1
|
Sancetta BM, Ricci L, Lanzone J, Boscarino M, Narducci F, Lippa G, Nesta M, Di Lazzaro V, Tombini M, Assenza G. Overnight switch from carbamazepine to eslicarbazepine in a real-life clinical scenario: a retrospective study. Neurol Sci 2024:10.1007/s10072-024-07354-6. [PMID: 38315252 DOI: 10.1007/s10072-024-07354-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2023] [Accepted: 01/22/2024] [Indexed: 02/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Carbamazepine (CBZ) is a first-choice anti-seizure medication (ASM) whose efficacy is often invalidated by adverse effects (AEs). Eslicarbazepine (ESL) is a structural derivative of CBZ with better pharmacokinetic/tolerability profiles. We describe our experience of the overnight CBZ to ESL switch in people with epilepsy (PwE) to improve seizure control, AEs, and ASMs adherence. METHODS We retrospectively included 19 PwE (12 females, 53 ± 21 years old) who underwent CBZ to ESL overnight switch due to single/multiple issues: poor efficacy (pEff, N = 8, 42%), tolerability (pToll, N = 11, 58%), adherence (pAdh, N = 2, 10%). 9/19 (47%) had psychiatric comorbidities. Clinical variables, seizure frequency, and AEs were recorded at switch time (T0) after 3.5 ± 3 (T1) and 6.5 ± 1.5 months (T2). RESULTS At T1, in pEff group, 1/8 (13%) was seizure free, 2/8 (25%) were responders (> 50% seizure reduction), 2/8 (25%) had no seizure changes, 3/8 (37%) had seizure worsening; the latter were those with the most severe epilepsy and encephalopathy. In pToll group, all PwE experienced AEs disappearance/amelioration. In pAdh group, all PwE reported adherence amelioration. Four dropouts. At T2, no changes were recorded within groups, while in the whole sample, 6/15 (40%) were responders, and 4/15 (27%) were seizure-free. No one complained of Powered by Editorial Manager® and ProduXion Manager® from Aries Systems Corporation psychiatric worsening, while 6/19 (32%) experienced mood/behavior benefits. CONCLUSIONS CBZ to ESL overnight switch offers an opportunity to improve efficacy, tolerability, adherence, and psychiatric symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Biagio Maria Sancetta
- UOC Neurologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200, 00128, Rome, Italy.
- Research Unit of Neurology, Neurophysiology and Neurobiology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico Di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 21, 00128, Rome, Italy.
| | - Lorenzo Ricci
- UOC Neurologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200, 00128, Rome, Italy
- Research Unit of Neurology, Neurophysiology and Neurobiology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico Di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 21, 00128, Rome, Italy
| | - Jacopo Lanzone
- Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Neurorehabilitation Department of the Milano Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Marilisa Boscarino
- Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Neurorehabilitation Department of the Milano Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Flavia Narducci
- UOC Neurologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200, 00128, Rome, Italy
- Research Unit of Neurology, Neurophysiology and Neurobiology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico Di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 21, 00128, Rome, Italy
| | - Giulia Lippa
- UOC Neurologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200, 00128, Rome, Italy
- Research Unit of Neurology, Neurophysiology and Neurobiology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico Di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 21, 00128, Rome, Italy
| | - Marianna Nesta
- UOC Neurologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200, 00128, Rome, Italy
- Research Unit of Neurology, Neurophysiology and Neurobiology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico Di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 21, 00128, Rome, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Di Lazzaro
- UOC Neurologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200, 00128, Rome, Italy
- Research Unit of Neurology, Neurophysiology and Neurobiology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico Di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 21, 00128, Rome, Italy
| | - Mario Tombini
- UOC Neurologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200, 00128, Rome, Italy
- Research Unit of Neurology, Neurophysiology and Neurobiology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico Di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 21, 00128, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Assenza
- UOC Neurologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200, 00128, Rome, Italy
- Research Unit of Neurology, Neurophysiology and Neurobiology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico Di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 21, 00128, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Koepp MJ, Trinka E, Mah Y, Bentes C, Knake S, Gigli GL, Serratosa JM, Zelano J, Magalhães LM, Pereira A, Moreira J, Soares‐da‐Silva P. Antiepileptogenesis after stroke-trials and tribulations: Methodological challenges and recruitment results of a Phase II study with eslicarbazepine acetate. Epilepsia Open 2023; 8:1190-1201. [PMID: 36944588 PMCID: PMC10472381 DOI: 10.1002/epi4.12735] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2023] [Accepted: 03/07/2023] [Indexed: 03/23/2023] Open
Abstract
There is currently no evidence to support the use of antiseizure medications to prevent unprovoked seizures following stroke. Experimental animal models suggested a potential antiepileptogenic effect for eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL), and a Phase II, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was designed to test this hypothesis and assess whether ESL treatment for 1 month can prevent unprovoked seizures following stroke. We outline the design and status of this antiepileptogenesis study, and discuss the challenges encountered in its execution to date. Patients at high risk of developing unprovoked seizures after acute intracerebral hemorrhage or acute ischemic stroke were randomized to receive ESL 800 mg/d or placebo, initiated within 120 hours after primary stroke occurrence. Treatment continued until Day 30, then tapered off. Patients could receive all necessary therapies for stroke treatment according to clinical practice guidelines and standard of care, and are being followed up for 18 months. The primary efficacy endpoint is the occurrence of a first unprovoked seizure within 6 months after randomization ("failure rate"). Secondary efficacy assessments include the occurrence of a first unprovoked seizure during 12 months after randomization and during the entire study; functional outcomes (Barthel Index original 10-item version; National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale); post-stroke depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9; PHQ-9); and overall survival. Safety assessments include the evaluation of treatment-emergent adverse events; laboratory parameters; vital signs; electrocardiogram; suicidal ideation and behavior (PHQ-9 question 9). The protocol aimed to randomize approximately 200 patients (1:1), recruited from 21 sites in seven European countries and Israel. Despite the challenges encountered, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic, the study progressed and included a remarkable number of patients, with 129 screened and 125 randomized. Recruitment was stopped after 30 months, the first patient entered in May 2019, and the study is ongoing and following up on patients according to the Clinical Trial Protocol.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias J. Koepp
- UCL Queen Square Institute of NeurologyLondonUK
- National Hospital for Neurology and NeurosurgeryLondonUK
| | - Eugen Trinka
- Department of NeurologyChristian‐Doppler University Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, Member of EpiCARESalzburgAustria
- Neuroscience Institute, Christian‐Doppler University HospitalParacelsus Medical University, Centre for Cognitive NeuroscienceSalzburgAustria
- Institute of Public Health, Medical Decision‐Making and HTAUMIT – Private University for Health SciencesMedical Informatics and TechnologyHall in TyrolAustria
| | - Yee‐Haur Mah
- King's College Hospital NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging SciencesKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - Carla Bentes
- Reference Centre for Refractory Epilepsies (Member of EpiCARE)Hospital de Santa Maria‐CHULNLisbonPortugal
- Department of Neuroscience and Mental Health (Neurology)Hospital de Santa Maria‐CHULNLisbonPortugal
- Centro de Estudos Egas MonizFaculdade de Medicina da Universidade de LisboaLisbonPortugal
| | - Susanne Knake
- Department of Neurology, Epilepsy Centre HessenPhilipps‐University MarburgMarburgGermany
| | - Gian Luigi Gigli
- Clinical Neurology Unit, Department of Medicine (DAME)University of UdineUdineItaly
| | - José M. Serratosa
- Department of Neurology and Laboratory of Neurology, Fundación Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria‐Fundación Jiménez DíazAutónoma UniversityMadridSpain
- Centro de Investigacion Biomedica en Red de Enfermedades Raras (CIBERER)MadridSpain
| | - Johan Zelano
- Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska AcademyUniversity of GothenburgGothenburgSweden
- Wallenberg Centre for Molecular and Translational MedicineUniversity of GothenburgGothenburgSweden
- Department of NeurologySahlgrenska University HospitalGothenburgSweden
| | | | | | | | - Patrício Soares‐da‐Silva
- Bial—Portela & Cª, S.A.CoronadoPortugal
- Department of BiomedicinePharmacology and Therapeutics Unit, Faculty of MedicineUniversity PortoPortoPortugal
- MedInUP—Center for Drug Discovery and Innovative MedicinesUniversity PortoPortoPortugal
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fei Y, Shi R, Song Z. Adjunctive Treatment With Eslicarbazepine Acetate for Adults and Children With Focal-Onset Epilepsy: A Meta-Analysis. Front Neurol 2022; 13:909471. [PMID: 35911890 PMCID: PMC9337800 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.909471] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2022] [Accepted: 06/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundThe efficacy and tolerability of eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) in adults and children with focal-onset epilepsy (FOE) according to the dose remain to be validated. A meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was therefore conducted as a summary.MethodsRelevant RCTs were collected by systematic searching the electronic databases of PubMed, Cochrane's Library, Embase, Wanfang and CNKI from inception to May 16, 2022. The random-effect model was adopted to pool the results by incorporating the possible heterogeneity. Efficacy outcomes including responsive rate and effective rate, defined as cases with 50 and ≥75% reduction in seizure frequency compared to baseline, were determined, respectively. Incidence of severe adverse events (AE) leading to drug discontinuation was also evaluated.ResultsTen studies including 2,565 people with epilepsy contributed to the meta-analysis. For adults, ESL 400 mg/d did not improve the response rate or the effective rate; ESL 800 mg/d was associated with improved response rate (odds ratio [OR] 2.16, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.65–2.83, p < 0.001) and effective rate (OR 2.16, 95% CI: 1.41–3.30, p < 0.001) without significantly increased severe AE (OR 1.58, 95% CI: 0.90–2.78, p = 0.11); ESL 1,200 mg/d improved response rate (OR 2.49, p < 0.001) and effective rate (OR 3.09, p = 0.04), but significantly increased severe AE (OR 3.72, p < 0.001). For children, ESL also did not significantly improve the response rate (OR 1.76, p = 0.22) or the effective rate (OR 2.17, p = 0.13).ConclusionESL 800 mg/d is effective and well-tolerated as adjuvants for adults with FOE. Efficacy of ESL in children with FOE should be further evaluated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yanqing Fei
- Department of Neurology, Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Ruting Shi
- Department of Rehabilitation, Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Zhi Song
- Department of Neurology, Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
- *Correspondence: Zhi Song
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Magalhães LM, Costa R, Vieira M, Moreira J, Gama H, Soares-da-Silva P. Safety of Eslicarbazepine Acetate in Elderly Versus Non-Elderly Patients with Focal Seizures: From Pooled Data of Clinical Studies to 8 Years of Post-Marketing Experience. Drug Saf 2021; 44:1099-1107. [PMID: 34536187 PMCID: PMC8473370 DOI: 10.1007/s40264-021-01097-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Introduction The prevalence of epilepsy increases in elderly patients aged > 65 years, and treatment is challenging because clinical data are limited. Objective Our objective was to evaluate the safety of eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) in patients aged ≥ 65 years versus non-elderly patients with focal seizures. Methods The safety data of seven phase II and III, double-blind, open-label, randomized clinical studies of ESL in adults were pooled. At least possibly related treatmentemergent adverse events (TEAEs) and ESL post-marketing adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were analyzed separately by age categories. Results The most frequently reported at least possibly related TEAEs in elderly (N = 120) versus non-elderly patients (N = 1863) were dizziness (10.8 vs. 20.3%), somnolence (9.2 vs. 12.6%), and hyponatremia (6.7 vs. 1.5%). Elderly patients presented a higher incidence of serious TEAEs (22.5 vs. 7.6%) and at least possibly related serious TEAEs (6.7 vs. 2.5%), probably because treatment was complicated by comorbidities and comedications. After an estimated cumulative exposure of over 2 million patient-months worldwide and 8 years of post-marketing surveillance, hyponatremia was the most frequently reported ADR (n = 232), accounting for 14.6% and 6.8% of the ADRs reported in elderly (n = 473) and non-elderly patients (n = 2406), respectively. This was followed by ADR/safety information such as drug–dose titration not performed (7.0 vs. 5.4%), product use in unapproved indication (4.9 vs. 1.9%), off-label use (3.4 vs. 2.2%), dizziness (3.4 vs. 3.5%), and seizure (2.1 vs. 5.8%). Conclusion No specific safety issue was identified from the pooled studies for elderly compared with non-elderly patients. After 8 years of post-marketing surveillance, the qualitative safety of ESL remains similar to that observed in the clinical studies. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40264-021-01097-5.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luís M Magalhães
- Division of Research and Development, Bial-Portela & Cª, S.A., À Avenida da Siderurgia Nacional, 4745‑457, Coronado (S. Romão e S. Mamede), Portugal.
| | - Raquel Costa
- Division of Research and Development, Bial-Portela & Cª, S.A., À Avenida da Siderurgia Nacional, 4745‑457, Coronado (S. Romão e S. Mamede), Portugal
| | - Mariana Vieira
- Division of Research and Development, Bial-Portela & Cª, S.A., À Avenida da Siderurgia Nacional, 4745‑457, Coronado (S. Romão e S. Mamede), Portugal
| | - Joana Moreira
- Division of Research and Development, Bial-Portela & Cª, S.A., À Avenida da Siderurgia Nacional, 4745‑457, Coronado (S. Romão e S. Mamede), Portugal
| | - Helena Gama
- Division of Research and Development, Bial-Portela & Cª, S.A., À Avenida da Siderurgia Nacional, 4745‑457, Coronado (S. Romão e S. Mamede), Portugal
| | - Patrício Soares-da-Silva
- Division of Research and Development, Bial-Portela & Cª, S.A., À Avenida da Siderurgia Nacional, 4745‑457, Coronado (S. Romão e S. Mamede), Portugal.,Department of Biomedicine, Unit of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.,MedInUP‑Center for Drug Discovery and Innovative Medicines, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Andermann E, Rosenfeld W, Penovich P, Rogin J, Cendes F, Carreño M, Ramsay RE, Ben-Menachem E, Gama H, Rocha F, Soares-da-Silva P, Tosiello R, Blum D, Grinnell T. Comparative analysis of the safety and tolerability of eslicarbazepine acetate in older (≥60 years) and younger (18-59 years) adults. Epilepsy Res 2020; 169:106478. [PMID: 33338829 DOI: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2020.106478] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2020] [Revised: 09/16/2020] [Accepted: 09/27/2020] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the safety and tolerability of eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL), a once-daily oral anti-seizure drug (ASD), in older and younger adult patient populations. METHODS Two post-hoc pooled data analyses were performed: one from three Phase III studies in patients with focal (partial-onset) seizures who were taking 1-3 concomitant ASDs; the other from five Phase II studies in patients from non-epilepsy populations not taking other ASDs chronically and/or at a clinically-effective anti-seizure dose. The frequencies of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were calculated for the older (≥60 years) and younger (18-59 years) adults separately. RESULTS In the focal seizures study pool, 4.1 % of patients (58/1431) were aged ≥60 years. The overall frequency of TEAEs was 77.5 % in older ESL-treated patients and 72.6 % in younger ESL-treated patients (p = 0.495). For patients who received placebo, the overall frequency of TEAEs was 50.0 % in the older adults and 57.5 % in the younger adults (p = 0.531). The overall placebo-adjusted frequency of TEAEs was 27.5 % in older adults and 15.1 % in younger adults. The placebo-adjusted frequencies of the TEAEs dizziness, somnolence, headache, nausea, diplopia, blurred vision, and ataxia were ≥5 % higher, and frequencies of vomiting and vertigo were ≥2 % higher in older than younger adults. The overall frequency of TEAEs leading to discontinuation was 15.0 % in older ESL-treated patients and 17.6 % in younger ESL-treated patients (p = 0.647); the frequency increased with increasing ESL dose. For patients who received placebo, the overall frequency of TEAEs leading to discontinuation was 5.6 % in older adults and 6.6 % in younger adults (p = 0.847). In the non-epilepsy study pool, 30.2 % of patients (515/1705) were aged ≥60 years. The overall frequency of TEAEs was 56.9 % in older ESL-treated patients and 58.8 % in younger ESL-treated patients. The placebo-adjusted frequencies were 14.9 % in older and 15.1 % in younger ESL-treated patients. The placebo-adjusted frequencies of the TEAEs nausea, vomiting, fatigue, and vertigo were ≥2 % higher in older adults, whereas somnolence was ≥2 % higher in younger adults. The overall frequency of TEAEs leading to discontinuation was 18.3 % in older ESL-treated patients and 12.1 % in younger ESL-treated patients (p = 0.003); frequencies were not related to ESL dose. For patients who received placebo, the overall frequency of TEAEs leading to discontinuation was 8.0 % in older adults and 5.6 % in younger adults (p = 0.407). CONCLUSION Analyses of adverse event data support the safety and tolerability of ESL in adults aged ≥60 years. In the limited number of older patients with focal seizures taking ESL plus concomitant ASDs (n = 40), the frequency of TEAEs was generally higher than in younger adults. However, in the non-epilepsy patient group (in which the number of older patients was ten times larger; 427 patients taking ESL without concomitant ASDs), no marked age-related TEAE differences were observed, suggesting that increased ASD load associated with adjunctive therapy may complicate treatment selection in older patients, due to risk of increased adverse events. As is common practice for all ASDs, balancing clinical response and tolerability is needed in this vulnerable group of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Andermann
- Neurogenetics Unit and Epilepsy Research Group, Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital, Departments of Neurology & Neurosurgery and Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
| | - William Rosenfeld
- The Comprehensive Epilepsy Care Center for Children and Adults, St Louis, MO, USA.
| | | | - Joanne Rogin
- Midwest Center for Seizure Disorders, Minneapolis Clinic of Neurology, Golden Valley, MN, USA.
| | - Fernando Cendes
- Department of Neurology, FCM, UNICAMP - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
| | | | - R Eugene Ramsay
- Epilepsy Institute, Ochsner Baptist Medical Center, New Orleans, LA, USA.
| | - Elinor Ben-Menachem
- Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
| | - Helena Gama
- BIAL - Portela & C(a), S.A., S. Mamede do Coronado, Portugal.
| | - Francisco Rocha
- BIAL - Portela & C(a), S.A., S. Mamede do Coronado, Portugal.
| | | | | | - David Blum
- Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc., Marlborough, MA, USA.
| | - Todd Grinnell
- Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc., Marlborough, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
Eslicarbazepine acetate (Zebinix®), a voltage-gated sodium channel blocker, is a once-daily, orally administered anti-seizure medication available in the EU for use as monotherapy in adults with newly diagnosed focal-onset seizures and as adjunctive therapy in adults, adolescents and children aged > 6 years with focal-onset seizures. In adult patients, adjunctive eslicarbazepine acetate was generally associated with a significant decrease in seizure frequency and an increase in responder rate compared with placebo. The drug was also an effective monotherapy agent in adult patients, demonstrating noninferiority to controlled-release carbamazepine, in terms of seizure freedom rates. In paediatric patients, eslicarbazepine acetate provided seizure control when administered as adjunctive therapy, with the benefits appearing to be dependent on age and dose. The antiepileptic efficacy of eslicarbazepine acetate as adjunctive therapy or as monotherapy was maintained during longer-term extension studies, with each extension study period being up to 2 years. Oral eslicarbazepine acetate was generally well tolerated when administered as adjunctive therapy or monotherapy in adult patients and when administered as adjunctive therapy in paediatric patients, with most adverse events being of mild or moderate intensity. In conclusion, with the convenience of once-daily administration, eslicarbazepine acetate is an effective and generally well-tolerated treatment option for adults, adolescents and children aged > 6 years with focal-onset seizures.
Collapse
|
7
|
Striano S, Ferrara N, Taglialatela M, Zanoni T, Corbi G. Management of epilepsy in elderly. JGG 2020. [DOI: 10.36150/2499-6564-334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
|
8
|
Giráldez BG, Garamendi‐Ruiz I, Zurita J, García A, Querol R, Campos D, Cabeza‐Alvarez C, Serrano P, López‐González FJ, Molins A, Serratosa JM. Clinical outcomes of eslicarbazepine acetate monotherapy for focal-onset seizures: A multicenter audit. Acta Neurol Scand 2019; 140:422-428. [PMID: 31498422 DOI: 10.1111/ane.13162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2019] [Revised: 08/31/2019] [Accepted: 09/03/2019] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the effectiveness and tolerability of eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) monotherapy in routine clinical practice for the treatment of focal-onset seizures. METHODS Multicenter, retrospective, observational study conducted in patients older than 16 years treated with ESL as first-line monotherapy or converted to ESL monotherapy from polytherapy or other monotherapy. Outcomes included 1-year retention rate, seizure-free rates after 6 and 12 months of monotherapy treatment, and safety/tolerability issues. RESULTS A total of 256 patients were included (106 first-line and 150 conversion to monotherapy; 56 patients aged >65 years). Overall, the 1-year retention rate was 79% (72.7% in the ≥65 years subgroup) and seizure-free rates at 6 and 12 months were 59.3% and 55.3% (72.2% and 67.3% in the ≥65 years subgroup), without significant differences when comparing first-line vs conversion-to-ESL monotherapy groups (P = .979). However, the conversion group was heterogeneous and included 43 (29.1%) patients that were seizure free the year prior ESL introduction. A substantially higher proportion of patients remained seizure free for the entire follow-up among those who initiated ESL due to tolerability problems compared with those treated due to inadequate seizure control (71.4% vs 37.3%). Overall, 62 of 256 (24.2%) patients reported AEs (39.3% in >65 years subgroup) and led to discontinuation in 20/256 (7.8%) patients (12.5% in >65 years subgroup). Commonly reported AEs were somnolence (6.6%), dizziness (6.3%), and headache (4.3%). Hyponatremia was recorded in five patients, the majority (4/5) of whom were older than 65 years. CONCLUSIONS Eslicarbazepine acetate was effective and well-tolerated as first-line or conversion to monotherapy in a clinical setting in adult and elderly patients with focal-onset seizures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Jorge Zurita
- Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor Madrid Spain
| | | | | | | | | | - Pedro Serrano
- Instituto de Investigación Biomédica (IBIMA) Hospital Regional Universitario Málaga Spain
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Weissinger F, Losch F, Winter Y, Brecht S, Lendemans D, Kockelmann E. Effectiveness of eslicarbazepine acetate in dependency of baseline anticonvulsant therapy: Results from a German prospective multicenter clinical practice study. Epilepsy Behav 2019; 101:106574. [PMID: 31678808 DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2019.106574] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2019] [Revised: 08/23/2019] [Accepted: 09/14/2019] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) is a third-generation antiepileptic drug (AED) approved as monotherapy for partial-onset seizures in adults and as adjunctive therapy in patients aged above 6 years in the European Union (EU). The prospective observational Zebinix Effects in DEpendency of BAseline Conditions (ZEDEBAC) study aimed at investigating the effectiveness of ESL in clinical practice, with ESL being administered as monotherapy (mono group), as only add-on to a current monotherapy (1+ group), or as add-on to ≥2 baseline AEDs (≥2+ group). In total, 237 patients were included, 35 in the mono group, 114 in the 1+, and 88 in the ≥2+ group. Six-month retention rates were 93.9%, 78.0%, and 75.3% in the mono, 1+, and ≥2+ group. There were 90.5%, 77.6%, and 48.3% of patients in the mono, 1+, and ≥2+ groups who were responders (patients with a ≥50% reduction in seizure frequency at follow-up vs. baseline). Seizure freedom rates were 81.5%, 47.9%, and 23.4%, respectively. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) occurred in 11.4% of patients of the mono, 19.3% of the 1+, and 28.4% of patients of the ≥2+ group. Hyponatremia was reported as ADR in 3.4% of all patients. Although baseline variables differed considerably, with most elderly patients with tumor-related and vascular etiologies in the mono group and most patients with refractory epilepsies with pronounced use of concomitant sodium channel blockers (SCBs) in the ≥2+ group, retention as a measure of real-life effectiveness turned out not to be substantially different and favorable in all groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florian Weissinger
- Epilepsy Centre, Department of Neurology, Vivantes Humboldt Hospital, Am Nordgraben 2, 13509 Berlin, Germany; Department of Neurology, Charité University Hospital, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Florian Losch
- Epilepsy Centre, Department of Neurology, Vivantes Humboldt Hospital, Am Nordgraben 2, 13509 Berlin, Germany
| | - Yaroslav Winter
- Mainz Comprehensive Epilepsy Center, Department of Neurology, Johannes Gutenberg-University, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Silvia Brecht
- Eisai GmbH, Lyoner Str. 36, 60528 Frankfurt, Germany.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Villanueva V, Bermejo P, Montoya J, Massot-Tarrús A, Galiano ML, Toledo M, Rodriguez-Uranga JJ, Bertol V, Mauri JÁ, Poza JJ, Bonet M, Castro-Vilanova MD, Ruiz-Giménez J, López-González FJ, Rodríguez-Osorio X, Tortosa-Conesa D, Ojeda J, Giner P, Garcés M, Alvarez BM, Quiroga-Subirana P, Esteve P, Baiges JJ, Hampel K. MONOZEB: Long-term observational study of eslicarbazepine acetate monotherapy. Epilepsy Behav 2019; 97:51-59. [PMID: 31181429 DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2019.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2019] [Revised: 04/26/2019] [Accepted: 05/08/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
AIM The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness and tolerability of eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) when used as monotherapy for 1 year or more in routine clinical use in patients with focal seizures in epilepsy clinics in Spain. METHODS This is a retrospective, observational, noninterventional study. Eligible patients were aged ≥18 years, had focal seizures, and started on ESL ≥1 year before database closure. Primary endpoint was the following: proportion seizure-free for ≥6 months at 1 and 2 years. Secondary endpoints included retention on ESL monotherapy at 1 and 2 years, seizure frequency change, seizure worsening, and side effects. Other analyses included seizure freedom from baseline to 1 and 2 years and outcomes in special populations. RESULTS Four hundred thirty-five patients were included (127 on first-line monotherapy and 308 converting to ESL monotherapy): median daily dose was 800 mg at all time points; 63.2% were seizure-free at 1 year, 65.1% at 2 years, and 50.3% for the entire follow-up. Mean duration of ESL monotherapy was 66.7 months; retention was 88.0% at 1 year and 81.9% at 2 years. Mean reduction in seizure frequency was 75.5% at last visit. Over the entire follow-up, seizure worsening was seen in 22 patients (5.1%), side effects in 28.0%, considered severe in 1.8%, and leading to discontinuation in 5.7%. Dizziness, hyponatremia (sodium <135 mEq/l), and somnolence were the most frequent side effects. Outcomes in special populations (patients aged ≥65 years and those with psychiatric history or learning difficulty) were consistent with the overall population. CONCLUSIONS Patients with focal seizures taking ESL monotherapy had excellent retention, high seizure-free rates, and good tolerability up to 2 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Pedro Bermejo
- Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Manuel Toledo
- Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebrón, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Pau Giner
- Hospital Universitario Doctor Peset, Valencia, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Kevin Hampel
- Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Abstract
Introduction: Epilepsy treatment in older people requires specific consideration owing to more physical co-morbidities, the risk of drug-to-drug interactions through polypharmacy, and differences in pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics. There are many 'newer' antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) widely used for various seizure types and seizure disorders. However, there is limited specific evidence for the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of these treatments in the elderly population. Areas covered: This review summarises the current most robust evidence available for the use of the newer AEDs belonging to generation two and three in elderly people with epilepsy. The article provides practical evidenced based clinical information to help prescribers choose the most appropriate AED from the drugs discussed. Expert opinion: Diagnosing new onset epilepsy in the elderly population requires specialist assessment. Treatment plans need to be tailored to accommodate an individual's co-morbidities, concurrent medications, and general health status. To date, few clinical investigations consider the elderly population specifically despite the increased risk factors. There is a need for large quality trial data to assess the impact of the newest AEDs on seizure control and quality of life in this population with complex needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lance Watkins
- Neath Port Talbot CLDT, Mental Health & Learning Disability Delivery Unit, Abertawe Bro Morgannwg University Health Board, LLwyneryr Unit , Morriston , UK
| | - Máire O'Dwyer
- School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Trinity College Dublin , Dublin , Ireland
| | - Rohit Shankar
- Developmental Neuropsychiatry Department, Cornwall Partnership NHS Foundation Trust , Truro , UK.,Exeter Medical School, Knowledge Spa, Royal Cornwall Hospital , Truro , UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Lawthom C, Bermejo P, Campos D, McMurray R, Villanueva V. Effectiveness and Safety/Tolerability of Eslicarbazepine Acetate in Epilepsy Patients Aged ≥ 60 Versus < 60 Years: A Subanalysis from the Euro-Esli Study. Neurol Ther 2019; 8:491-504. [PMID: 31098888 DOI: 10.1007/s40120-019-0137-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Clinical practice studies help guide antiepileptic drug (AED) therapy in patient groups routinely excluded from clinical trials, such as the elderly. The Euro-Esli study investigated the effectiveness and safety/tolerability of eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) when used in everyday clinical practice in Europe. A subanalysis of data from elderly patients (≥ 60 years) included in the Euro-Esli study was conducted to assess these aspects of ESL use in this population. Methods Euro-Esli was a pooled analysis of 14 European clinical practice studies. Effectiveness parameters included responder (≥ 50% seizure frequency reduction) and seizure freedom rates after 3, 6 and 12 months of treatment and at last visit. Safety and tolerability were assessed throughout the follow-up by evaluating adverse events (AEs) and ESL discontinuation due to AEs, respectively. Data were compared for patients aged ≥ 60 versus those aged < 60 years at study entry. Results Euro-Esli included 2058 patients (mean age 44.0 years). Age at study entry was known for 2057 patients, of whom 358 (17.4%) and 1699 (82.6%) were aged ≥ 60 and < 60 years, respectively. Mean maximum ESL dose was 882.0 and 1008.2 mg/day in patients aged ≥ 60 and < 60 years, respectively (p < 0.001). At all timepoints, responder and seizure freedom rates were significantly higher in patients aged ≥ 60 versus < 60 years; for example, at 12 months, responder rates were 83.9 and 73.7%, respectively (p = 0.002), and seizure freedom rates were 58.5 and 37.1%, respectively (p < 0.001). The incidence of AEs was significantly higher in patients aged ≥ 60 versus < 60 years (41.4 vs. 32.5%; p = 0.001), but the rate of discontinuation due to AEs was comparable between age groups (16.2 vs 13.1%; p = not significant). The safety/tolerability of ESL in patients aged ≥ 60 years was consistent with its known profile. Conclusion Eslicarbazepine acetate was efficacious and generally well tolerated when used to treat elderly patients with focal epilepsy in clinical practice, with no new or unexpected safety signals emerging in this setting. Funding Eisai Ltd.
Collapse
|