Exploring the Impact of Experiences with Everyday and Major Discrimination and HIV-Related Stigma on Engagement in HIV Care Among Older African Americans Living with HIV

Exploring Associations Between Social Factors and Current Substance Use Among Older African Americans with HIV

Background: Substance use is highly prevalent among older people with HIV and continues to have a negative impact on engagement along the HIV care continuum, particularly among African Americans (AA). Social factors like resource insecurity, stigma, and discrimination may play a role in substance use behaviors. However, there is limited research on how these social factors impact substance use among older people with HIV.

Objectives: The purpose of this descriptive study was to examine associations between demographic and social factors and substance use among older AAs with HIV.

Results: Fifty-two participants who were ≥50 years of age, living in Ohio, and identified as Black or AA completed an online survey. Past three-month substance use was self-reported for alcohol, opioids, cocaine, cannabis, and/or amphetamine type stimulants. Separate unadjusted, logistic regression models were conducted to examine factors between each type of substance and HIV-related stigma, food and housing insecurity, discrimination, history of incarceration, employment status, and demographics. The majority of participants self-reported past three-month use of cocaine (53.8%), cannabis (67.3%), amphetamine type stimulants (51.9%), and risky alcohol use (85.0%), and half reported opioid use. HIV-related stigma, discrimination, and housing insecurity were all associated with increased odds of opioid, cocaine, and amphetamine use. Discrimination, food, and housing insecurity were associated with increased odds of cannabis use and risky alcohol use.

Conclusions: More research is needed to further understand how social factors impact substance use among older people with HIV. This understanding can lead to interventions that target these social factors which in turn reduces substance use.

Addressing Stigma and Privacy Through Telemedicine: Qualitative Findings on Enhancing HIV Care Engagement Among Racial and Ethnic Minority Groups

We conducted a demonstration project of telemedicine HIV care services at the University of Florida (UF) College of Medicine, Jacksonville. Our sample focused on members of racial and ethnic minority groups living in an urban setting. As part of the project's evaluation, we conducted 13 focus groups. Focus groups assessed patient, staff, and provider experiences with facilitating or hindering factors to engaging in telemedicine. We also explored the decision-making processes among people with HIV (PWH) to engage or not in telemedicine. The 46 focus group participants included 21 PWH: 12 PWH who accepted and nine who declined participation in telemedicine. The remaining 25 focus group participants were comprised of medical, clinical support, and community-based organization staff who supported the demonstration project. An unexpected finding that emerged in the focus group narratives detailed that some PWH who accepted telemedicine visits appreciated that telemedicine minimized the stigma they have experienced during in-person healthcare encounters. Among PWH who declined a telemedicine visit, they felt the extension of service into their personal world invaded their privacy, created routes for stigma should their HIV status be disclosed outside the healthcare setting, and raised concerns about confidentiality in virtual settings. Like the PWH, the professionals were mixed in their opinions in that some felt telemedicine facilitated care while others raised concerns. Findings point to the importance of allowing PWH to select the format (in-person or via telemedicine) in which their HIV care is rendered and highlight the importance of intervening to decrease healthcare facility-based stigma.

Associations between perceived discrimination experiences, treatment adherence self-efficacy, and depressive symptoms among people living with HIV in the Southern United States

This study examined associations between perceived discrimination, treatment adherence self-efficacy, and depressive symptoms among people living with HIV (PLHIV) in the Southern United States. Cross-sectional survey data were collected from 402 PLHIV who self-reported on interpersonal discrimination experiences based on HIV status, sexuality, gender, income, and living condition. Participants also reported on adherence self-efficacy and depressive symptoms. We employed K-means clustering to identify groups based on discrimination experiences, and logistic regressions to examine group differences on adherence self-efficacy and depressive symptoms. Results suggested three groups: a cluster with high perceived discrimination across all identities/conditions (n = 41; 11%; Cluster 1); a cluster with high perceived discrimination based on HIV status, income, and living condition (n = 49; 13%; Cluster 2); and a cluster with low perceived discrimination across all identities/conditions (n = 288; 76%; Cluster 3). Compared to Cluster 3, Cluster 1 and 2 had 2.22 times (p = .037) and 3.98 times (p<.001) greater odds of reporting depressive symptoms. Compared to Cluster 3, Cluster 2 had 3.40 times (p = .003) greater odds of reporting lower adherence self-efficacy. Findings demonstrate the need for individual-level support for PLHIV with discrimination histories, and broader efforts to end the stigma, discrimination, and marginalization of PLHIV based on HIV status and other characteristics.

Exploring Correlates of Resource Insecurity Among Older Black or African Americans with HIV in Ohio

OBJECTIVES

Resource insecurity is a social determinant of health that can impact people with HIV (PWH), in particular older African Americans (AA) or blacks with HIV. The purpose of this study was to identify resource insecurities among older Blacks or AA PWH specifically related to food and housing. Secondary focus was to find associations between resource insecurity and substance use history, stigma, and various forms of discrimination.

METHODS

Eligible participants (N = 52) of this cross-sectional study were 50 years old or older, identified as Black or AA, diagnosed with HIV, and living in Ohio. Food insecurity was assessed using the Household Food Insecurity Access Scale and housing insecurity was defined as not having stable housing. Resource insecurity was categorized into food and housing secure, food or housing insecure, and food and housing insecure.

RESULTS

Almost half (48.1%) of participants reported housing insecurity, with approximately 58.0% experiencing food insecurity, and 38.5% facing both. Current substance use, particularly opiates, showed significant association with resource insecurity (OR = 5.54; 95% CI = 1.91-17.30). Moreover, experiences of everyday (OR = 1.19; 95% CI = 1.10-1.30) or major forms (OR = 1.75; 95% CI = 1.33-2.39) of discrimination, as well as HIV stigma (OR = 1.24; 95% CI = 1.01-1.55), were also linked to increased odds of resource insecurity among participants.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings highlight how social factors contribute to resource insecurity among older AA PWH. Understanding the factors offers insight for targeted intervention in the fight against HIV transmission.

The burden of secrecy in the management of multimorbidity in older people living with HIV aged 70 and over

The secrecy surrounding HIV continues to be a major concern for older people living with HIV (OPWH) despite their long-term experience of HIV and the presence of other chronic diseases. Our study aims to highlight how the secrecy surrounding HIV can affect the management of the other conditions. The results of this socio-anthropological sub-study of the ANRS EP66 SEPTAVIH study, which assesses frailty in OPWH, are based on in-depth interviews conducted with 20 OPWH with multimorbidities aged 70 years and over and 9 caregivers. Based on a cross-sectional thematic analysis, this study shows that HIV infection differs from other chronic diseases due to the secrecy and stigma associated with HIV. These specific issues associated with HIV complicate the lives of OPWH, depriving them of support from loved ones and forcing them to exclude their general practitioner from their care system. This then causes OPWH with multiple chronic diseases to become socially vulnerable and isolated. Interventions that support the sharing of information on HIV among OPWH and also among caregivers need to be identified as a matter of urgency in order to improve the lives and management of OPWH with multimorbidities.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03958786.

Disparities in mortality trends of adults with HIV in the USA: A comprehensive examination across 2 decades

Approximately 38 million people worldwide are affected by human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), with 4000 new infections daily. While literature explores HIV mortality among the elderly in the US, there is an underrepresentation of mortality data for adults. By scrutinizing mortality trends based on demographic factors such as gender, race or ethnicity, age groups, and geographic location, the study seeks to uncover patterns that may facilitate a longitudinal perspective for tailoring interventions and allocating resources effectively. Crude death rates and age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMR) per 100,000 individuals were calculated using HIV mortality data (ICD-10 Codes B20-24) from CDC WONDER database. Permutation test was used to calculate annual percentage changes in AAMR with 95% confidence interval. Average annual percentage changes were computed as weighted average of annual percentage changes. Between 1999 to 2020, US adult HIV deaths totaled 225,396 (AAMR: 5.03), with a significantly decreasing average annual percentage changes (-5.94). Males exhibited a 3-fold higher AAMR (7.50) than females (2.67). Non-Hispanic Blacks had the highest AAMR (21.82), while Non-Hispanic Asians had the lowest (0.67). The South and Northeast regions had the highest AAMRs (6.91 and 6.33, respectively). Notably, the District of Columbia had an alarmingly high mortality rate of 39.9, while North Dakota had the lowest (0.7). Urban regions (5.47) had double the mortality rates of rural regions (2.70). Mortality rate peaked in age groups 45 to 54 (8.65) and 35 to 44 (7.42). While overall HIV mortality is declining, disparities persist among demographics. Targeted interventions are crucial to improve preventive measures and healthcare access for disproportionately affected groups.

Validation of the attitudes towards people living with HIV/AIDS scale in nursing students

BACKGROUND

One of the environments where people living with HIV/AIDS should feel safer is in the health care setting; however, scientific evidence has identified discriminatory behaviour on the part of health care professionals towards these people. The reduction or abolition of discriminatory practices requires, first of all, to know the attitudes of nursing students towards AIDS with tools appropriate to the socio-cultural context of the disease. The objectives of this study are to update the AIDS Attitudes Scale for Nursing Students (EASE) by adapting it to the sociocultural landscape and to analyse the reliability and structural validity of the new scale.

METHODS

The results of the questionnaires answered by 213 undergraduate nursing students from the Faculty of Health Sciences of Ceuta (University of Granada) were analysed. Reliability (test-retest, n = 33) and validity (n = 180) tests were carried out.

RESULTS

An exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis indicated that a four-factor model was the most parsimonious solution. Items were examined for their underlying relationships and labelled: professional practice, social integration, partner and family, and benevolent stigma. The new scale yielded a McDonald's Omega coefficient (ω) of 0.893. Convergent validity was established for average variance extracted per factor greater than 0.5 and divergent validity when the variance retained by each factor is greater than the variance shared between them (average variance extracted per factor > ϕ2).

CONCLUSIONS

The new scale is a psychometrically sound instrument for assessing attitudes towards people living with HIV/AIDS in nursing students.