A Real-World Evidence Study of CDK4/6 Inhibitor Treatment Patterns and Outcomes in Metastatic Breast Cancer by Germline BRCA Mutation Status

Therapeutic advances and application of PARP inhibitors in breast cancer

Targeting of DNA repair pathway is the main therapeutic approach for BRCA1 and BRCA2 associated tumors, including breast cancer. BRCA1/2 genes play a pivotal role in HRR pathway. Mutations in BRCA1/2 leads to DDR deficiency, which cause the increasing of genome instability, thus rendering cancer cells vulnerable to inhibition of DNA repair related proteins, such as PARP1. Pre-clinical studies has demonstrated that cancer cells with BRCA1/2 deficient are sensitive to PARPi, which are an emerging class of small molecule drug. Several clinical trials demonstrated the promising efficacy of PARP inhibitors for BRCA1/2 mutated breast cancer patient through selectively induce synthetic lethality cancer cells. Currently, four PARP inhibitors had been approved by FDA for clinical use. PARPi demonstrated to improve progression-free survival, while resistance to PARPi is inevitable. In this review article, we highlighted the advances in the PARPi clinical trials, resistance mechanism and coping strategies in breast cancer patients. We also summarized the international guideline and recommendations on PARP inhibitor usage in breast cancer.

The clinical and molecular landscape of breast cancer in women of African and South Asian ancestry

Addressing existing racial disparity in breast cancer is crucial to ensure equitable benefit across diverse communities. We evaluate the molecular and clinical effects of genetic ancestry in African and South Asian women compared to European using a combined cohort of 7136 breast cancer patients. We find that non-European patients present significantly earlier and die at a younger age. The African group has an increased prevalence of higher grade and hormone receptor negative disease. The South Asian group shows tendency towards lower stage at diagnosis and tumour mutational burden. We observe differences and similarities in the somatic mutational landscape, and differences in germline mutation rates relevant to genetic testing and breast cancer predisposition. Potential therapeutic candidates are identified, with a higher propensity for homologous recombination deficiency serving as a therapy response indicator. We harness breast cancer multimodal data to improve understanding of ancestry-associated differences and highlight opportunities to advance health equity.

BRCA1/2 and Other Predisposition Genes in High-Risk Hormone Receptor+/Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2- Breast Cancer Treated With Endocrine Therapy With or Without Palbociclib: A Secondary PENELOPE-B Study Analysis

PURPOSE

The PENELOPE-B trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01864746) recruited patients with hormone receptor+/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2- early breast cancer without a pathological complete response after taxane-containing neoadjuvant chemotherapy and at a high risk of relapse. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive 13 cycles of palbociclib once daily or placebo on days 1-21 in a 28-day cycle in addition to endocrine therapy (ET). PENELOPE-B did not show improved invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) after adding palbociclib to ET. This retrospective analysis investigated the impact of germline pathogenic variant (PV) status of BRCA1/2 and non-BRCA1/2 cancer predisposition genes on the outcomes of PENELOPE-B trial patients.

METHODS

In total, 445 patients were sampled following a case-cohort design and 442 were analyzed for germline PVs. Statistical analyses were performed for time-to-event end points (iDFS, distant disease-free survival [DDFS], and overall survival [OS]).

RESULTS

Of the 442 patients, 42 carried PVs in any cancer predisposition gene; 15 carried BRCA1/2 PVs. Irrespective of the treatment arms, PV status was not a prognostic factor. Regarding the treatment arms in BRCA1/2 PV carriers, numerically better 3-year outcomes were observed in the palbociclib arm (iDFS, 95%; DDFS, 95%; OS, 100%) than in the placebo arm (iDFS, 72.8%; DDFS, 72.8%; OS, 87.5%; hazard ratios palbociclib v placebo 0.349 [iDFS] and 0.562 [DDFS], not calculated for OS, too few events). In patients without BRCA1/2 PVs, the differences in 3-year outcomes were negligible. PVs in non-BRCA1/2 cancer predisposition genes did not influence the efficacy of palbociclib, although gene-specific effects could not be excluded.

CONCLUSION

Patients with BRCA1/2 PVs had numerically better outcomes after palbociclib. However, the number of BRCA1/2 carriers was small. Larger randomized clinical trials should consider the PV status to further evaluate whether BRCA1/2 PV carriers benefit from cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitor treatment.

Beyond failure of endocrine-based therapies in HR+/HER2 negative advanced breast cancer: What before chemotherapy? A glimpse into the future

Despite the impressive improvements achieved by endocrine therapy and CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) and the forthcoming availability of alternative endocrine manipulations and targeted therapies, hormone-receptor positive/HER2 negative (HR+/HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC) is almost inevitably destined to become endocrine- refractory. At this time chemotherapy has been recently challenged and partly replaced by new targeted options as antibody-drug conjugated (ADCs). Trastuzumab-deruxtecan has been proven meaningfully superior to chemotherapy either in 1st and later lines after progression to CDK4/6i in HER2-low ABC and results with other ADCs as Sacituzumab Govitecan and Datopotamab-deruxtecan are promising, but the definition of cross-resistance between these drugs sharing either antibody or payload is crucial before implementing them in a useful sequence. While PARP inhibitors are the standard 2nd line in patients with gBRCA mutation, it is not still known whether patients with mutations of PALB2 or of other homologous recombinant defect (HRD)-related genes will benefit of the same treatment. On the other hand, the results obtained with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in HR+ /HER2-ABC contrarily to the early setting are disappointing up to now, but investigations of ICIs in combination with other targeted drugs which may increase immune response and the search for better markers of activity are under way. Moreover the anticipation in upfront treatment of ADCs or PARPi in patients with features of putative endocrine resistance and/or of less sensitiviy to CDK4/6i and the choice of therapy in patients recurring during or soon after adjuvant CDK4/6i and olaparib represent further challenges for the future.

Survival Following CDK4/6 Inhibitor Therapy for Hormone Receptor-Positive, ERBB2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer

Importance

Endocrine therapy (ET) combined with cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) agents is the standard first-line treatment for patients with hormone receptor-positive, ERBB2 (formerly HER2 or HER2/neu)-negative metastatic breast cancer. However, optimal therapy after tumor progression to ET plus CDK4/6i remains unclear.

Objective

To evaluate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in the clinical practice setting in patients with hormone receptor-positive, ERBB2-negative metastatic breast cancer following progression with ET plus CDK4/6i.

Design, Setting, and Participants

The multicenter retrospective cohort study included 506 patients diagnosed with hormone receptor-positive, ERBB2-negative metastatic breast cancer between April 22, 2015, and January 31, 2023, and who received ET-based or chemotherapy (CT)-based treatment following progression during ET plus CDK4/6i. Outcomes were analyzed based on treatment type, clinicopathologic features, and the duration of prior CDK4/6i therapy.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end point was PFS in the clinical practice setting, defined as the time between the initiation of the first systemic treatment on tumor progression to ET plus CDK4/6i treatment and the detection of disease progression or patient death from any cause. The secondary end point was OS in the clinical practice setting, defined as the time interval between tumor progression during ET plus CDK4/6i treatment and patient death from any cause.

Results

In 506 women (median age at diagnosis, 52.4 [IQR, 44.6-62.8] years) diagnosed with hormone receptor-positive, ERBB2-negative metastatic breast cancer progressing during ET plus CDK4/6i, independent factors associated with poorer PFS outcomes were visceral metastases (hazard ratio [HR], 1.45; 95% CI, 1.17-1.80; P = .008) and de novo metastatic disease (HR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.01-1.54; P = .04). A longer duration of CDK4/6i therapy (OS HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.41-0.73; P < .001) and an older age (PFS HR, 0.99; 95% CI 0.98-1.00; P = .03) were associated with better outcomes. Compared with oral CT, both intravenous CT- and ET-based treatments were associated with shorter PFS (intravenous CT: hazard ratio [HR], 1.45; 95% CI, 1.11-1.89; P = .006; everolimus plus exemestane: HR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.06-1.78; P = .02; ET only: HR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.05-1.89; P = .02). A duration of CDK4/6i treatment exceeding 12 months was associated with longer OS (HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.41-0.73; P < .001). Among patients with visceral metastases, intravenous CT was associated with shorter OS compared with oral CT (HR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.03-2.24; P = .04).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study, the duration of tumor control achieved with CDK4/6i-based therapy and the presence of visceral metastases emerged as key factors that may affect treatment decision. Oral CT may offer potential benefits for specific patient subgroups.

A therapeutic algorithm guiding subsequent therapy selection after CDK4/6 inhibitors' failure: A review of current and investigational treatment for HR+/Her2- breast cancer

The first-line combination therapies utilizing cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) with endocrine therapy (ET) have significantly impacted the course of hormone receptor positive (HR+)/Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC). However, resistance often emerges, leading to a molecularly different disease. Estrogen receptor one (ESR1) gene mutations, driving resistance to aromatase inhibitors (AIs), may guide the use of fulvestrant or emerging oral selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs) like elacestrant. The dynamic nature of ESR1 mutations suggests potential guidance for continuing CDK4/6i therapy beyond progression. Targeting mutations like breast cancer gene 1 and 2 (BRCA 1/2) with Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors or the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway provides therapeutic options. The advent of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) like trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) and novel agents targeting Trophoblast cell surface antigen-2 (Trop-2) introduces further complexity, underscoring the need for early intervention targeting specific genomic alterations in metastatic BC.

BRCA-mutated breast cancer: the unmet need, challenges and therapeutic benefits of genetic testing

Mutations in the BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 genes (BRCAm) increase the risk of developing breast cancer (BC) and are found in ~5% of unselected patients with the disease. BC resulting from a germline BRCAm (gBRCAm) has distinct clinical characteristics along with increased sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents such as poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors and platinum-based chemotherapies, and potentially decreased sensitivity to cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors. Given the evolving treatment landscape for gBRCAm BC in early and advanced disease settings, timely determination of gBRCAm status is fundamental to facilitate the most effective treatment strategy for patients. However, many patients with gBRCAm are not identified due to suboptimal referral rates and/or a low uptake of genetic testing. We discuss current evidence for a differential response to treatment in patients with gBRCAm in early and advanced BC settings, including outcomes with PARP inhibitors, platinum-based chemotherapies, and CDK4/6 inhibitors, as well as ongoing treatment innovations and the potential of these treatment approaches. Current genetic testing strategies are also examined, including the latest guidelines on who and when to test for gBRCAm, as well as challenges to testing and how these may be overcome.

BRCA genetic testing and counseling in breast cancer: how do we meet our patients' needs?

BRCA1 and BRCA2 are tumor suppressor genes that have been linked to inherited susceptibility of breast cancer. Germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants (gBRCAm) are clinically relevant for treatment selection in breast cancer because they confer sensitivity to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. BRCA1/2 mutation status may also impact decisions on other systemic therapies, risk-reducing measures, and choice of surgery. Consequently, demand for gBRCAm testing has increased. Several barriers to genetic testing exist, including limited access to testing facilities, trained counselors, and psychosocial support, as well as the financial burden of testing. Here, we describe current implications of gBRCAm testing for patients with breast cancer, summarize current approaches to gBRCAm testing, provide potential solutions to support wider adoption of mainstreaming testing practices, and consider future directions of testing.

What Proportion of BRCA-Associated Breast Cancer Is Human Epidermal Growth Factor 2-Low and Eligible for Additional Targeted Therapy?

INTRODUCTION

DESTINY B04 provided clinical meaning to a new classification of human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) expression in breast cancer: HER2-low. Patients with germline breast cancer type 1 gene pathogenic variants (gBRCA1) often develop triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), but the proportion who could be classified as HER2-low and qualify for an additional targeted therapy option is unknown. This study aims to characterize the proportion of gBRCA1 or germline breast cancer type 2 gene pathogenic variants patients for whom these novel targeted therapies may be an option.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart review of patients with gBRCA1/2 treated at our institution for invasive breast cancer from 2000 to 2021. Synchronous or metachronous contralateral breast cancers were recorded separately. HER2 status was determined by immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization. We excluded patients without complete HER2 data.

RESULTS

Among the 95 breast cancers identified in our cohort of 85 gBRCA1/2 patients, 41 (43%) were TNBC, 38 (40%) were hormone receptor positive (HR+)/HER2-negative, and 16 (17%) were HER2-positive based on standard conventions. We found that 82% of the HR+/HER2-cancers and 66% of TNBCs would be reclassified as HER2-low. After stratifying by BRCA gene status, 64% of cancers in patients with gBRCA1 and 58% of cancers in patients with germline breast cancer type 2 gene pathogenic variants were HER2-low.

CONCLUSIONS

A significant portion of gBRCA1/2 patients who were previously diagnosed with TNBC or HR+/HER2- breast cancer would now be classified as HER2-low and could be considered for the use of trastuzumab deruxtecan in the metastatic setting. Outcome differences from therapy changes in this cohort should now be assessed.

Novel Treatment Strategies for Hormone Receptor (HR)-Positive, HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer

Estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer (BC) is the most common BC subtype. Endocrine therapy (ET) targeting ER signaling still remains the mainstay treatment option for hormone receptor (HR)-positive BC either in the early or in advanced setting, including different strategies, such as the suppression of estrogen production or directly blocking the ER pathway through SERMs-selective estrogen receptor modulators-or SERDs-selective estrogen receptor degraders. Nevertheless, the development of de novo or acquired endocrine resistance still remains challenging for oncologists. The use of novel ET combined with targeted drugs, such as cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors, has significantly improved long-term outcome rates, thus changing the therapeutic algorithm for metastatic BC (MBC) and recently the therapeutic strategy in the adjuvant setting for early high-risk BC. Eluding the resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors combined with ET is currently an unmet medical need, and there is disagreement concerning the best course of action for patients who continue to progress after this combination approach. Genetic changes in the tumor along its growth uncovered by genomic profiling of recurrent and/or metastatic lesions through tumor and/or liquid biopsies may predict the response or resistance to specific agents, suggesting the best therapeutic strategy for each patient by targeting the altered ER-dependent pathway (novel oral SERDs and a new generation of anti-estrogen agents) or alternative ER-independent signaling pathways such as PI3K/AKT/mTOR or tyrosine kinase receptors (HER2 mutations or HER2 low status) or by inhibiting pathways weakened through germline BRCA1/2 mutations. These agents are being investigated as single molecules and in combination with other target therapies, offering promising weapons to overcome or avoid treatment failure and propose increasingly more personalized treatment approaches. This review presents novel insights into ET and other targeted therapies for managing metastatic HR+/HER2- BC by exploring potential strategies based on clinical evidence and genomic profiling following the failure of the CDK4/6i and ET combination.

Real-World Data Analysis of CDK4/6 Inhibitor Therapy-A Patient-Centric Single Center Study

BACKGROUND

The quest to comprehend the real-world efficacy of CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDKis) in breast cancer continues, as patient responses vary significantly.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective study evaluated CDKi use outside the trial condition from November 2016 to May 2020. Progression-free survival (PFS), time-to-treatment failure (TTF), short-term and prolonged treatment benefit (≥4 and ≥10 months), as well as prognostic and predictive markers were assessed with Kaplan-Meier and multivariate regression analyses.

RESULTS

Out of 86 identified patients, 58 (67.4%) had treatment failure of which 40 (46.5%) were due to progression. Median PFS and TTF were 12 and 8.5 months, respectively. A total of 57 (66.3%) and 42 (48.8%) patients experienced short-term and prolonged treatment benefit. Independent, significant predictors for PFS were progesterone receptor expression (HR: 0.88), multiple metastatic sites (HR: 2.56), and hepatic metastasis (HR: 2.01). Significant predictors for TTF were PR expression (HR: 0.86), multiple sites (HR: 3.29), adverse events (HR: 2.35), and diabetes (HR: 2.88). Aside from tumor biology and adverse events, treatment modifications like pausing and switching of CDKi were predictive for short-term (OR: 6.73) and prolonged (OR: 14.27) therapeutic benefit, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings emphasize the importance of tailored treatment strategies, highlighting the role of PR expression, metastatic burden, and therapeutic adjustments in optimizing patient outcomes in real-world breast cancer management.

HR-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer arising in patients with or without BRCA2 mutation: different biological phenotype and similar prognosis

Background

BRCA2 plays a key role in homologous recombination. However, information regarding its mutations in Chinese patients with breast cancer remains limited.

Objectives

This study aimed to assess the clinicopathological characteristics of BRCA2 mutation breast cancer and explore the mutation's effect on hormone receptor (HR)-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer survival in China.

Design

This hospital-based cohort study prospectively included 629 women with breast cancer diagnosed from 2008 to 2023 at Zhejiang Cancer Hospital in China.

Methods

We compared the clinicopathological characteristics and metastatic patterns and analysed the invasive disease-free survival (iDFS), distant relapse-free survival (DRFS) and first-line progression-free survival (PFS1) of patients with HR-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer according to BRCA2 mutations.

Results

Among the 629 patients, 78 had BRCA2 mutations (12.4%) and 551 did not (87.6%). The mean age at diagnosis was lower in the BRCA2 mutation breast cancer group than in the non-mutation breast cancer group (38.91 versus 41.94 years, p = 0.016). BRCA2 mutation breast cancers were more likely to be lymph node-positive than non-mutation breast cancers (73.0% versus 56.6%, p = 0.037). The pathological grade was higher in 47.1% of BRCA2 mutation breast cancers than in 29.6% of non-mutation breast cancers (p = 0.014). The proportions of patients with BRCA2 mutations who developed contralateral breast cancer (19.2% versus 8.8%, p = 0.004), breast cancer in the family (53.8% versus 38.3%, p = 0.009) and ovarian cancer in the family (7.6% versus 2.4%, p = 0.022) were higher than those of patients without the mutation. The median follow-up time was 92.78 months. Multivariate analysis showed that BRCA2 mutation was not associated with poorer iDFS [hazard ratio = 0.9, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.64-1.27, p = 0.56] and poorer distant relapse-free survival (DRFS) (hazard ratio = 1.09, 95% CI = 0.61-1.93, p = 0.76). There was no significant difference between the two groups with regard to metastatic patterns in the advanced disease setting. In the first-line metastatic breast cancer setting, PFS1 expression was broadly similar between the two groups irrespective of chemotherapy or endocrine therapy.

Conclusion

HR-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer with BRCA2 mutations differs from those without mutations in clinical behaviour and reflects more aggressive tumour behaviour. Our results indicate that BRCA2 mutations have no significant effect on the survival of Chinese women with HR-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer.

Clinical effectiveness and safety of olaparib in BRCA-mutated, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer in a real-world setting: final analysis of LUCY

PURPOSE

The interim analysis of the phase IIIb LUCY trial demonstrated the clinical effectiveness of olaparib in patients with germline BRCA-mutated (gBRCAm), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative metastatic breast cancer (mBC), with median progression-free survival (PFS) of 8.11 months, which was similar to that in the olaparib arm of the phase III OlympiAD trial (7.03 months). This prespecified analysis provides final overall survival (OS) and safety data.

METHODS

The open-label, single-arm LUCY trial of olaparib (300 mg, twice daily) enrolled adults with gBRCAm or somatic BRCA-mutated (sBRCAm), HER2-negative mBC. Patients had previously received a taxane or anthracycline for neoadjuvant/adjuvant or metastatic disease and up to two lines of chemotherapy for mBC.

RESULTS

Of 563 patients screened, 256 (gBRCAm, n = 253; sBRCAm, n = 3) were enrolled. In the gBRCAm cohort, median investigator-assessed PFS (primary endpoint) was 8.18 months and median OS was 24.94 months. Olaparib was clinically effective in all prespecified subgroups: hormone receptor status, previous chemotherapy for mBC, previous platinum-based chemotherapy (including by line of therapy), and previous cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor use. The most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were nausea (55.3%) and anemia (39.2%). Few patients (6.3%) discontinued olaparib owing to a TEAE. No deaths associated with AEs occurred during the study treatment or 30-day follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The LUCY patient population reflects a real-world population in line with the licensed indication of olaparib in mBC. These findings support the clinical effectiveness and safety of olaparib in patients with gBRCAm, HER2-negative mBC.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical trials registration number: NCT03286842.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Adjuvant Olaparib Versus Watch and Wait in the Treatment of Germline BRCA1/2-Mutated, High-Risk, HER2-Negative Early Breast Cancer in Sweden

INTRODUCTION

This study evaluated the cost effectiveness of adjuvant olaparib versus watch and wait (WaW) in patients with germline breast cancer susceptibility gene 1/2 (gBRCA1/2)-mutated, high-risk, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative early breast cancer (eBC), previously treated with neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy, from a Swedish healthcare perspective.

METHODS

A five-state (invasive disease-free survival [IDFS], non-metastatic breast cancer [non-mBC], early-onset mBC, late-onset mBC, death) semi-Markov state transition model with a lifetime horizon was developed. Transition probabilities were informed by data from the Phase III OlympiA trial, supplemented with data from additional studies in BRCA-mutated, HER2-negative mBC. Health state utilities were derived via mapping of OlympiA data and supplemented by literature estimates. Treatment, adverse events and other medical costs were extracted from publicly available Swedish sources. Incremental cost per life-year (LY) and quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained were estimated. Costs and outcomes were discounted at 3% annually. One-way deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were conducted.

RESULTS

Over a lifetime horizon, adjuvant olaparib was associated with an additional 1.50 LYs and 1.22 QALYs, and incremental cost of 471,156 Swedish krona (SEK) versus WaW (discounted). The resulting ICER was 385,183SEK per QALY gained for olaparib versus WaW. ICERs remained below 1,000,000SEK across a range of scenarios, and were consistent across subgroups (hormone receptor [HR]-positive/HER2-negative and triple-negative breast cancer [TNBC]). In PSA, the probability of olaparib being cost effective at 1,000,000SEK per QALY was 99.8%.

CONCLUSIONS

At list price, adjuvant olaparib is a cost-effective alternative to WaW in patients with gBRCA1/2-mutated, high-risk, HER2-negative eBC in Sweden.

The CDK4/6 inhibitors biomarker landscape: The most relevant biomarkers of response or resistance for further research and potential clinical utility

Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6is) in combination with Endocrine Therapy (ET) represent the standard frontline therapy for patients with Hormone Receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative metastatic Breast Cancer (mBC). Clinical activity and efficacy of CDK4/6is-based therapies have been proven both in the endocrine sensitive and resistant settings. Therapy resistance eventually underpins clinical progression to any CDK4/6is-based therapies, yet there is a lack of validated molecular biomarkers predictive of either intrinsic or acquired resistance to CDK4/6is in clinical practice. As the "post-CDK4/6is" landscape for the management of HR-positive/HER2-negative mBC is rapidly evolving with the introduction of novel therapies, there is an urgent need for the definition of clinically relevant molecular biomarkers of intrinsic/acquired resistance mechanisms to CDK4/6is. This narrative review outlines the role of currently approved CDK4/6is-based therapies, describes the most relevant molecular biomarkers of CDK4/6is-resistance, and ultimately provides a perspective on the clinical and research scenario.

Palbociclib Combined with an Aromatase Inhibitor in Patients with Breast Cancer with Lung or Liver Metastases in US Clinical Practice

A cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor combined with endocrine therapy is the standard of care for patients with hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (mBC), but real-world effectiveness data for patients with lung or liver metastases are limited. This retrospective study included data from the US Flatiron Health database of patients with HR+/HER2- mBC and lung or liver metastases treated with first-line palbociclib (PAL) plus an aromatase inhibitor (AI) or an AI alone in routine clinical practice. Overall survival (OS) and real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) were assessed. A total of 891 patients were included (622 with lung metastasis, 376 with liver metastasis, and 107 with both lung and liver metastasis). After stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting to balance patient characteristics, PAL + AI versus AI alone was associated with significantly prolonged OS (HR = 0.62; p < 0.001) and rwPFS (HR = 0.55; p < 0.001) in patients with lung metastases and numerically longer OS (HR = 0.73; p = 0.056) and significantly longer rwPFS (HR = 0.57, p < 0.001) for those with liver metastases. Overall, PAL + AI versus AI alone was associated with prolonged OS and rwPFS in routine clinical practice, supporting the use of first-line PAL + AI for patients with HR+/HER2- mBC with lung and/or liver metastases.

Breast cancers arising in subjects with germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations: Different biological and clinical entities with potentially diverse therapeutic opportunities

Breast cancers (BCs) arising in carriers of germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variants (PVs) have long been considered as indistinguishable biological and clinical entities. However, the loss of function of BRCA1 or BRCA2 proteins has different consequences in terms of tumor cell reliance on estrogen receptor signaling and tumor microenvironment composition. Here, we review accumulating preclinical and clinical data indicating that BRCA1 or BRCA2 inactivation may differentially affect BC sensitivity to standard systemic therapies. Based on a different crosstalk between BRCA1 or BRCA2 and the ER pathway, BRCA2-mutated Hormone Receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced BC may be less sensitive to endocrine therapy (ET) plus CDK 4/6 inhibitors (CDK 4/6i), whereas BRCA2-mutated triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) may be especially sensitive to immune checkpoint inhibitors. If validated in future prospective studies, these data may have relevant clinical implications, thus establishing different treatment paths in patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 PVs.

Progress and prospects in research and clinical practice of hormone receptor-positive, HER-2-negative breast cancer with BRCA1/2 mutations

Breast cancer (BC) is a heterogeneous disease that is the most common cancer in women worldwide. However, precise subtyping and corresponding treatments have improved patient outcomes. Hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2)-negative (HR+/HER2-) BC with BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 mutations (BRCA1/2m) is a unique BC subset with dual drivers: homologous recombination deficiency and hormone receptor signaling. Wild-type BRCA1/2 suppresses estrogen receptor-mediated signaling. Loss-of-function mutations in BRCA1/2 release estrogen receptor suppression, leading to reduced sensitivity to endocrine therapy. Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPis) exert antitumor effects against this subtype and can be used in combination with endocrine therapy. Although PARPis have been evaluated in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer, their efficacy against HR+/HER2- BC has not been clearly established. The present review summarizes recent advances and prospects in the progress of the HR+/HER2-/BRCA1/2m subgroup. As such, this article provides theoretical guidance for future research and promotes the use of PARPis for the treatment of HR+/HER2-/BRCA1/2m BC.

Beyond PARP Inhibitors in Advanced Breast Cancer Patients with Germline BRCA1/2 Mutations: Focus on CDK4/6-Inhibitors and Data Review on Other Biological Therapies

We explored the outcomes of germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants (PVs/LPVs) in the endocrine-sensitive disease treated with first-line standard of care cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors. Three studies retrospectively showed a reduction in the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in gBRCA1/2m patients compared to both the germinal BRCA1/2 wild type (gBRCA1/2wt) and the untested population. Regarding the efficacy of PI3Kα inhibitors, there are no subgroups or biomarker analyses in which germinal BRCA status was explored. However, the biological interactions between the PIK3CA/AKT/mTOR pathway and BRCA1/2 at a molecular level could help us to understand the activity of these drugs when used to treat BC in BRCA1/2 PVs/LPVs carriers. The efficacy of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd), an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) targeting HER2 for HER2-low and HER2-positive (HER2+) BC, has been increasingly described. Unfortunately, data on T-DXd in HER2+ or HER2-low metastatic BC harboring germinal BRCA1/2 PVs/LPVs is lacking. Including germinal BRCA1/2 status in the subgroup analysis of the registration trials of this ADC would be of great interest, especially in the phase III trial DESTINY-breast04. This trial enrolled patients with HER2-negative (HER2-) and both HR+ and HR- metastatic disease, which can now be categorized as HER2-low. The HER2-low subgroup includes tumors that were previously classified as triple negative, so it is highly likely that some women were germline BRCA1/2 PVs/LPVs carriers and this data was not reported. Germline BRCA1/2 status will be available for a higher number of individuals with BC in the near future, and data on the prognostic and predictive role of these PVs/LPVs is needed in order to choose the best treatment options.

Efficacy of front-line treatment for hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer with germline BRCA1/2 mutation

BACKGROUND

Efficacy of endocrine therapy in HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer could differ depending on the presence of BRCA1/2 germline mutation.

METHODS

The ESME metastatic breast cancer platform (NCT03275311) is a French real world database. Multivariable models including a time-varying approach and landmark analyses assessed the association between time-dependent gBRCA status (categorised as gBRCAm, gBRCAwt (wild type), and untested), overall survival (OS), and first-line progression-free survival (PFS1).

RESULTS

A total of 170 patients were gBRCAm carriers, 676 gBRCAwt, and 12,930 were untested at baseline. In the multivariable analysis, gBRCAm carriers overall had a lower OS compared to gBRCAwt (adjusted HR [95% CI] 1.26 [1.03-1.55]). gBRCAm patients treated with front-line endocrine therapy had lower adjusted OS (adjusted HR [95% CI] = 1.54 [1.03-2.32]) and PFS1 (adjusted HR [95% CI] 1.58 [1.17-2.12]) compared to gBRCAwt patients. However, for patients who received frontline chemotherapy, neither OS nor PFS1 differed between gBRCAm carriers and the other groups (HR versus gBRCAwt for OS: 1.12 [0.88-1.41], p = 0.350; PFS1: 1.09 [0.90-1.31], p = 0.379).

CONCLUSION

In this large cohort of HR+/HER2- MBC patients treated in a pre-CDK4/6 inhibitors era, gBRCAm status was associated with a lower OS and lower PFS following first-line endocrine therapy, but not following first-line chemotherapy.

Survival outcomes of metastatic breast cancer patients by germline BRCA1/2 status in a large multicenter real-world database

The outcomes and best treatment strategies for germline BRCA1/2 mutation (gBRCAm) carriers with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) remain uncertain. We compared the overall survival and the first line progression free survival (PFS1) of patients with a gBRCAm identified at initiation of first-line treatment with those of BRCA wild-type (WT) and not-tested (NT) individuals in the ESME real-world database of MBC patients between 2008 and 2016 (NCT03275311). Among the 20 624 eligible patients, 325 had a gBRCAm, 1138 were WT and 19 161 NT. Compared with WT, gBRCAm carriers were younger, and had more aggressive diseases. At a median follow-up of 50.5 months, median OS was 30.6 (95%CI: 21.9-34.3), 35.8 (95%CI: 32.2-37.8) and 39.3 months (95% CI: 38.3-40.3) in the gBRCAm, WT and NT subgroups, respectively. Median PFS1 was 7.9 (95%CI: 6.6-9.3), 7.8 (95%CI: 7.3-8.5) and 9.7 months (95%CI, 9.5-10.0). In the multivariable analysis conducted in the whole cohort, gBRCAm status had however no independent prognostic impact on OS and PFS1. Though, in the triple-negative subgroup, gBRCAm patients had better OS and PFS1 (HR vs WT = 0.76; 95%CI: 0.60-0.97; P = .027 and 0.69; 95% CI: 0.55-0.86; P = .001, respectively). In contrast, in patients with HR+/HER2 negative cancers, PFS1 appeared significantly and OS non significantly lower for gBRCAm carriers (PFS1: HR vs WT = 1.23; 95%CI: 1.03-1.46; P = .024; OS:HR = 1.22, 95% CI: 0.97-1.52, P = .089). In conclusion, gBRCA1/2 status appears to have divergent survival effects in MBC according to IHC subtype.

Novel combination treatment of CDK 4/6 inhibitors with PARP inhibitors in triple negative breast cancer cells

Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors provide promising results for treating hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. However, the efficacy of CDK4/6 inhibitors remains uncertain in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients with particularly carrying RB-deficient tumors. Poly-(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors offer a therapeutic strategy for the treatment of BRCA-mutated TNBC patients. However, the acquired drug resistance, changes in the cell cycle regulation, and DNA damage repair have demonstrated the necessity for developing new combination strategies. This preclinical study assessed a combinatory treatment of the CDK4/6 inhibitor abemaciclib with PARP inhibitors talazoparib (TAL) in HCC1937 BRCA-mutated RB-deficient TNBC cells and TAL-resistant HCC1937-R cells through WST-1 analysis, annexin V, cell cycle, acridine orange/propidium iodide staining, RT-PCR, and apoptosis array. Our findings revealed that abemaciclib and TAL combination synergistically suppressed the growth of TNBC cells and overcame TAL resistance through G0/G1 arrest and the activity of both intrinsic and extrinsic apoptotic pathways. These preliminary results suggest that the combination of abemaciclib and TAL could expand the use of these inhibitors in BRCA mutated and RB deficient TNBC patients and potentially overcomes PARP inhibitors resistance.

Maintained complete response to talazoparib in a BRCA-2 mutated metastatic luminal breast cancer: case report and review of literature

PARP inhibitors are progressively becoming a part of our therapeutic arsenal against BRCA-defective tumors, because of their capacity to induce synthetic lethality in cells with a deficiency in the homologous recombination repair system. Olaparib and talazoparib have been approved for metastatic breast cancer in carriers of germline BRCA mutations, which are found in approximately 6% of patients with breast cancer. We report the case of a patient with metastatic breast cancer, carrier of a germline mutation in BRCA2, with a complete response to first-line treatment with talazoparib, maintained after 6 years. To the best of our knowledge, this is the longest response reported with a PARP inhibitor in a BRCA-mutated tumor. We have made a review of literature, regarding the rationale for PARP inhibitors in carriers of BRCA mutations and their clinical relevance in the management of advanced breast cancer, as well as their emerging role in early stage disease, alone and in combination with other systemic therapies.

A review on the role of cyclin dependent kinases in cancers

The Cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) class of serine/threonine kinases has crucial roles in the regulation of cell cycle transition and is mainly involved in the pathogenesis of cancers. The expression of CDKs is controlled by a complex regulatory network comprised of genetic and epigenetic mechanisms, which are dysregulated during the progression of cancer. The abnormal activation of CDKs results in uncontrolled cancer cell proliferation and the induction of cancer stem cell characteristics. The levels of CDKs can be utilized to predict the prognosis and treatment response of cancer patients, and further understanding of the function and underlying mechanisms of CDKs in human tumors would pave the way for future cancer therapies that effectively target CDKs. Defects in the regulation of cell cycle and mutations in the genes coding cell-cycle regulatory proteins lead to unrestrained proliferation of cells leading to formation of tumors. A number of treatment modalities have been designed to combat dysregulation of cell cycle through affecting expression or activity of CDKs. However, effective application of these methods in the clinical settings requires recognition of the role of CDKs in the progression of each type of cancer, their partners, their interactions with signaling pathways and the effects of suppression of these kinases on malignant features. Thus, we designed this literature search to summarize these findings at cellular level, as well as in vivo and clinical levels.

Implementation of CDK4/6 Inhibitors and its Influence on the Treatment Landscape of Advanced Breast Cancer Patients - Data from the Real-World Registry PRAEGNANT

Background Comprehensive data from prospective clinical trials have led to a high level of evidence establishing CDK4/6 inhibitors in combination with endocrine treatment (CDK4/6i + ET) as a standard for the treatment of HER2-negative, hormone receptor-positive (HER2- HR+) breast cancer patients in the first-line advanced therapy setting. Data on patient populations that have been treated in the real-world setting may provide an insight into changes of patient characteristics and prognosis over time. Methods The data were extracted from the prospective real-world registry PRAEGNANT (NCT02338167). Patients had to have HER2- HR+ advanced breast cancer in the first-line metastatic setting. The chosen therapies were described as well as progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in relation to the given therapies and time periods during which they were indicated. Results CDK4/6 inhibitors have been rapidly implemented since their introduction in November 2016. In recent years (2018 - 2022), about 70 - 80% of the patient population have been treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors, while endocrine monotherapy was given to about 10% and chemotherapy to about 15% of all patients. The prognosis was worst in patients treated with chemotherapy. Recently, mainly patients with a good prognosis are being treated with endocrine monotherapy, and patients who are treated with chemotherapy have an unfavorable prognosis. The PFS and OS of patients treated with CDK4/6i + ET have remained similar over time despite changes in patient characteristics. Conclusion A treatment with CDK4/6i + ET has rapidly become the therapy standard for patients in the first-line advanced breast cancer setting. After the implementation of CDK4/6i + ET, endocrine monotherapy is only given to patients with a very favorable prognosis, while chemotherapy is provided to patients with a rather unfavorable prognosis. These changes in patient characteristics did not seem to influence the prognosis of patients treated with CDK4/6i + ET.

Real-World Effectiveness of Palbociclib Plus Letrozole vs Letrozole Alone for Metastatic Breast Cancer With Lung or Liver Metastases: Flatiron Database Analysis

Background

Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors are a standard treatment for patients with hormone receptor−positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2−negative (HER2−) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). However, real-world data on effectiveness in patients with liver or lung metastatic disease is limited. This study compared outcomes of palbociclib plus letrozole versus letrozole alone in patients with HR+/HER2− MBC with lung or liver metastasis treated in routine clinical practice in the United States.

Methods

This retrospective analysis used Flatiron Health’s database of electronic health records. Women with HR+/HER2− MBC and liver or lung metastasis received first-line palbociclib plus letrozole or letrozole alone between February 2015 and February 2019. Real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) was defined as time from start of treatment to death or disease progression. Stabilized inverse probability treatment weighting (sIPTW) was used to balance baseline demographic and clinical characteristics between palbociclib plus letrozole versus letrozole cohorts. Cox proportional-hazards models were used to estimate the effectiveness of palbociclib plus letrozole versus letrozole alone in rwPFS and overall survival (OS).

Results

The study included 353 patients with lung metastasis, 123 with liver metastasis, and 75 with both. After sIPTW, palbociclib plus letrozole versus letrozole alone was significantlly associated with prolonged rwPFS (hazard ratio (HR), 0.56) and OS (HR, 0.58) (both p&lt;0.001) in all patients. Palbociclib plus letrozole compared with letrozole alone demonstrated a median rwPFS of 16.5 versus 10.5 months, respectively (adjusted HR, 0.52; P&lt;0.001), a median OS of not reached versus 40.3 months (adjusted HR, 0.60; P&lt;0.01) in patients with lung metastasis, and median OS of 30.1 versus 16.8 months (adjusted HR, 0.56; P&lt;0.03 in patients with liver metastasis. In patients with liver metastasis, palbociclib plus letrozole had a median rwPFS of 10.7 months versus 8.0 months in the letrozole alone cohort (adjusted HR, 0.70; P=0.12).

Conclusions

In this real-world population, palbociclib in combination with letrozole is associated with improved outcomes compared with letrozole alone for patients with HR+/HER2− MBC and liver or lung metastasis in the first-line setting. The findings support first-line palbociclib in combination with an aromatase inhibitor as standard of care for HR+/HER2− MBC regardless of visceral disease.

Clinical Trial Registration

NCT04176354.

Predominance of BRCA2 Mutation and Estrogen Receptor Positivity in Unselected Breast Cancer with BRCA1 or BRCA2 Mutation

Simple Summary

We performed a meataanalysis of BRCA1 or BRCA2 germline pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant (gBRCA) in 108,699 unselected breast cancer patients and in 238,972 unaffected individuals. The metanalysis shows that 3.4% unselected breast cancer patients have a gBRCA. In unselected breast cancer patients with gBRCA, more than half of tumors are estrogen receptor-positive. 0.5% of unaffected individuals of the studied populations are gBRCA carriers. The frequency of gBRCA2 and gBRCA1 heterozygosity is estimated at 1/288 and 1/434, respectively. In unselected breast cancer and in unfafected individuals gBRCA2 is more frequent than gBRCA1.

Abstract

Background: Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 inhibitor (PARPi) agents can improve progression-free survival of patients with breast cancer who carry a germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant (gBRCA) in both the metastatic and adjuvant setting. Therefore, we need to reassess the frequency of gBRCA1 and gBRCA2 in order to redefine the criteria for women and tumor phenotype that should be tested. Objective: We studied the relative distribution of gBRCA1 and gBRCA2 in unselected populations of women with breast cancer and in unaffected individuals. We also analyzed the proportion of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive (ER+) tumors in unselected breast cancer patients with gBRCA. Design: We performed a meta-analysis of studies of unselected breast cancer that analyzed the relative contribution of gBRCA1 versus gBRCA2 among unselected breast cancer cases in gBRCA carriers. We then performed a meta-analysis of gBRCA carriage in unaffected individuals from genome-wide population studies, the gnomAD databank, and case–control studies. Results: The BRCA2 gene was involved in 54% of breast cancer cases in unselected patients with gBRCA (n = 108,699) and 60% of unaffected individuals (n = 238,973) as compared with 38% of the largest gBRCA family cohort (n = 29,700). The meta-analysis showed that 1.66% (95% CI 1.08–2.54) and 1.71% (95% CI 1.33–2.2) of unselected breast cancer patients carried gBRCA1 and gBRCA2, respectively. In a population of unaffected individuals, the frequency of heterozygosity for gBRCA1 and gBRCA2 was estimated at 1/434 and 1/288, respectively. Nearly 0.5% of unaffected individuals in the studied populations carried a gBRCA. Carriage of a gBRCA was 2.5% for patients with ER+ tumors (95% CI 1.5–4.1) and 5.7% (95% CI 5.1–6.2) for those with ER- tumors. Overall, 58% of breast tumors occurring in women carrying a gBRCA were ER+ (n = 86,870). Conclusions: This meta-analysis showed that gBRCA2 carriage is predominant in unselected breast cancer patients and unaffected individuals. ER+ tumors among women with gBRCA-related breast cancer are predominant and have been underestimated. Because PARPi agents improve progression-free survival with ER+ gBRCA breast cancer in most clinical trials, breast cancer should be considered, regardless of ER status, for BRCA1/2 screening for therapeutic purposes.

Genomic Markers of CDK 4/6 Inhibitor Resistance in Hormone Receptor Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer

Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors are the standard of care for hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer. This retrospective study reports on genomic biomarkers of CDK 4/6i resistance utilizing genomic data acquired through routine clinical practice. Patients with HR+ MBC treated with palbociclib, ribociclib, or abemaciclib and antiestrogen therapy were identified. Patients were grouped into early (<6 months); intermediate (6−24 months for 0−1 lines; 6−9 months for ≥2 lines); or late progressors (>24 months for 0−1 lines; >9 months PFS for ≥2 lines). NGS and RNA sequencing data were analyzed in association with PFS, and survival analysis was stratified by prior lines of chemotherapy. A total of 795 patients with HR+ MBC treated with CDK 4/6i were identified. Of these, 144 (18%) patients had genomic data and 29 (3.6%) had RNA data. Among the 109 patients who received CDK4/6i as 1st- or 2nd-line therapy, 17 genes showed associations with PFS (p-value ≤ 0.15 and HR ≥ 1.5 or HR < 0.5). Whole transcriptome RNAseq was analyzed for 24/109 (22%) patients with 0−1 prior lines of therapy and 56 genes associated with PFS (HR ≥ 4 or HR ≤ 0.25 and FDR ≤ 0.15). In this retrospective analysis, genomic biomarkers including FGFR1 amplification, PTEN loss, and DNA repair pathway gene mutations showed significant associations with shorter PFS for patients receiving CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy.

Update Breast Cancer 2022 Part 2 - Advanced Stage Breast Cancer

For patients with advanced breast cancer, several novel therapies have emerged in recent years, including CDK4/6 inhibitors, immune checkpoint inhibitors, PARP inhibitors, alpelisib, tucatinib and trastuzumab-deruxtecan, and sacituzumab-govitecan, which have transformed and expanded the therapeutic landscape for patients with advanced breast cancer. Some of these substances have now been approved for use in the early stages of the disease, or are expected to be approved in the near future, so the therapeutic landscape will change once again. Therefore, current scientific efforts are focused on the introduction of new substances and understanding their mechanisms of progression and efficacy. This review summarizes recent developments with reference to recent publications and conferences. Findings on the treatment of patients with HER2-positive breast cancer and brain metastases are presented, as are a number of studies looking at biomarkers in patients with HER2-negative, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. In particular, the introduction of oral selective estrogen receptor degraders provides new opportunities to establish biomarker-based therapy. Molecular diagnostics is establishing itself as a diagnostic marker and parameter of progression.

Real-world clinical outcomes of patients with BRCA-mutated, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative metastatic breast cancer: a CancerLinQ® study

Purpose

To investigate real-world clinical outcomes in patients with BRCA-mutated (BRCAm), HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (mBC) according to BRCA and hormone receptor (HR) status.

Methods

Patients diagnosed with HER2-negative mBC between 01 January 2010 and 31 December 2018 were retrospectively identified from the American Society of Clinical Oncology’s CancerLinQ Discovery® database. Time to first subsequent therapy or death (TFST) from date of mBC diagnosis and start of first-line treatment for mBC and overall survival (OS) from date of mBC diagnosis were investigated according to BRCA status (BRCAm, BRCA wild type [BRCAwt] or unknown BRCA [BRCAu]) and HR status (positive/triple negative breast cancer [TNBC]). Follow-up continued until 31 August 2019 (i.e. minimum of 8 months).

Results

3744 patients with HER2-negative mBC were identified (BRCAwt, n = 460; BRCAm, n = 83; BRCAu, n = 3201) (HR-positive, n = 2738). Median (Q1, Q3) age was 63.0 (54.0, 73.0) years. Median (95% confidence interval [CI]) TFST (months) from mBC diagnosis was as follows: HR-positive, 7.7 (5.0, 11.2), 8.3 (6.6, 10.2) and 9.4 (8.7, 10.1); TNBC, 5.4 (3.9, 12.4), 5.6 (4.7, 6.6) and 5.4 (5.0, 6.2) for BRCAm, BRCAwt and BRCAu, respectively. Median (95% CI) OS (months) was as follows: HR-positive, 41.1 (31.5, not calculable), 55.1 (43.5, 65.5) and 33.0 (31.3, 34.8); TNBC, 13.7 (11.1, not calculable), 14.4 (10.7, 17.0) and 11.7 (10.3, 12.8) for BRCAm, BRCAwt and BRCAu, respectively.

Conclusion

When stratified by HR status, TFST and OS were broadly similar for patients with HER2-negative mBC, irrespective of BRCA status. Further global real-world studies are needed to study outcomes of this patient population.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10549-022-06541-3.

PARP Inhibitors: A Major Therapeutic Option in Endocrine-Receptor Positive Breast Cancers

Recently, OlympiAD and EMBRACA trials demonstrated the favorable efficacy/toxicity ratio of PARPi, compared to chemotherapy, in patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancers (mBC) carrying a germline BRCA mutation. PARPi have been largely adopted in triple-negative metastatic breast cancer, but their place has been less clearly defined in endocrine-receptor positive, HER2 negative (ER+/ HER2-) mBC. The present narrative review aims at addressing this question by identifying the patients that are more likely benefit from PARPi. Frequencies of BRCA pathogenic variant (PV) carriers among ER+/HER2- breast cancer patients have been underestimated, and many experts assume than 50% of all BRCA1/2 mutated breast cancers are of ER+/HER2- subtype. Patients with ER+/HER2- BRCA-mutated mBC seemed to have a higher risk of early disease progression while on CDK4/6 inhibitors and PARPi are effective especially when prescribed before exposure to chemotherapy. The OLYMPIA trial also highlighted the utility of PARPi in patients with early breast cancers at high risk of relapse and carrying PV of BRCA. PARPi might also be effective in patients with HRD diseases, representing up to 20% of ER+/HER2- breast cancers. Consequently, the future implementation of early genotyping strategies for identifying the patients with high-risk ER+/HER2- HRD breast cancers likely to benefit from PARPi is of high importance.