Antimuscarinic Cascade Across Individual Cholinesterase Inhibitors in Older Adults with Dementia

Prescribing Cascades with Recommendations to Prevent or Reverse Them: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

To reduce prescribing cascades occurring in clinical practice, healthcare providers require information on the prescribing cascades they can recognize and prevent.

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review aims to provide an overview of prescribing cascades, including dose-dependency information and recommendations that healthcare providers can use to prevent or reverse them.

METHODS

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) was followed. Relevant literature was identified through searches in OVID MEDLINE, OVID Embase, OVID CINAHL, and Cochrane. Additionally, Web of Science and Scopus were consulted to analyze reference lists and citations. Publications in English were included if they analyzed the occurrence of prescribing cascades. Prescribing cascades were included if at least one study demonstrated a significant association and were excluded when the adverse drug reaction could not be confirmed in the Summary of Product Characteristics. Two reviewers independently extracted and grouped similar prescribing cascades. Descriptive summaries were provided regarding dose-dependency analyses and recommendations to prevent or reverse these prescribing cascades.

RESULTS

A total of 95 publications were included, resulting in 115 prescribing cascades with confirmed adverse drug reactions for which at least one significant association was found. For 52 of these prescribing cascades, information regarding dose dependency or recommendations to prevent or reverse prescribing cascades was found. Dose dependency was analyzed and confirmed for 12 prescribing cascades. For example, antipsychotics that may cause extrapyramidal syndrome followed by anti-parkinson drugs. Recommendations focused on dosage lowering, discontinuing medication, and medication switching. Explicit recommendations regarding alternative options were given for three prescribing cascades. One example was switching to ondansetron or granisetron when extrapyramidal syndrome is experienced using metoclopramide.

CONCLUSIONS

In total, 115 prescribing cascades were identified and an overview of 52 of them was generated for which recommendations to prevent or reverse them were provided. Nonetheless, information regarding alternative options for managing prescribing cascades was scarce.

Research on prescribing cascades: a scoping review

Background: The concept of prescribing cascades has been proposed for more than 20 years, but the research progress and cognitive level varied in different countries. The aim of this study was to systematically evaluate the current status of relevant original research on prescribing cascades, and to provide references for further research and continuous improvement in clinical practice. Methods: We searched three English databases and four Chinese databases from inception until January 2022. Relevant studies about prescribing cascades meeting the eligibility criteria were extracted independently by two reviewers, and a descriptive analysis was conducted to compare the methods and outcomes of the included studies. Results: A total of 32 studies involving 7,075,200 patients in 11 countries were included, including 13 cross-sectional studies, 11 case reports, 7 cohort studies, and 1 case-control study. The target population was mainly elderly people (24 studies). The purpose of the included studies could be divided into three categories: prevention (4 studies), identification (17 studies), and resolution (11 studies) of prescribing cascades. 49 prescribing cascade routes were identified and mainly attributed to the cardiovascular system, most primary diseases of which were dementia, the initial medications of prescribing cascades were mainly calcium channel blockers, and two to six drugs were involved in the prescribing cascade routes. Conclusion: Prescribing cascades have attracted more attention internationally and current studies have mainly focused on the elderly and their cardiovascular diseases and nervous diseases, but still not yet formed integral research in other special populations of drug use, such as children and pregnant women. It is necessary to further conduct in-depth studies with a broader range, and to establish a series of effective measures to decrease the incidence of prescribing cascades in the high-risk group of drug use.

Characterization of Potentially Inappropriate Medications That Need Special Attention in the Elderly with Dementia by Analyzing Pharmacy Claims Data

Community pharmacists may play a key role in promoting deprescribing of potential inappropriate medications (PIMs) that are highly prevalent among community-dwelling elderly with dementia. To characterize PIMs categories that need a special attention for dementia patients, in the present study, we analyzed the anonymized pharmacy claims data of patients aged 65 years and older (n = 333869) who visited nationwide 905 community-based pharmacies of Sugi Pharmacy Co., Ltd. during December 1-31, 2019. A dementia group was defined as patients who received typical dementia medications marketed in Japan, i.e., donepezil, galantamine, memantine or rivastigmine, and a non-dementia group was defined as patients who received no such medications. After propensity score matching on the basis of patients' age, gender and home healthcare insurance usage, the data of 11486 patients in each group were subjected to logistic regression analyses, to identify PIMs categories particularly important for dementia patients. Univariate analysis indicated that the proportions of dementia patients who received 1 and 2≤ of PIMs were significantly (p < 0.001) greater than those of non-dementia patients (odds ratios were 1.35 and 1.47, respectively). Multivariate analyses identified 5 categories of PIMs that were significantly more frequently prescribed in dementia patients, i.e., 'H2 blockers,' 'drugs for overactive bladder,' 'anti-diabetes drugs' and 'sulpiride' listed as PIMs categories for non-specific cases (adjusted odds ratios (aORs): 1.29, 1.91, 1.17, and 1.38, respectively), in addition to 'antipsychotics' listed only for dementia patients (aOR: 4.29). These results provide useful information to establish strategies for pharmacist-led deprescribing of PIMs in dementia patients.

Prescribing cascades in community-dwelling adults: A systematic review

The misattribution of an adverse drug reaction (ADR) as a symptom or illness can lead to the prescribing of additional medication, referred to as a prescribing cascade. The aim of this systematic review is to identify published prescribing cascades in community-dwelling adults. A systematic review was reported in line with the PRISMA guidelines and pre-registered with PROSPERO. Electronic databases (Medline [Ovid], EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Cochrane Library) and grey literature sources were searched. Inclusion criteria: community-dwelling adults; risk-prescription medication; outcomes-initiation of new medicine to "treat" or reduce ADR risk; study type-cohort, cross-sectional, case-control, and case-series studies. Title/abstract screening, full-text screening, data extraction, and methodological quality assessment were conducted independently in duplicate. A narrative synthesis was conducted. A total of 101 studies (reported in 103 publications) were included. Study sample sizes ranged from 126 to 11 593 989 participants and 15 studies examined older adults specifically (≥60 years). Seventy-eight of 101 studies reported a potential prescribing cascade including calcium channel blockers to loop diuretic (n = 5), amiodarone to levothyroxine (n = 5), inhaled corticosteroid to topical antifungal (n = 4), antipsychotic to anti-Parkinson drug (n = 4), and acetylcholinesterase inhibitor to urinary incontinence drugs (n = 4). Identified prescribing cascades occurred within three months to one year following initial medication. Methodological quality varied across included studies. Prescribing cascades occur for a broad range of medications. ADRs should be included in the differential diagnosis for patients presenting with new symptoms, particularly older adults and those who started a new medication in the preceding 12 months.

Risk of Serious Adverse Events Associated With Individual Cholinesterase Inhibitors Use in Older Adults With Dementia: A Population-Based Cohort Study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs) are used as first-line pharmacotherapy to manage dementia. However, there are limited data regarding their relative safety. This study evaluated the risk of serious adverse events (SAEs) associated with individual ChEIs in older adults with dementia and also examined sex-based and dose-based effects on this risk.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study using 2013-2015 US Medicare claims data involving Parts A, B, and D. Patients aged ≥ 65 years with a dementia diagnosis and incident use of the ChEIs, namely donepezil, galantamine, or rivastigmine, were included. The primary outcome of interest was SAEs defined as emergency department visits, inpatient hospitalizations, or death within 6 months of ChEI initiation. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression with propensity score (PS) as a covariate and inverse probability of treatment weighting generated using generalized boosted models was used to assess the risk of SAEs across individual ChEIs.

RESULTS

The study included 767,684 older adults with dementia who were incident new users of ChEIs (donepezil 79.42%, rivastigmine 17.67%, galantamine 2.91%). SAEs were observed in 15.5% of the cohort within 6 months of ChEI prescription. Cox regression model with PS as covariate found that patients prescribed rivastigmine (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.12; 95% CI 1.03-1.33) and galantamine (aHR 1.51; 95% CI 1.24-1.84) were at increased risk of SAEs compared with patients on donepezil. Stratified analyses revealed that rivastigmine was associated with an 18% increased risk for SAEs in females (aHR 1.18; 95% CI 1.06-1.31), and galantamine was associated with a 71% increased risk in males (aHR 1.71; 95% CI 1.17-2.51) compared with donepezil. High and recommended index doses of rivastigmine and galantamine were associated with an increased risk of SAEs compared with donepezil. The findings were consistent in sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSION

The study found that the risk of SAEs varied across individual ChEIs, with sex and dose moderating these effects. Therefore, these moderating effects should be carefully considered in personalizing dementia care.