Differences in Health Characteristics of Geographic Subgroups of Arab Americans in a Northern California Health Plan

Depression and Anxiety Among Arab Individuals in the United States: A Meta-analysis

Emerging research suggests that the increasing population of Arab immigrants and refugees living in the United States (U.S.) has a greater risk for depression and anxiety than other groups. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to estimate the prevalence of depression and anxiety for Arabs in the U.S., to examine the moderating effects of key demographic variables (gender, immigration status, ethnicity) and study characteristics (research design and quality) on the prevalence of anxiety and depression, and to evaluate the direct effects of additional demographic and study characteristics on prevalence rates. Using guidelines from the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P), we searched PubMed, Embase, CINHAL, ProQuest, and the Web of Science databases for articles published between January 2000 and March 2023. Two reviewers each individually extracted the articles' data and evaluated the reported study's methodological quality using a well-established checklist. Statistical analyses consisted of random effects models to estimate the pooled prevalence of depression and anxiety across all studies, separate random effects models for distinct demographic (e.g., immigration status) and methodologic (e.g., study quality) subgroups that might have unique prevalence rates, and a meta-regression to identify additional variables (e.g., age of individuals) that might influence prevalence rates. Our review included 17 studies with a total sample population size of 22, 558 participants. Results indicated that the estimated prevalence of depression overall was 48% (CI 34, 63%) and 58% (CI 33, 83%) for the prevalence of anxiety. Our subgroup analyses uncovered notable variations in prevalence rates based on gender composition, immigration status, ethnicity, and research quality while results of the meta-regressions demonstrated effects of publication year and age of the Arab individual on the estimated prevalence of depression and anxiety. The high prevalence rates for depression and anxiety identified through this meta-analysis are very concerning and underscore the urgent need to address mental health concerns in Arab communities. Results of subgroup and meta-regression analyses suggest that refugees, individuals from specific countries of origin, and younger Arabic persons may need particular attention by clinicians in screening for and treating their depression and anxiety. Our results also signify the need for further high-quality studies to more rigorously assess prevalence of these mental health problems, since we found evidence of potential publication bias and approximately one third of the studies in the review had less optimal methodological quality based on our evaluation. Ultimately, in-depth research regarding the causes of anxiety or depression among Arab individuals will be essential to the development of culturally competent interventions that may reduce their very high prevalence rates.

Cardiovascular disease in Arab Americans: A literature review of prevalence, risk factors, and directions for future research

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of mortality worldwide. Recent evidence suggests Arab Americans, individuals with ancestry from Arabic-speaking countries, have an elevated risk for CVD compared to other ethnicities in the US. However, research focusing specifically on CVD in this population is limited. This literature review synthesizes studies investigating CVD prevalence, risk factors, and outcomes in Arab Americans. Multiple studies found higher rates of coronary heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, and hypertension compared to non-Hispanic White participants. The prevalence of type 2 diabetes, a major CVD risk factor, was also markedly higher, ranging from 16 % to 41 % in Arab Americans based on objective measures. Possible explanations include high rates of vitamin D deficiency, genetic factors, and poor diabetes control. Other metabolic factors like dyslipidemia and obesity did not consistently differ from general population estimates. Psychosocial factors may further increase CVD risk, including acculturative stress, discrimination, low health literacy, and barriers to healthcare access. Smoking, especially waterpipe use, was more prevalent in Arab American men. Though heterogenous, Arab Americans overall appear to have elevated CVD risk, warranting tailored screening and management. Culturally appropriate educational initiatives on CVD prevention are greatly needed. Future directions include better characterizing CVD prevalence across Arab American subgroups, delineating genetic and environmental factors underlying increased diabetes susceptibility, and testing culturally tailored interventions to mitigate CVD risks. In summary, this review highlights concerning CVD disparities in Arab Americans and underscores the need for group-specific research and preventive strategies.

Identifying and improving the "ground truth" of race in disparities research through improved EMR data reporting. A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Studies about racial disparities in healthcare are increasing in quantity; however, they are subject to vast differences in definition, classification, and utilization of race/ethnicity data. Improved standardization of this information can strengthen conclusions drawn from studies using such data. The objective of this study is to examine how data related to race/ethnicity are recorded in research through examining articles on race/ethnicity health disparities and examine problems and solutions in data reporting that may impact overall data quality.

METHODS

In this systematic review, Business Source Complete, Embase.com, IEEE Xplore, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science Core Collection were searched for relevant articles published from 2000 to 2020. Search terms related to the concepts of electronic medical records, race/ethnicity, and data entry related to race/ethnicity were used. Exclusion criteria included articles not in the English language and those describing pediatric populations. Data were extracted from published articles. This review was organized and reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 statement for systematic reviews.

FINDINGS

In this systematic review, 109 full text articles were reviewed. Weaknesses and possible solutions have been discussed in current literature, with the predominant problem and solution as follows: the electronic medical record (EMR) is vulnerable to inaccuracies and incompleteness in the methods that research staff collect this data; however, improved standardization of the collection and use of race data in patient care may help alleviate these inaccuracies.

INTERPRETATION

Conclusions drawn from large datasets concerning peoples of certain race/ethnic groups should be made cautiously, and a careful review of the methodology of each publication should be considered prior to implementation in patient care.

Differential COVID-19 testing, admissions, and mortality for Arab Americans in Southern California

BACKGROUND

Understanding of COVID-19 acquisition and severity risk in minoritized groups is limited by data collection on race and ethnicity; very little is known about COVID-19 risk among Arab Americans in the United States.

PURPOSE

To quantify whether Arab Americans in the El Cajon region of California experienced differential levels of SARS-CoV-2 infection, severity and mortality when compared to other racial/ethnic groups.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted using Sharp Grossmont Hospital's electronic medical records. Patients were included in the study if they were: 18 years of age or older, tested for SARS-CoV-2, admitted for COVID-19 infection, or had COVID-19 listed as a cause of death between March 1, 2020 and January 31, 2021. The primary outcomes of interest were a positive COVID-19 test result, admission to the hospital due to COVID-19, and in hospital COVID-19 related mortality. Comparisons were made across racial/ethnic groups using chi-squared statistics and logistic regression models adjusted for sociodemographics, comorbidities, and time from March 2020.

RESULTS

Arab Americans had greater odds of testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 than non-Hispanic White (adjusted odds ratio, AOR: 3.83, 95% confidence interval, CI: 3.29, 4.46) and non-Hispanic Black (AOR: 2.34, 95% CI: 1.91, 2.88) patients but lower odds of admission (AOR: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.36, 0.63) and in-hospital mortality (AOR: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.28, 0.65) than Hispanic patients.

CONCLUSIONS

There were distinct patterns for COVID-19 infection, severity, and mortality for Arab Americans in Southern California. Without a dedicated ethnic identifier, COVID-19 disparities facing Arab Americans will continue to go undocumented.