A Retrospective Observational Study of Anesthetic Induction Dosing Practices in Female Elderly Surgical Patients: Are We Overdosing Older Patients?

Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Changes in the Older Adults: Impact on Anesthetics

Anesthesiologists are increasingly required to care for frail older adults patients. A detailed knowledge of the influence of age on the pharmacokinetics and dynamics of the anesthetic drugs is essential for optimal safety and care. For most of the anesthetic drugs, the older adults need lower doses to achieve the same plasma concentrations, and at any given plasma and effect-site concentration, they will have more profound clinical effects than younger patients. Caution is required, with close monitoring of clinical effects and active titration of dose administration to achieve the desired level of effect, ideally following the "start low, go slow" principle.

Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Changes in the Elderly: Impact on Anesthetics

Anesthesiologists are increasingly required to care for frail elderly patients. A detailed knowledge of the influence of age on the pharmacokinetics and dynamics of the anesthetic drugs is essential for optimal safety and care. For most of the anesthetic drugs, the elderly need lower doses to achieve the same plasma concentrations, and at any given plasma and effect-site concentration, they will have more profound clinical effects than younger patients. Caution is required, with close monitoring of clinical effects and active titration of dose administration to achieve the desired level of effect, ideally following the "start low, go slow" principle.

High daily caffeine intake is associated with lower propofol requirements for anesthetic induction

Background and Aims

There is significant interindividual variation in the dose of propofol required for anesthetic induction. Factors dictating this are poorly described, but understanding them would be useful for anesthetic drug dosing. It has been shown in rats and recently in humans that caffeine administration accelerates recovery from anesthesia, but no study has assessed the effect on anesthetic induction.

Material and Methods

Forty American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA)-I, 18-65-year-old patients, undergoing day case general anesthesia with propofol and fentanyl took part in this observational study. Total daily caffeine intake (mg) was estimated using the caffeine assessment tool and caffeine content values from the US Department of Agriculture National Nutrient Database. Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling was used to estimate the effect site concentration of propofol at loss of consciousness (Ce(p) LOC).

Results

Median (interquartile range [IQR]) daily caffeine intake was 106 (51-193) mg. Ce(p) LOC was lower in those with caffeine intake greater than or equal to the median of 106 mg (median (IQR) = 0.64 μg/ml (0.51-0.72) vs. 0.70 μg/ml (0.57-1.10), P = 0.04). The effect was robust when controlling for weight-adjusted fentanyl dose, age, smoking status, and alcohol intake (F (1,34) = 4.66, P = 0.04).

Conclusion

High daily caffeine intake is associated with lower propofol requirements for day case anesthetic induction. We propose that high daily caffeine intake may cause lower arousal levels prior to surgery due to a relative caffeine deficit caused by being nil by mouth. As such, assessment of daily caffeine intake preoperatively may aid anesthetic drug dosing.

Unveiling age-independent spectral markers of propofol-induced loss of consciousness by decomposing the electroencephalographic spectrum into its periodic and aperiodic components

Background

Induction of general anesthesia with propofol induces radical changes in cortical network organization, leading to unconsciousness. While perioperative frontal electroencephalography (EEG) has been widely implemented in the past decades, validated and age-independent EEG markers for the timepoint of loss of consciousness (LOC) are lacking. Especially the appearance of spatially coherent frontal alpha oscillations (8-12 Hz) marks the transition to unconsciousness.Here we explored whether decomposing the EEG spectrum into its periodic and aperiodic components unveiled markers of LOC and investigated their age-dependency. We further characterized the LOC-associated alpha oscillations by parametrizing the adjusted power over the aperiodic component, the center frequency, and the bandwidth of the peak in the alpha range.

Methods

In this prospective observational trial, EEG were recorded in a young (18-30 years) and an elderly age-cohort (≥ 70 years) over the transition to propofol-induced unconsciousness. An event marker was set in the EEG recordings at the timepoint of LOC, defined with the suppression of the lid closure reflex. Spectral analysis was conducted with the multitaper method. Aperiodic and periodic components were parametrized with the FOOOF toolbox. Aperiodic parametrization comprised the exponent and the offset. The periodic parametrization consisted in the characterization of the peak in the alpha range with its adjusted power, center frequency and bandwidth. Three time-segments were defined: preLOC (105 - 75 s before LOC), LOC (15 s before to 15 s after LOC), postLOC (190 - 220 s after LOC). Statistical significance was determined with a repeated-measures ANOVA.

Results

Loss of consciousness was associated with an increase in the aperiodic exponent (young: p = 0.004, elderly: p = 0.007) and offset (young: p = 0.020, elderly: p = 0.004) as well as an increase in the adjusted power (young: p < 0.001, elderly p = 0.011) and center frequency (young: p = 0.008, elderly: p < 0.001) of the periodic alpha peak. We saw age-related differences in the aperiodic exponent and offset after LOC as well as in the power and bandwidth of the periodic alpha peak during LOC.

Conclusion

Decomposing the EEG spectrum over induction of anesthesia into its periodic and aperiodic components unveiled novel age-independent EEG markers of propofol-induced LOC: the aperiodic exponent and offset as well as the center frequency and adjusted power of the power peak in the alpha range.

Clinical observation of different dosages of dexmedetomidine combined with a target-controlled infusion of propofol in hysteroscopic submucosal myomectomy

Objective

This study aimed to explore the clinical effects of different dosages of dexmedetomidine (Dex) combined with a target-controlled infusion of propofol in hysteroscopic submucosal myomectomy.

Methods

Ninety patients who underwent hysteroscopic submucosal myomectomy between September 2021 and March 2022 were enrolled and randomly divided into three groups, with 30 patients in each group. Patients in Groups A, B, and C received injections of 0.25, 0.5, or 0.75 µg/kg of Dex, respectively, by intravenous pump over 10 min. After this time, a maintenance dosage of 0.5 µg/kg/h was administered by intravenous infusion until the end of the surgery. Anesthesia was induced using 1.5 mg/kg of propofol and 0.3 µg/kg of sufentanil that were introduced through a laryngeal mask. The plasma concentration of propofol was maintained at 3 µg/ml by target-controlled infusion until the end of the surgery. The mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), and electroencephalographic bispectral index (BIS) were observed when the patient entered the operating room (T0), after catheter indwelling for anesthesia (T1), at the time of cervical dilation (T2), at the time of hysteroscopic surgery (T3), and at the end of the surgery (T4) in all three groups. The total dosage of propofol for induction and maintenance, anesthesia awakening time, orientation recovery time, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score of the post-awakening uterine contraction pain, and adverse reactions were recorded.

Results

The intraoperative reductions of MAP and HR in patients were significant in Group C when compared with those in Groups A and B (P < 0.05), and BIS was significantly lower in Group C at T2 and T3 when compared with the baseline measurement at T0 (P < 0.05). The dosage of propofol was significantly higher for Group A than for Groups B and C (P < 0.05). The anesthesia awakening time and orientation recovery time were significantly longer for patients in Group C when compared with patients in Groups A and B (P < 0.05). Within 5-30 min after awakening, the VAS scores in Groups B and C were significantly lower than those for Group A (P < 0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions in Group B was significantly less than that for Groups A and C (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

The continuous pumping of 0.5 µg/kg of Dex combined with a target-controlled infusion of propofol in hysteroscopic submucosal myomectomy resulted in positive anesthetic and analgesia effects and fewer adverse reactions. It therefore has high clinical significance.

Moderate sedation by total intravenous remimazolam-alfentanil vs. propofol-alfentanil for third molar extraction: A prospective randomized controlled trial

Background

Oral dental treatment cause anxiety, fear, and physical stress. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of moderate sedation by remimazolam with alfentanil vs. propofol with alfentanil in third molar extraction.

Methods

This single-center, randomized, single-blind clinical trial included 100 adults who underwent third molar ambulatory extraction. All patients had continuous infusion of Alfentanil 0.2 μg/kg/min. Group remimazolam with alfentanil (group RA) had an induction dose of 80 μg/kg and maintenance dosage of 5 μg/kg/min. In group propofol with alfentanil (PA group), propofol was infused at an initial concentration of 1.8 μg/mL under target controlled infusion (TCI) mode and a maintenance concentration of 1.5 μg/mL. The incidence rates of adverse effects were recorded and compared. Depth of sedation was assessed using the modified observer alertness/sedation assessment (MOAA/S) and entropy index. Recovery characteristics were recorded and complications observed for next 24 h.

Results

The incident of adverse events 6 (12%) in the group RA was lower than the group PA 25 (50%) [Mean difference 0.136 (95%CI, 0.049–0.377); P &lt; 0.05], with no serious adverse events during the sedation procedure. The incidence of injection pain in group RA was significantly lower than that in group PA [4 vs. 26%, mean difference 0.119 (95%CI, 0.025–0.558); P = 0.004]. Before starting local anesthesia, the mean arterial pressure, heart rate, and respiratory rate of the PA group were lower than those of the RA group. None of the patients required further treatments for a decreased heart rate, blood pressure, or low SpO2. The rate of moderate sedation success was 100% in both groups. The MOAA/S score was similar between the groups indicating that the depth of sedation was effective. Group RA had significantly shorter recovery and discharge times than those of group PA.

Conclusions

Remimazolam with alfentanil is a safer and more effective alternative for ambulatory sedation and can reduce recovery and discharge time and the incidence of perioperative adverse events compare with propofol.

Clinical trial registration

http://www.chictr.org.cn/index.aspx, identifier: ChiCTR2200058106.

Association of propofol induction dose and severe pre-incision hypotension among surgical patients over age 65

STUDY OBJECTIVE

We aimed to study the association between propofol induction dose (mg/kg) and pre-incision severe hypotension (Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) ≤ 55 mmHg) among patients ≥65 years of age.

DESIGN

Retrospective Observational.

SETTING

40 centers participating in the Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group consortium.

PATIENTS

Patients ≥65 years of age undergoing non-cardiac, non-vascular surgery who received propofol for general anesthetic induction prior to endotracheal intubation between January 2014 and December 2018.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS

The primary exposure was total propofol induction dose in mg/kg, and the primary outcome was occurrence of severe hypotension (MAP≤55 mmHg) prior to surgical incision, stratified by non-invasive vs. invasive blood pressure monitoring type.

MAIN RESULTS

Among 320,585 total patients, 22.6% experienced the outcome of pre-incision severe hypotension (MAP≤55 mmHg). When stratified by blood pressure monitoring type, 20.7% with non-invasive blood pressure measurements, and 35.0% with invasive blood pressure measurements had the outcome. After controlling for a variety of patient and procedural factors, there was a significant independent association between propofol induction dose and pre-incision hypotension (Non-invasive blood pressure cohort odds ratio (OR) 1.10; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.07 to 1.13; p < 0.001; and Invasive blood pressure cohort OR 1.15; 95%CI 1.10 to 1.21; adjusted p < 0.001). The association was robust to alternative definitions of the outcome, including less severe hypotension (MAP≤65 mmHg) and blood pressure drop from baseline as a continuous measure. Although no threshold safe induction dose was identified at which hypotension was avoided, an analysis of propofol dose greater or less than 1.5 mg/kg (i.e. the maximum FDA-defined typical induction dose) demonstrated that doses in excess of the FDAs threshold were positively associated with odds of severe hypotension (Non-invasive cohort: OR 1.05; 95% CI 1.02 to 1.08; p < 0.001; Invasive cohort: OR 1.11; 95%CI 1.05 to 1.17; adjusted p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In a multicenter cohort of geriatric surgical patients receiving propofol for general anesthetic induction and endotracheal intubation, severe pre-incision hypotension (MAP ≤55 mmHg) that has previously been associated with postoperative morbidity was common. The dose of propofol used was significantly associated with increased odds of this outcome after controlling for a number of clinically relevant factors. Future studies that are designed to test different approaches to anesthesia induction for reducing severe post induction pre-incision hypotension are warranted.

An Analysis of Anesthesia Induction Dosing in Female Older Adults

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

In the context of an aging surgical population, appropriate anesthetic induction dose adjustments for the older adult remain poorly defined. In the present study, we describe the prevalence of excess induction agent dose in reference to US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance and seek to investigate the possible association of such excess dose with postinduction hypotension and postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI).

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective observational study was conducted in a large tertiary teaching hospital in accordance with our a priori analytic protocol as registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03699696). For inclusion, patients had to be 65 years or older and to have received general anesthesia with propofol induction for gynecologic oncology surgery between December 1, 2014 and July 8, 2018. Descriptive variables of the patients, machine-captured perioperative vital signs, induction anesthetic, and vasopressor/inotrope administrations were recorded.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

A total of 541 female patients met inclusion criteria. The mean (standard deviation) age of the cohort was 72.20 (5.93) years. Regarding the primary outcome, 65.43% (354 patients, 95% confidence interval 61.2-69.4) of the cohort received more than the FDA recommended 1-1.5 mg/kg induction dose for patients of advanced age undergoing general anesthesia.

RESULTS

The percentage of patients receiving doses in excess of the FDA guidance remained substantial across all age groups, but decreased progressively with increasing 5-year age intervals (from 74% among those aged 65-69 years to 44% among those aged > 80 years). Excess propofol dose in the present cohort was not associated with our a priori definition of postinduction hypotension. Regarding AKI, among the 30 patients suffering this outcome, it occurred less often in patients who received higher propofol doses (4.1% [9/217] vs. 15.3% [21/138], p < 0.001), a result that may have been confounded by differential rates of missingness.

CONCLUSIONS

Older adults commonly receive propofol induction doses in excess of the FDA guidance. The immediate hemodynamic effects of these doses on postinduction hypotension were not seen in the present cohort, suggesting that propofol dose adjustments may serve as a marker of physicians' judgments as to the frailty of patients. The relevance of the AKI association is difficult to interpret due to the non-differential missingness of AKI data between the two groups.

Aged mice show an increased mortality after anesthesia with a standard dose of ketamine/xylazine

Geriatric animal models are crucial for a better understanding and an improved therapy of age-related diseases. We observed a high mortality of aged mice after anesthesia with a standard dose of ketamine/xylazine, an anesthetic regimen frequently used in laboratory veterinary medicine.

C57BL/6-N mice at the age of 2.14 ± 0.23 months (young mice) and 26.31 ± 2.15 months (aged mice) were anesthetized by intraperitoneal injection of 2 mg ketamine and 0.2 mg xylazine. 4 of 26 aged mice (15.4%) but none of 26 young mice died within 15 min after injection of the anesthetics. The weight of aged mice was significantly higher than that of young mice (32.8 ± 5.4 g versus 23.2 ± 3.4 g, p < 0.0001). Thus, aged mice received lower doses of anesthetics in relation to their body weight which are within the lower range of doses recommended in the literature or even beneath. There were no differences between deceased and surviving aged mice concerning their sex, weight and their motor performance prior to anesthesia.

Our data clearly show an age-related increase of mortality upon anesthesia with low standard doses of ketamine/xylazine. Assessment of weight and motor performance did not help to predict vulnerability of aged mice to the anesthetics. Caution is necessary when this common anesthetic regimen is applied in aged mice: lower doses or the use of alternative anesthetics should be considered to avoid unexpected mortality.

The present data from our geriatric mouse model strongly corroborate an age-adjusted reduction of anesthetic doses to reduce anesthesia-related mortality in aged individuals.

A Pilot Analysis of the Association Between Types of Monitored Anesthesia Care Drugs and Outcomes in Transfemoral Aortic Valve Replacement Performed Without General Anesthesia

OBJECTIVE

The types of agents used for monitored anesthesia care (MAC) and their possible differential effects on outcomes have received less study despite increased use over general anesthesia (GA) in transfemoral aortic valve replacements (TAVRs). In this pilot analysis of patients undergoing TAVR using MAC, the authors described the anesthetic agents used and sought to investigate the possible association of anesthetic agent choice with outcomes and the extent to which total weight and time-adjusted doses of anesthetics declined with increasing 10-year age increments.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational study.

SETTING

Tertiary teaching hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Ninety-three participants scheduled to undergo TAVR, with a primary plan of conscious sedation between November 2014 and June 2016, were included.

INTERVENTION

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Types of MAC were divided into 4 primary groups, but 2 groups were focused: propofol (n = 39) and dexmedetomidine plus propofol (n = 34). Conversion to GA occurred in 6 participants (6.45%) and was not associated with the type of sedation received. The authors also compared patients who received dexmedetomidine with those who did not in accordance with their a priori analytic plan. There were no associations between the use of dexmedetomidine and postoperative delirium or intensive care unit/hospital length of stay. No significant trends in medication dose adjustments were seen across increasing 10-year age increments.

CONCLUSIONS

A wide breadth of MAC medications is in use among TAVR patients and does not support differences in outcomes. Despite recommendations to reduce anesthetic drug dosing in the elderly, no significant trends in dose reduction with increasing age were noted.