Apparent biochemical thyrotoxicosis due to assay interference by high-dose biotin given for multiple sclerosis

Mitigation of Biotin Interference in Manual and Automated Immunoassays by Preconjugating Biotinylated Antibodies to the Streptavidin Surface as an Alternative to Biotin Depletion

BACKGROUND

Streptavidin-to-biotin binding is one of the strongest noncovalent interactions in nature and incorporated into many immunoassays. Biotin-streptavidin coupling assays are susceptible to interference from free biotin in patient specimens, which may falsely decrease or increase results. To prevent biotin interference, we evaluated a method to preconjugate biotinylated antibodies to the assay's streptavidin solid surface before adding patient specimen and compared this technique to a biotin depletion protocol.

METHODS

Biotin interference in 3 manual ELISAs and 2 automated immunoassays was established. Mitigation of biotin interference by preincubation was evaluated in each assay by adding biotinylated antibody to the streptavidin-coated surface before adding biotin- or PBS-spiked serum. Lastly, the preincubation method was compared to a biotin-depletion protocol to compare the effectiveness of mitigating biotin interference.

RESULTS

In the presence of 400 µg/L biotin, analyte detection was reduced to 10% to 15% of total in the ELISA assays and to 15.2% in the automated sandwich (thyroglobulin) immunoassay. In the automated competitive (free thyroxine) immunoassay, biotin caused an increased detection of 551.6%. Preconjugation of the biotinylated capture antibody to the streptavidin surface in the ELISA assays resulted in 84% to 99% activity recovery, compared to 84% to 97% by a biotin depletion protocol. Similarly, automated sandwich and competitive immunoassays obtained 97.1% and 116.5% recovery by preconjugation, compared to 95.6% and 100.3% by the depletion method, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates how assay redesign to include preconjugation of biotinylated capture antibody to streptavidin is an effective alternative to biotin-depletion methods to mitigate biotin interference.

AACC Guidance Document on Biotin Interference in Laboratory Tests

BACKGROUND

Laboratory tests that use streptavidin-biotin binding mechanisms have the potential to be affected by high circulating biotin concentrations, which would produce positive and negative interference in biotinylated competitive and noncompetitive (sandwich) immunoassays, respectively. Consumption of high-dose biotin supplements for cosmetic or health-related reasons has drawn attention to biotin interference in clinical laboratory tests. Case reports and in vivo studies show that ingestion of supplemental biotin can cause clinically significant errors in select biotinylated immunoassays.

CONTENT

This AACC Academy document is intended to provide guidance to laboratorians and clinicians for preventing, identifying, and dealing with biotin interference. In vivo and in vitro spiking studies have demonstrated that biotin concentrations required to cause interference vary by test and by manufacturer. This document includes discussion of biotin's mechanisms for interference in immunoassays, pharmacokinetics, and results of in vitro and in vivo studies and cites examples of assays known to be affected by high biotin concentrations. This document also provides guidance recommendations intended to assist laboratories and clinicians in identifying and addressing biotin interference in laboratory testing.

SUMMARY

The recent increase in the use of high-dose biotin supplements requires laboratorians and clinicians to be mindful of the potential for biotin interference in biotinylated immunoassay-based laboratory tests. Laboratories, clinicians, regulators, and patients should work together to ensure accurate laboratory results. Laboratories have several options for identifying suspected biotin interference in specimens. Alternatively, the relatively fast elimination of biotin allows the potential for rapid follow-up specimen analysis if necessary.

Prevalence of Detectable Biotin in Five US Emergency Department Patient Cohorts

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to estimate the prevalence of biotin supplementation in United States emergency department patients using a multi-site, geographically distributed sampling model.

METHODS

Biotin was measured using an Abbott ARCHITECT Biotin research use only assay in 7118 emergency department patient serum or plasma samples from five US medical centers. Samples with biotin ≥10 ng/mL underwent additional LC-MS/MS confirmatory testing for biotin and its primary metabolites. The overall and site-specific prevalence of detectable biotin was determined using the screening assay while biotin speciation (i.e., prevalence of detectable metabolites) was determined using LC-MS/MS.

RESULTS

Of 7118 samples screened, 291 (4.1%) had biotin ≥10 ng/mL and were considered positive. Across five medical centers, the fraction of positive samples ranged from 2.0% to 5.4%. The maximum biotin concentration observed was 355 ng/mL. Of the 285 positive screens that underwent additional LC-MS/MS testing, 89 (31%) showed detectable biotin, bisnorbiotin, and/or biotin sulfoxide. Biotin, bisnorbiotin, and biotinsulfoxide were detected in 82/89 (92.1%), 61/89 (68.5%), and 18/89 (20.2%) samples, respectively; biotin was detected in the absence of either metabolite in 18/89 (20.2%) samples.

CONCLUSIONS

Using a screening assay, 4.1% of emergency department patient samples were found to be potentially susceptible to interference from biotin. Confirmatory testing showed detectable biotin and/or biotin metabolites in 31% of positive screens (1.3% overall). The prevalence of biotin ≥10 ng/mL varied 2-3-fold across US emergency department patient cohorts. Biotin metabolites were observed in 80% of samples confirmed to have detectable biotin species by LC-MS/MS, suggesting that rigorous assessments of assay susceptibility to biotin interference, often performed using in vitro studies, should consider the potential role of biotin metabolites present in vivo.