First-Line Biological Agents Plus Chemotherapy in Older Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Pooled Analysis

A Post Hoc Analysis of Older Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Receiving Oxaliplatin-Based Chemotherapy Plus Bevacizumab: The Randomized Obelics Study

BACKGROUND

Phase II trials and subgroup analyses of clinical studies suggest that bevacizumab plus an oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy doublet is effective and tolerable in fit older patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the influence of age on the incidence of side effects and efficacy of this combination in patients with mCRC randomized in the prospective phase III OBELICS study.

METHODS

In total, 230 patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) 0 out of 1 were retrieved on the basis of age (190 < 70 years and 40 ≥ 70 years). They received bevacizumab 5 mg/kg administered either on the same day as chemotherapy (standard arm) or 4 days before chemotherapy (experimental arm) and oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 on day 1, plus capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 twice a day (bid) orally on days 1-10 or levofolinic acid, 200 mg/m2, bolus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 400 mg/m2, and a 46-h intravenous infusion of 5-FU 2400 mg/m2, every 14 days; oxaliplatin was discontinued after 12 cycles. The primary end point was the overall response rate (ORR).

RESULTS

Efficacy and toxicity analyses are reported in aggregate form because there were no statistically significant differences between the two arms. Patient characteristics are well balanced between older and younger patients. No difference in ORR was observed between the two groups (50% for the older patients versus 57.9% for the younger ones; p = 0.36). The median PFS was 10.8 (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.9-12.2) and 11.3 (95% CI 8.3-13.0) months, respectively, for subjects younger than 70 years and those aged ≥ 70 years, with an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 1.16 (95% CI 0.80-1.68; p = 0.43). The median OS was 26.2 (95% CI 23.3-32.7) for the former and 23.2 (95% CI 17.3-35.3) months for the latter, respectively, with an adjusted HR of 1.60 (95% CI 1.08-2.37; p = 0.027). Considering all forms of toxicity, the most severe ones were not statistically different between the two groups (65% for the older patients and 60.6% for the younger ones, p = 0.61).

CONCLUSIONS

Bevacizumab plus an oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy doublet were effective in older patients randomized in the OBELICS trial, and the adverse event profile was not dissimilar from that of younger patients; no new safety concerns were identified. This post hoc analysis confirms that fit older patients with mCRC should be considered for treatment with this regimen.

Efficacy of FOLFIRI plus cetuximab vs FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab in 1st-line treatment of older patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: an analysis of the randomised trial FIRE-3

Background

The evidence on the efficacy of anticancer therapy is limited in older patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). This retrospective analysis of phase III FIRE-3 trial assesses the efficacy of FOLFIRI plus either cetuximab or bevacizumab according to the patients’ age and sidedness of primary tumour.

Methods

The study endpoints overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between younger (<65 years) and older (≥65 years) patients, followed by stratification according to primary tumour sidedness. ORR was compared using Fisher´s exact test, OS and PFS were estimated by the Kaplan–Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Univariate Cox regression analyses assessed hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for OS and PFS.

Results

Overall, older patients with RAS WT tumours had a significantly shorter OS when compared to younger patients (25.9 months vs 29.3 months, HR 1.29; P = 0.02). Also the proportion of right-sided tumours was significantly greater in older patients (27.1% vs 17.9%; P = 0.029). Secondary resection rates were numerically higher in younger patients (25.4% vs. 17.6%, P = 0.068) than in older patients. This was primarily seen in the Cetuximab arm, where older patients underwent less likely resection (13.1% vs. 26%; P = 0.02). Older patients with left-sided tumours showed only a trend towards greater efficacy of cetuximab (HR 0.86; P = 0.38). In patients with right-sided primary tumours, older patients did not appear to benefit from cetuximab in contrast to younger patients (≥65 years: 16.6 months vs 23.6 months, HR 1.1; P = 0.87; <65 years: 21.9 months vs 16.4 months HR 1.5; P = 0.31).

Conclusions

In FIRE-3, OS was generally shorter in older patients in comparison to younger patients. This could be explained by the overrepresentation of right-sided tumours and a lower secondary resection rate in older patients. The efficacy of targeted therapy was dependent on tumour sidedness in older patients with RAS WT mCRC.

Clinical trial

FIRE-3 (NCT00433927).

Efficacy of Bevacizumab and Gemcitabine in Combination with Cisplatin in the Treatment of Esophageal Cancer and the Effect on the Incidence of Adverse Reactions

Objective. To evaluate the efficacy of bevacizumab and gemcitabine in combination with cisplatin in the treatment of esophageal cancer and the effect on the incidence of adverse reactions. Methods. A total of 100 esophageal cancer patients admitted to our hospital from March 2019 to March 2021 were identified as research subjects and randomized into the control group and the study group, with 50 cases in each group. The control group was treated with gemcitabine combined with cisplatin, and the study group was treated with the triple therapy of bevacizumab, gemcitabine, and cisplatin. The treatment efficiency and the incidence of adverse reactions were compared between the two groups of patients. Results. The total treatment efficiency in the study group was 86%, which was significantly higher than that of 66% in the control group ( $P<0.05$ ). After treatment, the levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), Cyfra21-1, and C-met were reduced in both groups, with significantly lower levels in the study group than in the control group ( $P<0.05$ ). The incidence of all CTCAE, ototoxicity, and nephrotoxicity was comparable between the two groups ( $P>0.05$ ). The survival rates of patients in the study group were 88% and 54% at 1 and 2 years after treatment, which were significantly higher than that of 68% and 32% in the control group ( $P<0.05$ ). Conclusion. The clinical efficiency of bevacizumab and gemcitabine combined with cisplatin in the treatment of esophageal cancer is remarkable, which improves the survival of patients, and is worthy of clinical promotion and application.