Ultrasound of glenoid labrum with MR arthrographic correlation

Pre-operative Assessment of Shoulder Pathologies on MRI by a Radiologist and an Orthopaedic Surgeon

Introduction

Pathologies of the shoulder, i.e. rotator cuff tears and labral injuries are very common. Most patients receive MRI examination prior to surgery. A correct assessment of pathologies is significant for a detailed patient education and planning of surgery.

Materials and methods

Sixty-nine patients were identified, who underwent both, a standardised shoulder MRI and following arthroscopic shoulder surgery in our hospital. For this retrospective comparative study, the MRIs were pseudonymised and evaluated separately by an orthopaedic surgeon and a radiologist. A third rater evaluated images and reports of shoulder surgery, which served as positive control. Results of all raters were then compared. The aim was an analysis of agreement rates of diagnostic accuracy of preoperative MRI by a radiologist and an orthopaedic surgeon.

Results

The overall agreement with positive control of detecting transmural cuff tears was high (84% and 89%) and lower for partial tears (70-80%). Subscapularis tears were assessed with moderate rates of agreement (60 - 70%) compared to intra-operative findings. Labral pathologies were detected mostly correctly. SLAP lesions and pulley lesions of the LHB were identified with only moderate agreement (66.4% and 57.2%) and had a high inter-rater disagreement.

Conclusion

This study demonstrated that tears of the rotator cuff (supraspinatus, infraspinatus) and labral pathologies can be assessed in non-contrast pre-operative shoulder MRI images with a high accuracy. This allows a detailed planning of surgery and aftercare. Pathologies of the subscapularis tendon, SLAP lesions and biceps instabilities are more challenging to detect correctly. There were only small differences between a radiologic and orthopaedic interpretation of the images.

The effect of non-contrast enhanced MRA on patients with renal insufficiency and foot pain

To investigate the feasibility of non-contrast magnetic resonance angiography of arteries and veins (NATIVE) sampling perfection with application optimized contrasts by using different flip angle evolution (SPACE) and quiescent interval single shot (QISS) in assessing foot arteries of patients with renal insufficiency and foot pain. Fifty-three patients (mean age = 44.2 ± 11.4 years, male: female = 27:26) underwent QISS and NATIVE-SPACE. The source images were reconstructed to maximum intensity projection and volume render. The image quality of QISS and NATIVE-SPACE was rated (0-3, poor to excellent), and was compared using Wilcoxon test. True or false positive was determined by comparing the findings of QISS and NATIVE-SPACE. The relative signal intensity of artery was obtained for each case, and was compared between QISS and NATIVE-SPACE using Mann Whitney test. The acquisition time of NATIVE-SPACE was significantly longer than that of QISS (178.4 ± 35.7 seconds vs 45.4 ± 8.9 seconds, P < .001). QISS had significantly lower image quality score versus NATIVE-SPACE (1.4 ± 0.5 vs 2.4 ± 0.6, P = .02). Fifteen percentage (8/53) NATIVE-SPACE cases had poor image quality due to the similarity of peak flow and minimum flow. The relative signal intensity was significantly lower in QISS versus NATIVE-SPACE (9.7 ± 1.3 vs 68.2 ± 12.4, P < .001). NATIVE-SPACE is valuable in evaluating foot arteries of patients with renal insufficiency. QISS can serve as an alternative test to NATIVE-SPACE.

MR arthrography of the shoulder; correlation with arthroscopy

Background

Shoulder dislocation is a common injury, particularly in the younger population. Common long-term sequelae include pain, recurrence, and shoulder arthritis. Immediate and correct diagnosis following shoulder dislocation is key to achieving optimum outcomes. Although magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA) is frequently used for diagnosing shoulder instabilities, arthroscopy is still considered the gold standard.

Purpose

This study aims to compare the diagnostic value of arthroscopy and MRA of the shoulder joint.

Materials and methods

This retrospective study estimates the sensitivity and specificity of MRA of the shoulder. Data from patients who had undergone shoulder MRA and subsequent arthroscopy during a 5-year period were retrospectively collected. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated using the arthroscopic findings as the gold standard. Moreover, diagnostic accuracy was estimated using McNemar’s test.

Results

In total, 205 cases were included from which 372 pathological findings were uncovered during the arthroscopic procedures as opposed to 360 findings diagnosed from the MRA images. The glenoid labral tear was the most common finding reported by MRA and arthroscopy. For the detection of glenoid labral tears on MRA, the sensitivity was 0.955 but with eight missed lesions; the specificity was 0.679. Capsular tears, rotator cuff tears, and cartilage lesions proved the most difficult to correctly diagnose using MRA with sensitivities of 0.2, 0.346, and 0.366, respectively.

Conclusions

With a sensitivity of 95%, MRA is a valuable diagnostic tool for assessing shoulder instabilities, particularly when diagnosing labral lesions, including bony and soft-tissue Bankart lesions. Sensitivities and specificities for other glenohumeral lesions are less convincing, however.