Drug-drug interactions between sucroferric oxyhydroxide and losartan, furosemide, omeprazole, digoxin and warfarin in healthy subjects

A safety evaluation of sucroferric oxyhydroxide for the treatment of hyperphosphatemia

INTRODUCTION

Hyperphosphatemia is a common complication as chronic kidney disease (CKD) progresses and most patients undergoing dialysis are prescribed oral phosphate binder therapy to control serum phosphate concentrations. Sucroferric oxyhydroxide is an iron-based phosphate binder approved for the treatment of hyperphosphatemia in CKD patients on dialysis.

AREAS COVERED

This article reviews key safety and effectiveness data for sucroferric oxyhydroxide from both prospective clinical trials and real-world observational studies.

EXPERT OPINION

Sucroferric oxyhydroxide potently binds dietary phosphate in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, resulting in effective reduction of serum phosphate concentrations with a relatively low daily pill burden. Data from clinical trials and real-world observational studies show sucroferric oxyhydroxide has a favorable safety and tolerability profile. The most frequent side effects observed with sucroferric oxyhydroxide are GI-related, mainly discolored (black) stools and mild or moderate transient diarrhea, both of which are manageable. There is minimal systemic iron absorption from sucroferric oxyhydroxide, and therefore the drug is associated with a low risk of iron accumulation. Sucroferric oxyhydroxide also displays low potential for drug-drug interactions with other commonly prescribed oral medications. Overall, sucroferric oxyhydroxide offers an effective and well-tolerated treatment option for the management of hyperphosphatemia.

Strategy for the Prediction of Steady-State Exposure of Digoxin to Determine Drug-Drug Interaction Potential of Digoxin With Other Drugs in Digitalization Therapy

Digoxin, a narrow therapeutic index drug, is widely used in congestive heart failure. However, the digitalization therapy involves dose titration and can exhibit drug-drug interaction. Ctrough versus area under the plasma concentration versus time curve in a dosing interval of 24 hours (AUC0-24h) and Cmax versus AUC0-24h for digoxin were established by linear regression. The predictions of digoxin AUC0-24h values were performed using published Ctrough or Cmax with appropriate regression lines. The fold difference, defined as the quotient of the observed/predicted AUC0-24h values, was evaluated. The mean square error and root mean square error, correlation coefficient (r), and goodness of the fold prediction were used to evaluate the models. Both Ctrough versus AUC0-24h (r = 0.9215) and Cmax versus AUC0-24h models for digoxin (r = 0.7781) showed strong correlations. Approximately 93.8% of the predicted digoxin AUC0-24h values were within 0.76-fold to 1.25-fold difference for Ctrough model. In sharp contrast, the Cmax model showed larger variability with only 51.6% of AUC0-24h predictions within 0.76-1.25-fold difference. The r value for observed versus predicted AUC0-24h for Ctrough (r = 0.9551; n = 177; P < 0.001) was superior to the Cmax (r = 0.6134; n = 275; P < 0.001) model. The mean square error and root mean square error (%) for the Ctrough model were 11.95% and 16.2% as compared to 67.17% and 42.3% obtained for the Cmax model. Simple linear regression models for Ctrough/Cmax versus AUC0-24h were derived for digoxin. On the basis of statistical evaluation, Ctrough was superior to Cmax model for the prediction of digoxin AUC0-24h and can be potentially used in a prospective setting for predicting drug-drug interaction or lack of it.

Effectiveness of sucroferric oxyhydroxide in patients on on-line hemodiafiltration in real-world clinical practice: A retrospective study

INTRODUCTION

Hyperphosphatemia is a serious consequence of chronic kidney disease and has been associated with an increased risk for cardiovascular disease. Controlling serum phosphorus levels in patients on dialysis is a challenge for the clinicians and implies, in most cases, the use of phosphate binders (PB). Part of the reason for this challenge is poor adherence to treatment because of the high pill burden in this patient group.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the real-world effectiveness of sucroferric oxyhydroxide (SO) in controlling serum phosphorus levels and determine the associated pill burden.

METHODS

A multicenter, quantitative, retrospective, before-after study was conducted with patients receiving online hemodiafiltration. Patients who switched to SO as a part of routine care were included in the study. PB treatment, number of pills, serum phosphorus levels, and intravenous iron medication and dosage were collected monthly during the six months of treatment with either PB or SO.

RESULTS

A total of 42 patients were included in the study. After switching from a PB to SO, the prescribed pills/day was reduced 67% from 6 pills/day to 2 pills/day (p < 0.001) and the frequency of pill intake was lowered from 3 times/day to 2 times/day (p < 0.001). During the treatment with SO, the proportion of patients with serum phosphorus ≤ 5.5 mg/dL increased from 33.3% at baseline to 45% after six months of treatment.

CONCLUSION

During the six-month follow-up with SO, serum phosphorus levels were controlled with one third of the pills/day compared to other PB.

Sucroferric oxyhydroxide for the treatment of hyperphosphatemia

INTRODUCTION

Sucroferric oxyhydroxide is a non-calcium, iron-based phosphate binder indicated for the treatment of hyperphosphatemia in patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing dialysis. Areas covered: Herein, the preclinical development and clinical data for sucroferric oxyhydroxide are reviewed, including the key data from the Phase III registration study and the latest evidence from the real-world clinical setting. Expert opinion: Sucroferric oxyhydroxide displays potent phosphate-binding capacity and clinical studies demonstrate its effectiveness for the long-term reduction of serum phosphorus levels in dialysis patients. Observational study data also show that sucroferric oxyhydroxide provides effective serum phosphorus control for hyperphosphatemic patients in the real-world clinical setting. The serum phosphorus reductions with sucroferric oxyhydroxide can be achieved with a relatively low pill burden in comparison with other phosphate binders, which may translate into better treatment adherence in clinical practice. The Phase III data also indicate that sucroferric oxyhydroxide has a favorable impact on other chronic kidney disease-related mineral bone disease parameters, including a fibroblast growth factor-23-lowering effect. Sucroferric oxyhydroxide is well tolerated and associated with low systemic iron absorption, minimizing the potential for iron accumulation or overload. These attributes render sucroferric oxyhydroxide an attractive non-calcium-containing phosphate binder for the treatment of hyperphosphatemia.

[Sucroferric oxyhydroxide, a novel iron-based phosphate binder. Which current use in dialysis patients?]

International guidelines suggest lowering elevated phosphorus level to the normal range in patients on dialysis. Among the phosphate-lowering strategies, phosphate binder is frequently used in addition to dietary phosphate restriction and an adequate dialysis strategy. However, serum phosphate concentration higher than 1.78mmol/L is observed in more than 40% of patients justifying the quest for new drugs. Sucroferric oxyhydroxide is one of the new iron-based agents and is available in France since May 2016. A recent international multicentre study showed this new drug to be as efficacious and non-inferior to sevelamer carbonate in magnitude of serum phosphate control. The serum phosphorus-lowering effect was maintained over 1year. When compared to carbonate sevelamer, the pill-burden was half with sucroferric oxyhydroxide because of its high phosphate binding capacity. As previously shown by experimental studies, no risk of iron accumulation was observed since iron absorption is negligible. Discolored feces and diarrhea were fairly frequent side effects. When diarrhea subsides, the tolerability of this new phosphate binder is excellent on a long-term basis.

Dental implants in patients affected by systemic diseases

Several systemic diseases (and relative medications) have been reported to impair or in some cases complicate dental implant surgery. In broader terms, when dealing with patients suffering from systemic diseases, the monitoring of the medical condition and of the related post-operative complications is of great importance in order to avoid risks which could jeopardise the health of the patient. In this review, the available evidence on implant survival/success, as well as relevant surgical recommendations in patients affected by systemic diseases, are evaluated and when possible, practical suggestions for the clinician are provided.

Phosphate binders for the treatment of chronic kidney disease: role of iron oxyhydroxide

Chronic kidney disease-mineral bone disorder is frequent in patients with renal failure. It is characterized by abnormalities in mineral and bone metabolism with resulting hyperphosphatemia, low serum vitamin D, secondary hyperparathyroidism, altered bone morphology and strength, higher risk of bone fractures, and development of vascular or other soft tissue calcifications. Besides the recommendation to reduce phosphorus dietary intake, many drugs are currently available for the treatment of calcium/phosphate imbalance. Among them, phosphate binders represent a milestone. Calcium-based binders (calcium carbonate, calcium acetate) are effective in lowering serum phosphate, but their use has been associated with an increased risk of hypercalcemia and calcifications. Calcium-free binders (sevelamer hydrochloride, sevelamer carbonate, and lanthanum carbonate) are equally or slightly less effective than calcium-containing compounds. They would not induce an increase in calcium levels but may have relevant side effects, including gastrointestinal symptoms for sevelamer and risk of tissue accumulation for lanthanum. Accordingly, new phosphate binders are under investigation and some of them have already been approved. A promising option is sucroferric oxyhydroxide (Velphoro(®), PA21), an iron-based phosphate binder consisting of a mixture of polynuclear iron(III)-oxyhydroxide, sucrose, and starches. The present review is focused on pharmacology, mode of action, and pharmacokinetics of sucroferric oxyhydroxide, with a discussion on comparative efficacy, safety, and tolerability studies of this drug in chronic kidney disease and patient perspectives such as quality of life, satisfaction, and acceptability. Sucroferric oxyhydroxide has proven to be as effective as sevelamer in reducing phosphatemia with a similar safety profile and lower pill burden. Experimental and clinical studies have documented a minimal percentage of iron absorption without inducing toxicity. In conclusion, the overall benefit-risk balance of sucroferric oxyhydroxide is deemed to be positive, and this new drug may therefore represent a good alternative to traditional phosphate binders for the treatment of hyperphosphatemia in dialysis patients.

Iron-based phosphate binders--a new element in management of hyperphosphatemia

INTRODUCTION

Management of serum phosphorus in patients with chronic kidney disease remains a significant clinical challenge. A pivotal component of the clinical approach to maintaining serum phosphorus concentrations towards the normal range is the use of phosphate binding agents in addition to comprehensive dietary counseling. The available agents work similarly by capitalizing on a cation within the agent to bind negatively charged phosphorus, forming an insoluble complex and reducing ingested phosphorus absorption. Despite several effective options for phosphate binder therapies, patient adherence remains an issue, mainly due to adverse effect profiles and large daily pill burdens.

AREAS COVERED

Two new iron-based phosphate binder therapies have recently become available in the United States, sucroferric oxyhydroxide and ferric citrate. These agents have both been shown to effectively reduce serum phosphorus comparably to widely used calcium-based binders and sevelamer salts.

EXPERT OPINION

The two new iron-based binders differ substantially with regard to phosphate binding chemistry and iron absorption profiles. Their place in therapy is still evolving and the impact of pill burden, gastrointestinal adverse effect profiles, potential cost reduction of anemia therapies and physiologic effects of long-term iron exposure need to be further evaluated.

Sucroferric oxyhydroxide: a review in hyperphosphataemia in chronic kidney disease patients undergoing dialysis

Sucroferric oxyhydroxide (Velphoro®), an iron-based oral phosphate binder, is available for the control of serum phosphorus levels in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) on dialysis. In a pivotal phase III trial, sucroferric oxyhydroxide 1000-3000 mg/day for 24 weeks was noninferior to sevelamer carbonate 4800-14,400 mg/day with regard to lowering serum phosphorus levels. Additionally, sucroferric oxyhydroxide at maintenance dosages was significantly more effective than low dosage sucroferric oxyhydroxide (250 mg/day) with regard to maintaining controlled serum phosphorus levels during weeks 24-27 of treatment. Sucroferric oxyhydroxide had a numerically lower mean daily pill burden and better treatment adherence than sevelamer carbonate. Treatment with sucroferric oxyhydroxide was generally well tolerated over 24 weeks' treatment, with the most frequently reported treatment-emergent adverse events being mild, transient diarrhoea and discoloured faeces. In a 28-week extension study, the efficacy and tolerability profile of sucroferric oxyhydroxide remained similar to sevelamer carbonate for up to 52 weeks. In conclusion, sucroferric oxyhydroxide is a valuable treatment option for hyperphosphataemia in CKD patients on dialysis, providing an effective and generally well tolerated noncalcium-based phosphate binder therapy with a lower pill burden than sevelamer carbonate and the potential for improved treatment adherence.

Iron-based phosphate binders: do they offer advantages over currently available phosphate binders?

Increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality has been associated with the hyperphosphatemia seen in patients with end-stage chronic kidney disease (CKD). Oral phosphate binders are prescribed in these patients to prevent intestinal absorption of dietary phosphate and reduce serum phosphate. In prospective observational cohorts they have shown to decrease all-cause and cardiovascular mortality risk. Different problems have been associated with currently available phosphate binders as positive calcium balance and impaired outcomes with calcium-based phosphate binders or increased costs with non-calcium-based phosphate binders. Iron-based phosphate binders represent a new class of phosphate binders. Several iron-based phosphate binders have undergone testing in clinical trials. Ferric citrate (JTT-751) and sucroferric oxyhydroxide (PA21) are the two iron-based binders that have passed to the clinical field after being found safe and effective in decreasing serum phosphate. Iron from ferric citrate is partially absorbed compared to sucroferric oxyhydroxide. Ferric citrate usage could result in an important reduction in erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) and IV iron usage, resulting in significant cost savings. Sucroferric oxyhydroxide was effective in lowering serum phosphorus in dialysis patients with similar efficacy to sevelamer carbonate, but with lower pill burden, and better adherence. Ferric citrate may be more suited for the treatment of chronic hyperphosphatemia in CKD patients requiring iron supplements but its use may have been hampered by potential aluminum overload, as citrate facilitates its absorption; sucroferric oxyhydroxide may be more suited for hyperphosphatemic CKD patients not requiring iron supplementation, with low pill burden.