Atrial fibrillation and chronic kidney disease conundrum: an update

Predictive value of fine fibrillatory wave for declining eGFR in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation: Long-term follow-up study

BACKGROUND

Renal dysfunction has been identified as a risk factor for both stroke and bleeding events in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients, yet the mechanisms remain unclear. We examines the connection between fine fibrillatory wave and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline, alongside chronic kidney disease (CKD).

METHODS

Persistent AF patients admitted to Jinan University's First Affiliated Hospital from January 2019 to June 2023 were enrolled. Kaplan-Meier analysis explored kidney endpoints for coarse and fine fibrillatory wave. A multivariate Cox model estimated adjusted hazard ratios (HR) and 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CI) to determine the correlation between fine fibrillatory wave and eGFR decline, as well as CKD.

RESULTS

Of the 3521 AF patients, 229 were ultimately included in the analysis of this study. The median age of these patients was 75 years, with 58 % being male. The median follow-up time was 23 months, and the mean eGFR was 70 ± 19 mL/min/1.73 m2. Multivariate COX regression analysis revealed fine fibrillatory wave (HR = 8.311, 95 % CI 3.418-20.211, p < 0.001) as an independent risk factor associated with a ≥ 30 % decline in eGFR. Among 166 AF patients with eGFR >60 mL/min/1.73 m2, 40 cases (24 %) experienced a decline to <60 mL/min/1.73 m2. In comparison to coarse fibrillatory wave, the risk of fine fibrillatory wave causing eGFR decline to <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 was approximately 4.6 times higher (HR = 4.645, 95 % CI 2.127-10.142, p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Fine fibrillatory wave was independently associated with the risk of eGFR decline ≥30 % and eGFR decline to <60 mL/min/1.73 m2.

Anticoagulation in Chronic Kidney Disease

The nuanced landscape of anticoagulation therapy in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) presents a formidable challenge, intricately balancing the dual hazards of hemorrhage and thrombosis. These patients find themselves in a precarious position, teetering on the edge of these risks due to compromised platelet functionality and systemic disturbances within their coagulation frameworks. The management of such patients necessitates a meticulous approach to dosing adjustments and vigilant monitoring to navigate the perilous waters of anticoagulant therapy. This is especially critical considering the altered pharmacokinetics in CKD, where the clearance of drugs is significantly impeded, heightening the risk of accumulation and adverse effects. In the evolving narrative of anticoagulation therapy, the introduction of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) has heralded a new era, offering a glimmer of hope for those navigating the complexities of CKD. These agents, with their promise of easier management and a reduced need for monitoring, have begun to reshape the contours of care, particularly for patients not yet on dialysis. However, this is not without its caveats. The application of DOACs in the context of advanced CKD remains a largely uncharted territory, necessitating a cautious exploration to unearth their true potential and limitations. Moreover, the advent of innovative strategies such as left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) underscores the dynamic nature of anticoagulation therapy, potentially offering a tailored solution for those at the intersection of CKD and elevated stroke risk. Yet the journey toward integrating such advancements into standard practice is laden with unanswered questions, demanding rigorous investigation to illuminate their efficacy and safety across the spectrum of kidney disease. In summary, the management of anticoagulation in CKD is a delicate dance, requiring a harmonious blend of precision, caution, and innovation. As we venture further into this complex domain, we must build upon our current understanding, embracing both emerging therapies and the need for ongoing research. Only then can we hope to offer our patients a path that navigates the narrow strait between bleeding and clotting, toward safer and more effective care.

Appropriateness of prescribing profiles and intake adherence to non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation: analysis of a retrospective longitudinal study using real-world data from Northern Portugal (AF-React Study)

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to assess the appropriateness of prescribing profiles and intake adherence to non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).

DESIGN

Retrospective longitudinal study.

SETTING

The study was conducted in the Regional Health Administration of Northern Portugal.

PARTICIPANTS

The authors selected a database of 21 854 patients with prescriptions for NOACs between January 2016 and December 2018 and were classified with AF until December 2018.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The appropriate dosage of NOAC for patients with AF divided into three categories: contraindicated, inconsistent and consistent, based on the 2020 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for AF.

RESULTS

Dabigatran had a lower percentage of guideline-consistent doses (n=1657, 50.1%) than other drugs such as rivaroxaban (n=4737, 81.6%), apixaban (n=3830, 78.7%) and edoxaban (n=436, 82.1%). Most patients with an inconsistent dose were prescribed a lower dose than recommended based on their glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Among patients younger than 75 years with GFR >60 mL/min, 59.8% (n=10 028) had an adequate GFR range, while 27.8% (n=7166) of GFR measurements from patients older than 75 years old and 29.4% (n=913) of GFR measurements from patients younger than 75 years with GFR <60 mL/min were within an adequate time range. Adherence to NOACs varied across different drugs, with 59.1% (n=540) adhering to edoxaban, 56.3% (n=5443) to rivaroxaban, 55.3% (n=3143) to dabigatran and 53.3% (n=4211) to apixaban.

CONCLUSIONS

Dabigatran had the lowest percentage of guideline-consistent doses. Patients younger than 75 years with GFR >60 mL/min had the highest percentage with an adequate GFR range, while other groups who require closer GFR monitoring had lower percentages within an adequate GFR range. Adherence to NOACs differed among different drugs, with greater adherence to treatment with edoxaban and less adherence to apixaban.

Non-valvular atrial fibrillation in patients on peritoneal dialysis, prevalence, treatment and professionals involved

Atrial fibrillation is the most frequent chronic arrhythmia in patients with chronic kidney disease. Oral anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists and now direct oral anticoagulants have been and are the fundamental pillars for the prevention of thromboembolic events. However, there are no randomized clinical trials on the risk-benefit profile of oral anticoagulation in patients with chronic kidney disease stage 5 on peritoneal dialysis and there is little evidence in the literature in this population. The objective of our study was to know the prevalence, treatment and professionals involved in the management of atrial fibrillation in peritoneal dialysis patients. For this purpose, we performed a descriptive analysis through a survey sent to different peritoneal dialysis units in Spain. A total of 1,403 patients on peritoneal dialysis were included in the study, of whom 186 (13.2%) had non-valvular atrial fibrillation. In addition, the assessment of the scores of thromboembolic and bleeding risks for the indication of oral anticoagulation was mainly carried out by the cardiologist (60% of the units), as well as its prescription (cardiologist 47% or in consensus with the nephrologist 43%). In summary, patients on peritoneal dialysis have a remarkable prevalence of non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Patients frequently receive oral anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists, as well as direct oral anticoagulants. The data obtained regarding the scores used for the assessment of thromboembolic and bleeding risk, treatment and involvement by Nephrology indicates that there is a need for training and involvement of the nephrologist in this pathology.

Association of Atrial Fibrillation with Insomnia in the Elderly Population

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES

Insomnia is a common sleep disorders that affects most individuals in the United States, and worldwide. Insomnia is linked with an increased risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) in adults, although the strengths of association were weak, especially in the elderly population. AF is estimated to affect approximately 3 to 6 million people in the United States. We studied the association of AF with insomnia in the elderly population.

METHODS

We reviewed the electronic medical records of elderly patients who received care in an internal medicine office from July 1, 2020 through June 30, 2021. Patients were grouped into AF group, and a group without AF (NOAF). Association of insomnia and other variables were compared between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

Among 2428 patients, 341 (14%) had AF. Patients in the AF group were significantly older compared to no-AF group (80.3 ± 7.9 vs 76.1 ± 7.4 years; P < .001). A higher frequency of men was noted in AF group versus NOAF group (54.3 vs 42.0%; P < .001). The frequency of insomnia was significantly higher in AF group versus NOAF group (14.1 vs 9.5%; P < .05). Additionally, greater frequencies of associations of other comorbid medical conditions were noted in the AF group compared to NOAF group, such as cerebrovascular accident (CVA; 12.9 vs 5.4%; P < .001), transient ischemic attack (TIA; 7.0 vs 3.0%; P < .001), dementia (5.9 vs 3.3%; P < .05), coronary artery disease (CAD; 34.9 vs 18.3%; P < .001), congestive heart failure (CHF; 21.1 vs 3.8%; P < .001), other cardiac arrhythmias (53.4 vs 6.3%; P < .001), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD; 12.3 vs 5.7%; P < .001), obstructive sleep apnea (OSA; 17.6 vs 11.8%; P = .003), chronic kidney disease (CKD; 22.9 vs 11.9%; P < .001), anemia (23.2 vs 13.0%; P < .001), and cancer (36.1 vs 27.9%; P = .002). There was significantly greater odds of AF in patients who had insomnia (OR = 1.972, CI = 1.360-2.851; P < .001).

CONCLUSION

AF was associated with insomnia in the elderly population. Higher frequencies of association of AF were also seen with older age, male sex, White race, CVA, TIA, dementia, CAD, CHF, other cardiac arrhythmias, COPD, OSA, CKD, anemia, and cancer.

Atrial Fibrillation Ablation in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: A Review of Literature

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common arrhythmia among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), which leads to increased cardiovascular complications. Catheter ablation (CA) has emerged as an effective and safe treatment for AF in CKD patients. CA offers tailored treatment strategies and presents a safer alternative with fewer adverse outcomes than anti-arrhythmic agents. Although CKD patients undergoing ablation have similar complication rates to non-CKD patients, they face a higher risk of hospitalization due to heart failure. Furthermore, CA shows promise in improving kidney function, particularly in individuals who maintain sinus rhythm. Future research should address limitations by including advanced CKD patients, conducting longer-term follow-ups, and developing individualized treatment approaches.

CHA2DS2VASc score predicts risk of end stage renal disease in patients with atrial fibrillation: Long-term follow-up study

Background

End stage renal disease (ESRD) is an increasing worldwide epidemic disease. CHA2DS2-VASc score is a well-established predictor of cardiovascular outcome among atrial fibrillation (AF) patients.

Objective

The aim of this study was to test whether CHA2DS2-VASc score is a good predictor for incident ESRD events.

Methods

This is a retrospective cohort study (from January 2010 to December 2020) with median follow-up of 61.7 months. Clinical parameters and baseline characteristics were recorded. The endpoint was defined as ESRD with dialysis dependent.

Results

The study cohort comprised 29,341 participants. Their median age was 71.0 years, 43.2% were male, 21.5% had diabetes mellitus, 46.1% had hypertension, and mean CHA2DS2-VASc score was 2.89. CHA2DS2-VASc score was incrementally associated with the risk of ESRD status during follow-up. Using the univariate Cox model, we found a 26% increase in ESRD risk with an increase of one point in the CHA2DS2-VASc score (HR 1.26 [1.23-1.29], P < 0.001). And using the multi-variate Cox model adjusted by initial CKD stage, we still observed a 5.9% increase in risk of ESRD with a one-point increase in the CHA2DS2-VASc score (HR 1.059 [1.037-1.082], P < 0.001). The CHA2DS2-VASC score and the initial stage of CKD were associated with the risk of ESRD development in patients with AF.

Conclusions

Our results first confirmed the utility of CHA2DS2-VASC score in predicting progression to ESRD in AF patients. The efficiency is best in CKD stage 1.

Renal decline in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation treated with rivaroxaban or warfarin: A population-based study from the United Kingdom

BACKGROUND

Reports suggest that renal decline is greater among patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) treated chronically with warfarin vs. some non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Using primary care electronic health records from the United Kingdom we followed adults with NVAF and who started rivaroxaban (20 mg/day, N = 5338) or warfarin (N = 6314), excluding those with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <50 ml/min/1.73m², end-stage renal disease (ESRD) or no eGFR or serum creatinine (SCr) values recorded in the previous year. Outcomes were: doubling SCr levels, ≥30% decline in eGFR and progression to ESRD. We calculated adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each outcome. Average eGFR slope was estimated using mixed model regression. After a mean follow-up 2.5 years, the number of incident cases of adverse renal events within the two cohorts was: doubling SCr (n = 322), ≥30% decline in eGFR (n = 1179), and progression to ESRD (n = 22). Adjusted HRs (95% CIs) for the renal outcomes among rivaroxaban vs. warfarin users were: doubling SCr, 0.63 (0.49-0.81); ≥30% decline in eGFR, 0.76 (0.67-0.86); ESRD, 0.77 (0.29-2.04). Similar results were observed among patients with diabetes or heart failure. Estimated mean decline in renal function over the study period was 2.03 ml/min/1.73 m²/year among warfarin users and 1.65 ml/min/1.73 m²/year among rivaroxaban users (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

We found clear evidence that patients with NVAF, preserved renal function at baseline and treated with rivaroxaban had a markedly reduced risk and rate of renal decline compared with those treated with warfarin.

Renal Function Protection as an Important Component of a Comprehensive Approach to the Management of Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

The increase in the life expectancy of the population  is accompanied by an increase in the prevalence of diseases for which old and senile age are risk factors. Atrial fibrillation (AF) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) are two diseases that can coexist in a patient. The risk of ac thromboembolic and hemorrhagic events in this case increases due to the mutual aggravating influence of these diseases. In addition,  these patients have a high incidence of coronary  events, and cardiovascular complications are the main cause of death in patients with AF and CKD. Consequently, such patients require an integrated  approach  to treatment,  and their management is a complex  clinical task. The direct oral anticoagulant rivaroxaban has been most studied in a population  of comorbid  AF and CKD  patients and has proven a high efficacy and safety profile in these patients in randomized controlled trials. In addition,  rivaroxaban has shown  a significant  reduction in the risk of myocardial  infarction  in various patients,  as well as the possibility of preserving renal function to a greater extent compared  with warfarin therapy, and a possible positive effect on reducing  the risk of cognitive impairment.  A single dosing  regimen  can improve adherence  to treatment,  which is one of the key conditions  for achieving  the above effects. Thus, these factors make it possible to achieve comprehensive protection of comorbid  patients with AF and CKD.

Left atrial strain: A novel "biomarker" for chronic kidney disease patients?

Cardiovascular disease and chronic kidney disease are frequently inter-connected and this association leads to an exponential growth of cardiovascular risk. This risk is currently underestimated by the existing algorithms and there is a constant need for new markers to predict adverse outcomes in this special population. In general population left atrial strain has emerged as an important tool for both the diagnosis and prognostic stratification, but data regarding its role in chronic kidney disease patients is scarce. The purpose of this review is to summarize the current evidence regarding this matter. Left atrial size and function mirror the duration and severity of increased left ventricular filling pressures. Increased left atrial volume index and impaired left atrial strain parameters are independent predictors for adverse cardiovascular events. Left atrial strain is impaired before changes in volume appear, thus being able to predict both diastolic and systolic function in chronic kidney disease patients. Finally, left atrial strain can identify renal patients with impaired exercise capacity and this could have clinical applications in the rehabilitation of this patients.

Atrial fibrillation in advanced renal failure: are there alternative solutions to warfarin-dicumarol?

Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and chronic renal failure (CRF) represent a growing population in epidemiological terms since both conditions increase with advancing age. The association of AF and CRF is burdened with a poor prognosis and with a high risk of adverse events, both ischaemic and haemorrhagic. Oral anticoagulant therapy, in these patients, is more problematic, especially due to the concomitant increased risk of bleeding. The use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with non-severe renal insufficiency appears to be safe and effective. Since all currently available DOACs are at least partially eliminated by the kidney (dabigatran is the direct anticoagulant with the highest rate of renal elimination, approximately 80%), periodic monitoring of renal function is recommended to evaluate possible need for dosage adjustment. In patients with advanced renal insufficiency, the use of DOAC appears controversial, given the small number of clinical studies that have tested its efficacy and safety. It is known, however, that oral anticoagulation therapy with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) is associated with an increase in nephropathy and renal-vascular calcification. From this point of view, therapy with DOAC could be more advantageous than VKAs. Data from clinical studies would seem to show that the use of dabigatran and rivaroxaban in these patients may lead to a reduction in the inevitable deterioration of renal function.

Differences in risk factors for anticoagulant-related nephropathy between warfarin and direct oral anticoagulants: Analysis of the Japanese adverse drug event report database

Limited information is available on anticoagulant-related nephropathy (ARN). We therefore reviewed the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database to investigate kidney injury (KI) in patients administered warfarin or direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and sought to clarify the risk factors for ARN. KI risk in warfarin users was associated with male sex (odds ratio [OR], 1.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.35-2.13; P < .01) and age ≥80 years (OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.07-1.72; P = .01). KI risk in DOAC users was associated with body weight ≥80 kg (OR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.01-2.53; P = .04) and use of dabigatran (OR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.09-2.37; P < .01). Our findings suggest that risk factors for ARN differ between warfarin and DOACs and that these risk factors may be associated with bleeding risk. Therefore, the risk of ARN may be decreased by better managing bleeding risk in patients taking anticoagulants.

Chronic kidney disease as a cardiovascular risk factor

: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a public health threat with impact in cardiovascular risk. All forms of cardiovascular disease and mortality are more common in CKD. Treatment of cardiovascular risk factors, hypertension, dyslipidemia and diabetes is essential for cardiovascular and kidney protection. CKD is a marker of high or very high cardiovascular risk and its presence require early treatment and specific goals. Lifestyle is a pivotal factor, stopping smoking, reducing weight in the overweight or obese, starting regular physical exercise and healthy dietary pattern are recommended. Office BP should be lowered towards 130/80 mmHg or even lower if tolerated with sodium restriction and single pill combination, including angiotensin system blocker. Out-of-office BP monitoring, mainly 24-h assessment, is recommended. Diabetes requires treatment from the moment of diagnosis, but prediabetes benefits with lifestyle changes and metformin in patients stage 2 and 3a. iSGLT2 and GLP-1RA are initially recommended in T2D patients with high or very high cardiovascular risk. Concerning dyslipidemia, for patients in stage 4, LDL-C 55 mg/dl or less (1.4 mmol/l) and an LDL-C reduction of 50% or less from baseline is recommended. In stage 3, LDL-C goal is 70 mg/dl or less (1.8 mmol/l) and an LDL-C. reduction of at least 50% from baseline. Statins are the lipid-lowering therapy of choice with or without ezetimibe. Higher doses of statins are required as GFR declines. Available evidence suggests that combined PCSK9 inhibitors with maximally tolerated dose of statins may have an emerging role in treatment of dyslipidemia in CKD patients.

Atrial fibrillation and associated outcomes in patients with peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis: a 14-year nationwide population-based study

BACKGROUND

Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) undergoing dialysis have increased risks of atrial fibrillation (AF).

OBJECTIVE

To investigate dialysis-related incident AF and associated outcomes.

METHODS

Patients with dialysis were retrieved using data from Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database during 2001-2013. Patients were separated into peritoneal dialysis (PD) and hemodialysis (HD) according to their initial modality. Primary outcome was new-onset AF. Secondary outcomes were AF-associated ischemic stroke (IS)/systemic embolism (SE) and hemorrhagic stroke.

RESULTS

A total of 158,910 dialytic patients were retrieved. After exclusion criteria, a total of 117,023 patients with ESRD undergoing dialysis were separated into 12,659 patients on PD and 104,364 patients on HD. There were 458 PD patients with subsequent development of AF, and 6216 HD patients with subsequent development of AF. At end of follow-up, patients on PD and HD had AF incidence densities of 7.8 and 8.8 events per 1000 person-years, the SHR of PD versus HD was 0.83 (95% CI 0.73-0.94). The SHR of PD versus HD was 1.07 (95% CI 0.80-1.44) for IS/SE and the SHR of PD versus HD was 0.34 (95% CI 0.13-0.90) for hemorrhagic stroke.

CONCLUSION

In patients with ESRD undergoing dialysis, PD had lowered risks of new onset of AF compared to HD. Subsequently, these AF patients in PD group had comparable incidence of ischemic stroke but decreased incidence of hemorrhagic stroke compared to AF patients in HD group. PD could be the most suitable modality in patients at risk for the onset of AF.