1
|
Carapinha JL. Market Transparency in Medicine Pricing: Pathways to Fair Pricing. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2024; 42:611-614. [PMID: 38722539 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-024-01390-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/22/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- João L Carapinha
- Syenza, Anaheim, CA, USA.
- School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Marshall DA, Hua N, Buchanan J, Christensen KD, Frederix GWJ, Goranitis I, Ijzerman M, Jansen JP, Lavelle TA, Regier DA, Smith HS, Ungar WJ, Weymann D, Wordsworth S, Phillips KA. Paving the path for implementation of clinical genomic sequencing globally: Are we ready? HEALTH AFFAIRS SCHOLAR 2024; 2:qxae053. [PMID: 38783891 PMCID: PMC11115369 DOI: 10.1093/haschl/qxae053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2024] [Revised: 04/18/2024] [Accepted: 04/25/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024]
Abstract
Despite the emerging evidence in recent years, successful implementation of clinical genomic sequencing (CGS) remains limited and is challenged by a range of barriers. These include a lack of standardized practices, limited economic assessments for specific indications, limited meaningful patient engagement in health policy decision-making, and the associated costs and resource demand for implementation. Although CGS is gradually becoming more available and accessible worldwide, large variations and disparities remain, and reflections on the lessons learned for successful implementation are sparse. In this commentary, members of the Global Economics and Evaluation of Clinical Genomics Sequencing Working Group (GEECS) describe the global landscape of CGS in the context of health economics and policy and propose evidence-based solutions to address existing and future barriers to CGS implementation. The topics discussed are reflected as two overarching themes: (1) system readiness for CGS and (2) evidence, assessments, and approval processes. These themes highlight the need for health economics, public health, and infrastructure and operational considerations; a robust patient- and family-centered evidence base on CGS outcomes; and a comprehensive, collaborative, interdisciplinary approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah A Marshall
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 4Z6, Canada
- Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 4N1, Canada
| | - Nicolle Hua
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 4Z6, Canada
| | - James Buchanan
- Health Economics and Policy Research Unit, Centre for Evaluation and Methods, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 2AB, United Kingdom
| | - Kurt D Christensen
- PRecisiOn Medicine Translational Research (PROMoTeR) Center, Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA 02215, United States
| | - Geert W J Frederix
- Epidemiology and Health Economics, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3584 CG Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Ilias Goranitis
- Health Economics Unit, Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia
- Australian Genomics, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia
| | - Maarten Ijzerman
- University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Eramus University Rotterdam, 3062 PA Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jeroen P Jansen
- Center for Translational and Policy Research on Precision Medicine (TRANSPERS), Department of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, United States
| | - Tara A Lavelle
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA 02111, United States
| | - Dean A Regier
- Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, Cancer Control Research, BC Cancer Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia V5Z 1L3, Canada
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z3, Canada
| | - Hadley S Smith
- PRecisiOn Medicine Translational Research (PROMoTeR) Center, Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA 02215, United States
| | - Wendy J Ungar
- Program of Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario M5G 0A4, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5T 3M6, Canada
| | - Deirdre Weymann
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z3, Canada
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia V5A 1S6, Canada
| | - Sarah Wordsworth
- Health Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health and NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LF, United Kingdom
| | - Kathryn A Phillips
- Center for Translational and Policy Research on Precision Medicine (TRANSPERS), Department of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, United States
- Health Affairs Scholar Emerging & Global Health Policy, Health Affairs, Washington, DC 20036, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bayani DB, Wee HL. Value-based payment for high-cost treatments in Singapore: a qualitative study of stakeholders' perspectives. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2024; 40:e22. [PMID: 38629196 DOI: 10.1017/s0266462324000217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/03/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The rising costs of drugs have necessitated the exploration of innovative payment methods in healthcare systems. Risk-sharing agreements (RSAs) have been implemented in many countries as a value-based payment mechanism to manage the uncertainty associated with expensive technologies. This study aimed to investigate stakeholder perspectives on value-based payment in the Singaporean context, providing insights for future directions in health technology assessment and financing. METHODS This descriptive qualitative inquiry involved participant interviews conducted between October 2021 and April 2022. Thematic analysis was conducted in two phases to analyze the interview transcripts. RESULTS Seventeen respondents participated in the study, and five key themes emerged from the analysis. Stakeholders viewed RSAs as moderately positive, despite limited experience with them. They emphasized the importance of clearly defining objectives and establishing transparent criteria for implementing these schemes. The current data infrastructure was identified as both a barrier and facilitator, as RSAs impose administrative burdens. To successfully implement these payment mechanisms, capacity building, and effective stakeholder engagement that fosters mutual trust and cocreation are crucial. CONCLUSION This study confirms previously identified barriers and facilitators to successful RSA implementation while contextualizing them within the Singaporean setting. The findings suggest that value-based payment has the potential to address uncertainty and improve access to healthcare technologies, but these barriers must be addressed for the schemes to be effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diana Beatriz Bayani
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Hwee Lin Wee
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sorato MM, Davari M, Kebriaeezadeh A. Improving access to medicines to reduce marketing and use of substandard and falsified medicines in Africa: Scoping review. THE JOURNAL OF MEDICINE ACCESS 2024; 8:27550834241236598. [PMID: 38476401 PMCID: PMC10929061 DOI: 10.1177/27550834241236598] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2023] [Accepted: 02/15/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024]
Abstract
Background Both constrained access to essential medicines and combatting marketing of substandard and falsified (SF) medicines are unmet health sector goals in Africa. Objective To answer the question of how improved access can reduce the continuous surge of SF medicines in Africa. Design We conducted a scoping review based on standard protocol. Methods We searched articles published in the English language from PubMed/Medline, Cochrane Library, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar by using a systematic search query. Results Seventy-one articles were included in this review. Access to quality essential medicines is still a major problem in developing countries in Africa and will continue as a threat for the next decade of health care. Ensuring access to quality medicines and preventing SF medicines in Africa need a systematic approach to address their underlying causes. Failure to ensure access to medicines is the major reason for the availability of SF medicines. Improving access to quality medicines can reduce SF medicine marketing and use. Manipulating the entire supply chain for efficiency, avoiding trade agreements that could reduce access, using compulsory licensing provisions, and pharmaceutical price control, providing incentives for drug development, and promoting rational use of medicines can improve access. Conclusion Ensuring access to medicines and preventing SF medicine marketing cannot be achieved in the planned period in developing countries in Africa unless a comprehensive strategy is used. Improving access to quality medicines can reduce SF medicine marketing and use, that is, ensuring access through uninterrupted supply, improved efficiency, enhanced local production, preventing SF medicine entry, improved medication use system, and improved affordability. Therefore, it is essential to improve supply chain capability, address challenges of the supply chain, improve leadership and governance, establish country-specific anti-counterfeiting and anti-substandardization committees, and collaborate with all relevant stakeholders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mende Mensa Sorato
- Department of Pharmacy, College of Medicine, Komar University of Science and Technology, Sulaimaniyah, Iraq
| | - Majid Davari
- Department of Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmaceutical Administration, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Abbas Kebriaeezadeh
- Department of Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmaceutical Administration, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bayani DB, Wee HL. Implementing outcomes-based risk-sharing agreements: an integrative review of applications in blood cancer in the UK and beyond. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2023; 23:879-889. [PMID: 37482751 DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2023.2240515] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2023] [Accepted: 07/20/2023] [Indexed: 07/25/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Outcomes-based risk-sharing agreements (OBRSA) have been increasingly used worldwide to manage uncertainty in value assessments. This review aimed to summarize motivations, barriers, and facilitators to implementing OBRSAs with a specific focus on therapies for hematological cancer. AREAS COVERED An integrative review was conducted based on a scoping of existing reviews on the topic and reports published by UK NICE. Findings from 16 articles and 10 reports were summarized and categorized into three themes: applications in blood cancer drugs, motivations for adoption, and barriers and facilitators to implementation. EXPERT OPINION There was a dissociation between the theoretical basis for opting for OBRSAs, and reasons stated or inferred from practice. The administrative burden was considered a notable barrier to implementation, which affects not only payers and manufacturers but also healthcare providers. Effective stakeholder engagement and building mutual trust among key groups were identified as factors enabling successful implementation. The review raises essential considerations in implementing OBRSAs and implications for their future role, particularly for blood cancer drugs where uncertainty is rife. Carefully designed and managed schemes may remain an option for health systems to manage risks involved when funding high-cost treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diana Beatriz Bayani
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Republic of Singapore
| | - Hwee Lin Wee
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Republic of Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Beletsi A, Stefanou G, Kourlaba G. Time From Marketing Authorization to Reimbursement of Medicines in Greece After the Introduction of the Health Technology Assessment Process From July 2018 to April 2022. Value Health Reg Issues 2023; 36:58-65. [PMID: 37030032 DOI: 10.1016/j.vhri.2023.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2022] [Revised: 02/04/2023] [Accepted: 03/07/2023] [Indexed: 04/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aimed to quantify the median time from marketing authorization (MA) to the inclusion of medicines in the reimbursement list after the introduction of the health technology assessment process in Greece. METHODS From July 2018 to April 2022, the Ministerial Decisions (MDs) and reimbursement lists, posted on the website of the Ministry of Health, were reviewed. The following information was collected for the medicines: the date that MDs and positive reimbursement lists were issued, the MA date, the date of the official price publication, and the type of the health technology assessment application. The time from MA to listing was calculated as the difference between the MA date and the date that the relevant reimbursement list was issued. RESULTS During the study period, 93 MDs were issued, from which 79 (85%) were positive and 14 (15%) were negative. Focusing on medicines included in the positive list for the first time, the median time from MA to listing for the new molecules was found to be 34.8 (interquartile range 25.7-41.3) months. This time was statistically significantly shortened for fixed dose combinations (20.9 [15.3-45.4] months, P = .008), and biosimilars (23 [16.6-28.2] months, P = .001). For generics was 17.6 (interquartile range 10-30) months, statistically significantly lower than that of new molecules (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS The time from MA to the inclusion of medicines in the reimbursement list in Greece is significantly long, especially for innovative medicines. Thus, policy makers should consider this point to optimize and improve patients' subsidized access.
Collapse
|
7
|
Kim H, Godman B, Kwon HY, Hong SH. Introduction of managed entry agreements in Korea: Problem, policy, and politics. Front Pharmacol 2023; 14:999220. [PMID: 37124231 PMCID: PMC10133550 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.999220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2022] [Accepted: 03/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to understand Managed Entry Agreements (MEAs) in Korea through the framework of three streams of the policy window model and its practical management and impact on pricing and reimbursement scheme. Methods: An extensive literature review based on Kingdon's model was conducted. We also performed descriptive analyses of MEA implementation using data on medicines listed in Korea and compared its MEA scheme with four different countries. Results: As per problem streams, patients with rare disease or cancers have considerable difficulties in affording their medicines and this has challenged the drug benefit system and raised an issue of patient's access. Policy streams highlighted that MEAs were introduced as a benefit enhancement plan for four major diseases since January 2014. MEAs have also been strengthened as a bypass mechanism to expand the insurance coverage especially for new premium-priced medicines under Moon Care (Listing all non-listed services). In descriptive analysis of MEAs, a total of 48 medicines were contracted as MEAs from January 2014 to December 2020, accounting for 73.4% of listed medicines for cancer or rare diseases and 97.9% of the cases were finance-based contracts. Meanwhile, outcome-based contracts such as CED accounted for only 2.1%. The application of MEAs differs across countries, resulting in a kappa coefficient of 0.00-0.14 (United Kingdom 0.03, Italy 0.00, Australia 0.14), indicating a lack of consistency compared to South Korea. Conclusion: MEAs, which were introduced as a bypass mechanism, have now superseded the standard process for anticancer agents or orphan drugs. Further studies are needed to evaluate the impact of the confidential agreements and effectiveness of new high-priced medicines with limited clinical data at launch.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyungmin Kim
- College of Pharmacy, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- National Health Insurance Service, Wonju, Republic of Korea
| | - Brian Godman
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology, Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom
- Division of Public Health Pharmacy and Management, School of Pharmacy, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Pretoria, South Africa
- School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia
| | - Hye-Young Kwon
- Division of Biology and Public Health, Mokwon University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
- *Correspondence: Hye-Young Kwon, ; Song Hee Hong,
| | - Song Hee Hong
- College of Pharmacy, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- *Correspondence: Hye-Young Kwon, ; Song Hee Hong,
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Reimbursement and payment models in Central and Eastern European as well as Middle Eastern countries: A survey of their current use and future outlook. Drug Discov Today 2023; 28:103433. [PMID: 36372328 DOI: 10.1016/j.drudis.2022.103433] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2022] [Revised: 09/01/2022] [Accepted: 11/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
There is growing interest in innovative reimbursement and payment models in Central and Eastern European (CEE) and Middle Eastern (ME) countries. A questionnaire was sent to payers from CEE and ME countries regarding the current use of, future preferences for and perceived barriers with these models. Twenty-seven healthcare payers from 11 countries completed the survey. Results showed participants preferred using outcome-based reimbursement models and delayed payment models more often; however, currently they are rarely applied. Barriers hindering implementation were mostly related to IT and data infrastructure, measurement issues, transaction costs and the administrative burden. Given these barriers highlighted in our study, policymakers should focus on the development of an implementation framework with contract templates for the preferred reimbursement and payment schemes to aid the feasibility of a successful implementation.
Collapse
|
9
|
Callenbach MHE, Vreman RA, Mantel-Teeuwisse AK, Goettsch WG. When Reality Does Not Meet Expectations-Experiences and Perceived Attitudes of Dutch Stakeholders Regarding Payment and Reimbursement Models for High-Priced Hospital Drugs. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 20:340. [PMID: 36612665 PMCID: PMC9819658 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20010340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2022] [Revised: 12/20/2022] [Accepted: 12/22/2022] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
This study aimed to identify the current experiences with and future preferences for payment and reimbursement models for high-priced hospital therapies in the Netherlands, where the main barriers lie and assess how policy structures facilitate these models. A questionnaire was sent out to Dutch stakeholders (in)directly involved in payment and reimbursement agreements. The survey contained statements assessed with Likert scales, rankings and open questions. The results were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Thirty-nine stakeholders (out of 100) (in)directly involved with reimbursement decision-making completed the survey. Our inquiry showed that currently financial-based reimbursement models are applied most, especially discounts were perceived best due to their simplicity. For the future, outcome-based reimbursement models were preferred, particularly pay-for-outcome models. The main stated challenge for implementation was generating evidence in practice. According to the respondents, upfront payments are currently implemented most often, whereas delayed payment models are preferred to be applied more frequently in the future. Particularly payment-at-outcome-achieved models are preferred; however, they were stated as administratively challenging to arrange. The respondents were moderately satisfied with the payment and reimbursement system in the Netherlands, arguing that the transparency of the final agreements and mutual trust could be improved. These insights can provide stakeholders with future direction when negotiating and implementing innovative reimbursement and payment models. Attention should be paid to the main barriers that are currently perceived as hindering a more frequent implementation of the preferred models and how national policy structures can facilitate a successful implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcelien H. E. Callenbach
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology & Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS), Utrecht University, 3584 CG Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Rick A. Vreman
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology & Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS), Utrecht University, 3584 CG Utrecht, The Netherlands
- National Health Care Institute (ZIN), 1112 ZA Diemen, The Netherlands
| | - Aukje K. Mantel-Teeuwisse
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology & Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS), Utrecht University, 3584 CG Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Wim G. Goettsch
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology & Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS), Utrecht University, 3584 CG Utrecht, The Netherlands
- National Health Care Institute (ZIN), 1112 ZA Diemen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Simoens S, Abdallah K, Barbier L, Lacosta TB, Blonda A, Car E, Claessens Z, Desmet T, De Sutter E, Govaerts L, Janssens R, Lalova T, Moorkens E, Saesen R, Schoefs E, Vandenplas Y, Van Overbeeke E, Verbaanderd C, Huys I. How to balance valuable innovation with affordable access to medicines in Belgium? Front Pharmacol 2022; 13:960701. [PMID: 36188534 PMCID: PMC9523170 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.960701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2022] [Accepted: 08/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Countries are struggling to provide affordable access to medicines while supporting the market entry of innovative, expensive products. This Perspective aims to discuss challenges and avenues for balancing health care system objectives of access, affordability and innovation related to medicines in Belgium (and in other countries). Methods: This Perspective focuses on the R&D, regulatory approval and market access phases, with particular attention to oncology medicines, precision medicines, orphan medicines, advanced therapies, repurposed medicines, generics and biosimilars. The authors conducted a narrative review of the peer-reviewed literature, of the grey literature (such as policy documents and reports of consultancy agencies), and of their own research. Results: Health care stakeholders need to consider various initiatives for balancing innovation with access to medicines, which relate to clinical and non-clinical outcomes (e.g. supporting the conduct of pragmatic clinical trials, treatment optimisation and patient preference studies, optimising the use of real-world evidence in market access decision making), value assessment (e.g. increasing the transparency of the reimbursement system and criteria, tailoring the design of managed entry agreements to specific types of uncertainty), affordability (e.g. harnessing the role of generics and biosimilars in encouraging price competition, maximising opportunities for personalising and repurposing medicines) and access mechanisms (e.g. promoting collaboration and early dialogue between stakeholders including patients). Conclusion: Although there is no silver bullet that can balance valuable innovation with affordable access to medicines, (Belgian) policy and decision makers should continue to explore initiatives that exploit the potential of both the on-patent and off-patent pharmaceutical markets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven Simoens
- KU Leuven Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Khadidja Abdallah
- KU Leuven Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Liese Barbier
- KU Leuven Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Alessandra Blonda
- KU Leuven Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Elif Car
- KU Leuven Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Zilke Claessens
- KU Leuven Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Thomas Desmet
- KU Leuven Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Evelien De Sutter
- KU Leuven Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Laurenz Govaerts
- KU Leuven Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Rosanne Janssens
- KU Leuven Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Teodora Lalova
- KU Leuven Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Leuven, Belgium
- KU Leuven Centre for IT & IP Law (CiTiP), Leuven, Belgium
| | - Evelien Moorkens
- KU Leuven Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Robbe Saesen
- KU Leuven Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Leuven, Belgium
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Elise Schoefs
- KU Leuven Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Yannick Vandenplas
- KU Leuven Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Eline Van Overbeeke
- KU Leuven Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ciska Verbaanderd
- KU Leuven Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Leuven, Belgium
- Anticancer Fund, Strombeek-Bever, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Isabelle Huys
- KU Leuven Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Streamlining breast cancer and colorectal cancer biosimilar regulations to improve treatment access in Latin America: an expert panel perspective. Lancet Oncol 2022; 23:e348-e358. [DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(22)00121-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2021] [Revised: 02/11/2022] [Accepted: 02/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
12
|
Faleiros DR, Nunes da Silva E, Santos AC, Godman BB, Goncalves Pereira R, Guerra Junior AA. Adoption of new therapies in the treatment of Hepatitis: a verification of the accuracy of budget impact analysis to guide investment decisions. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2022; 22:927-939. [PMID: 35320682 DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2022.2057950] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES While there are good Budget Impact Analysis (BIA) guidelines, studies still register potential bias. To do this, we compared the results between theoretical and real-world evidence (RWE) expenditures for medicines for Hepatitis C: boceprevir (BOC) and telaprevir (TVR). While both are not currently recommended in treatment guidelines following recent developments, this is an emblematic case because for 4 years these medicines consumed considerable resources. METHODS Theoretical results and RWE expenditures were compared regarding the incorporation of BOC and TVR in 2013-2014 into the Brazilian Public Health System. Theoretical values were extracted from Commission for Technology Incorporation Report and RWE expenditures were extracted from the administrative data records using deterministic-probabilistic linkage. RESULTS The estimated number of patients treated (BOC+TVR) was 13,012 versus 7,641 (real). The estimated purchase price for BOC was US$6.20 versus US$11.07 (real) and for TVR was US$42.21 versus US$84.09 (average/real). The estimated budget impact was US$285.16 million versus US$128.58 million (real). CONCLUSION This study demonstrates appreciable divergence (US$156.58 million) between the theoretical budget impact and RWE expenditures due to underestimated purchase prices and overestimated populations. The greater the degree of accuracy the more reliable and usable BIAs become for decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Resende Faleiros
- Nucleus Infectious and Parasitic Diseases, Tropical Medicine Centre, University of Brasilia, Brasília, Brazil
| | | | - Andreia C Santos
- Department of Clinical Research, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Brian B Godman
- Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.,Centre of Medical and Bio-allied Health Sciences Research, Ajman University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates.,Department of Public Health Pharmacy and Management, School of Pharmacy, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Ramon Goncalves Pereira
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Federal University of Minas Gerais,Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
| | - Augusto A Guerra Junior
- Department of Social Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Federal University of Minas Gerais. Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Bohm N, Bermingham S, Grimsey Jones F, Gonçalves-Bradley DC, Diamantopoulos A, Burton JR, Laing H. The Challenges of Outcomes-Based Contract Implementation for Medicines in Europe. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2022; 40:13-29. [PMID: 34480324 PMCID: PMC8738500 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-021-01070-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/18/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim was to outline the challenges of implementing outcomes-based contracts (OBCs) in Europe. METHODS A scoping review was conducted, building on the searches of a previous systematic review and updating them for December 2017 until May 2021. The combined results were screened, based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. All identified studies published in the English language that described specific OBC schemes for medicines in European countries were included. Insights into the challenges of OBCs were extracted and analysed to develop a conceptual framework. RESULTS Ten articles from the previous systematic review matched our inclusion criteria, along with 14 articles from electronic searches. Analysis of these 24 articles and classification of the challenges revealed that there are multiple barriers that must be overcome if OBCs that benefit all stakeholders are going to be adopted widely across Europe. These challenges were grouped according to five key themes: negotiation framework; outcomes; data; administration and implementation; and laws and regulation. CONCLUSIONS If the promise of OBCs is to be fully realised in Europe, there remain major challenges that need to be overcome by all stakeholders working in partnership. The overlapping and interconnected nature of these challenges highlights the complexity of OBC arrangements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie Bohm
- Pfizer Limited, Walton Oaks, Dorking Road, Tadworth, KT20 7NS, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | - Jessica R Burton
- Pfizer Limited, Walton Oaks, Dorking Road, Tadworth, KT20 7NS, UK
| | - Hamish Laing
- Value-Based Health and Care Academy, School of Management, Swansea University, Swansea, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Vicente G, Cunico C, Leite SN. Transforming uncertainties into legitimate regulation? NICE and CONITEC agencies' decisions on rare diseases. CIENCIA & SAUDE COLETIVA 2021; 26:5533-5546. [PMID: 34852088 DOI: 10.1590/1413-812320212611.34542020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2020] [Accepted: 02/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
As a scientific and technological practice, the evaluation of health technologies (HTA) is, at the same time, a challenge to determine the value of the technologies to be incorporated. This study aimed to explore and compare the results and technical elements of the evaluations issued for rare diseases between the English (NICE) and the Brazilian agency (CONITEC). The first part of the study involved the systematic search for evaluations from 2013 to 2019. In the second stage, the reports were analyzed based on: (i) descriptive narrative review; and (ii) calculation of the absolute and relative frequency according to each domain and component (element) applied in the European HTA network model. Twenty-four medicines were distinctly assessed during the study period. Through 126 questions (elements) distributed among nine domains, the analysis revealed that 67 (53.2%) and 44 (35.0%) were described in the reports, 42 (33.3%) and 59 (47.0 %) were only considered partially, and 17 (13.5%) and 23 (18.0%) were not considered in the NICE and CONITEC reports, respectively. We identified a relatively low agreement between the Brazilian agency with the English agency in the reports issued for rare diseases. It remains to be seen whether the agencies are able to capture the various values of these medicines, as well as manage uncertainties in the evaluations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Geison Vicente
- Departamento de Ciências Farmacêuticas, Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. R. Delfino Conti S/N Trindade, 88040-370 Florianópolis SC Brasil.
| | - Cássia Cunico
- Departamento de Ciências Farmacêuticas, Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. R. Delfino Conti S/N Trindade, 88040-370 Florianópolis SC Brasil.
| | - Silvana Nair Leite
- Departamento de Ciências Farmacêuticas, Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. R. Delfino Conti S/N Trindade, 88040-370 Florianópolis SC Brasil.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Cruz BD, Barbosa MM, Torres LL, Azevedo PS, Silva VEA, Godman B, Alvares-Teodoro J. Crizotinib Versus Conventional Chemotherapy in First-Line Treatment for ALK-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Oncol Ther 2021; 9:505-524. [PMID: 34117602 PMCID: PMC8594233 DOI: 10.1007/s40487-021-00155-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2021] [Accepted: 05/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Lung cancer is the most frequently diagnosed type of cancer and the main cause of death from malignant neoplasms worldwide. One of the most recent discoveries in the context of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was the mutation of the anaplastic lymphoma kinase receptor (ALK). This genetic alteration is found in approximately 2-5% of NSCLC patients, and crizotinib was the first targeted therapy discovered for its first-line treatment. OBJECTIVE To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the magnitude of the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) from using crizotinib as treatment compared to traditional chemotherapy to guide future decision making. METHODS PRISMA and Cochrane recommendations were followed using the findings based on studies published in the main international electronic databases. Selection criteria included the following: randomized clinical trials (RCT) or cohort studies that had assessed the efficacy and effectiveness of crizotinib as monotherapy in patients with NSCLC with ALK fusions. RESULTS From 2504 publications identified in the literature, only eight publications referring to seven studies met the selection criteria, with high heterogeneity identified between the studies. Overall, there was a significant gain in PFS (HR 0.38; 95% CI 0.30-0.49; p < 0.00001); however, there was no significant gain in OS (HR 0.68; 95% CI 0.43-1.08; p = 0.10). CONCLUSION The study highlighted and confirmed that treatment with crizotinib led to clinical improvement in PFS among patients with advanced NSCLC with ALK fusion, as previously reported. However, there was no increase in overall survival in patients with NSCLC with genetic alterations of ALK. This must be considered when reviewing and funding treatments for NSCLC patients with this mutation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara D Cruz
- Programa de Pós-Graduação Em Medicamentos E Assistência Farmacêutica, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
| | - Mariana M Barbosa
- Câmara de Regulação Do Mercado de Medicamentos (CMED), Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (ANVISA), Governo Federal, Brasília, Brazil
| | - Lucas L Torres
- Programa de Pós-Graduação Em Medicamentos E Assistência Farmacêutica, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
| | - Pamela S Azevedo
- Programa de Pós-Graduação Em Medicamentos E Assistência Farmacêutica, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
| | - Vânia E A Silva
- Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais, PUC Minas, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
| | - Brian Godman
- Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, G4 0RE, UK
- School of Pharmacy, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Garankuwa, South Africa
| | - Juliana Alvares-Teodoro
- Programa de Pós-Graduação Em Medicamentos E Assistência Farmacêutica, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Vella Bonanno P, Cassar V, Godman B. A Review of the Evidence on Attitudes, Perceived Impacts and Motivational Factors for European Member State Collaboration for Pricing and Reimbursement of Medicines: Time for the EEA Member States to Apply Their Experience and Expertise in Evidence-Based Decision Making to Their Current Pharmaceutical Policy Challenges. Front Pharmacol 2021; 12:666405. [PMID: 34867312 PMCID: PMC8633953 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2021.666405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2021] [Accepted: 09/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
In 2018/2019 there were a number of initiatives for collaboration between Member States in the European Economic Area (EEA) and the European Commission published a Proposal for a Regulation on Health Technology Assessment. In view of the perceived benefits from collaboration, the experiences and challenges of these collaborative initiatives and the possible implications of the proposed legislation, a study of the evidence on attitudes, perceived impacts and the motivational factors towards European Member State collaboration regarding the pricing and reimbursement of medicines was conducted. This study adopted an evidence-based management approach by Barends and Rousseau. The main findings showed that Member States differed in their motivation for collaboration for different pharmaceutical activities. Member States favoured voluntary co-operation for all activities of pricing and reimbursement except for relative effectiveness assessments where Member State authorities had divergent attitudes and prioritised activities related to the sustainability of their healthcare systems and access to medicines. Contrastingly pharmaceutical companies strongly favoured mandatory cooperation for evaluation. Member States motivation for collaboration was highly dependent on the purpose, political will, implementation climate and cultural factors. Currently, with the experiences of ongoing collaborations, following the progress of the discussion at Council, and with a number of inititatives for new pharmaceutical strategy and policy, it is proposed that Member States use their trust, expertise and knowledge of application of evidence-based decision making for pricing and reimbursement of medicines and apply it to decide the future model for Member State collaboration. The applicability of principles of evidence-based management to pharmaceutical policy can be used as a starting point.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patricia Vella Bonanno
- Department of Management, Faculty of Economics, Management and Accountancy, University of Malta, Msida, Malta
- Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Vincent Cassar
- Department of Management, Faculty of Economics, Management and Accountancy, University of Malta, Msida, Malta
| | - Brian Godman
- Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom
- Division of Public Health Pharmacy and Management, School of Pharmacy, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Pretoria, South Africa
- School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
O'Mahony JF. Revision of Ireland's Cost-Effectiveness Threshold: New State-Industry Drug Pricing Deal Should Adequately Reflect Opportunity Costs. PHARMACOECONOMICS - OPEN 2021; 5:339-348. [PMID: 34318440 PMCID: PMC8315504 DOI: 10.1007/s41669-021-00289-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/11/2021] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
Abstract
Ireland's cost-effectiveness threshold is currently €45,000 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). It has previously been determined by periodic agreements between the State and a pharma industry lobby body. A new deal is due in July 2021 and it is therefore timely to re-examine Ireland's threshold, how it is set and transparency around adherence to it. Previous research has noted a series of problems with the threshold, including that it is likely too high relative to the opportunity cost of unmet need within Ireland's health system. This means reimbursement at the threshold may do net harm to population health. The high threshold may also mean the Irish health system is failing to satisfy existing legislation on healthcare resource allocation. Recent COVID-19-related pressures on healthcare capacity and public spending appear to increase the urgency for an evidence-based revision of threshold to better reflect opportunity costs within the Irish healthcare system. Despite these problems, the prospects for reform of the threshold do not appear strong as the political and institutional incentives may favour the status quo. At the very least, the State should provide greater transparency regarding how the threshold is set and adhered to. A potential reform for consideration in the longer run could include a partial abandonment of thresholds in favour of an auction process to achieve the lowest cost per QALY from new drug interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James F O'Mahony
- Centre for Health Policy and Management, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Xoxi E, Facey KM, Cicchetti A. The Evolution of AIFA Registries to Support Managed Entry Agreements for Orphan Medicinal Products in Italy. Front Pharmacol 2021; 12:699466. [PMID: 34456724 PMCID: PMC8386173 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2021.699466] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2021] [Accepted: 06/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Italy has a well-established prominent system of national registries to support managed entry agreements (MEAs), monitoring innovative medicinal products (MPs) with clinical as well as economic uncertainties to ensure appropriate use and best value for money. The technological architecture of the registries is funded by pharmaceutical companies, but fully governed by the national medicines agency (AIFA). A desktop analysis was undertaken of data over a 15-year timeframe of all AIFA indication-based registries and associated EMA information. The characteristics of registries were evaluated, comparing orphan MPs vs. all MPs exploring cancer and non-cancer indications. OMP (orphan medicinal product) registries’ type vs. AIFA innovation status and EMA approval was reviewed. Of the 283 registries, 182 are appropriateness registries (35.2% relate to OMPs, with an almost equal split of cancer vs. non-cancer for OMPs and MPs), 35 include financial-based agreements [20% OMPs (2 non-cancer, 5 cancer)], and 60 registries are payment by result agreements [23.3% OMPs (4 non-cancer, 10 cancer)]. Most OMPs (53/88) came through the normal regulatory route. With the strengthening of the system for evaluation of innovation, fewer outcomes-based registries have been instigated. AIFA has overcome many of the challenges experienced with MEA through developing an integrated national web-based data collection system: the challenge that remains for AIFA is to move from using the system for individual patient decisions about treatment to reviewing the wealth of data it now holds to optimize healthcare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Entela Xoxi
- Graduate School of Health Economics and Management, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Karen M Facey
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Americo Cicchetti
- Graduate School of Health Economics and Management, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Godman B, Fadare J, Kwon HY, Dias CZ, Kurdi A, Dias Godói IP, Kibuule D, Hoxha I, Opanga S, Saleem Z, Bochenek T, Marković-Peković V, Mardare I, Kalungia AC, Campbell S, Allocati E, Pisana A, Martin AP, Meyer JC. Evidence-based public policy making for medicines across countries: findings and implications for the future. J Comp Eff Res 2021; 10:1019-1052. [PMID: 34241546 DOI: 10.2217/cer-2020-0273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: Global expenditure on medicines is rising up to 6% per year driven by increasing prevalence of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) and new premium priced medicines for cancer, orphan diseases and other complex areas. This is difficult to sustain without reforms. Methods: Extensive narrative review of published papers and contextualizing the findings to provide future guidance. Results: New models are being introduced to improve the managed entry of new medicines including managed entry agreements, fair pricing approaches and monitoring prescribing against agreed guidance. Multiple measures have also successfully been introduced to improve the prescribing of established medicines. This includes encouraging greater prescribing of generics and biosimilars versus originators and patented medicines in a class to conserve resources without compromising care. In addition, reducing inappropriate antibiotic utilization. Typically, multiple measures are the most effective. Conclusion: Multiple measures will be needed to attain and retain universal healthcare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian Godman
- Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy & Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G4 0RE, UK
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Karolinska Institute, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, SE-141 86, Stockholm, Sweden
- School of Pharmacy, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Pretoria, South Africa
- School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia
| | - Joseph Fadare
- Department of Pharmacology & Therapeutics, Ekiti State University, Ado-Ekiti, Nigeria
- Department of Medicine, Ekiti State University Teaching Hospital, Ado-Ekiti, Nigeria
| | - Hye-Young Kwon
- Division of Biology and Public Health, Mokwon University, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Carolina Zampirolli Dias
- Graduate Program in Public Health, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
| | - Amanj Kurdi
- Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy & Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G4 0RE, UK
- School of Pharmacy, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Pretoria, South Africa
- Department of Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, Hawler Medical University, Erbil, Iraq
| | - Isabella Piassi Dias Godói
- Institute of Health & Biological Studies - Universidade Federal do Sul e Sudeste do Pará, Avenida dos Ipês, s/n, Cidade Universitária, Cidade Jardim, Marabá, Pará, Brazil
- Researcher of the Group (CNPq) for Epidemiological, Economic and Pharmacological Studies of Arboviruses (EEPIFARBO) - Universidade Federal do Sul e Sudeste do Pará; Avenida dos Ipês, s/n, Cidade Universitária, Cidade Jardim, Marabá, Pará, Brazil
| | - Dan Kibuule
- Department of Pharmacy Practice & Policy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Namibia, Windhoek, Namibia
| | - Iris Hoxha
- Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine Tirana, Albania
| | - Sylvia Opanga
- Department of Pharmaceutics & Pharmacy Practice, School of Pharmacy, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Zikria Saleem
- Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Tomasz Bochenek
- Department of Nutrition & Drug Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
| | - Vanda Marković-Peković
- Department of Social Pharmacy, University of Banja Luka, Faculty of Medicine, Banja Luka, Republic of Srpska, Bosnia & Herzegovina
| | - Ileana Mardare
- "Carol Davila" University of Medicine & Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
| | | | - Stephen Campbell
- Centre for Primary Care, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research & Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
- NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Eleonora Allocati
- Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche 'Mario Negri' IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Alice Pisana
- Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Antony P Martin
- Faculty of Health & Life Sciences, The University of Liverpool, Brownlow Hill, Liverpool, L69 3BX, UK
| | - Johanna C Meyer
- School of Pharmacy, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Pretoria, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
da Silva WC, Godman B, de Assis Acúrcio F, Cherchiglia ML, Martin A, Maruszczyk K, Izidoro JB, Portella MA, Lana AP, Campos Neto OH, Andrade EIG. The Budget Impact of Monoclonal Antibodies Used to Treat Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in Minas Gerais, Brazil. APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY 2021; 19:557-577. [PMID: 33506317 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-020-00626-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/23/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Biological medicines have increased the cost of cancer treatments, which also raises concerns about sustainability. In Brazil, three monoclonal antibodies (mAbs)-bevacizumab, cetuximab, and panitumumab-are indicated for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) but not currently funded by the Unified Health System (SUS). However, successful litigation has led to funding in some cases. OBJECTIVE Our objective was to evaluate the budgetary impact of including the mAbs bevacizumab, cetuximab, and panitumumab in standard chemotherapy for the treatment of mCRC within the SUS of Minas Gerais (MG), Brazil. METHOD A budget impact analysis of incorporating mAbs as first-line treatment of mCRC in MG was explored. The perspective taken was that of the Brazilian SUS, and a 5-year time horizon was applied. Data were collected from lawsuits undertaken between January 2009 and December 2016, and the model was populated with data from national databases and published sources. Costs are expressed in $US. RESULTS In total, 351 lawsuits resulted in funding for first-line treatment with mAbs for mCRC. The three alternative scenarios analyzed resulted in cost increases of 348-395% compared with the reference scenario. The use of panitumumab had a budgetary impact of $US103,360,980 compared with the reference scenario over a 5-year time horizon, and bevacizumab and cetuximab had budgetary impacts of $US111,334,890 and 113,772,870, respectively. The use of the anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mAbs (cetuximab and panitumumab) is restricted to the approximately 41% of patients with KRAS mutations, so the best cost alternative for incorporation would be the combination of panitumumab and bevacizumab, with a cost of approximately $US106 million. CONCLUSION These results highlight the appreciable costs for incorporating bevacizumab, cetuximab, and panitumumab into the SUS. Appreciable discounts are likely to be necessary before incorporation of these mAbs is approved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wânia Cristina da Silva
- Postgraduate Program in Medicines and Pharmaceutical Services, School of Pharmacy, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
| | - Brian Godman
- Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden
- Health Economics Centre, University of Liverpool Management School, Liverpool, UK
- Division of Public Health Pharmacy and Management, School of Pharmacy, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Francisco de Assis Acúrcio
- Postgraduate Program in Medicines and Pharmaceutical Services, School of Pharmacy, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
- Postgraduate Program in Public Health, School of Medicine, Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, Brazil
| | - Mariângela Leal Cherchiglia
- Postgraduate Program in Medicines and Pharmaceutical Services, School of Pharmacy, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
- Postgraduate Program in Public Health, School of Medicine, Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, Brazil
| | - Antony Martin
- Health Economics Centre, University of Liverpool Management School, Liverpool, UK
| | | | - Jans Bastos Izidoro
- Divisão de Medicamentos Essenciais, Departamento de Assistência Farmacêutica, Secretaria de Estado de Saúde de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
| | | | - Agner Pereira Lana
- Postgraduate Program in Public Health, School of Medicine, Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, Brazil
| | | | - Eli Iola Gurgel Andrade
- Postgraduate Program in Medicines and Pharmaceutical Services, School of Pharmacy, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
- Postgraduate Program in Public Health, School of Medicine, Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Godman B, Egwuenu A, Haque M, Malande OO, Schellack N, Kumar S, Saleem Z, Sneddon J, Hoxha I, Islam S, Mwita J, do Nascimento RCRM, Dias Godói IP, Niba LL, Amu AA, Acolatse J, Incoom R, Sefah IA, Opanga S, Kurdi A, Chikowe I, Khuluza F, Kibuule D, Ogunleye OO, Olalekan A, Markovic-Pekovic V, Meyer JC, Alfadl A, Phuong TNT, Kalungia AC, Campbell S, Pisana A, Wale J, Seaton RA. Strategies to Improve Antimicrobial Utilization with a Special Focus on Developing Countries. Life (Basel) 2021; 11:life11060528. [PMID: 34200116 PMCID: PMC8229985 DOI: 10.3390/life11060528] [Citation(s) in RCA: 81] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2021] [Revised: 05/22/2021] [Accepted: 06/02/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a high priority across countries as it increases morbidity, mortality and costs. Concerns with AMR have resulted in multiple initiatives internationally, nationally and regionally to enhance appropriate antibiotic utilization across sectors to reduce AMR, with the overuse of antibiotics exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Effectively tackling AMR is crucial for all countries. Principally a narrative review of ongoing activities across sectors was undertaken to improve antimicrobial use and address issues with vaccines including COVID-19. Point prevalence surveys have been successful in hospitals to identify areas for quality improvement programs, principally centering on antimicrobial stewardship programs. These include reducing prolonged antibiotic use to prevent surgical site infections. Multiple activities centering on education have been successful in reducing inappropriate prescribing and dispensing of antimicrobials in ambulatory care for essentially viral infections such as acute respiratory infections. It is imperative to develop new quality indicators for ambulatory care given current concerns, and instigate programs with clear public health messaging to reduce misinformation, essential for pandemics. Regular access to effective treatments is needed to reduce resistance to treatments for HIV, malaria and tuberculosis. Key stakeholder groups can instigate multiple initiatives to reduce AMR. These need to be followed up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian Godman
- Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G4 0RE, UK;
- Division of Public Health Pharmacy and Management, School of Pharmacy, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Pretoria 0204, South Africa;
- School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM), Penang 11800, Malaysia
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +44-0141-548-3825; Fax: +44-0141-552-2562
| | - Abiodun Egwuenu
- AMR Programme Manager, Nigeria Centre for Disease Control (NCDC), Ebitu Ukiwe Street, Jabi, Abuja 240102, Nigeria;
| | - Mainul Haque
- Unit of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine and Defence Health, Universiti Pertahanan Nasional Malaysia (National Defence University of Malaysia), Kem Perdana Sungai Besi, Kuala Lumpur 57000, Malaysia;
| | - Oliver Ombeva Malande
- Department of Child Health and Paediatrics, Egerton University, Nakuru, P.O. Box 536, Egerton 20115, Kenya;
- East Africa Centre for Vaccines and Immunization (ECAVI), Namela House, Naguru, Kampala P.O. Box 3040, Uganda
| | - Natalie Schellack
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Basic Medical Sciences Building, University of Pretoria, Prinshof 349-Jr, Pretoria 0084, South Africa;
| | - Santosh Kumar
- Department of Periodontology and Implantology, Karnavati University, Gandhinagar 382422, India;
| | - Zikria Saleem
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, The University of Lahore, Lahore 54000, Pakistan;
| | - Jacqueline Sneddon
- Healthcare Improvement Scotland, Delta House, 50 West Nile Street, Glasgow G1 2NP, UK; (J.S.); (R.A.S.)
| | - Iris Hoxha
- Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine Tirana, 1005 Tirana, Albania;
| | - Salequl Islam
- Department of Microbiology, Jahangirnagar University, Savar, Dhaka 1342, Bangladesh;
| | - Julius Mwita
- Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Botswana, Private Bag 0022, Gaborone, Botswana;
| | - Renata Cristina Rezende Macedo do Nascimento
- Department of Pharmacy, Postgraduate Program in Pharmaceutical Sciences (CiPharma), School of Pharmacy, Federal University of Ouro Preto, Ouro Preto 35400-000, Minas Gerais, Brazil;
| | - Isabella Piassi Dias Godói
- Institute of Health and Biological Studies, Universidade Federal do Sul e Sudeste do Pará, Avenida dos Ipês, s/n, Cidade Universitária, Cidade Jardim, Marabá 68500-00, Pará, Brazil;
- Center for Research in Management, Society and Epidemiology, Universidade do Estado de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte 31270-901, MT, Brazil
| | - Loveline Lum Niba
- Effective Basic Services (eBASE) Africa, Ndamukong Street, Bamenda P.O Box 5175, Cameroon;
- Department of Public Health, University of Bamenda, Bambili P.O. Box 39, Cameroon
| | - Adefolarin A. Amu
- Pharmacy Department, Eswatini Medical Christian University, P.O. Box A624, Swazi Plaza, Mbabane H101, Eswatini;
| | - Joseph Acolatse
- Pharmacy Directorate, Cape Coast Teaching Hospital (CCTH), Cape Coast, Ghana; (J.A.); (R.I.)
| | - Robert Incoom
- Pharmacy Directorate, Cape Coast Teaching Hospital (CCTH), Cape Coast, Ghana; (J.A.); (R.I.)
| | - Israel Abebrese Sefah
- Pharmacy Department, Keta Municipal Hospital, Ghana Health Service, Keta-Dzelukope, Ghana;
- Pharmacy Practice Department of Pharmacy Practice, School of Pharmacy, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, Volta Region, Ghana
| | - Sylvia Opanga
- Department of Pharmaceutics and Pharmacy Practice, School of Pharmacy, University of Nairobi, Nairobi P.O. Box 30197-00100, Kenya;
| | - Amanj Kurdi
- Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G4 0RE, UK;
- Department of Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, Hawler Medical University, Erbil 44001, Iraq
| | - Ibrahim Chikowe
- Pharmacy Department, College of Medicine, Chichiri 30096, Blantyre 3, Malawi; (I.C.); (F.K.)
| | - Felix Khuluza
- Pharmacy Department, College of Medicine, Chichiri 30096, Blantyre 3, Malawi; (I.C.); (F.K.)
| | - Dan Kibuule
- Department of Pharmacy Practice and Policy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Namibia, Windhoek 13301, Namibia;
| | - Olayinka O. Ogunleye
- Department of Pharmacology, Therapeutics and Toxicology, Lagos State University College of Medicine, Ikeja, Lagos 100271, Nigeria;
- Department of Medicine, Lagos State University Teaching Hospital, Ikeja, Lagos 100271, Nigeria
| | - Adesola Olalekan
- Department of Medical Laboratory Science, University of Lagos, Idiaraba, Lagos 100271, Nigeria;
- Centre for Genomics of Non-Communicable Diseases and Personalized Healthcare (CGNPH), University of Lagos, Akoka, Lagos 100271, Nigeria
| | - Vanda Markovic-Pekovic
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Social Pharmacy, University of Banja Luka, 78000 Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina;
| | - Johanna C. Meyer
- Division of Public Health Pharmacy and Management, School of Pharmacy, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Pretoria 0204, South Africa;
| | - Abubakr Alfadl
- National Medicines and Poisons Board, Federal Ministry of Health, Khartoum 11111, Sudan;
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Unaizah College of Pharmacy, Qassim University, Unaizah 56264, Qassim 56453, Saudi Arabia
| | - Thuy Nguyen Thi Phuong
- Pharmaceutical Administration & PharmacoEconomics, Hanoi University of Pharmacy, 13-15 Le Thanh Tong, Hoan Kiem District, Hanoi, Vietnam;
| | - Aubrey C. Kalungia
- Department of Pharmacy, School of Health Sciences, University of Zambia, P.O. Box 32379, Lusaka 10101, Zambia;
| | - Stephen Campbell
- Centre for Primary Care and Health Services Research, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK;
- NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
| | - Alice Pisana
- Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden;
| | - Janney Wale
- Independent Researcher, 11a Lydia Street, Brunswick, VIC 3056, Australia;
| | - R. Andrew Seaton
- Healthcare Improvement Scotland, Delta House, 50 West Nile Street, Glasgow G1 2NP, UK; (J.S.); (R.A.S.)
- Infectious Disease Department, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Govan Road, Glasgow G51 4TF, UK
- Department of Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Faleiros DR, Alvares-Teodoro J, Nunes da Silva E, Godman BB, Gonçalves Pereira R, Gurgel Andrade EI, de Assis Acurcio FA, Guerra Júnior AA. Budget impact analysis of medicines: estimated values versus real-world evidence and the implications. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2021; 22:271-281. [PMID: 33971778 DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2021.1927716] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Objectives: Budget Impact Analyses (BIA) of medicines helps managers in promoting health systems' sustainability when assessing the role and value of new medicines. However, it is not clear whether BIAs typically underestimate or overestimate the impact on real-world budgets. This retroactive analysis seeks to compare estimated values obtained by a BIA and Real-World Evidence (RWE) to guide discussions.Methods: The estimated values were obtained through a BIA concerning the incorporation of adalimumab for the treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis into the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS) carried out retroactively and per international guidelines. RWE data was extracted from SUS computerized systems. We subsequently compared the number of treatments, costs, and Incremental Budget Impact (IBI).Results - The total number of treatments was underestimated by 10% (6,243) and the total expenditure was overestimated by 463% (US$ 4.7 billion). In five years, the total difference between the estimated values and real IBI reached US$ 1.1 billion. A current expenditure of US$ 1.0 was observed for every US$ 5.60 of estimated expenditure.Conclusion - The higher estimates from the BIA might cause decision makers to be more cautious with the introduction of a new medicine to reduce the opportunity costs for other interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Brian B Godman
- Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, Strathclyde University, Glasgow, UK.,Division of Public Health Pharmacy and Management, School of Pharmacy, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Pretoria, South Africa.,School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia
| | | | | | - Francisco A de Assis Acurcio
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Minas Gerais, Brazil.,Faculty of Medicine, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Minas Gerais, Brazil
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Fens T, van Puijenbroek EP, Postma MJ. Efficacy, Safety, and Economics of Innovative Medicines: The Role of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis and Managed Entry Agreements in Practice and Policy. FRONTIERS IN MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY 2021; 3:629750. [PMID: 35047908 PMCID: PMC8757864 DOI: 10.3389/fmedt.2021.629750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2020] [Accepted: 04/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Through the years, solutions for accelerated access to innovative treatments are implemented in models of regulatory approvals, yet with limited data. Besides efficacy data, providing adequate safety data is key to transferring conditional marketing authorization to final marketing authorization. However, this remains a challenge because of the restricted availability and transferability of such data. Within this study, we set up a challenge to analyze the answers of two questions. First, from regulatory bodies' point of view, we bring the question of whether multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) is an adequate tool for further improvement of health technology assessment (HTA) of innovative medicines. Second, we ask if managed entry agreements (MEAs) pose solutions for facilitating the access to innovative medicines and further strengthening the evidence base concerning efficacy and effectiveness, as well as safety. Elaborating on such challenges brought us to conclude that increasing the attention to safety in MCDAs and MEAs will increase the trust of the authorities and improve the access for the manufacturers and the early availability of safe and effective medicines for the patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tanja Fens
- Department of Health Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
- Institute of Science in Healthy Aging and healthcaRE (SHARE), University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
- Department of PharmacoTherapy, -Epidemiology and -Economics, Groningen Research Institute of Pharmacy, School of Science and Engineering, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
- *Correspondence: Tanja Fens
| | - Eugène P. van Puijenbroek
- Department of PharmacoTherapy, -Epidemiology and -Economics, Groningen Research Institute of Pharmacy, School of Science and Engineering, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
- Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, 's-Hertogenbosch, Netherlands
| | - Maarten J. Postma
- Department of Health Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
- Institute of Science in Healthy Aging and healthcaRE (SHARE), University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
- Department of PharmacoTherapy, -Epidemiology and -Economics, Groningen Research Institute of Pharmacy, School of Science and Engineering, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
- Department of Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
- Department of Pharmacology and Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia
- Center of Excellence in Higher Education for Pharmaceutical Care Innovation, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Godman B, Hill A, Simoens S, Selke G, Selke Krulichová I, Zampirolli Dias C, Martin AP, Oortwijn W, Timoney A, Gustafsson LL, Voncina L, Kwon HY, Gulbinovic J, Gotham D, Wale J, Cristina Da Silva W, Bochenek T, Allocati E, Kurdi A, Ogunleye OO, Meyer JC, Hoxha I, Malaj A, Hierländer C, Sauermann R, Hamelinck W, Petrova G, Laius O, Langner I, Yfantopoulos J, Joppi R, Jakupi A, Greiciute-Kuprijanov I, Vella Bonanno P, Piepenbrink JH, de Valk V, Wladysiuk M, Marković-Peković V, Mardare I, Fürst J, Tomek D, Obach Cortadellas M, Zara C, Pontes C, McTaggart S, Laba TL, Melien Ø, Wong-Rieger D, Bae S, Hill R. Potential approaches for the pricing of cancer medicines across Europe to enhance the sustainability of healthcare systems and the implications. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2021; 21:527-540. [PMID: 33535841 DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2021.1884546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: There are growing concerns among European health authorities regarding increasing prices for new cancer medicines, prices not necessarily linked to health gain and the implications for the sustainability of their healthcare systems.Areas covered: Narrative discussion principally among payers and their advisers regarding potential approaches to the pricing of new cancer medicines.Expert opinion: A number of potential pricing approaches are discussed including minimum effectiveness levels for new cancer medicines, managed entry agreements, multicriteria decision analyses (MCDAs), differential/tiered pricing, fair pricing models, amortization models as well as de-linkage models. We are likely to see a growth in alternative pricing deliberations in view of ongoing challenges. These include the considerable number of new oncology medicines in development including new gene therapies, new oncology medicines being launched with uncertainty regarding their value, and continued high prices coupled with the extent of confidential discounts for reimbursement. However, balanced against the need for new cancer medicines. This will lead to greater scrutiny over the prices of patent oncology medicines as more standard medicines lose their patent, calls for greater transparency as well as new models including amortization models. We will be monitoring these developments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian Godman
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Karolinska Institute, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden.,Division of Pharmacoepidemiology, Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.,Division of Public Health Pharmacy and Management, School of Pharmacy, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Pretoria, South Africa.,School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia
| | - Andrew Hill
- Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, UK
| | - Steven Simoens
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - Gisbert Selke
- Wissenschaftliches Institut Der AOK (WIdO), Berlin, Germany
| | - Iva Selke Krulichová
- Department of Medical Biophysics, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové, Charles University, Hradec, Králové, Czech Republic
| | - Carolina Zampirolli Dias
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Postgraduate Program in Medicines and Pharmaceutical Services, Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.,SUS Collaborating Centre for Technology Assessment and Excellence in Health (CCATES), Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
| | - Antony P Martin
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Liverpool, UK.,QC Medica, Sim Balk Lane, York UK
| | - Wija Oortwijn
- Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Angela Timoney
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology, Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.,NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Lars L Gustafsson
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Karolinska Institute, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Hye-Young Kwon
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology, Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.,Division of Biology & Public Health, Mokwon University, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Jolanta Gulbinovic
- Department of Pathology, Forensic Medicine and Pharmacology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | | | - Janet Wale
- Independent Consumer Advocate, Brunswick, Victoria, Australia
| | - Wânia Cristina Da Silva
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Postgraduate Program in Medicines and Pharmaceutical Services, Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.,Data and Knowledge Integration Center for Health(CIDACS), Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)/ Salvador, Bahia, Brazil
| | - Tomasz Bochenek
- Department of Nutrition and Drug Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
| | - Eleonora Allocati
- Istituto Di Ricerche Farmacologiche 'Mario Negri' IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Amanj Kurdi
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology, Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.,Division of Public Health Pharmacy and Management, School of Pharmacy, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Pretoria, South Africa.,Department of Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, Hawler Medical University, Erbil, Iraq
| | - Olayinka O Ogunleye
- Department of Pharmacology, Therapeutics and Toxicology, Lagos State University College of Medicine, Ikeja, Lagos, Nigeria.,Department of Medicine, Lagos State University Teaching Hospital, Ikeja, Lagos, Nigeria
| | - Johanna C Meyer
- Division of Public Health Pharmacy and Management, School of Pharmacy, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Iris Hoxha
- Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine, Tirana, Albania
| | | | - Christian Hierländer
- Department of Pharmaceutical Affairs, Federation of Social Insurances, Vienna, Austria
| | - Robert Sauermann
- Department of Pharmaceutical Affairs, Federation of Social Insurances, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Guenka Petrova
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Department of Social Pharmacy and Pharmacoeconomics, Medical University of Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Ott Laius
- State Agency of Medicines, Tartu, Estonia
| | - Irene Langner
- Wissenschaftliches Institut Der AOK (WIdO), Berlin, Germany
| | - John Yfantopoulos
- School of National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Athens Greece
| | - Roberta Joppi
- Pharmaceutical Drug Department, Azienda Sanitaria Locale of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Arianit Jakupi
- Faculty of Pharmacy, UBT - Higher Education Institution, Prishtina, Kosovo
| | | | - Patricia Vella Bonanno
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology, Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK
| | | | - Vincent de Valk
- National Health Care Institute (ZIN), XH, Diemen, Netherlands
| | | | - Vanda Marković-Peković
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Social Pharmacy, University of Banja Luka, Banja Luka, Republic of Srpska, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - Ileana Mardare
- Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Management Department, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Jurij Fürst
- Health Insurance Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Dominik Tomek
- Faculty of Medicine, Slovak Medical University in Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovakia
| | | | - Corinne Zara
- Drug Department, Catalan Health Service, Catalan Health Service, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Caridad Pontes
- Drug Department, Catalan Health Service, Catalan Health Service, Barcelona, Spain.,Department of Pharmacology, Therapeutics and Toxicology, Universitat Autònoma De Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Tracey-Lea Laba
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, University of Technology Sydney, Broadway, Sydney, NSW
| | - Øyvind Melien
- Reviews and Health Technology Assessments, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
| | - Durhane Wong-Rieger
- Health Data Science, Institute of Population Health, Liverpool, Canadian Organization for Rare Disorders, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - SeungJin Bae
- College of Pharmacy, Ewha Woman's University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Ruaraidh Hill
- Health Data Science, Institute of Population Health Liverpool Reviews and Implementation Group, Whelan Building, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Kim S, Kim J, Cho H, Lee K, Ryu C, Lee JH. Trends in the pricing and reimbursement of new anticancer drugs in South Korea: an analysis of listed anticancer drugs during the past three years. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2020; 21:479-488. [PMID: 33275463 DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2021.1860023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to examine patient accessibility to new anticancer drugs including reimbursement coverage, time to listing, and listing price during the recent 3 years after the introduction of alternative pricing and reimbursement pathways in South Korea.Methods: Anticancer drugs were selected for analysis from the new drugs reviewed from January 2017 to March 2020. Descriptive statistics were used to present the levels of the listing prices. Pearson's correlation analysis was used to analyze the relationship between the list price in comparison to the External Reference Price(ERP) and the time to listing.Results: Thirty-two anticancer drugs were included in analysis. The average time to listing for these drugs was 36.7 months. The ratio of the listing price in comparison with Average Adjusted Price from seven reference countries was from 12.6% to 90.2%. Pearson's correlation coefficient for the correlation between the ratio of the listing price to the ERP and the time to listing was -0.37 and was statistically significant (p = 0.035).Conclusions: Policies that relate to the scope of reimbursement, time to reimbursement, and list price should be able to equally reflect patient accessibility and national health insurance finances, as well as the impact on industry as a whole.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sungju Kim
- Healthcare Group, Lee&Ko, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jinhong Kim
- Department of Market Access, GlaxoSmithKline Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyunyoung Cho
- Department of Market Access, AbbVie Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Kyungmin Lee
- Department of Patient Access and Public Affairs, Novartis Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Chiyoung Ryu
- Department of Healthcare Policy and Market Access, Korea Research-based Pharma Industry Association, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jong Hyuk Lee
- Department of Pharmaceutical Engineering, Hoseo University, Asan, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|