Drug-Drug Interaction Profile of the Fixed-Dose Combination Tablet Regimen Ledipasvir/Sofosbuvir

Mechanisms and Clinical Significance of Pharmacokinetic Drug Interactions Mediated by FDA and EMA-approved Hepatitis C Direct-Acting Antiviral Agents

The treatment of patients infected with the hepatitis C virus (HCV) has been revolutionised by the development of direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) that target specific HCV proteins involved in viral replication. The first DAAs were associated with clinical problems such as adverse drug reactions and pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions (DDIs). Current FDA/EMA-approved treatments are combinations of DAAs that simultaneously target the HCV N5A-protein, the HCV N5B-polymerase and the HCV NS3/4A-protease. Adverse events and DDIs are less likely with these DAA combinations but several DDIs of potential clinical significance remain. Much of the available information on the interaction of DAAs with CYP drug-metabolising enzymes and influx and efflux transporters is contained in regulatory summaries and is focused on DDIs of likely clinical importance. Important DDIs perpetrated by current DAAs include increases in the pharmacokinetic exposure to statins and dabigatran. Some mechanistic information can be deduced. Although the free concentrations of DAAs in serum are very low, a number of these DDIs are likely mediated by the inhibition of systemic influx transporters, especially OATP1B1/1B3. Other DDIs may arise by DAA-mediated inhibition of intestinal efflux transporters, which increases the systemic concentrations of some coadministered drugs. Conversely, DAAs are victims of DDIs mediated by cyclosporin, ketoconazole, omeprazole and HIV antiretroviral drug combinations, especially when boosted by ritonavir and, to a lesser extent, cobicistat. In addition, concurrent administration of inducers, such as rifampicin, carbamazepine and efavirenz, decreases exposure to some DAAs. Drug-drug interactions that increase the accumulation of HCV N3/4A-protease inhibitors like grazoprevir may exacerbate hepatic injury in HCV patients.

Statins Increase the Bioavailability of Fixed-Dose Combination of Sofosbuvir/Ledipasvir by Inhibition of P-glycoprotein

BACKGROUND

Coadministration of statins and direct acting antiviral agents is frequently used. This study explored the effects of both atorvastatin and lovastatin on pharmacokinetics of a fixed-dose combination of sofosbuvir/ledipasvir "FDCSL".

METHODS

12 healthy volunteers participated in a randomized, three-phase crossover trial and were administered a single atorvastatin dose 80 mg plus tablet containing 400/90 mg FDCSL, a single lovastatin dose 40 mg plus tablet containing 400/90 mg FDCSL, or tablets containing 400/90 mg FDCSL alone. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry was used to analyze plasma samples of sofosbuvir, ledipasvir and sofosbuvir metabolite "GS-331007" and their pharmacokinetic parameters were determined.

RESULTS

Atorvastatin caused a significant rise in sofosbuvir bioavailability as explained by increasing in AUC0-∞ and Cmax by 34.36% and 11.97%, respectively. In addition, AUC0-∞ and Cmax of GS-331007 were increased by 73.73% and 67.86%, respectively after atorvastatin intake. Similarly, co-administration of lovastatin with FDCSL increased the bioavailability of sofosbuvir, its metabolite (AUC0-∞ increase by 17.2%, 17.38%, respectively, and Cmax increase by 12.03%, 22.24%, respectively). However, neither atorvastatin nor lovastatin showed a change in ledipasvir bioavailability. Hepatic elimination was not affected after statin intake with FDCSL. Compared to lovastatin, atorvastatin showed significant increase in AUC0-∞ and Cmax of both sofosbuvir and its metabolite.

CONCLUSIONS

Both atorvastatin and lovastatin increased AUC of sofosbuvir and its metabolite after concurrent administration with FDCSL. Statins' P-glycoprotein inhibition is the attributed mechanism of interaction. The increase in sofosbuvir bioavailability was more pronounced after atorvastatin intake. Close monitoring is needed after co-administration of atorvastatin and FDCSL.

Drug-Drug Interactions of Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs): From Pharmacological to Clinical Practice

The direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban, are becoming the most commonly prescribed drugs for preventing ischemic stroke in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and for the treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Rivaroxaban was also recently approved for the treatment of patients with a recent acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Their use demonstrated to have a favorable risk-benefit profile, with significant reductions in stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, and mortality compared to warfarin, but with increased gastrointestinal bleeding. Nevertheless, their safety profile is compromised in multimorbidity patients requiring contemporary administration of several drugs. Comorbidity and polypharmacy have a high prevalence in elderly patients, who are also more susceptible to bleeding events. The combination of multiple treatments can cause relevant drug–drug interactions (DDIs) by affecting the exposure or the pharmacological activities of DOACs. Although important differences of the pharmacokinetic (PK) properties can be observed between DOACs, all of them are substrate of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and thus may interact with strong inducers or inhibitors of this drug transporter. On the contrary, rivaroxaban and, to a lower extent, apixaban, are also susceptible to drugs altering the cytochrome P450 isoenzyme (CYP) activities. In the present review, we summarize the potential DDI of DOACs with several classes of drugs that have been reported or have characteristics that may predict clinically significant DDIs when administered together with DOACs. Possible strategies, including dosage reduction, avoiding concomitant administration, or different time of treatment, will be also discussed to reduce the incidence of DDI with DOACs. Considering the available data from specific clinical trials or registries analysis, the use of DOACs is associated with fewer clinically relevant DDIs than warfarin, and their use represents an acceptable clinical choice. Nevertheless, DDIs can be significant in certain patient conditions so a careful evaluation should be made before prescribing a specific DOAC.

An evaluation of ledipasvir + sofosbuvir for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C infection

Introduction: Hepatitis C (HCV) is viral disease with a global impact. Over the last 10 years, the treatment of this disease has evolved. Treatment guidelines have evolved to adopt new medications for HCV. These drugs have shown efficacy over 90% throughout the class as well as a better safety profile than the previous recommended pharmacotherapy. Dual-therapy DAAs emerged with FDA approval of Ledipasvir/Sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) in 2014.Areas Covered: LDV/SOF is a dual-therapy option for chronic HCV patients (>6 months of infection) in select genotypes. This article reviews the studies relevant to the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic properties of these drugs as well as its trials leading to approval.Expert opinion: LDV/SOF is included in the AASLD/IDSA guidelines for the treatment of HCV genotypes 1a and 1b with or without cirrhosis and genotype 4 without cirrhosis with an evidence and recommendation rating of IA. Genotype 4 with cirrhosis and genotypes 5 and 6 carry a Class IIa level B recommendation. The combination is not FDA approved for genotypes 2 and 3. Single-pill regimens, like LDV/SOF, are important to maintain the quality of life of children and other special populations infected with HCV by shortening treatment regimens, avoiding complex pill regimens, and eliminating injection therapies.

Cocrystal of Apixaban-Quercetin: Improving Solubility and Bioavailability of Drug Combination of Two Poorly Soluble Drugs

Drug combinations have been the hotspot of the pharmaceutical industry, but the promising applications are limited by the unmet solubility and low bioavailability. In this work, novel cocrystals, consisting of two antithrombotic drugs with poor solubility and low bioavailability in vivo, namely, apixaban (Apx) and quercetin (Que), were developed to discover a potential method to improve the poor solubility and internal absorption of the drug combination. Compared with Apx, the dissolution behavior of Apx–Que (1:1) and Apx–Que–2ACN (1:1:2) was enhanced significantly, while the physical mixture of the chemicals failed to exhibit the advantages. The dissolution improvements of Apx–Que–2ACN could be explained by the fact that the solid dispersion-like structure and column-shaped cage of Que accelerated the access of the solvent to the inner layer of Apx. The fracture of the hydrogen bonds of Apx, which was the joint of the adjacent Que chains, facilitated the break-up of the structures. Besides, the bioavailability of Apx–Que was increased compared with the physical mixture and Apx, and Apx–Que remained stable in high temperature and illumination conditions. Therefore, a drug–drug cocrystal of two antithrombotic agents with poor solubility was developed, which exhibited greatly improved solubility, bioavailability and superior stability, indicating a novel method to overcome the shortages of drug combination.

Pharmacokinetic interaction between atorvastatin and fixed-dose combination of sofosbuvir/ledipasvir in healthy male Egyptian volunteers

PURPOSE

Comorbid conditions of heart and liver disorders added to HCV-induced hepatic steatosis make co-administration of statins, and direct-acting antivirals is common in clinical practice. This study aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetic interaction of atorvastatin and fixed-dose combination of sofosbuvir/ledipasvir "FDCSL" with rationalization to the underlying mechanism.

METHODS

A randomized, three-phase crossover study that involves 12 healthy volunteers was performed. Participants received a single-dose of atorvastatin 80 mg alone, atorvastatin 80-mg plus tablets containing 400/90 mg FDCSL, or tablets containing 400/90 mg FDCSL alone. Plasma samples were analyzed using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) for atorvastatin, sofosbuvir, ledipasvir, and sofosbuvir metabolite "GS-331007," and their pharmacokinetics parameters were determined.

RESULTS

Compared to atorvastatin alone, the administration of FDCSL caused a significant increase in both areas under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC_0-∞) and maximum plasma concentration (C_max) of atorvastatin by 65.5% and 156.0%, respectively. Also, atorvastatin caused a significant increase in the AUC_0-∞ and C_max of sofosbuvir by 32.0% and 11.0%, respectively. Similarly, AUC_0-∞ and C_max of sofosbuvir metabolite significantly increased by 84.0% and 74.0%, respectively. However, ledipasvir AUC_0-∞ showed no significant change after atorvastatin intake. The elimination rate in all drugs revealed no significant changes.

CONCLUSION

After concurrent administration of FDCSL with atorvastatin, the AUC_0-∞ of both atorvastatin and sofosbuvir were increased. Caution should be taken with close monitoring for possible side effects after co-administration of atorvastatin and FDCSL in clinical practice.

Drug-Drug Interactions in Children and Adolescents Receiving Ledipasvir/Sofosbuvir for the Treatment of Hepatitis C Virus Infection

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Drug-drug interactions need to be considered to optimize the pharmacotherapeutic outcome of direct-acting antivirals. The aim of this study was to report on possible drug-drug interactions between ledipasvir/sofosbuvir and other medications received by children and adolescents with hepatitis C virus, in addition to suggested management for these drug-drug interactions.

METHODS

Hepatitis C virus-infected children and adolescents, 12-17 years of age and/or weighing ≥ 35 kg, who presented to the Pediatric Hepatology Unit at Cairo University Pediatric Hospitals for ledipasvir/sofosbuvir treatment were included. Medication history was taken including long-term medications for chronic conditions and on-demand medications for inter-current illnesses. Medications were reviewed by the Kasr Alainy Drug Information Center to identify possible drug-drug interactions with prescribed ledipasvir/sofosbuvir and their management. HEP Drug Interactions provided by the University of Liverpool, Lexicomp^®, and Medscape were the utilized references. Each drug-drug interaction was assigned a risk rating of A, B, C, D, or X.

RESULTS

Sixty hepatitis C virus-infected children and adolescents assigned to receive ledipasvir/sofosbuvir were enrolled. Thirty percent of patients had associated chronic co-morbid conditions. The overall number of medications received was 48; 39 were prescribed as long-term medications with a median of 3 (interquartile range 4.24) medications per patient. Proton pump inhibitors, antacids, histamine H₂ receptor antagonists, sodium bicarbonate, and colchicine were reported to be associated with a drug-drug interaction risk D necessitating therapy modification, which occurred prior to administration.

CONCLUSIONS

Early identification and prompt response to drug-drug interactions with the aid of pharmacists optimize the pharmacotherapeutic outcome and eliminate possible morbidities when using direct-acting antivirals in children and adolescents with hepatitis C virus.

Estimating Efflux Transporter-Mediated Disposition of Molecules beyond the Rule of Five (bRo5) Using Transporter Gene Knockout Rats

Transporter gene knockout models are a practical and widely used tool for pharmacokinetic studies in drug discovery. P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and breast cancer resistance protein (Bcrp) are major efflux transporters that control absorption and bioavailability, and are important when determining oral drug disposition. To the best of our knowledge, beyond the rule of five (bRo5) molecules launched on the market to date tend to be substrates for efflux transporters. The purpose of this study is to evaluate in vivo the impact of efflux transporters on the oral absorption process and systemic clearance using rats which lack P-gp and/or Bcrp expression. We administered five bRo5 substrates (asunaprevir, cyclosporine, danoprevir, ledipasvir, and simeprevir) intravenously or orally to wild-type and Mdr1a, Bcrp, and Mdr1a/Bcrp knockout rats, calculated the clearance, oral bioavailability, and absorption rate profile of each substrate, and compared the results. Systemic clearance of the substrates in knockout rats changed within approximately ±40% compared to wild-types, suggesting the efflux transporters do not have a significant influence on clearance in rats. On the other hand, the oral absorption of substrates in the knockout rats, especially those lacking Mdr1a, increased greatly-between 2- and 5-fold more than in wild-types. This suggests that rat efflux transporters, especially P-gp, greatly reduce the oral exposure of these substrates. Moreover, results on the absorption rate-time profile suggest that efflux transporters are constantly active during the absorption period in rats. Transporter knockout rats are a useful in vivo tool for estimating the transporter-mediated disposition of bRo5 molecules in drug discovery.

Development and validation of a versatile HPLC-DAD method for simultaneous determination of the antiviral drugs daclatasvir, ledipasvir, sofosbuvir and ribavirin in presence of seven potential impurities. Application to assay of dosage forms and dissolution studies

This study describes a simple, sensitive, specific and generic HPLC-DAD method for simultaneous determination of four drugs prescribed for treatment of Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) infection. Investigated drugs include daclatasvir (DAC), ledipasvir (LED), sofosbuvir (SOF) and ribavirin (RIB). Successful separation was accomplished using Thermohypersil BDS-C8 column (4.6 × 250 mm, 5 µm) with gradient elution of the mobile phase consisted of mixed phosphate buffer pH 7.5 and methanol. Gradient elution started with 25% methanol, ramped up linearly to 80% in 15 min then kept constant till the end of the run. Flow rate was 1.5 mL/min. Peak areas were measured at 235, 260, 315, and 332 nm for RIB, SOF, DAC, and LED, respectively. Peaks of the analytes were perfectly resolved with retention times 2.0, 12.1, 14.7, and 17.2 min for RIB, SOF, DAC, and LED, respectively. The developed method was validated according to ICH guidelines with respect to system suitability, linearity, ranges, accuracy, precision, specificity, robustness, and limits of detection and quantification. The proposed method showed good linearity in the ranges 5-500, 2-300, 0.5-75, and 0.5-75 µg/mL for RIB, SOF, DAC, and LED respectively. Limits of detection were 0.10-0.66 μg/mL for the analyzed drugs. Specificity was established by separation of target drugs from 7 process-related impurities for SOF including its major metabolite (GS-331007). Applicability of the proposed method to real life situations was assessed through the analysis of four different pharmaceutical formulations and satisfactory results were obtained. Additionally, dissolution profiles of the 4 drugs were studied using the developed method.

Correlation Between Tenofovir Drug Levels and the Renal Biomarkers RBP-4 and ß2M in the ION-4 Study Cohort

Background

Concomitant dosing of ledipasvir (LDV) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) results in an increased tenofovir (TFV) area under the curve (AUC). The aim of this study was to examine whether there was a correlation between the renal biomarkers retinol binding protein–4 (RBP-4) and β2 microglobulin (β2M) and tenofovir AUC.

Methods

The ION-4 trial enrolled HIV/hepatitis C virus–coinfected patients on nonpharmacologically boosted antiretroviral regimens with TDF-containing backbones. We assessed for a correlation between tenofovir AUC and urinary biomarkers and also for changes in serologic biomarkers with respect to clinically relevant changes in renal function (creatinine clearance decrease >25%, change in creatinine >0.2 mg/dL, change in proteinuria from negative/trace to ≥1+).

Results

Three hundred thirty-five patients were enrolled in the ION-4 study; their demographic characteristics have been previously described. Both RBP-4 and β2M exhibited positive correlations with tenofovir AUC. Baseline and study levels of RBP-4 and β2M were higher for patients with increases in urine proteinuria and an absolute creatinine increase.

Conclusions

TFV exposure is associated with increased proximal tubule urine biomarkers in participants on ledipasvir/sofosbuvir and nonpharmacologically boosted TDF-based antiretroviral regimens. Baseline proximal tubule biomarkers may predict nephrotoxicity risk if events are prevalent. Further studies assessing the predictive role of these urine biomarkers may help guide medical decision-making and risk/benefit assessments in patients with risk factors for renal dysfunction.