Pharmacokinetics of Selinexor: The First-in-Class Selective Inhibitor of Nuclear Export

Adverse events reporting of XPO1 inhibitor - selinexor: a real-word analysis from FAERS database

As the world's first oral nuclear export inhibitor, selinexor is increasingly being used in clinical applications for malignant tumors. However, there is no extensive exploration on selinexor's adverse events (ADEs), necessitating a real-word assessment of its clinical medication safety. FAERS data (July 2019-June 2023) were searched for selinexor ADE reports across all indications. Use the system organ class (SOC) and preferred terms (PT) from the medical dictionary for regulatory activities (MedDRA) to describe, categorize, and statistic ADEs. Disproportionality analysis was employed through calculation of reporting odds ratio (ROR) and proportional reporting ratio (PRR). Based on total of 4392 selinexor related ADE reports as the primary suspect (PS), of which 2595 instances were severe outcomes. The predominant ADEs included gastrointestinal disorders, myelosuppression symptoms, and various nonspecific manifestations. 124 signals associated with selinexor ADE were detected, and 10 of these top 15 signals were not included into the instructions. Our study provides real-world evidence regarding the drug safety of selinexor, which is crucial for clinicians to safeguard patients' health.

Selinexor in multiple myeloma

INTRODUCTION

Selinexor, an XPO1 inhibitor, has emerged as a promising therapeutic option in the challenging landscape of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM).

AREAS COVERED

This article provides a review of selinexor, with a focus on available clinical studies involving MM patients and its safety profile. Clinical trials, such as STORM and BOSTON, have demonstrated its efficacy, particularly in combination regimens, showcasing notable overall response rates (ORR) and prolonged median progressionfree survival (mPFS). Selinexor's versatility is evident across various combinations, including carfilzomibdexamethasone (XKd), lenalidomidedexamethasone (XRd), and pomalidomidedexamethasone (XPd), with efficacy observed even in tripleclass refractory and highrisk patient populations. However, challenges, including resistance mechanisms and adverse events, necessitate careful management. Realworld evidence also underscores selinexor's effectiveness in RRMM, though dose adjustments and supportive measures remain crucial. Ongoing trials are exploring selinexor in diverse combinations and settings, including pomalidomidenaïve patients and postautologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) maintenance.

EXPERT OPINION

The evolving landscape of selinexor's role in the sequencing of treatment for RRMM, its potential in highrisk patients, including those with extramedullary disease, as revealed in the most recent international meetings, and ongoing investigations signal a dynamic era in myeloma therapeutics. Selinexor emerges as a pivotal component in multidrug strategies and innovative combinations.

The development and validation of a liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry method for the quantification of selinexor and its application in Chinese multiple myeloma patients

Selinexor is a nuclear exportin-1 (XPO1) inhibitor that has been approved for the treatment of multiple myeloma patients. However, sustained use of selinexor may result in some undesirable consequences. Furthermore, selinexor has moderate inter-patient variability. Herein, we developed an ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry method for measuring selinexor levels in human plasma ranging from 1 to 1000 ng mL-1. Furthermore, the developed approach was validated in accordance with FDA criteria. The established approach demonstrated inter-day and intra-day precision, expressed as the relative standard deviation, of less than 8%, with accuracies of less than 6%, expressed as relative error. The results showed that the protein depletion was quite complete for selinexor extraction, with recoveries ranging from 85.89 to 108.38%. The validated method facilitates the quantitation of selinexor in multiple myeloma patients. The selinexor plasma concentration exhibits obvious inter-patient' variability after administration. Thus, it is necessary to make a personalized prescription through therapeutic drug monitoring. Furthermore, the change in platelet counts before and after selinexor treatment was shown to be related to the plasma concentration at 3 h after administration, which provides the basis for therapeutic drug monitoring sampling time points and a method for predicting the occurrence of thrombocytopenia. In conclusion, the developed method can be used for the quantification of the plasma concentration of selinexor, and it is of great significance to conduct therapeutic drug monitoring for patients taking selinexor in order to enhance therapeutic effects and prevent the occurrence of adverse reactions.

Phase 1 study of selinexor in combination with salvage chemotherapy in Adults with relapsed or refractory Acute myeloid leukemia

Selinexor, an oral inhibitor of the nuclear transport protein Exportin-1, shows promising single-agent activity in clinical trials of relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and preclinical synergy with topoisomerase (topo) IIα inhibitors. We conducted a phase 1, dose-escalation study of selinexor with mitoxantrone, etoposide, and cytarabine (MEC) in 23 patients aged < 60 years with R/R AML. Due to dose-limiting hyponatremia in 2 patients on dose level 2 (selinexor 40 mg/m2), the maximum tolerated dose was 30 mg/m2. The most common grade ≥ 3 treatment-related non-hematologic toxicities were febrile neutropenia, catheter-related infections, diarrhea, hyponatremia, and sepsis. The overall response rate was 43% with 6 patients (26%) achieving complete remission (CR), 2 (9%) with CR with incomplete count recovery, and 2 (9%) with a morphologic leukemia-free state. Seven of 10 responders proceeded to allogeneic stem cell transplantation. The combination of selinexor with MEC is a feasibile treatment option for patients with R/R AML.

XPO1 inhibition sensitises CLL cells to NK cell mediated cytotoxicity and overcomes HLA-E expression

The first-in-class inhibitor of exportin-1 (XPO1) selinexor is currently under clinical investigation in combination with the BTK inhibitor ibrutinib for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) or non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Selinexor induces apoptosis of tumour cells through nuclear retention of tumour suppressor proteins and has also recently been described to modulate natural killer (NK) cell and T cell cytotoxicity against lymphoma cells. Here, we demonstrate that XPO1 inhibition enhances NK cell effector function against primary CLL cells via downregulation of HLA-E and upregulation of TRAIL death receptors DR4 and DR5. Furthermore, selinexor potentiates NK cell activation against CLL cells in combination with several approved treatments; acalabrutinib, rituximab and obinutuzumab. We further demonstrate that lymph node associated signals (IL-4 + CD40L) inhibit NK cell activation against CLL cells via upregulation of HLA-E, and that inhibition of XPO1 can overcome this protective effect. These findings allow for the design of more efficacious combination strategies to harness NK cell effector functions against CLL.

Selinexor-Bortezomib-Dexamethasone: A Review in Previously Treated Multiple Myeloma

Selinexor [Nexpovio^® (EU); Xpovio^® (USA)] is a first-in-class, selective exportin-1 inhibitor. Oral selinexor once weekly in combination with subcutaneous bortezomib once weekly and oral dexamethasone twice weekly (selinexor-bortezomib-dexamethasone) is approved in the EU and USA for the treatment of adult patients with multiple myeloma who have received at least one prior therapy. In the open-label, randomized, phase 3 BOSTON trial, this regimen significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) compared with the standard bortezomib-dexamethasone regimen in patients with previously treated multiple myeloma. Selinexor-bortezomib-dexamethasone had a generally manageable tolerability profile and an acceptable safety profile in BOSTON, with a lower incidence of peripheral neuropathy (a bortezomib-induced toxicity) compared with bortezomib-dexamethasone. The triplet regimen uses less bortezomib and dexamethasone during the first 24 weeks of treatment. The efficacy and safety profiles of selinexor-bortezomib-dexamethasone, combined with its once-weekly administration of selinexor and bortezomib, make it a useful additional triplet therapy option for previously treated multiple myeloma.

Small molecules in the treatment of COVID-19

The outbreak of COVID-19 has become a global crisis, and brought severe disruptions to societies and economies. Until now, effective therapeutics against COVID-19 are in high demand. Along with our improved understanding of the structure, function, and pathogenic process of SARS-CoV-2, many small molecules with potential anti-COVID-19 effects have been developed. So far, several antiviral strategies were explored. Besides directly inhibition of viral proteins such as RdRp and M^pro, interference of host enzymes including ACE2 and proteases, and blocking relevant immunoregulatory pathways represented by JAK/STAT, BTK, NF-κB, and NLRP3 pathways, are regarded feasible in drug development. The development of small molecules to treat COVID-19 has been achieved by several strategies, including computer-aided lead compound design and screening, natural product discovery, drug repurposing, and combination therapy. Several small molecules representative by remdesivir and paxlovid have been proved or authorized emergency use in many countries. And many candidates have entered clinical-trial stage. Nevertheless, due to the epidemiological features and variability issues of SARS-CoV-2, it is necessary to continue exploring novel strategies against COVID-19. This review discusses the current findings in the development of small molecules for COVID-19 treatment. Moreover, their detailed mechanism of action, chemical structures, and preclinical and clinical efficacies are discussed.

Selinexor and COVID-19: The Neglected Warden

A novel severe acute respiratory distress syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has been confirmed as the cause of the global pandemic coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Different repurposed drugs have been trialed and used in the management of COVID-19. One of these agents was the anti-cancer Selinexor (SXR). SXR is an anti-cancer drug that acts by inhibition of nuclear exportin-1 (XPO1), which inhibits transport of nuclear proteins from the nucleus to the cytoplasm, leading to the induction of cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis. XPO1 inhibitors had antiviral effects, mainly against respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and influenza virus. SXR inhibits transport of SARS-CoV-2 nuclear proteins to the cytoplasm with further inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 proliferation. SXR has the ability to prevent the development of a cytokine storm in COVID-19 by inhibiting the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines with the augmentation release of anti-inflammatory cytokines. In conclusion, SARS-CoV-2 infection is linked with activation of XPO1, leading to the triggering of inflammatory reactions and oxidative stress. Inhibition of XPO1 by Selinexor (SXR), a selective inhibitor of nuclear export (SINE), can reduce the proliferation of SARS-CoV-2 and associated inflammatory disorders. Preclinical and clinical studies are warranted in this regard.

Predictive modeling of resistance to SMO-inhibition in a patient-derived orthotopic xenograft model of SHH medulloblastoma

Background

Inhibition of the sonic hedgehog (SHH) pathway with Smoothened (SMO) inhibitors is a promising treatment strategy in SHH-activated medulloblastoma, especially in adult patients. However, the problem is that tumors frequently acquire resistance to the treatment. To understand the underlying resistance mechanisms and to find ways to overcome the resistance, preclinical models that became resistant to SMO inhibition are needed.

Methods

To induce SMO inhibitor resistant tumors, we have treated a patient-derived xenograft (PDX) model of SHH medulloblastoma, sensitive to SMO inhibition, with 20 mg/kg Sonidegib using an intermitted treatment schedule. Vehicle-treated and resistant models were subjected to whole-genome and RNA sequencing for molecular characterization and target engagement. In vitro drug screens (76 drugs) were performed using Sonidegib-sensitive and -resistant lines to find other drugs to target the resistant lines. One of the top hits was then validated in vivo.

Results

Nine independent Sonidegib-resistant PDX lines were generated. Molecular characterization of the resistant models showed that eight models developed missense mutations in SMO and one gained an inactivating point mutation in MEGF8, which acts downstream of SMO as a repressor in the SHH pathway. The in vitro drug screen with Sonidegib-sensitive and -resistant lines identified good efficacy for Selinexor in the resistant line. Indeed, in vivo treatment with Selinexor revealed that it is more effective in resistant than in sensitive models.

Conclusions

We report the first human SMO inhibitor resistant medulloblastoma PDX models, which can be used for further preclinical experiments to develop the best strategies to overcome the resistance to SMO inhibitors in patients.

Selinexor Enhances NK Cell Activation Against Malignant B Cells via Downregulation of HLA-E

Selinexor is an FDA approved selective inhibitor of the nuclear export protein exportin-1 (XPO1) and causes specific cancer cell death via nuclear accumulation of tumor suppressor proteins. Design of rational studies for the use of selinexor in combination with other therapeutic agents, such as immunotherapies, requires a fundamental understanding of the effects of selinexor on the immune system. One important emerging area of immunotherapy are natural killer (NK) cell based therapeutics. NK cell function is tightly regulated by a balance of signals derived from multiple activating and inhibitory receptors. Thus in cancer, up-regulation of stress ligands recognised by activating receptors or down-regulation of HLA class I recognised by inhibitory receptors can result in an anti-cancer NK cell response. Changes in XPO1 function therefore have the potential to affect NK cell function through shifting this balance. We therefore sought to investigate how selinexor may affect NK cell function. Selinexor pre-treatment of lymphoma cells significantly increased NK cell mediated cytotoxicity against SU-DHL-4, JeKo-1 and Ramos cells, concurrent with increased CD107a and IFNγ expression on NK cells. In addition, selinexor enhanced ADCC against lymphoma cells coated with the anti-CD20 antibodies rituximab and obinutuzumab. In probing the likely mechanism, we identified that XPO1 inhibition significantly reduced the surface expression of HLA-E on lymphoma cell lines and on primary chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells. HLA-E binds the inhibitory receptor NKG2A and in accordance with this, selinexor selectively increased activation of NKG2A+ NK cells. Our data reveals that selinexor, in addition to its direct cytotoxic activity, also activates an anti-cancer immune response via disruption of the inhibitory NKG2A:HLA-E axis.

Emerging agents for metastatic pancreatic cancer: spotlight on early phase clinical trials

INTRODUCTION

Despite the recent development of new chemotherapeutic regimens and combination strategies, metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC) still shows only a modest response to conventional cytotoxic agents. However, several novel therapeutic agents targeting the unique features of mPC are showing promise in clinical trials.

AREA COVERED

This article reviews the current state of development of new agents targeting various systems and molecular pathways. We searched PubMed and clinicaltrials.gov in September 2021 with a special focus on ongoing early phase clinical trials to identify the promising therapeutic strategies for mPC.

EXPERT OPINION

Extensive tumor heterogeneity, complex tumor microenvironment, genetic alterations of the oncogenic signaling pathways, metabolic dysregulation, and a low immunogenicity are hurdles for current treatment approaches. Ongoing research efforts strive to overcome these hurdles and are showing some promising early results.

Selinexor population pharmacokinetic and exposure-response analyses to support dose optimization in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

PURPOSE

Characterize the population PK and exposure-response (ER) relationships of selinexor in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) (efficacy endpoints) or other non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) patients (safety endpoints) to determine the optimal dose in patients with DLBCL.

METHODS

This work included patients from seven clinical studies, with 800 patients for PK, 175 patients for efficacy and 322 patients for safety analyses. Logistic regression models and Cox-regression models were used for binary and time-to-event endpoints, respectively. Model-based simulations were performed to justify dose based on balance between efficacy and safety outcome.

RESULTS

Selinexor pharmacokinetics were well-described by a two-compartment model with body weight as a significant covariate on clearance and central volume of distribution and gender on clearance. Overall response rate (ORR) in patients with DLBCL increased with day 1 C_max and decreased in patients with higher baseline tumor size (p < 0.05). Significant exposure-safety relationships (p < 0.05) in NHL patients were identified for the frequency of the following safety endpoints: dose modifications, decreased appetite Grade ≥ 3 (Gr3+), fatigue Gr2+, vision blurred Gr1+, and vomiting Gr2+. Similar exposure-safety relationships were found for time-to-onset of the adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Simulations of the safety and efficacy ER models suggested that, compared to a starting dose of 60 mg twice weekly (BIW), a 40 mg BIW regimen resulted in an absolute decrease in AE probabilities between 1.9 and 5.3%, with a clinically significant absolute efficacy decrease of 4.7% in ORR. The modeling results support that 60 mg BIW is the optimal dose in patients with DLBCL.