1
|
Rottura M, Drago SFA, Gianguzzo VM, Molonia A, Pallio G, Scoglio R, Marino S, Alibrandi A, Imbalzano E, Squadrito F, Irrera N, Arcoraci V. Chronic kidney disease progression in diabetic patients: Real world data in general practice. Heliyon 2024; 10:e30787. [PMID: 38765038 PMCID: PMC11096917 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30787] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2024] [Revised: 04/30/2024] [Accepted: 05/06/2024] [Indexed: 05/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Aims the aim of the study was to analyze glomerular filtration ratio (GFR) changes in diabetic patients assisted by General Practitioners (GPs) evaluating the risk factors related to glomerular function. Methods patients with diabetes with at least three recorded values of creatinine were recruited in the study and GFR values were estimated. The quarterly percentage change in GFR for each patient was estimated. Nephrotoxic drugs were identified, and glucose-lowering drugs use was described. Linear regression analyses were performed to identify eGFR changes predictors. Results a total of 545 patients with diabetes were selected. According to the last eGFR values 64 (11.7 %) patients were classified in G1 stage, 277 (50,8 %) in G2, 175 (32.1 %) in G3a, 25 (4.6 %) in G3b and only 4 (0.7 %) in G4. Patients treated with at least one glucose-lowering drugs were 479 (87.9 %), most of them with biguanides (67.0 %). At least one nephrotoxic drug prescription was recorded in 524 (96.1 %) patients; proton pump inhibitors (74.7 %) and NSAIDs (71.6 %) were the most prescription classes. Heart failure, diabetes duration and preserved GFR values were related to reduced eGFR values. Conclusions patients with diabetes should be more carefully observed regardless of kidney risk factors and GFR values in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelangelo Rottura
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Via C. Valeria, 98125, Messina, Italy
| | - Selene Francesca Anna Drago
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Via C. Valeria, 98125, Messina, Italy
| | - Viviana Maria Gianguzzo
- Department of Chemical, Biological, Pharmaceutical and Environmental Sciences, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Antonino Molonia
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Via C. Valeria, 98125, Messina, Italy
| | - Giovanni Pallio
- Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphological and Functional Imaging, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | | | | | - Angela Alibrandi
- Department of Economics Section of Statistical and Mathematical Sciences, University of Messina, Via dei Verdi, 98122, Messina, Italy
| | - Egidio Imbalzano
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Via C. Valeria, 98125, Messina, Italy
| | - Francesco Squadrito
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Via C. Valeria, 98125, Messina, Italy
| | - Natasha Irrera
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Via C. Valeria, 98125, Messina, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Arcoraci
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Via C. Valeria, 98125, Messina, Italy
| | - Audit & Research Messina Primary Care Group
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Via C. Valeria, 98125, Messina, Italy
- Department of Chemical, Biological, Pharmaceutical and Environmental Sciences, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
- Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphological and Functional Imaging, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
- Italian Society of General Practice (SIMG), Messina, Italy
- Department of Economics Section of Statistical and Mathematical Sciences, University of Messina, Via dei Verdi, 98122, Messina, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Orloff J, Min JY, Mushlin A, Flory J. Safety and effectiveness of metformin in patients with reduced renal function: A systematic review. Diabetes Obes Metab 2021; 23:2035-2047. [PMID: 34009711 DOI: 10.1111/dom.14440] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2021] [Revised: 05/12/2021] [Accepted: 05/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
AIM To examine clinical and safety outcomes associated with metformin use in patients with impaired renal function. MATERIALS AND METHODS We searched PubMed and Embase databases from inception to August 2020, supplementing our search with a review of investigator files and reference lists of included studies. Any study reporting original data on metformin and patient-centred outcomes in patients with impaired renal function, defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of less than 60 mL/min/1.73m2 , was included. Post hoc meta-analysis was performed for the outcomes of mortality, cardiovascular events and acidosis. RESULTS Nine small prospective studies enrolling patients with significantly impaired renal function identified only one case of clinically apparent lactic acidosis. Among 13 larger retrospective studies, seven examined the risk of mortality across patient subgroups; meta-analysis showed reductions in overall mortality at an eGFR of 45 mL/min/1.73m2 or higher but not at an eGFR of less than 45 mL/min/1.73m2 . Eight retrospective studies evaluated acidosis as an outcome; meta-analysis showed no increase in risk of acidosis except at an eGFR of less than 30 mL/min/1.73m2 , in which group the HR was 1.97 (95% CI 1.03-3.77). CONCLUSIONS The literature shows metformin to be associated with reduced mortality and no increased risk of acidosis at an eGFR of 45 mL/min/1.73m2 or higher. Metformin appears to be associated with fewer benefits and possible increases in the risk of acidosis at an eGFR of less than 30 mL/min/1.73m2 . Consistent with US Food and Drug Administration guidelines, metformin should not be used at an eGFR less than 30 mL/min/1.73m2 , and further research on its risk-benefit profile at eGFR values approaching 30 mL/min/1.73m2 is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeremy Orloff
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jea Young Min
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Alvin Mushlin
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - James Flory
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|