Kidney transplant in patients with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome in the anti-C5 era: single-center experience with tailored Eculizumab

Anti-C5 monoclonal antibody treatment showing pathological resolution of complement-mediated atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome: a case report

BACKGROUND

No reports have shown histological changes before and after anti-C5 monoclonal antibody treatment in patients with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS). Here, we report a rare case of complement-mediated aHUS with a complement factor H (CFH) mutation and anti-CFH antibodies who underwent multiple kidney biopsies.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 53-year-old woman developed aHUS with CFH gene mutation [c.3572C > T (p. Ser1191 Leu)] and anti-CFH antibodies. Her father had succumbed to acute kidney injury (AKI) in his 30 s. She exhibited AKI, thrombocytopenia, and hemolytic anemia with schistocytes. After improving the platelet count with one session of plasma exchange, a kidney biopsy was performed one month after the onset of symptoms. Blood vessel thrombosis, obvious endothelial swelling, endocapillary hypercellularity, and subendothelial exudative lesions in the glomeruli and arterioles were detected. Anti-C5 monoclonal antibody treatment with eculizumab immediately improved disease activity. A second biopsy 3 months later revealed marked improvement of endothelial injuries with residual membrane double contours and exudative lesions. A third biopsy at 17 months after gradual improvement of kidney function showed a further decrease of double contours along with alterations of the exudative lesions to fibrous intimal thickening.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first report showing the pathophysiology of aHUS in the kidneys and the efficacy of anti-C5 monoclonal antibody treatment by presenting serial kidney pathological features before and after anti-C5 monoclonal antibody treatment. Since her CFH mutation was considered the most important pathological condition, treatment centered on eculizumab was administered, resulting in a good long-term prognosis. In addition, kidney pathological resolution in aHUS occurred over 1 year after anti-C5 monoclonal antibody treatment.

Outcome of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome: role of triggers and complement abnormalities in the response to C5 inhibition

BACKGROUND

Atypical-hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) is a rare thrombotic microangiopathy often due to uncontrolled complement activation, characterized by high risk of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). Eculizumab has improved the outcome, however, its efficacy varies among patients and its discontinuation is debated.

METHODS

To identify characteristics associated with treatment response, we analyzed 244 aHUS patients referred to our center. Patients were classified according to the presence/absence of complement abnormalities and/or triggers at onset in 4 categories: (1) primary (complement abnormality without trigger), (2) secondary (trigger without complement abnormality), (3) combined (trigger and complement abnormality), (4) idiopathic (no trigger, no complement abnormality). Response to treatment was evaluated by comparing the response to eculizumab with that of conventional therapy. Short- and long-term outcomes were evaluated with the relapse rate after discontinuation of C5-inhibition.

RESULTS

Patients had a better outcome with eculizumab compared to conventional treatment, with a response rate of 81.9% vs 56.9%, p < 0.001 and a long-term cumulative incidence of ESKD of 5.8% vs 22.5% (hazard ratio 0.25, 95% confidence interval: 0.10-0.80). The excellent global response was driven by the primary and combined groups (89.8% vs 54.0% and 89.3% vs 54.2%, respectively). The relapse rate following discontinuation of the C5-inhibitor was as high as 66.7% in the primary group, 18.7% in the combined, and 0% in the secondary and idiopathic groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data show a better outcome in aHUS patients treated with C5-inhibition, particularly in the primary and combined forms, which have a high risk of relapse after discontinuation that is not observed in the secondary and idiopathic forms.

New findings in preventing recurrence and improving renal function in AHUS patients after renal transplantation treated with eculizumab: a systemic review and meta-analyses

BACKGROUND

The long-term mortality of kidney transplantation patients with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome remains high, and the efficacy of the main treatment eculizumab is still controversial.

OBJECTIVE

A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials using eculizumab in renal transplant patients with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of this therapy and its impact on renal function.

METHODS

A comprehensive systematic search was conducted across multiple reputable databases, including Ovid (MEDLINE, EMBASE), PubMed, and the Cochrane Library (since database inception), to identify relevant studies exploring the use of eculizumab in patients with atypical hemolytic uremic kidney transplantation. Various renal function parameters, such as dialysis, rejection, glomerular filtration rate, serum creatinine, lactate dehydrogenase, and platelet count, along with patient relapse rates, were extracted and summarized using a combination of robust statistical methods, including fixed effects, random effects, and general inverse variance methods.

RESULT

Eighteen trials with 618 subjects were analyzed. Our analysis suggests that the use of eculizumab is associated with a reduced likelihood of AHUS recurrence (odds ratio (OR) = 0.05, 95% CI: 0.00-0.13), as well as a significant reduction in the need for dialysis (odds ratio (OR) = 0.13, 95% CI: 0.01-0.32). Additionally, eculizumab treatment led to lower serum creatinine levels (mean differences (MD) = 126.931μmoI/L, 95% CI: 115.572μmoI/L-138.290μmoI/L) and an improved glomerular filtration rate (mean differences (MD) = 59.571 ml/min, 95% CI: 57.876 ml/min-61.266 mL/min). Our results also indicate that the use of eculizumab reduces the likelihood of rejection (odds ratio (OR) = 0.09, 95% CI: 0.01-0.22). Furthermore, the drug was effective in improving platelet counts (×10∧9/L) (mean differences (MD) = 163.421, 95% CI: 46.998-279.844) and lactate dehydrogenase levels (mean differences (MD) = 336.608 U/L, 95% CI: 164.816 U/L-508.399 U/L).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the meta-analysis, treatment with eculizumab can reduce dialysis rates and improve patients' quality of life by enhancing renal function.

Eculizumab Rescue Therapy in Patients with Recurrent Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome After Kidney Transplantation

Introduction

Since 2016, kidney transplantation in patients with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) in the Netherlands is performed without eculizumab prophylaxis. Eculizumab is given in case of posttransplant aHUS recurrence. Eculizumab therapy is monitored in the CUREiHUS study.

Methods

All participating kidney transplant patients who received eculizumab therapy for a suspected posttransplant aHUS recurrence were evaluated. Overall recurrence rate was monitored prospectively at Radboud University Medical Center.

Results

In the period from January 2016 until October 2020, we included 15 (12 females, 3 males; median age 42 years, range 24-66 years) patients with suspected aHUS recurrence after kidney transplantation in this study. The time interval to recurrence showed a bimodal distribution. Seven patients presented early after transplantation (median 3 months, range 0.3-8.8 months), with typical aHUS features: rapid loss of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and laboratory signs of thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA). Eight patients presented late (median 46 months, range 18-69 months) after transplantation. Of these, only 3 patients had systemic TMA, whereas 5 patients presented with slowly deteriorating eGFR without systemic TMA. Treatment with eculizumab resulted in improvement or stabilization of eGFR in 14 patients. Eculizumab discontinuation was tried in 7 patients; however, it was successful only in 3. At the end of the follow-up (median 29 months, range 3-54 months after start of eculizumab), 6 patients had eGFR <30 ml/min per 1.73 m². Graft loss had occurred in 3 of them. Overall, aHUS recurrence rate without eculizumab prophylaxis was 23%.

Conclusions

Rescue treatment of posttransplant aHUS recurrence is effective; however, some patients suffer from irreversible loss of kidney function, likely caused by delayed diagnosis and treatment and/or too aggressive discontinuation of eculizumab. Physicians should be aware that recurrence of aHUS can present without evidence of systemic TMA.

Pharmacotherapeutic options for the prevention of kidney transplant rejection: the evidence to date

INTRODUCTION

Although early rejection episodes are successfully controlled, the problem of unrecognized production of de novo anti HLA antibodies and associated chronic rejection still persists.

AREAS COVERED

In addition to the standard induction and maintenance therapy, we present a couple of new drugs as induction (Alemtuzumab), CNI free protocol (Belatacept, Sirolimus, Everolimus), maintenance treatment in transplant patients with various type of malignancies (T cell targeted immunomodulators blocking the immune checkpoints CTLA-4, PD1/PDL1) and TMA (aHUS) -eculizimab, and IL6 receptor antagonists in antibody mediated rejection (AMR).

EXPERT OPINION

There are couple of issues still preventing improvement in kidney transplant long-term outcomes with current and anticipated future immunosuppression: patient more susceptible to infection and CNI nephrotoxicity in kidneys obtained from elderly donors, highly sensitized patients with limited chances to get appropriate kidney and a higher risk for late AMR. A lower rate of CMV/BK virus infections has been observed in everolimus treated patients. Belatacept use has been justified only in EBV seropositive kidney transplants due to the increased risk of PTLD. Eculizumab upon recurrence of aHUS is a sole cost-effective option. A new IL-6 blocking drug (clazakizumab/tocilizumab) is promising option for prevention/treatment of AMR. Clinical experience in tailoring immunosuppression for as long as possible graft and patient survival is inevitable.

Pediatric Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome Advances

Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) is a rare disorder characterized by dysregulation of the alternate pathway. The diagnosis of aHUS is one of exclusion, which complicates its early detection and corresponding intervention to mitigate its high rate of mortality and associated morbidity. Heterozygous mutations in complement regulatory proteins linked to aHUS are not always phenotypically active, and may require a particular trigger for the disease to manifest. This list of triggers continues to expand as more data is aggregated, particularly centered around COVID-19 and pediatric vaccinations. Novel genetic mutations continue to be identified though advancements in technology as well as greater access to cohorts of interest, as in diacylglycerol kinase epsilon (DGKE). DGKE mutations associated with aHUS are the first non-complement regulatory proteins associated with the disease, drastically changing the established framework. Additional markers that are less understood, but continue to be acknowledged, include the unique autoantibodies to complement factor H and complement factor I which are pathogenic drivers in aHUS. Interventional therapeutics have undergone the most advancements, as pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties are modified as needed in addition to their as biosimilar counterparts. As data continues to be gathered in this field, future advancements will optimally decrease the mortality and morbidity of this disease in children.