharmacokinetic testing to allow for targeted Melphalan dosing in multiple myeloma patients undergoing autologous transplant

AIMS

High dose melphalan (HDM) and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) is standard of care for multiple myeloma (MM), but there is significant variability in melphalan exposure (area under the plasma drug concentration-time curve, AUC) when using body surface area-based dosing. Our aim was to establish a method of pharmacokinetic (PK) testing for real-time melphalan dose adjustments.

METHODS

We performed a prospective PK study of melphalan 140 or 200 mg/m2 in MM patients undergoing ASCT. Twenty MM patients were administered HDM on days -2 and - 1, with PK sampling at 8-10 time points. PK testing was performed on day -2 in all patients, and on day -1 in 5 patients.

RESULTS

Less than 20% interpatient variation in the day -2 and - 1 AUC was observed. The day -2 range in AUC (4.95-11.28 mg h/L) confirmed significant interpatient variability. The hypothetical total dose ranged from 133-302 mg/m2 to achieve the total median AUC. A 4-time point AUC (0, 30, 150 and 240 min) highly correlated with the AUC from the 8-time point schedule. A higher AUC correlated with increased risk of febrile neutropenia (P = .05).

CONCLUSION

Here we outline the methods to establish novel melphalan dosing using PK testing in MM patients undergoing ASCT to target a desired melphalan AUC.

Predictors of increased melphalan exposure correlate with overall survival, nonrelapse mortality, and toxicities in patients undergoing reduced-intensity allogeneic stem cell transplantation with fludarabine and melphalan

The reduced-intensity conditioning regimen, fludarabine and melphalan 140 mg/m² (FM140), is widely adopted in practice. Pharmacokinetic studies report 10-fold interpatient variability in melphalan exposure. We identified low hemoglobin (Hb) and/or creatinine clearance (CrCl), determinants of melphalan pharmacokinetic, as strong predictors of outcomes after high-dose melphalan and autologous transplant. We hypothesized that these variables could predict for outcomes after FM140. Overall survival was shorter in patients with a lower Hb (113 vs. 2536 days; p = 0.004), due to an increased rate of nonrelapse mortality (NRM) (p = 0.0005). Overall survival was also worse in patients with lower CrCl (75 vs. 317 days; p = 0.003), with a significantly worse nonrelapse mortality (p = 0.0023). In a multivariate analysis, a higher Hb and CrCl predicted for better overall survival (p = 0.017). In patients with a lower Hb, the median duration of hospitalization (p = 0.02) and the mean duration of diarrhea (p = 0.008) were longer. In patients with a lower CrCl, the median duration of hospitalization (p = 0.06) and the mean duration of diarrhea (p = 0.0009) longer, and the rate of infection was higher (p = 0.02). We show for the first time that Hb and CrCl represent important determinants of outcomes after FM140, suggesting that pharmacokinetic-directed dosing may be beneficial in achieving optimal outcomes.

Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy of Generic Melphalan Is Comparable to Innovator Formulation in Patients With Multiple Myeloma Undergoing Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation

BACKGROUND

High-dose melphalan (MEL) is the standard conditioning regimen used for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Generic MEL is routinely used in various transplant centers across the world including ours due to its reduced cost and ease of availability. We compared the pharmacokinetics (PK) and the clinical efficacy of generic MEL with that of the innovator formulation in MM patients undergoing ASCT.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sixty-three patients diagnosed with MM receiving high-dose MEL were included in this study. MEL levels in plasma were measured using a liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC/MS-MS) protocol and non-linear mixed effects modeling was used to evaluate the PK of the data.

RESULTS

The interindividual variability (IIV) in MEL area under the concentration versus time curve (AUC) and clearance (CL) were 4.39, 5.88-fold for generic, and 4.34, 6.85-fold for the innovator formulation, respectively. The median MEL AUC and CL were comparable between the 2 formulations. The population PK analysis showed age and creatinine CL as the only significant covariates explaining IIV in MEL AUC/CL. Analysis of MEL PK parameters with clinical outcome showed no significant differences in terms of onset and severity of mucositis, day to neutrophil and platelet engraftment, as well as response status on day 100 post ASCT between patients receiving generic or innovator formulations of MEL. In addition, neither MEL AUC nor CL was found to be associated with day +100 response.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that the PK and efficacy of the generic MEL is comparable to the innovator formulation.

Pretransplant hemoglobin and creatinine clearance correlate with treatment-free survival after autologous stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma

Melphalan is given at a dose of 200 mg/m² (Mel200) prior to ASCT for multiple myeloma (MM). Pharmacokinetic (PK) studies show a high degree of interpatient variability. We aimed to test the impact of clinical factors previously shown to affect melphalan PK such as hemoglobin (Hgb), fat-free mass (FFM), and creatinine clearance (CrCl) on outcomes. Median Hgb (from day -2 to -1) and FFM were grouped as low or high relative to their sample medians, and CrCl was divided into ≥60 or <60 ml/min. In 133 MM patients, median TFS (defined as time from ASCT to initiation of next subsequent line of therapy or death) was longer in patients with lower Hgb (35 vs. 16 months, p = 0.02). Patients with both lower Hgb and CrCl experienced longer TFS compared to those with higher Hgb and CrCl (35 vs. 13 months, p = 0.03). In multivariate analysis, lower hemoglobin, lower CrCl, and a combined low hemoglobin and CrCl were strongly associated with improved TFS. Patients with a lower hemoglobin or creatinine clearance experienced significantly more toxicity. We show for the first time that Hgb and CrCl are important predictors of outcomes after Mel200. PK-directed melphalan dosing may be beneficial in achieving optimal outcomes.

Determination of melphalan in human plasma by UPLC-UV method

It is desirable to develop a fast method for quantification of melphalan due to its instability. Here we report a method for quantification of melphalan (MPL) in human plasma using a UPLC-PDA system. Briefly, 50 µL plasma sample was mixed with 25 µL internal standard (2500 ng/mL acetylmelphalan in methanol) and 25 µL 20% trichloroacetic acid, and centrifuged at 21,000 g (15,000 rpm) at 4 °C for 3 min. The supernatant (5 µL) was injected onto an Acquity™ BEH C18 LC column (2.1 × 50 mm, 1.7 µm) and eluted with 25 mM NH₄AC (pH 4.7)-acetonitrile in a gradient mode at a flow rate of 0.6 mL/min. The column kept at 40 ± 5 °C and the autosampler kept at 4 ± 5 °C. The detector set at 261 nm, and sampling rate was 40points/sec. The retention times were typically 2.11 min for melphalan and 2.38 min for the internal standard. Total run time is 4 min per sample. Calibration range was 100-40,000 ng/mL. The lower limit of quantification was 100 ng/mL. The method was validated based on the FDA guidelines, and applied to a clinical pharmacokinetic study in pediatric patients.

Emerging roles for clinical pharmacometrics in cancer precision medicine

Purpose of review

Although significant progress has been made in cancer research, there exist unmet needs in patient care as reflected by the 'Cancer Moonshot' goals. This review appreciates the potential utility of quantitative pharmacology in cancer precision medicine.

Recent findings

Precision oncology has received federal funding largely due to 'The Precision Medicine Initiative'. Precision medicine takes into account the inter-individual variability, and allows for tailoring the right medication or the right dose of drug to the best subpopulation of patients who will likely respond to the intervention, thus enhancing therapeutic success and reducing "financial toxicity" to patients, families and caregivers. The National Cancer Institute (NCI) committed US$ 70 million from its fiscal year 2016 budget to advance precision oncology research. Through the 'Critical Path Initiative', pharmacometrics has gained an important role in drug development; however, it is yet to find widespread clinical applicability.

Summary

Stakeholders including clinicians and pharmacometricians need to work in concert to ensure that benefits of model-based approaches are harnessed to personalize cancer care to the individual needs of the patient via better dosing strategies, companion diagnostics, and predictive biomarkers. In medical oncology, where immediate patient care is the clinician's primary concern, pharmacometric approaches can be tailored to build models that rely on patient data already digitally available in the Electronic Health Record (EHR) to facilitate quick collaboration and avoid additional funding needs. Taken together, we offer a roadmap for the future of precision oncology which is fraught with both challenges and opportunities for pharmacometricians and clinicians alike.