Perceptions of exercise benefits and barriers: the influence on physical activity behaviour in individuals undergoing haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis

Can exercise reduce fatigue in people living with kidney disease?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In people living with kidney disease (KD) Fatigue is a whole-body tiredness that is not related to activity or exertion. Often self-reported, fatigue is a common and highly burdensome symptom, yet poorly defined and understood. While its mechanisms are complex, many fatigue-related factors may be altered by exercise and physical activity intervention. Thus, this review aims to review the latest research on exercise in reducing fatigue in people living with KD.

RECENT FINDINGS

The benefits of exercise in KD are well known, yet recent data from clinical trials on fatigue are scarce. Favourable effects on fatigue were found through a myriad of physical activity and exercise-based interventions, including using exercise-based video games, exercise during dialysis, nurse-led exercise programs, and home-based exercise delivered by a novel digital health intervention. Yet, whilst the handful of recent trials show positive efficacy on fatigue across the spectrum of KD, contemporary exercise-based research was impacted critically by COVID-19, and the field is limited by underpowered trials and heterogeneity of assessment tools.

SUMMARY

Fatigue remains, at best, a secondary outcome measure in trials despite it being the most commonly reported symptom in KD. Given its importance to the people it impacts most, better quality evidence is needed to fully understand and optimize the impact of exercise in this group.

Prescribing Physical Activity and Exercise for People with CKD: A Practical Guide by the Global Renal Exercise Network

Physical activity (PA) and exercise are fundamental to optimizing and maintaining health. The evidence on the benefits of PA and exercise in people with CKD is well-established. Yet patients remain inactive, partly driven by a lack of knowledge and confidence from the healthcare providers involved in their management. A potential key element in improving PA in CKD includes better provisions around education, tools, and training resources among nephrology healthcare providers on PA recommendations, counseling, prescription, and referral to appropriate professionals for assessment, implementation, and monitoring. Much like other pharmacologic therapies, an effective prescription should be prescribed at the correct dose, strength, and frequency to the individual, titrated (and progressed) to optimize adherence and safety, and reviewed regularly to ensure maximum effectiveness. Aside from a formal prescription of exercise, many people would benefit from modest improvements in daily PA, and an emphasis on reducing sedentary behavior is likely to confer beneficial effects on outcomes. The purpose of this article is to outline the key components of successful PA and exercise prescriptions, including understanding the barriers and facilitators individuals may have, taking a PA history, and how to tailor exercise "dose" to each patient with the ultimate goal of increasing accessibility of PA for all people living with CKD. To do this, we will use worked examples to demonstrate what an exercise prescription may consist of across each of the major CKD stages.

Exercise perceptions and practices of people receiving peritoneal dialysis: An international cross-sectional survey

BACKGROUND

Low physical activity and functional impairment are prevalent and unaddressed in people receiving peritoneal dialysis (PD). Exercise has been shown to improve physical function and mental health for people with kidney disease.

METHODS

Cross-sectional descriptive survey aimed at identifying the exercise and physical activity perceptions and practice patterns of people receiving PD. The survey was developed and pretested with persons living with kidney disease, PD clinicians and exercise specialists.

RESULTS

There were 108 respondents (people receiving PD) with the majority from Canada (68%) and the United Kingdom (25%). Seventy-one per cent were engaged in physical activity two or more times per week. Most (91.8%) believed that physical activity is beneficial, and 61.7% reported healthcare provider discussion about physical activity. Perceptions regarding weightlifting restrictions varied: 76% were told not to lift weight with a maximum amount ranging from 2 kg to 45 kg. Few (28%) were instructed to drain PD fluid prior to physical activity. Mixed advice regarding swimming ability was common (44% were told they could swim and 44% were told they should not).

CONCLUSIONS

Knowledge gaps suggest that education for both healthcare providers and patients is needed regarding the practice of exercise for people living with PD. Common areas of confusion include the maximum weight a person should lift, whether exercise was safe with or without intrabdominal PD fluid in situ and whether swimming is allowed. Further research is needed to provide patients with evidence-based recommendations rather than defaulting to restricting activity.

Perceptions of healthcare providers on benefits, risks and barriers regarding intradialytic exercise among haemodialysis patients

PURPOSE

Clinical guidelines call for the inclusion of exercise interventions in every patient's dialysis session, but these recommendations are rarely adopted. Healthcare providers play a key role in this. Therefore, the aim of this study was to explore how healthcare providers perceive the benefits, risks and barriers of intradialytic exercise (IDE).

METHODS

We conducted 21 individual, semi-structured interviews with 11 nurses, 5 nephrologists, 3 training assistants and 2 managers from two dialysis centres in Slovakia. Verbatim transcripts of digitally recorded interviews were thematically analysed using MAXQDA®.

RESULTS

Participants reported the benefits of IDE as improvements in patients' physical and psychosocial functioning, independence and self-efficacy, clinical profile and quality of therapy. As risks of IDE, they most frequently reported exercise-related damage to vascular access, insufficient individualization of training and musculoskeletal injuries. The presence of psychological problems among patients was reported as a major barrier for initiating and maintaining patients' exercise. Other reported barriers included limitations in financial and personnel resources of haemodialysis care.

CONCLUSIONS

Safe and sustainable implementation of IDE, which might improve a patient's well-being, need to be prescribed in alignment with the patient's clinical profile, be delivered individually according to the patient's characteristics and requires adjustments in the available resources.

Current status and influencing factors of kinesiophobia in patients with peritoneal dialysis: a multicenter cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Kinesiophobia, an irrational fear-avoidance behaviour, can significantly impact the quality of life and prognosis of peritoneal dialysis patients. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of kinesiophobia in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis and to analyse its influencing factors.

METHODS

A total of 291 patients who visited the outpatient and ward of peritoneal dialysis in 7 tertiary hospitals in Jiangsu Province from December 2023 to March 2024 were selected as research subjects via the convenience sampling method. A cross-sectional survey was conducted using a general data questionnaire, the Tampa Kinesiophobia-11 Scale, the Chinese Version of the Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Scale, and the Simplified Coping Style Questionnaire.

RESULTS

The score obtained using the Tampa Scale for kinesiophobia in patients with peritoneal dialysis was 22.44 ± 7.46, with a prevalence rate of 69.1%. Binary logistic regression analysis revealed that no complications, daily exercise before illness, and positive coping styles were protective factors (p < 0.05), whereas fatigue and negative coping styles were risk factors for kinesiophobia in patients receiving peritoneal dialysis (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of kinesiophobia in patients receiving peritoneal dialysis was high but at a mild level. Medical staff should combine influencing factors to identify high-risk groups as early as possible, formulate targeted interventions to reduce the occurrence of kinesiophobia and mitigate adverse effects on peritoneal dialysis patients.

The Association Between the Perception of Exercise Benefits and Barriers and Exercise Self-Efficacy During the Induction Phase of Dialysis in Patients with End-Stage Kidney Disease: A Cross-Sectional Study

Background/Objectives: The physical function of patients with chronic kidney disease gradually declines as kidney function deteriorates, and this decline becomes more pronounced after the initiation of dialysis. Encouraging the development of exercise habits from the initiation phase of dialysis is crucial. Increased exercise self-efficacy is essential for establishing these habits. However, the related factors at this stage are unclear. This study hypothesized that perceptions of exercise benefits and barriers are related to exercise self-efficacy and aimed to investigate this association. Methods: This single-center, cross-sectional study included 72 patients and assessed the stages of exercise behavior change, perceptions of exercise benefits and barriers, and exercise self-efficacy. Multiple regression analysis was used to examine the association between exercise self-efficacy and perceptions of the benefits and barriers of exercise. Results: Perceptions of exercise benefits were still significantly associated with self-efficacy for exercise after adjustment for age, gender, history of cardiovascular disease, diabetic kidney disease, living alone, employment, and physical function (β = 0.474, p < 0.001). Similarly, perceptions of exercise barriers were also significantly associated with self-efficacy for exercise (β = -0.410, p = 0.001). A subgroup analysis that only examined participants without exercise habits revealed a similar association. Conclusions: Perceptions of exercise benefits and barriers may be associated with exercise self-efficacy in patients with end-stage kidney disease during the initiation phase of dialysis. As patients are temporarily hospitalized during this phase, it provides an opportunity for intervention. Exercise education and supportive environments during hospitalization may enhance perceptions of exercise benefits, reduce perceptions of exercise barriers, and improve exercise self-efficacy.

Psychometrically validated questionnaires to measure the effects and benefits/barriers to physical exercise in hemodialysis patients: a systematic review

PURPOSE

To provide a critical assessment, summarize, and synthesize the evidence from studies using psychometrically validated questionnaires to assess the effects and benefits/barriers of physical exercise in hemodialysis patients.

METHODS

The search was performed on six electronic databases. It was conducted following the PRISMA statement and the PICO framework. The methodological quality was assessed using the MMAT. Were used the quality criteria for psychometric properties developed by Terwee et al.

RESULTS

Overall, 70 studies were included, and 39 questionnaires identified, evaluating 13 outcomes. The quality of the psychometric properties of the questionnaires was not always described; only 13 presented positive ratings on > =6/9 properties. The most assessed measure was criterion validity, and the least assessed criteria was responsiveness. The most outcome measured by these questionnaires was quality of life using SF-36, followed by psychological health using the BDI. The DPEBBS was the only instrument identified that assessed the benefits and barriers of exercise.

CONCLUSION

Quality of life and depression were the most frequent outcomes. Other measures contemplating physical, mental, cognitive performance, and especially of the perceptions benefits and barriers to exercise should be further investigated. We have clearly identified the need for more studies evaluating psychometric measures that have not been tested satisfactorily or hardly been tested at all.

Home-based exercise in dialysis patients with end-stage renal disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Lack of exercise may reduce the quality of life, physical capability, and functional capability of dialysis patients. Home-based exercise seems to be a desirable form of low-cost intervention. But the effectiveness of this intervention in the dialysis population is still unclear. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to provide effective evidence to determine the impact of home-based exercise on functional capacity, physical capacity, muscular strength, biochemical parameters, and health-related quality of life among dialysis patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD).

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched from inception to May 2023, to identify potential randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effectiveness of home-based exercise in dialysis patients with ESRD. Two independent reviewers selected studies, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane tool. Evidence summary using fixed or random effects for meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Twelve RCTs including 1008 dialysis patients met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis showed significant effects of home-based exercise on physical capacity. Seven studies reported the results of the 6-min walking test, compared with short-term (0-3 months) home-based exercise (P = 0.76), long-term (3-6 months) interventions (P < 0.001) can significantly improve the results of the 6-min walking test. The results showed that home-based exercise did significantly improve patients' VO2 peak (P = 0.007). Compared with center-based exercise or usual care, home exercise did not significantly improve handgrip strength, quality of life or CRP and other biochemical parameters (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The results showed that long-term home-based exercise can improve walking ability. In addition, home-based exercise had the benefit on the VO2 peak of ESRD patients receiving dialysis patients. However, there was no statistically significant difference in handgrip strength, health-related quality of life, CRP, and other biochemical parameters.

Differences in the purpose of exercise between hemodialysis patients who continued or dropped out of exercise programs: a multicenter cohort study

BACKGROUND

Selecting suitable exercise goals is crucial for fostering adherence to, and maintenance of, exercise therapy. We aimed to evaluate the variance in exercise objectives between individuals who continued and those who dropped out of a 6-month intradialytic exercise program by analyzing an open-ended questionnaire administered to patients undergoing hemodialysis.

METHODS

The study consisted of outpatients (n = 541; mean age, 70 years) undergoing maintenance hemodialysis, who had been informed of an intradialytic exercise program and voluntarily agreed to participate. The primary outcome was the exercise purpose. The difference in exercise purpose was quantitatively analyzed between the exercise continuation and dropout groups. A co-occurrence network was created and concepts were constructed. The basic attributes were compared using chi-squared and independent t-tests.

RESULTS

Over 6 months, 154 patients (28.5%) dropped out of the intradialytic exercise program. Concepts related to the goals of the program were: (1) physical function and condition, (2) addressing limitations, (3) maintaining daily life activities, and (4) physical condition recognition. Co-occurrence network analysis showed that the exercise continuation group established their objectives based on the health benefits of exercise, and proactively set goals rooted in comprehending their current issues and problems. The dropout group tended to perceive treatment passively as an extension of daily clinical practice, rather than actively formulating exercise objectives.

CONCLUSION

The exercise objectives of those who continued the exercise program differed from those who dropped out. Patients in the exercise continuation group set more affirmative and specific exercise objectives, whereas those in the dropout group set more passive and abstract exercise objectives.

Delivering Personalized, Goal-Directed Care to Older Patients Receiving Peritoneal Dialysis

Background

An aging population living with chronic kidney disease and progressing to kidney failure, subsequently receiving peritoneal dialysis (PD) is growing. A significant proportion of these patients are also living with multi-morbidities and some degree of frailty. Recent practice recommendations from the International Society of Peritoneal Dialysis advocate for high-quality, goal-directed PD prescription, and the Standardized Outcomes of Nephrology-PD initiative emphasized the need for an individualized, goal-based care approach in all patients receiving PD treatment. In older patients, this approach to PD care is even more important. A frailty screening assessment, followed by a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) prior to PD initiation and when dictated by change in relevant circumstances is paramount in tailoring PD care and prescription according to the needs, life goals, as well as clinical status of older patients with kidney failure.

Summary

Our review aimed to summarize the different dimensions to be taken into account when delivering PD care to the older patient - from frailty screening and CGA in older patients receiving PD to employing a personalized, goal-directed PD prescription strategy, to preserving residual kidney function, optimizing blood pressure (BP) control, and managing anemia, to addressing symptom burden, to managing nutritional intake and promoting physical exercise, and to explore telehealth opportunities for the older PD population.

Key Messages

What matters most to older PD patients may not be simply extending survival, but more importantly, to be living comfortably on PD treatment with minimal symptom burden in a home environment and to minimize treatment complications.

An International Survey of Peritoneal Dialysis Exercise Practices and Perceptions

Introduction

Low activity levels and poor physical function are associated with technique failure and mortality in people receiving peritoneal dialysis (PD). Adequate levels of physical function are required to maintain independence for people choosing this predominantly home-based therapy. The objective of this study was to identify the exercise-related perceptions and practices of PD clinicians globally.

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional survey of PD clinicians from English-, Thai-, Spanish-, and Portuguese-speaking PD-prevalent countries exploring clinicians' perceptions and practices of swimming, activity following PD catheter insertion, lifting, and falls prevention. This study was convened by the International Society of Peritoneal Dialysis and Global Renal Exercise Network between July and December 2021.

Results

Of 100 of the highest PD-prevalent countries, 85 responded and were represented in the findings. A total of 1125 PD clinicians (448 nephrologists, 558 nephrology nurses, 59 dietitians, and 56 others) responded from 61% high-income, 32% upper middle-income and 7% lower middle-income countries. The majority (n = 1054, 94%) agreed that structured exercise programs would be beneficial for people receiving PD. Most respondents believed people on PD could perform more exercise (n = 907, 81%) and that abdominal strengthening exercises could be safely performed (n = 661, 59%). Compared to clinicians in high-income countries, clinicians from lower middle-income status (odds ratio [OR], 5.57; 1.64 to 18.9) are more likely to promote participation in physical activity.

Conclusion

Clinicians know the importance of physical activity in people receiving PD. Exercise counseling and structured exercise plans could be included in the standard care of people receiving PD to maintain independence.

Influence of sex differences in maintenance-hemodialysis participants on motivation of exercise therapy implementation: a multicenter cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Exercising requires continuing training and maintenance of motivation. Support for exercise continuation by setting sex-appropriate goals is needed. However, this has not been investigated in patients undergoing hemodialysis. This study aimed to investigate sex differences in exercise motivation by analyzing an open-ended questionnaire of patients undergoing hemodialysis.

METHODS

This multicenter, cross-sectional study was conducted among participants undergoing outpatient hemodialysis at 21 dialysis clinics. Before the intradialytic exercise program, a self-reported questionnaire was used to assess exercise purpose using open-label questions. Exercise purpose was analyzed between sexes by quantitative analysis of text, extracting frequently occurring words, creating a co-occurrence network, and constructing concepts. The basic attributes of the two groups were compared using the chi-squared and independent t tests.

RESULTS

The analysis of 669 participants who attended an exercise program showed that the common words for exercise purpose in both sexes were strength, maintenance, walking, exercise, and muscle strength. Significant differences were observed in exercise purpose. Concepts related to the purpose of exercise were categorized into (1) physical function and condition, (2) addressing limitations, and (3) maintaining daily life activities. Physical appearance was important in both sexes. The main purpose of exercise for men was to increase physical fitness and muscle strength, while that for women was to maintain or improve their current functional status and prevent limb weakness. Women had significantly weaker muscle strength and poorer exercise habits than men and had more difficulty in daily life, suggesting that their purpose for exercise was to reduce difficulties in daily life and the burden on family. Women had significantly weaker muscle strength and poorer exercise habits than men and had more difficulty in daily life, suggesting that their purpose for exercise was to reduce difficulties in daily life and the burden on family. Furthermore, fear of falls was higher in women and prevention of falls may be a key for motivation.

CONCLUSION

Exercise purpose in patients undergoing hemodialysis was summarized into the categories of physical function and condition, exercise, and daily life. Men aimed to maintain and increase their current physical status, and women aimed to reduce anxiety regarding their lower limbs and lack of exercise. It is necessary to consider sex differences in exercise purpose when designing exercise regimens and motivating participants.