Perspectives of Pediatric Rheumatologists on Initiating and Tapering Biologics in Patients with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: A Formative Qualitative Study

Diagnostic accuracy of serum calprotectin measured by CLIA and EIA in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a proof-of-concept study

Objective

C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) are used to assess disease activity in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). However, because these biomarkers do not always differentiate between active and inactive disease, there is a need for alternative markers such as serum calprotectin (sCal). The main aim of this proof-of-concept study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of sCal in patients with JIA. Secondary aims were to identify the optimal sCal cut-off levels to define active disease and evaluate the association between these biomarkers and disease activity status.

Methods

Serum samples were obtained from 25 pediatric patients with JIA. Serum calprotectin levels were determined by two different assays, the QUANTA FLASH chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA) from Inova Diagnostics and the solid-phase enzyme immunoassay (EIA) from Bühlmann Laboratories. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed for sCal CLIA, sCal EIA, CRP, and ESR. The results obtained by the CLIA and EIA methodologies were compared. We also evaluated the association between the individual each biomarkers (sCal CLIA, sCal EIA, CRP, and ESR) and disease activity (according to JADAS-27 criteria and the ACR criteria modified by Anink and colleagues).

Results

For both sCal assays (CLIA and EIA), the optimal cut-off level (ROC analysis) was the same (2.3 µg/ml). Serum calprotectin levels measured by CLIA and EIA were strongly correlated with each other (Kendall's tau-b, 0.71; p < 0.001). Compared to ESR and CRP, sCal CLIA and EIA were both more accurate (i.e., greater sensitivity) in identifying patients with active disease. By contrast, ESR and CRP were more effective in identifying patients in remission (i.e., better specificity).

Conclusion

This proof-of-concept study shows that determination of serum calprotectin levels with CLIA or EIA can accurately identify the presence of active disease in patients with JIA.

Clinical decision making for VA ECMO weaning in patients with cardiogenic shock A formative qualitative study

Weaning and liberation from VA ECMO in cardiogenic shock patients comprises a complex process requiring a continuous trade off between multiple clinical parameters. In the absence of dedicated international guidelines, we hypothesized a great heterogeneity in weaning practices among ECMO centers due to a variety in local preferences, logistics, case load and individual professional experience. This qualitative study focused on the appraisal of clinicians' preferences in decision processes towards liberation from VA ECMO after cardiogenic shock while using focus group interviews in 4 large hospitals. The goal was to provide novel and unique insights in daily clinical weaning practices. As expected, we found we a great heterogeneity of weaning strategies among centers and professionals, although participants appeared to find common ground in a clinically straightforward approach to assess the feasibility of ECMO liberation at the bedside. This was shown in a preference for robust, easily accessible parameters such as arterial pulse pressure, stable cardiac index ≥2.1 L/min, VTI LVOT and 'eyeballing' LVEF.

Adolescent and caregiver preferences for juvenile idiopathic arthritis treatment: a discrete-choice experiment

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to elicit and quantify preferences for treatments for juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA).

METHODS

We conducted a discrete-choice experiment among adolescents with JIA in the United States (US) (n = 197) and United Kingdom (UK) (n = 100) and caregivers of children with JIA in the US (n = 207) and UK (n = 200). In a series of questions, respondents chose between experimentally designed profiles for hypothetical JIA treatments that varied in efficacy (symptom control; time until next flare-up), side effects (stomachache, nausea, and vomiting; headaches), mode and frequency of administration, and the need for combination therapy. Using a random-parameters logit model, we estimated preference weights for these attributes, from which we derived their conditional relative importance.

RESULTS

On average, respondents preferred greater symptom control; greater time until the next flare-up; less stomachache, nausea, and vomiting; and fewer headaches. However, adolescents and caregivers in the US were generally indifferent across varying modes and frequencies of administration. UK adolescents and caregivers preferred tablets, syrup, or injections to intravenous infusions. US and UK adolescents were indifferent between treatment with monotherapy or combination therapy; caregivers in the UK preferred treatment with combination therapy to monotherapy. Subgroup analysis showed preference heterogeneity across characteristics including gender, treatment experience, and symptom experience in both adolescents and caregivers.

CONCLUSIONS

Improved symptom control, prolonged time to next flare-up, and avoidance of adverse events such as headache, stomachache, nausea, and vomiting are desirable characteristics of treatment regimens for adolescents with JIA and their caregivers.

Withdrawing biologics in non-systemic JIA: what matters to pediatric rheumatologists?

OBJECTIVE

Approximately one third of children with JIA receive biologic therapy, but evidence on biologic therapy withdrawal is lacking. This study aims to increase our understanding of whether and when pediatric rheumatologists postpone a decision to withdraw biologic therapy in children with clinically inactive non-systemic JIA.

METHODS

A survey containing questions about background characteristics, treatment patterns, minimum treatment time with biologic therapy, and 16 different patient vignettes, was distributed among 83 pediatric rheumatologists in Canada and the Netherlands. For each vignette, respondents were asked whether they would withdraw biologic therapy at their minimum treatment time, and if not, how long they would continue biologic therapy. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics, logistic and interval regression analysis.

RESULTS

Thirty-three pediatric rheumatologists completed the survey (40% response rate). Pediatric rheumatologists are most likely to postpone the decision to withdraw biologic therapy when the child and/or parents express a preference for continuation (OR 6.3; p < 0.001), in case of a flare in the current treatment period (OR 3.9; p = 0.001), and in case of uveitis in the current treatment period (OR 3.9; p < 0.001). On average, biologic therapy withdrawal is initiated 6.7 months later when the child or parent prefer to continue treatment.

CONCLUSION

Patient's and parents' preferences were the strongest driver of a decision to postpone biologic therapy withdrawal in children with clinically inactive non-systemic JIA and prolongs treatment duration. These findings highlight the potential benefit of a tool to support pediatric rheumatologists, patients and parents in decision making, and can help inform its design.