Correction to: The obesity paradox and osteoporosis

Association between body fat and bone mineral density in Korean adults: a cohort study

Although obesity was once considered protective against osteoporosis, various factors influence the relationship between fat and bone mineral density (BMD). To establish the importance of healthy body composition in decelerating declines in BMD, we conducted a study to compare the association between body fat composition and BMD in Korean adults. Using data collected from the Kangbuk Samsung Health Study from 2012 to 2019, this cohort study compared the incidence of decreased BMD among the following four groups: normal BMI and normal adiposity (NBMI-NA), normal BMI and high adiposity (NBMI-HA), overweight, and obesity. Decreased BMD was defined as a Z-score ≤  - 2.0 in premenopausal women and men < 50 years of age or a T-score <  - 1.0 in postmenopausal women and men ≥ 50 years of age. Individuals who were diagnosed with osteoporosis or compression fracture after their second visit were categorized as having decreased BMD. The incidence rate of decreased BMD in the NBMI-NA group was 3.37, and that in the NBMI-HA group was 4.81, which was the highest among all groups. After adjusting for confounding factors, NBMI-HA led to a significantly greater risk of decreased BMD compared to NBMI-NA (HR 1.47; 95% CI 1.09-1.99). Even with a normal BMI, a high BFP was associated with an increased risk of decreased BMD. Therefore, healthy body composition management, not simply BMI, is important in preventing decreased BMD.

The impact of body mass index on prognosis in patients with colon carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The impact of body mass index (BMI) on prognosis in patients with curatively resected stage I-III colon carcinoma was analyzed.

METHODS

The prospectively collected data of 694 patients who underwent complete mesocolic excision between 2003 and 2014 were analyzed. BMI was classified into four categories: underweight (BMI < 18.5 kg/m²; n = 13), normal weight (BMI 18.5 to 24.9 kg/m²; n = 221), overweight (BMI 25.0 to 29.9 kg/m²; n = 309), and obese (BMI ≥ 30.0 kg/m²; n = 151). Univariate and multivariate analyses for comparison of prognosis were performed.

RESULTS

The 5-year rate of locoregional recurrence in all 694 patients was 2.1%, and no differences were found with respect to BMI (p = 0.759). For distant metastasis, the 5-year rate for all patients was 13.4%, and BMI did not have a significant impact (p = 0.593). The 5-year rate of disease-free survival for all 694 patients was 72.4%. The differences with respect to BMI were not found to be significant in univariate analysis (p = 0.222). In multivariate Cox regression analysis, disease-free survival was significantly better in obese patients (HR 0.7; p = 0.034). Regarding overall survival, the 5-year rate for all patients was 78.1%. In univariate analyses, no significant differences were found for BMI (p = 0.094). In the Cox regression analysis, overweight and obese patients had significantly better survival (overweight: HR 0.7; p = 0.027; obese: HR 0.6; p = 0.019).

CONCLUSION

The better survival of overweight and obese patients in multivariate analyses must be interpreted with caution. It is influenced by several factors and seems to correspond to the phenomenon of the obesity paradox.