CO2 laser for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers with exposed bone. A consecutive series of type 2 diabetic patients

Impact of ultra-pulse carbon dioxide laser on the treatment of chronic refractory ulcer with bone exposure

BACKGROUND

Chronic refractory ulcers with bone exposure present significant challenges in wound management and necessitate effective treatment strategies to facilitate healing and alleviate patient discomfort. This study aimed to investigate the impact of ultra-pulse carbon dioxide laser on treating chronic refractory ulcers with bone exposure.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study enrolled patients diagnosed with chronic refractory ulcers with bone exposure admitted to the wound repair clinic of the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University between July 2018 and July 2019.

RESULTS

A total of 64 patients with chronic refractory ulcers and bone exposure were included, of which 32 patients underwent ultra-pulse carbon dioxide laser drilling. Compared with patients who did not receive ultra-pulse carbon dioxide laser treatment, those who experienced the procedure demonstrated significantly higher wound healing rates on the fourth, eighth, 12th, 16th, and 20th days after treatment (all P < .001), lower scores on the visual analog scale for pain after 20 days of debridement (0.24 ± 0.05 vs 0.58 ± 0.12, P < .001), lower granulation color observation scores on the 12th, 16th, and 20th days (all P = .001), as well as reduced treatment costs (8200 ± 1600 yuan vs 15400 ± 3800 yuan, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Ultra-pulse carbon dioxide laser treatment may enhance the growth of granulation tissue, improve wound healing rates, reduce pain, and lower treatment costs for patients with chronic bone exposure wounds compared to those without such treatment.

Scanner-Assisted CO2 Laser Fissurectomy: A Pilot Study

Introduction: Surgery for chronic anal fissure is challenging for every proctologist. Solving the pain by guaranteeing rapid and effective healing is the objective, but what is the price to pay today in functional terms? Though this result is nowadays partially achievable through interventions that include the execution of an internal sphincterotomy among the procedures, it is necessary to underline the high rate of patients who can present faecal incontinence. The aim of this study is to explore the effectiveness of scanner-assisted CO₂ laser fissurectomy.

Methods: From April 2021 to September 2021, all consecutive patients who affected by chronic anal fissure suitable for surgery, meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria, were evaluated. All planned data were recorded before surgery, then at 24 h, 1 week, and 1 month follow-up. A scanner-assisted CO₂ laser was used in this study to achieve a smooth and dried wound with a minimal tissue thermal damage, to ensure good postsurgical pain control, rapid and functional, elastic and stable healing, and to prevent potential relapses. Paracetamol 1 g every 8 h was prescribed for the first 24 h and then continued according to each patient's need. Ketorolac 15 mg was prescribed as rescue.

Results: Mean pain intensity ≤3, considered as the principal endpoint, was recorded in 26 out of the 29 patients who enrolled in the study with a final success rate of 89.7% at 1-month follow-up. Pain and anal itching showed a statistically significant reduction while bleeding, burning, and maximum pain, and REALIS score showed a reduction too at the end of the follow-up period. Reepithelisation proved to be extremely fast and effective: 22 of 29 (75.9%) showed a complete healing and 5 showed a partial reepithelisation at 1-month follow-up.

Discussion: Outcomes of this study showed that it is undoubtedly necessary to change the surgical approach in case of anal fissure. The internal sphincterotomy procedure must be most of all questioned, where the availability of cutting-edge technological tools must be avoided and offered only in selected cases. Scanner-assisted CO₂ laser showed great results in terms of pain control and wound healing, secondary to an extremely precise ablation, vaporisation, and debridement procedures with minimal lateral thermal damage.

Efficacy and safety of CO2 laser in the treatment of chronic wounds: A Retrospective Matched Cohort Trial

OBJECTIVES

Treating chronic cutaneous wounds is challenging, and debridement is a central concept in treating them. Studies have shown that CO₂ laser debridement can control local infection and promote the wound healing process. The present study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of fully ablative CO₂ laser debridement compared to routine surgical debridement in the treatment of chronic wounds.

METHODS

The retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients with chronic (>1 month) cutaneous wounds (≥1 cm² ) between December 1, 2017, and December 1, 2020, in the Wound Healing Center at Shanghai Ruijin Hospital, China. Patients treated with CO₂ laser debridement with a DEKA SmartXide2 C80 (DEKA) (the CO₂ laser group) were compared with matched control patients with similar baseline characteristics who had undergone routine surgical debridement (the routine group). The primary outcome was time-to-heal (days) for chronic wounds in two groups, and secondary outcomes included the wound area and BWAT (Bates-Jensen wound assessment tool) score before treatment, and at 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks after treatment.

RESULTS

The study included 164 patients (82 in the CO₂ laser group and 82 matched in the routine group). The time-to-heal for patients in the CO₂ laser group (41.30 ± 17.11) was significantly shorter than that of the patients in the routine group (48.51 ± 24.32) (p = 0.015). At 3 and 4 weeks after treatment, the absolute wound area of the CO₂ laser group was significantly smaller than that of the routine group. Also, the CO₂ laser group exhibited a significantly lower relative area at 2, 3, and 4 weeks after treatment. The CO₂ laser group yielded significantly lower BWAT scores at 2, 3, and 4 weeks after treatment. Additionally, the relative BWAT score was significantly lower in the CO₂ laser group than the relative scores in the routine group at 2, 3, and 4 weeks after treatment. No adverse events related to the treatments were observed in either group during the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study has shown that fully ablative CO₂ laser debridement has several advantages over routine sharp surgical debridement. It is superior at ameliorating wound status and reducing wound area, and it also significantly reduces the time-to-heal for chronic wounds, without causing any adverse events.

Retrospective Matched Case-Control Study on the Use of CO2 Laser for the Treatment of Nonhealing Diabetic Foot Ulcers: The DULCIS-2 (Diabetic ULcer, CO2 Laser, and Infections) Study

PURPOSE

Infection, which is one of the possible complications of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs), makes the treatment of ulcers challenging because of its negative impact on healing processes and the high prevalence of multiresistant germs. This study is aimed at verifying the effect of a surgical CO₂ laser (which reduces the bacterial load and allows a more accurate debridement), as compared with the traditional lancets, on the healing rate of DFU.

METHODS

The present case-control retrospective analysis was performed on patients with chronic (>6 months) DFU with Texas grade >1, treated with 80 W surgical CO₂ laser (DEKA SmartXide2 C80, El.En. Group) and compared with a matched sample of patients with similar characteristics, who were treated with a traditional surgical approach. The debridement was performed trying to achieve the complete removal of nonviable tissues. The principal endpoint was the proportion of patients healed at 6 months. All analyses were carried out with SPSS 25.0. The study protocol was approved by the local ethical committee.

RESULTS

This study included 118 patients (59 cases and 59 controls). At 6 months, the proportion of healing patients was 35% and 18% in cases and controls, respectively (P = .034). The corresponding figure at 1 year was 62% and 38% (P = .009), whereas no difference was observed at 1, 2, and 3 months. No serious adverse event was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

In this article, we show for the first time that CO₂ laser treatment, in comparison with traditional surgical approaches, can be associated with an increased healing rate in patients with DFU.

Evaluation of the Efficacy of Ultrapulsed CO2 Laser in Chronic Wounds

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Chronic wound repair is a major problem in wound treatment. Recently, several studies have suggested that carbon dioxide (CO₂ ) laser can be used to improve the healing of chronic wounds. The aim of the present study was to preliminarily investigate the efficacy of laser debridement in treating chronic wound through a comparison of traditional instrument/surgical debridement with the ultrapulsed CO₂ laser debridement in terms of wound healing, wound infection control, and wound blood perfusion.

STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with chronic wound admitted to the Wound Repair Clinic at The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University (Luzhou, China) between February 2019 and May 2019 were enrolled. They were randomly divided into two groups. The patients in one group were treated with traditional sharp instrument/surgical debridement (RT group; number of wounds: 28), while the patients in the other group were treated with ultrapulsed CO₂ laser debridement (LT group; number of wounds: 26). An intergroup comparison was performed based on parameters, such as wound healing, wound infection control, and changes in wound blood perfusion.

RESULTS

The wound healing rate and the total time to achieve healing were significantly better in the LT group versus the RT group at 7, 14, 21, and 28 days after treatment. The wound exudation scores were significantly higher in the LT group versus the RT group at 7, 14, and 28 days after treatment. The positive rate of pre-debridement bacterial culture was significantly lower in the LT group versus the RD group at 14 and 28 days after treatment. The percentage of wound perfusion/normal periwound skin perfusion was significantly higher in the LT group versus the RT group at 1, 7, and 14 days after treatment.

CONCLUSION

For the treatment of chronic refractory wounds, the ultrapulsed CO₂ laser exhibits higher accuracy, more effectively controls wound infection, promotes an increase in wound blood perfusion, and achieves faster wound healing compared with traditional sharp instrument/surgical debridement. Lasers Surg. Med. © 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

A randomized, open-label, controlled trial to evaluate the antimicrobial and surgical effect of CO2 laser treatment in diabetic infected foot ulcers: DULCIS (diabetic ulcer, CO2 laser, and infections) study

AIM

Debridement of fibrin and necrotic tissue from the ulcer surface is an important component of the treatment of diabetic ulcers. A possible alternative to standard lancets is represented by CO₂ laser, which vaporizes necrotic tissues together with any pathogen. The present trial is aimed at verifying the effect of a CO₂ laser on bacterial load in the debridement of infected diabetic foot ulcers.

METHODS

In this open-label randomized controlled trial (NCT02677779), patients with diabetes and an infected foot ulcers were randomized to either CO₂ laser or traditional debridement.

RESULTS

The reduction (%) of bacterial load with CO₂ laser was significantly greater than in control group [-99.9 (-100.0; -90.0) vs. -50.0 (-96.0; -75.0), p = 0.049]. Similarly, a significantly greater reduction (%) of the fraction of ulcer area covered by fibrin was obtained in the intervention group [-84.1 (-95.0; -72.2) vs. -46.9 (-69.5; -40.8), p = 0.038].

CONCLUSIONS

Debridement of ulcers with CO₂ laser significantly reduces bacterial load and fibrin-covered areas, and could be of help in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcer.