Assessment of a new instrument for detecting preventable adverse drug reactions

Surveillance des effets indésirables lors des campagnes de la chimioprévention du paludisme saisonnier chez les enfants de 3-59 mois au Burkina Faso

INTRODUCTION

Seasonal malaria chemoprevention (SMC) by mass administration of sulfadoxine pyrimethamine + amodiaquine (SPAQ) reduces the burden of malaria in children aged 3-59 months. The occurrence of adverse drug reaction (ADR) may affect the success of this intervention. There are few studies of SMC adverse event surveillance in sub-Saharan Africa, particularly in Burkina Faso, a highly endemic country. Our main objective was to characterize the ADRs reported during SMC campaigns in Burkina Faso. Secondly, we evaluated the performance of the pharmacovigilance integrated into the SMC program in order to support safe administration of SMC.

METHOD

This was a retrospective descriptive study of SMC individual case safety reports recorded in VigiBase® in Burkina Faso from 2014 to 2021. We used the P-method for the analysis of preventable serious adverse drug reactions and WHO criteria for assessing the performance of pharmacovigilance integrated into the SMC program.

RESULTS

A total of 1,105 SMC individual case safety reports were registered in VigiBase® for 23,311,453 doses of SPAQ given between 2014 and 2021. No pharmacovigilance signal was detected. The number of serious cases was 101, of which 23 (22.8%) were preventable. In 38.1% of children, the occurrence of ADRs led to discontinuation of SMC treatment. Vomiting was the most frequently reported adverse drug reaction (48.0%). The proportion of children whose treatment was discontinued due to vomiting was 42.7%, while the proportion of treatment discontinuation for other ADRs was 32.8% (p = 0.01). The SMC program contributed at 46.2% to the national pharmacovigilance database. The reporting rate was 0.03 per 1,000 exposed children in 2021. The median completeness score of the ICSRs was 0.7 (IQR: 0.5-0.7), and the median time to register the ICSRs in VigiBase® was 204 (IQR: 143-333) days.

CONCLUSIONS

Post-drug administration vomiting may interfere with the purpose of SMC. Measures to manage this adverse drug reaction should be taken to improve the success of the SMC program. Based on the information on reporting time and reporting rate, spontaneous reporting should be supported by active surveillance, including cohort event monitoring, in Burkina Faso.

Adverse drug reactions of Rituximab in patients suffering from autoimmune neurological diseases

BACKGROUND

Rituximab, a chimeric human/mouse monoclonal antibody targeting CD-20 antigens, has been used recently for various rheumatological and autoimmune diseases, including autoimmune neurological disorders.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to study the frequency, seriousness, causality, and preventability of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) of rituximab in Iranian patients with autoimmune neurological diseases.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional observational study, patients with autoimmune neurological diseases who had an indication for rituximab treatment were enrolled. Naranjo adverse drug reaction probability scale was used to assess the causality of ADRs, and the preventability of the ADRs was determined by P-Method. The seriousness of ADRs was also determined.

RESULTS

A total of 264 ADRs were recorded from 97 patients. The Median (min-max) number of ADRs experienced by patients was 3 (1-7) events. 11.3% of patients experienced serious ADRs. 18.2% and 26.9% of ADRs were Definite and Probable, respectively. Only 5% of the ADRs were ''preventable". The most frequent ADRs were rituximab infusion-related reactions.

CONCLUSION

Rituximab had an acceptable safety profile in our study patients. However, there must be certain cautions regarding the use of the medication for the elderly or patients with a compromised immune system. Timely detection and management of ADRs would also be crucial to prevent severe and permanent damages. Moreover, considering that rituximab is used as an off-label treatment for autoimmune neurological diseases, a risk-benefit assessment would be necessary before deciding on the treatment choice.

Evaluation of pharmacovigilance systems for reporting medication errors in Africa and the role of patients using a mixed-methods approach

Background

Reviewing the epidemiological profile of medication errors (MEs) reported by African countries and the systems put in place to report such errors is crucial because reporting plays an important role in improving patient safety. The objectives of this study were to characterize the profile of spontaneously reported MEs submitted by African countries to VigiBase; the World Health Organization (WHO) global database of individual case safety reports, describe systems in place for reporting these errors, and explore the challenges and facilitators for spontaneous reporting and understand the potential role of patients.

Methods

In the present study, we used, a mixed-methods sequential explanatory design involving a quantitative review of ME reports over a 21-year period (1997–2018) and qualitative interviews with employees from African countries that are members of the WHO Program for International Drug Monitoring (WHO PIDM). Descriptive statistics were used to summarize key variables of interest.

Results

A total of 4,205 ME reports were submitted by African countries to VigiBase representing 0.4% of all reports in the database. Only 15 countries out of the 37 WHO PIDM members from Africa contributed ME to reports, with 99% (3,874) of them reports originating from Egypt, Morocco, and South Africa. The reasons given for low reporting of MEs were weak healthcare and pharmacovigilance systems, lack of staff capacity at the national centers, illiteracy, language difficulties, and socio-cultural and religious beliefs. Some facilitators suggested by the participants to promote reporting included proactive engagement of patients regarding issues relating to MEs, leveraging on increased technology, benchmarking and mentoring by more experienced national centers. Sixteen of the twenty countries interviewed had systems for reporting MEs integrated into adverse drug reaction reporting with minimal patient involvement in seven of these countries. Patients were not involved in directly reporting MEs in the remaining 13 countries.

Conclusions

MEs are rarely reported through pharmacovigilance systems in African countries with limited patient involvement. The systems are influenced by multifactorial issues some of which are not directly related to healthcare.

Serious adverse drug reactions in sub-Saharan Africa in the era of antiretroviral treatment: A systematic review

We aimed to summarize and describe the burden of serious adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) in the era of antiretroviral therapy. We searched Medline, CINAHL, Africa-Wide Information, Scopus, and Web of Science, without language restriction up to March 2021. We hand-searched reference lists, conference abstracts, and dissertation databases. We included studies reporting proportions of admissions attributed to ADRs, admissions prolonged by ADRs, or in-hospital deaths attributed to ADRs. Two reviewers independently screened the studies, reviewed the study quality using a previously published tool, and extracted the data. We tested for heterogeneity using I2 -statistics and summarized the study results using medians and interquartile ranges. Subgroup analyses summarized the results by study quality, setting, methodology, and population. From 1005 unique references identified, we included 15 studies. Median study quality was 7/10; heterogeneity was very high. Median [IQR] proportion of admissions attributed to ADRs was 4.8% [1.5% to 7.0%] (14 studies) and 6.4% [4.0% to 8.4%] in nine active surveillance studies in adults. Two pediatric studies reported the proportion of admissions prolonged by ADRs (0.29% and 0.99%). Three studies reported the proportion of in-hospital deaths attributed to ADRs (2.5%, 13%, and 16%). Antiretroviral and antituberculosis drugs were often implicated in serious ADRs. Evidence of the burden of serious ADRs in SSA is patchy and heterogeneous. A few high-quality studies suggest that the burden is considerable, and that it reflects the regional impact of the HIV pandemic. Further characterization of this burden is required, ideally in studies of standardized methodology.

The 2011–2020 Trends of Data-Driven Approaches in Medical Informatics for Active Pharmacovigilance

Pharmacovigilance, the scientific discipline pertaining to drug safety, has been studied extensively and is progressing continuously. In this field, medical informatics techniques and interpretation play important roles, and appropriate approaches are required. In this study, we investigated and analyzed the trends of pharmacovigilance systems, especially the data collection, detection, assessment, and monitoring processes. We used PubMed to collect papers on pharmacovigilance published over the past 10 years, and analyzed a total of 40 significant papers to determine the characteristics of the databases and data analysis methods used to identify drug safety indicators. Through systematic reviews, we identified the difficulty of standardizing data and terminology and establishing an adverse drug reactions (ADR) evaluation system in pharmacovigilance, and their corresponding implications. We found that appropriate methods and guidelines for active pharmacovigilance using medical big data are still required and should continue to be developed.

Construction and analysis of a database for medication errors in a pharmacovigilance centre-the Moroccan experience

PURPOSE

The study aimed to describe the epidemiological profile of medication errors (MEs) reported to the Moroccan Pharmacovigilance Center (MPVC), to determine factors associated with serious MEs, and to describe signals related to them.

METHODS

We carried out a retrospective descriptive analysis of MEs reported to the MPVC from 2006 to 2016 and a secondary analysis of the seriousness of MEs with adverse drug reactions (ADRs). The reports were sorted by demographic profile and by ME and ADR characteristics. For signal detection, a quantitative approach was adopted, and the root cause analysis was completed. Epi info 7 software was used to perform descriptive and analytical statistics. The statistical significance level was set at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

A total of 1618 ME reports were retrieved. The proportion of MEs associated with serious ADRs was 23.9%. The factors statistically associated with serious MEs were as follows: (i) the age group 16 years old and less (p < 0.001), (ii) the gender (p = 0.01), (iii) the administration and the prescription stages (p < 0.001), and (iv) the ME types related to inappropriate schedule of drug administration, drug prescribing error (p < 0.001), and incorrect drug administration dosage form (p = 0.04). Fourteen signals related to MEs were detected, for which risk minimization actions were implemented.

CONCLUSION

The establishment of a ME unit within the MPVC was an opportunity to further improve the pharmacovigilance centre performance and consequently its contribution to medication safety. The lessons learned from MEs should be shared through pharmacovigilance networks and with institutions involved in medication safety for synergistic results to achieve patient safety worldwide.

Intravenous ranitidine injection and risk of cardiac arrest: Medication errors

BACKGROUND

Ranitidine injection is not well-known to cause cardiac arrest except in few published case reports. The Eritrean Pharmacovigilance Centre received four cases of cardiac arrest associated with ranitidine injection.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the causal relationship between cardiac arrest and ranitidine, and to identify possible risk factors.

METHODS

This is a descriptive case series assessment of cardiac arrest associated with ranitidine and data was mined to supplement the cases from the WHO global database of individual case safety reports.

RESULTS

In all cases, ranitidine injection was administered fast IV bolus without proper dilution and the outcome was fatal in three. All patients encountered cardiac arrest within 20 minutes of intravenous use. Causality was found to be probable in two cases and possible in the other two. Cardiac arrest could have been prevented in all cases. On top of this, from the WHO global database, 185 cases of cardiac arrest and cardio-pulmonary arrest associated with ranitidine were retrieved and 49.7% were fatal. In 40% of the cases, ranitidine was reported as a single suspect. In 36 cases, cardiac arrest resolved following withdrawal of ranitidine and reaction recurred in one case after re-introduction of the product.

CONCLUSION

There appears a causal link between ranitidine and cardiac arrest, possibly related to medication errors that warrants immediate attention from healthcare professionals.

Preventable Cases of Oral Anticoagulant-Induced Bleeding: Data From the Spontaneous Reporting System

Background

Despite the risk of bleeding is a well-known adverse effect of oral anticoagulants, there is scarce evidence on the preventability of oral anticoagulant-induced bleedings. Therefore, we investigated the potential risk factors related to preventable cases of oral anticoagulant-induced bleedings.

Methods

We performed a study using Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSRs) with an oral anticoagulant as suspected drug among those reported through the spontaneous reporting system of Campania Region from 1 July 2012 to 31 December 2017. The P-method was used for the preventability assessment of all cases of bleeding.

Results

In total, 58 cases out of 253 (22.9%) were preventable, and the most reported suspected drug was an indirect oral anticoagulant (warfarin). Sixty-eight critical criteria for preventability were identified, all related to healthcare professionals' practices. The most detected risk factor related to healthcare professionals' practices was the labeled drug-drug interaction for both direct and indirect oral anticoagulants.

Conclusion

Our findings describe the most reported risk factors for preventability of oral anticoagulant-induced bleedings. These factors may be useful for targeting interventions to improve pharmacovigilance activities in our regional territory and to reduce the burden of medication errors and inappropriate prescription.

Medication Errors Associated With Adverse Drug Reactions in Iran (2015-2017): A P-Method Approach

Medication errors are the second most common cause of adverse patient safety incidents and the single most common preventable cause of adverse events in medical practice. Given the high human fatalities and financial burden of medication errors for healthcare systems worldwide, reducing their occurrence is a global priority. Therefore, appropriate policies to reduce medication errors, using national data and valid statistics are required. The primary objective of this study was to provide a national ‘characteristic profile’ of medication error-associated adverse drug reactions (ADRs), which are also known as preventable ADRs (pADRs). A retrospective study of pADR reports submitted to the national pharmacovigilance center (PCV) within Iran’s Food and Drug Administration was conducted over a 2-year period (2015-2017). Preventability Method (P-Method), which is a standardized tool developed and recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO), was used for preventability assessment. The results of the analyses revealed that while the number of pADRs increased from year one to two (601 to 630), their proportion out of all ADRs per year decreased (7.32% to 6.44%). The percentage of pADRs was higher in females (61.01%) and adults (83.27%), and the highest number of reports were received by nurses (71.57%). Having ‘a documented hypersensitivity to an administered drug or drug class’ was the most common preventable factor in both years (61.23% and 54.29% respectively), and ‘anti-infectives used systemically’ were the medication class which primarily contributed to both serious (53.29%) and non-serious pADRs (39.19%). The specific characteristics of medication errors associated with ADRs from this study, especially the preventable criteria which led to their occurrence, can help devise more specific preventative policies.

Real World Data on the Utilization Pattern and Safety Profile of Infliximab Originator Versus Biosimilars in Italy: A Multiregional Study

BACKGROUND

In recent years, several biosimilar drugs, including those of infliximab, have obtained marketing authorization from the European Medicines Agency (EMA). Given the peculiarity of the safety profile of biological medical products (originator and biosimilars), the evaluation of their tolerability represents an important component of pre-marketing and post-marketing clinical development. For example, infliximab products may cause adverse drug reactions (ADRs) including acute infusion reactions, delayed hypersensitivity reactions, and loss of efficacy, as a direct consequence of immunogenicity. Therefore, specific contraindications, special warnings and precautions have been introduced in the infliximab Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC).

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to assess the magnitude of preventable ADRs in individual case safety reports (ICSRs) having infliximab as a suspected drug across Italy (using the spontaneous reporting systems), and the probability of reporting infections, infusion reactions, lack of efficacy, and hypersensitivity for originator and biosimilars of infliximab.

METHODS

We analyzed ADRs reported across the 2015-2017 period in the databases of five Italian regions: Campania, Lombardy, Sicily, Tuscany, and Veneto. Preventability of ADRs was assessed using the P-method. To compare the probability of reporting infections, infusion reactions, lack of efficacy, and hypersensitivity as ADRs as opposed to other types of ADRs between originator and biosimilars of infliximab, we used the reporting odds ratio (ROR). For descriptive purposes, the number of ICSRs involving infliximab, the number of infliximab vials distributed in the aforementioned Italian regions and the relative reporting rate stratified by semester were reported.

RESULTS

From October 2015 to October 2017, 459 ICSRs reported infliximab as a suspected drug (222 ICSRs related to infliximab originator and 237 to infliximab biosimilars). In the same period, 81,906 vials of infliximab were distributed, resulting in a reporting rate of six ICSRs/1000 vials. Overall, 34 cases (7.41%) were categorized as preventable. The most frequently detected critical criteria were "documented hypersensitivity to administered drug or drug class," "inappropriate prescription for patient's underlying medical condition" and "incorrect dose." Biosimilars had, in adjusted analyses, an increased probability of being reported as suspected in ICSRs reporting infusion reactions (ROR 4.09; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.26-13.32) when compared to Remicade^®. On the contrary, they had a decreased probability of being reported as suspected in ICSRs reporting infections or lack of efficacy (ROR 0.33; 95% CI 0.12-0.89; ROR 0.35; 95% CI 0.20-0.61).

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates that, along with a rapid increase in the utilization of infliximab biosimilars across Italy, there was also an increase in reporting ADRs induced by infliximab biosimilars. Of the reported ADRs, 7.4% were considered preventable. In adjusted analyses, infliximab biosimilars were shown to have an increased probability of being reported as suspected drugs in infusion reactions and a decreased probability of being reported as suspected drugs in cases of lack of efficacy or infection. Considering the potential advantages offered by the utilization of biosimilars in clinical practice, we believe that the use of biosimilars, including those of infliximab, should be supported. In order to achieve this aim, increased knowledge on safety and efficacy of biosimilar drugs should be obtained from real world clinical practice.

Study on the Classification, Causality, Preventability and Severity of Adverse Drug Reaction Using Spontaneous Reporting System in Hospitalized Patients

Hospital-based adverse drug reaction (ADR) monitoring and reporting programs intend to identify and quantify the risks associated with the use of medicines. To examine the causality, preventability and severity of ADR in a hospital setting; a prospective cohort study on spontaneous ADR reporting was conducted from December 2015 to May 2016. Incidence of ADRs, causality, type, severity and preventability were assessed using necessary assessment scales. The study included 3157 hospitalized individuals, in whom 51 ADRs were detected among 49 patients. The overall incidence of suspected ADRs was found to be 1.6%. According to the causality assessment, most of the ADRs reported were probable (n = 26, 51.0%), and type A (augmented/pharmacological) reactions (n = 39, 76%) were the most common type of ADR found. The majority of ADRs were moderate to severe (n = 35, 68.6%), of which 37.3% were found to be potentially preventable. Predictability was observed in 28 (54.9%) reported ADRs. The prescribed medicines most frequently associated with ADRs were antibiotics, antiepileptics and antihypertensives. This feasibility study was able to highlight the clinical pharmacist's role in ADR monitoring service and create awareness about the way it could be done to promote safer medication use. Similar ADR reporting programs are necessary to educate and to improve awareness among healthcare professionals in some countries.

Adverse drug reactions during hepatitis C treatment with direct-acting antivirals: The role of medication errors, their impact on treatment discontinuation and their preventability. New insights from the Campania Region (Italy) spontaneous reporting system

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Medication errors, such as unnecessary treatment discontinuation during treatment with direct-acting antivirals (DAAs), can lead to imbalances in the benefit-to-risk ratio. This risk is especially high when the medication error leads to adverse drug reactions (ADRs). However, to date, evidence on the frequency of this phenomenon is scarce. This study aims to provide better insight into ADRs possibly due to medication errors leading to DAA discontinuation and their preventability.

METHODS

The Italian Pharmacovigilance Network database was used to extract individual case safety reports (ICSRs) generated from July 2012 to March 2017 via the Campania Region (Italy) spontaneous reporting system. ICSRs that included ledipasvir/sofosbuvir, ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir, dasabuvir, daclatasvir, sofosbuvir, simeprevir or elbasvir/grazoprevir as suspected drugs were included in this study. A preventability assessment was then performed utilizing the "P-Method," an algorithm that evaluates known risk factors due to medication errors that can be detected in ICSRs.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Of the 355 cases included in this study, 6 (1.69%) were classified as preventable and 52 (14.6%) were classified as potentially preventable. The most frequently identified critical criteria (risk factor) for preventable or potentially preventable cases were drug-drug interactions and incorrect drug dosing as part of the antiviral treatment scheme. In total, 89 of the 355 cases (25.1%) discontinued use of the DAAs due to ADRs, of which 20 of the 89 cases (22.5%) were due to an unimportant medical event as classified by the European Medicine Agency important medical event list.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

This study found a proportion of preventable/potentially preventable ADRs involving DAA, which could be improved in the Campania Region (Italy). Additionally, the study identified a high proportion of seemingly unnecessary DAA discontinuations among patients who experienced ADRs.

Preventable statin adverse reactions and therapy discontinuation. What can we learn from the spontaneous reporting system?

BACKGROUND

Statin treatment is often associated with poor adherence, which may be due to the onset of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). We investigated on potential risk factors related to preventable cases of statin-induced ADRs and to the discontinuation of statin therapy.

METHODS

We performed a study using the database of Italian spontaneous reporting. The target population for the preventability assessment was all patients with suspected statin-induced ADRs deriving from Campania Region (a territory of Southern Italy) between 2012 and 2017. Additionally, a local sentinel surveillance site involving General Practitioners was selected to countercheck in routine clinical practice the role of ADRs for statin discontinuation.

RESULTS

In total, 34 of 655 (5.19%) regional cases were preventable and among detected risk factors 90.0% was related to healthcare professionals' practices and 10.0% to patient behaviour. In 81.4% (533/655) of cases, statin therapy was discontinued due to ADRs, mainly classified as not serious and associated with a positive prognosis. These results were also confirmed in the active sentinel site.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest an inappropriate use of statins among the identified preventable cases and a potential inappropriate statin discontinuation due to ADRs. These factors may be useful for targeting interventions to improve statin adherence.

Medicines Optimisation Assessment Tool (MOAT): a prognostic model to target hospital pharmacists' input to improve patient outcomes. Protocol for an observational study

INTRODUCTION

Medicines optimisation is a key role for hospital pharmacists, but with ever-increasing demands on services there is a need to increase efficiency while maintaining patient safety. The aim of this study is to develop a prognostic model, the Medicines Optimisation Assessment Tool (MOAT), which can be used to target patients most in need of pharmacists' input while in hospital.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The MOAT will be developed following recommendations of the Prognosis Research Strategy partnership. Using a cohort study we will prospectively include 1500 adult patients from the medical wards of two UK hospitals. Data on medication-related problems (MRPs) experienced by study patients will be collected by pharmacists at the study sites as part of their routine daily clinical assessment of patients. Data on potential risk factors such as polypharmacy, renal impairment and the use of 'high risk' medicines will be collected retrospectively from the information departments at the study sites, laboratory reporting systems and patient medical records. Multivariable logistic regression models will then be used to determine the relationship between potential risk factors and the study outcome of preventable MRPs that are at least moderate in severity. Bootstrapping will be used to adjust the MOAT for optimism, and predictive performance will be assessed using calibration and discrimination. A simplified scoring system will also be developed, which will be assessed for sensitivity and specificity.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study has been approved by the Proportionate Review Service Sub-Committee of the National Health Service Research Ethics Committee Wales REC 7 (16/WA/0016) and the Health Research Authority (project ID 197298). We plan to disseminate the results via presentations at relevant patient/public, professional, academic and scientific meetings and conferences, and will submit findings for publication in peer-reviewed journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02582463.

Mobile App Design, Development, and Publication for Adverse Drug Reaction Assessments of Causality, Severity, and Preventability

BACKGROUND

Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) cause significant morbidity and mortality. Improved assessment of ADRs to identify the causal relationship, the severity, and the preventability will aid ADRs prevention or reduce patient burden.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to develop mobile apps in assisting clinical decision in ADR assessments of causality, severity, and preventability using validated tools. The usability of the apps was assessed.

METHODS

We designed mobile apps using validated assessment tools for ADRs. They are the Liverpool ADRs Causality Assessment Tool, Hartwig's Severity Assessment Scale, and the Modified Schumock and Thronton Preventability Scale. The apps were named "Adverse Drug ReactionCausality," "Adverse Drug ReactionSeverity," and "Adverse Drug RxnPreventability." A survey was conducted using the System Usability Scale (SUS) to assess the usability of the developed apps among health care professionals.

RESULTS

These apps are available for download through Google Play Store for free since January 2015. From the survey, the mean SUS score was 70.9 based on 26 responses from the pediatric ward of Hospital Ampang, Malaysia.

CONCLUSIONS

The developed apps received an overall acceptable usability among health care professionals. The usage of these apps will improve detection, assessment, and avoidance of future ADRs. They will also contribute to future research on ADRs, thus increasing drug safety.

Campania Preventability Assessment Committee (Italy): A Focus on the Preventability of Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs' Adverse Drug Reactions

Purpose: This study aims to investigate preventability criteria of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) involving non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) by analyzing individual case safety reports (ICSRs) sent through Campania region (Italy) spontaneous reporting system from July 2012 to October 2016. Methods: For all the ICSRs that reported NSAIDs as suspected drug, a trained multidisciplinary team of Campania Pharmacovigilance Regional Centre composed of clinical pharmacologists and pharmacists with pluriannual experience in Pharmacovigilance assessed preventability by using the P-method. Results: In all 19,039 ICSRs were sent to Campania Pharmacovigilance Regional Centre, of which 550 reported NSAIDs as suspected drug. In total, 94 cases (17.1%) out of 550 ICSRs were preventable. In the 94 preventable cases, 201 critical criteria were detected of which 182/201 (90.5%) related to healthcare professionals' practices, 0/201 (0.0%) to drug quality, and 19/201 (9.5%) to patient behavior. The most detected critical criteria were the necessary medication not given (52/182; 28.6%), labeled drug-drug interaction (36/182; 19.7%), incorrect drug administration duration (31/182; 16.9%), wrong indication (26/182; 14.2%), therapeutic duplication (18/182; 10.0%), and documented hypersensitivity to administered drug or drug class (10/182; 5.6%). In seventeen (18.1%) preventable cases, there were 19 critical criteria involving non-compliance (15/19 critical criteria; 78.9%) and self-medication with the non-over-the-counter drugs (4/19 critical criteria; 21.1%). In all, 17 out 94 (18.1%) preventable cases involved over-the-counter drugs. Conclusion: A call for action for Campania Pharmacovigilance Regional Centre is necessary in order to promote initiatives to increase the awareness of healthcare professionals and citizens on the risk associated with inappropriate use of NSAIDs.

Campania preventability assessment committee: a focus on the preventability of the contrast media adverse drug reactions

OBJECTIVE

The current study aims to assess the preventability of the contrast media adverse drug reactions reported through the Campania spontaneous reporting system, identifying the possible limitations emerged in this type of evaluation.

METHOD

All the individual case safety reports validated by the Campania Pharmacovigilance Regional Centre from July 2012 to September 2015 were screened to select those that reported contrast media as suspected drug. Campania Preventability Assessment Committee, in collaboration with clinicians specialized in Radiology, assessed the preventability according to the P-Method, through a case-by-case approach.

RESULTS

From July 2012 to September 2015, 13798 cases were inserted by pharmacovigilance managers in the Italian Pharmacovigilance Network database (in the geographical contest of the Campania Region), of which 67 reported contrast media as suspected drug. Five preventable cases were found. The most reported causes for preventability were the inappropriate drug use for the case clinical conditions and the absence of the preventive measure administrated prior to the contrast media administration. Several limitations were found in the evaluation of the critical criteria for the preventability assessment.

CONCLUSIONS

Educational initiatives will be organized directly to the healthcare professionals involved in the contrast media administration, to promote an appropriate use of the contrast media.

Campania Region (Italy) spontaneous reporting system and preventability assessment through a case-by-case approach: a pilot study on psychotropic drugs

OBJECTIVE

We conducted the first pilot Italian study to assess the preventability of adverse drug reactions involving psychotropic drugs reported through spontaneous reporting system from 01/07/2012 to 31/12/2014 in Campania Region.

METHODS

Preventability was assessed, case-by-case, using an adapted version of the P-method. The evaluation was performed only for those reports that had, as suspected drug, antipsychotics, mood stabilizers, antidepressants, anxiolytic and/or sedative-hypnotic.

RESULTS

Eighty-one cases (19.2%) out of 421 reported during the study period were preventable. In seventy-seven (95.1%) out of 81 preventable cases, the underlying mechanism of the adverse drug reactions was dose-related, in four (4.9%) preventable cases the underlying mechanism of the adverse drug reactions was respectively susceptibility- (1; 1.2%), unknown- (1; 1.2%) and time-related (2; 2.5%). In the 81 preventable cases, 97 critical criteria were detected of which 29/97 (29.9%) related to healthcare professionals' practices, 0/97 (0.0%) to drug quality and 68/97 (70.1%) to patient behaviour.

CONCLUSIONS

We proved that it was possible to apply and adapt the P-Method to assess the preventability of the adverse drug reactions involving psychotropic drugs, analysing individual case safety report sent through Campania Region spontaneous reporting system. Information acquired will be used to organize educational activities for both physicians and patients to promote a more appropriate drug use.

Serious adverse events reported for antiobesity medicines: postmarketing experiences from the EU adverse event reporting system EudraVigilance

BACKGROUND

Use of antiobesity medicines has been linked with serious cardiac and psychiatric adverse events (AEs). Spontaneous reports can provide information about serious, rare and unknown AEs occurring after the time of marketing. In Europe, information about AEs reported for antiobesity medicines can be accessed in the EudraVigilance (EV) database. Therefore, we aimed to identify and characterise AEs associated with the use of antiobesity medicines in Europe.

METHODS

AE reports submitted for antiobesity medicines (Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) group A08A) from 2007 to 2014 and located in the EV database were analysed. AE data were categorised with respect to time, age and sex of patient/consumer, type of reporter, category and seriousness of reported AEs and medicines. Consumer AE reports were compared with reports from other types of reporters with respect to age and sex of consumer, seriousness, system organ class and medicine. The unit of analysis was one AE and one AE report, respectively.

RESULTS

We located 4941 AE reports corresponding to 13 957 AEs for antiobesity medicines in the EV database. More than 90% of all AE cases were serious, including 159 deaths. The majority of AE cases were reported for female adults. The majority of serious AEs was reported for orlistat (37%) and rimonabant (22%). The largest share of serious AEs was of the type 'cardiac disorders' (19%) and 'psychiatric disorders' (18%). Consumer AEs reporting differed from other sources with respect to share and seriousness of AEs, type of AEs (system organ class) and medicines (ATC level 5).

CONCLUSIONS

Many serious AEs were found for antiobesity medicines in EV, and consumers contributed with a relatively high share of reports. Although several products have been withdrawn from the market and new medicines are being marketed, the utilisation of antiobesity medicines is widespread, and therefore systematic monitoring of the safety of these medicines is necessary.

The monitoring medicines project: a multinational pharmacovigilance and public health project

The Monitoring Medicines project (MM), funded by the FP-7 EU framework, was carried out between 2009 and 2013 by a consortium of 11 partners. The objectives were to support and strengthen consumer reporting of adverse drug reactions (ADRs); expand the role and scope of national pharmacovigilance centres concerning medication errors; promote improved use of pharmacovigilance data; and develop methods to complement spontaneous reporting. The work was organised into four themes: patient reporting; medication errors; drug dependence, counterfeit and substandard medicines and clinical risk estimation; and active and targeted spontaneous pharmacovigilance. MM differed from some other major pharmacovigilance initiatives by having participants from developing countries in Asia and Africa and in leaning towards public health and communicable diseases. MM brought together stakeholders including WHO, drug regulators, pharmacovigilance centres, consumers, public health and disease specialists and patient safety networks. Resources and methodologies developed directly by, or with support from, MM include electronic systems/tools for consumer ADR reporting and cohort event monitoring; publication by WHO of handbooks on consumer reporting, medication errors and pharmacovigilance for TB medicines; methodologies for detecting drug dependence and substandard or counterfeit medicines in ADR databases; and a database on HIV treatment risks with a risk assessment tool. MM enabled stakeholders to achieve more than if they had worked alone in pursuit of patient safety.