Masked Hypertension: How to Identify and When to Treat?

Predictors Factors of Uncontrolled Masked Hypertension (MUCH) in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD)

Background/Objectives: Masked uncontrolled hypertension (MUCH) is a blood pressure phenotype prevalent among chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. It has been associated with an elevated risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Identifying MUCH predictor factors in this population is crucial in facilitating anticipation of adverse outcomes and complications. Methods: For a period of 7 years (2017-2023), hypertensive patients presenting CKD and in-office normotension (<140/90 mmHg) were consecutively selected. After ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM), we classified the patients into controlled hypertension (CH) or MUCH. We used epidemiological, clinical, anthropometric, and laboratory data to develop a predictor model of the MUCH phenotype. Results: From 220 participants, 109 (49.5%) had MUCH (mean age: 60 ± 16 years; 45% men; 35% with obesity). Higher diastolic BP (DBP) values were observed in the MUCH group (72 vs. 75; p = 0.01). In contrast, a higher body mass index was observed in the CH group (26 vs. 28; p < 0.01), while elevated albuminuria was observed in the MUCH group (69 vs. 275; p < 0.01). After multivariate analysis, DBP ≥75 mmHg (Odds Ratio: 1.93, 95%CI 1.03-3.64; p = 0.04), BMI ≤25 Kg/m2 (Odds Ratio: 2.21, 95%CI 1.08-4.52; p = 0.03), and albuminuria ≥ 300 mg/g (Odds Ratio: 3.26, 95%CI 1.71-6.19; p < 0.01) were identified as predictors of MUCH phenotype Conclusions: MUCH is common in patients with arterial hypertension (AH) and CKD. DBP ≥ 75 mmHg, BMI ≤ 25 Kg/m2, and albuminuria ≥ 300 mg/g were predictors of MUCH in these patients.

Obesity and hypertension: Obesity medicine association (OMA) clinical practice statement (CPS) 2023

Background

This Obesity Medicine Association (OMA) Clinical Practice Statement (CPS) provides an overview of the mechanisms and treatment of obesity and hypertension.

Methods

The scientific support for this CPS is based upon published citations, clinical perspectives of OMA authors, and peer review by the Obesity Medicine Association leadership.

Results

Mechanisms contributing to obesity-related hypertension include unhealthful nutrition, physical inactivity, insulin resistance, increased sympathetic nervous system activity, renal dysfunction, vascular dysfunction, heart dysfunction, increased pancreatic insulin secretion, sleep apnea, and psychosocial stress. Adiposopathic factors that may contribute to hypertension include increased release of free fatty acids, increased leptin, decreased adiponectin, increased renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system activation, increased 11 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1, reduced nitric oxide activity, and increased inflammation.

Conclusions

Increase in body fat is the most common cause of hypertension. Among patients with obesity and hypertension, weight reduction via healthful nutrition, physical activity, behavior modification, bariatric surgery, and anti-obesity medications mostly decrease blood pressure, with the greatest degree of weight reduction generally correlated with the greatest degree of blood pressure reduction.

Effects of Nondipping Blood Pressure Changes: A Nephrologist Prospect

Blood pressure (BP) variations depend on various internal, environmental, and behavioral factors. BP fluctuations occur both in normotensive and hypertensive people. Although it fluctuates over the 24-hr day and night, the morning BP increases after waking up and declines throughout sleep. It is typical for BP to decrease by 10% to 20%, while sleeping, known as dipping BP. However, if there is no decrease in nighttime mean systolic BP or a drop of less than 10 mmHg, it is called nondipping BP. Conversely, reverse dipping BP means an increase in mean systolic BP instead of a drop during the night. Reverse dipping is observed in hypertension (HTN), diabetes mellitus (DM), chronic kidney disease (CKD), and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) syndrome. The introduction of ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) led to the emergence of identifying normal and elevated BP patterns. Non-dipping BP increases the risk of cardiovascular system (CVS) complications such as left ventricular hypertrophy, proteinuria, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) reduction, and CKD progression. A loss or blunting of the normal BP profile is recognized as a deleterious variant, and restoring abnormal BP patterns has been reported to significantly impact end-organ damage, morbidity, and mortality. In this non-systematic clinically-oriented, comprehensive review, we aim to update the BP variables and the pathophysiology of nondipping BP and point out the areas which need more investigation from a nephrology perspective because the nondipping BP increases the risk of proteinuria, GFR reduction, and CKD progression. A literature search of PubMed, Google, EMBASE, and Google Scholar was conducted. Checks of selected papers and relevant reviews complemented the electronic search. With improved BP measurement methods, the physiology of BP profile variations is readily detectable during the day and night. A nondipping BP profile is a distinct BP pattern that may have significant end-organ damage effects and therapeutic importance for nephrologists. The pathophysiology of the nondipping BP variant must be clarified to prevent complications, and further investigations are required. Furthermore, there is debate about the best BP index to utilize: systolic BP, diastolic BP, mean arterial pressure, or a mixture of all. All these areas are important and need new research projects.

Masked pregnancy-associated hypertension as a predictor of adverse outcomes

BACKGROUND

Masked hypertension has been described in nonpregnant populations as elevated blood pressure in the home setting that is not reproduced on clinical assessment. Patients with masked hypertension have a greater risk of cardiovascular morbidity than patients who have blood pressures within normal range or those with white coat hypertension.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine whether masked pregnancy-associated hypertension detected on Connected Maternity Online Monitoring, a remote home blood pressure monitoring system, is associated with higher rates of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy during delivery admission and maternal and neonatal morbidities.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study of all patients on Connected Maternity Online Monitoring who delivered at 6 hospitals in a single healthcare system between October 2016 and December 2020. Patients were classified as having either normal blood pressure or masked pregnancy-associated hypertension. Masked pregnancy-associated hypertension was defined as remotely detected systolic blood pressure of ≥140 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure of ≥90 mm Hg after 20 weeks of gestation on 2 occasions before diagnosis in a clinical setting. The chi-square test and Student t test were used for demographic and outcomes comparisons. Logistic regression was used to adjust outcomes by race, insurance, and body mass index.

RESULTS

A total of 2430 deliveries were included in our analysis, including 165 deliveries that met the criteria for masked pregnancy-associated hypertension. Clinically established pregnancy-associated hypertension, defined at the time of delivery, was more common in the masked pregnancy-associated hypertension group than in the normotensive group (66% vs 10%; adjusted odds ratio, 17.2; 95% confidence interval, 11.91-24.81). Patients with masked pregnancy-associated hypertension had higher rates of preeclampsia with severe features on delivery admission than normotensive patients (28% vs 2%; adjusted odds ratio, 23.35; 95% confidence interval, 14.25-38.26). Preterm delivery (16% vs 7%; adjusted odds ratio, 2.47; 95% confidence interval, 1.55-3.94), cesarean delivery(38% vs 26%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.58; 95% confidence interval, 1.13-2.23), small for gestational age (11% vs 5%; adjusted odds ratio, 2.27; 95% confidence interval, 1.31-3.94), and neonatal intensive care unit admission (8% vs 4%; adjusted odds ratio, 2.20; 95% confidence interval, 1.18-4.09) were more common among patients with masked pregnancy-associated hypertension than among normotensive patients.

CONCLUSION

With more outcomes research, remote blood pressure monitoring may prove to be an important tool in identifying pregnancies at risk of complications related to masked hypertension.

A comparative meta-analysis of prospective observational studies on masked hypertension and masked uncontrolled hypertension defined by ambulatory and home blood pressure

BACKGROUND

In a comparative meta-analysis, we investigated the prognostic value of masked hypertension and masked uncontrolled hypertension defined by ambulatory or home blood pressure (BP) monitoring.

METHODS

We searched English literature published till 2 September 2018 to identify prospective observational studies. Masked hypertension was defined as a normal clinic BP (<140/90 mmHg) in the presence of an elevated 24 h, daytime or night-time ambulatory or home BP. Clinical outcomes included all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, and fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular, stroke, cardiac, coronary and renal disease events.

RESULTS

In total, 21 studies (n = 130 318) were included. Overall, compared with normotensive participants, masked hypertensive patients had a 5.7/2.9 mmHg higher clinic BP and 18.7/9.8 mmHg higher out-of-office BP. The pooled risk ratio for masked hypertension versus normotension was 1.67 (95% confidence interval, 1.32-2.13) and 2.19 (1.72-2.78) for all-cause (eight studies) and cardiovascular mortality (three studies), respectively, and 1.71 (1.53-1.91), 1.95 (1.36-2.80), 1.76 (1.33-2.33), 1.62 (0.27-9.60), 3.85 (2.03-7.31) for fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular (15 studies), stroke (two studies), cardiac (two studies), coronary (two studies) and renal disease events (two studies), respectively. Risk ratios for all-cause mortality (1.78 versus 1.40, P = 0.16) and fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events (1.81 versus 1.61, P = 0.29) were similar between studies on ambulatory and home BP monitoring in the overall analyses. The analyses in subgroups according to treatment status (untreated, treated or mixed) and sampling approach (population or referred patients) were confirmatory.

CONCLUSION

Masked hypertension and masked uncontrolled hypertension were associated with unfavorable clinical outcomes, regardless of the out-of-office BP monitoring techniques.

Epidemiological Impact and Clinical Consequences of Masked Hypertension: A Narrative Review

Masked hypertension (MHT) is a clinical condition characterized by normal blood pressure (BP) levels during clinical consultation and above normal out-of-office BP values. MHT is associated to an increased risk of developing hypertension-mediated organ damage (HMOD) and major cardiovascular (CV) outcomes, such as myocardial infarction, stroke, and hospitalizations due to CV causes, as well as to metabolic abnormalities and diabetes, thus further promoting the development and progression of atherosclerotic disease. Previous studies showed contrasting data on prevalence and clinical impact of MHT, due to not uniform diagnostic criteria (including either home or 24-h ambulatory BP measurements, or both) and background antihypertensive treatment. Whatever the case, over the last few years the widespread diffusion of validated devices for home BP monitoring has promoted a better diagnostic assessment and proper identification of individuals with MHT in a setting of clinical practice, thus resulting in increased prevalence of this clinical condition with potential clinical and socio-economic consequences. Several other items, in fact, remain unclear and debated, particularly regarding the therapeutic approach to MHT. The aim of this narrative review is to illustrate the clinical definition of MHT, to analyze the diagnostic algorithm, and to discuss the potential pharmacological approaches to be adopted in this clinical condition, in the light of the recommendations of the recent European hypertension guidelines.

A brief submaximal isometric exercise test 'unmasks' systolic and diastolic masked hypertension

OBJECTIVES

An exaggerated blood pressure (BP) response during dynamic exercise testing has been proposed as an additional screening tool to identify systolic masked hypertension (masked-HYP). However, masked-HYP in young people is often characterized by an elevated DBP. Static/isometric exercise elicits augmented sympathetic stimulation causing greater increases in both SBP and DBP than dynamic exercise.

AIMS

To examine whether individuals with masked-HYP exhibit exaggerated BP responses during a submaximal handgrip vs. normotensive individuals and individuals with sustained hypertension (true-HYP), and the possible associations of exercise BP with total peripheral resistance (TPR), central/aortic BP, and 24-h-ambulatory BP (24-h BP).

METHODS

Eighty-six participants [untreated, newly diagnosed, masked-HYP (n = 27), true-HYP (n = 31), and normotensive individuals (n = 28); 46.3 ± 10.7 years], following evaluation of office BP, central/aortic BP, pulse wave velocity, carotid intima-media thickness, echocardiocardiography, and 24-h BP, underwent a 3-min handgrip (30% maximal voluntary contraction) with beat-by-beat BP and hemodynamics assessment (Finapres Medical Systems).

RESULTS

Despite similar baseline-BP in masked-HYP and normotensive individuals, during exercise masked-HYP exhibited a markedly greater (P < 0.01) SBP and DBP vs. normotensive individuals, and similar BP to true-HYP. TPR significantly increased (P < 0.001) during exercise, in masked-HYP and true-HYP. The exaggerated BP responses in masked-HYP were evident from the 1st minute of exercise and correlated (P < 0.05) with central/aortic-BP, aortic stiffness, 24-h BP, day-BP, night-time-BP, and interventricular septum thickness.

CONCLUSION

During handgrip, masked-HYP exhibited exaggerated BP and TPR responses, similar to those of true-HYP. These responses were evident from the 1st minute of exercise and correlated with 24-h BP, suggesting that systolic and diastolic masked-HYP can be 'unmasked' during a brief, submaximal, handgrip test.