1
|
Goodwin RL, Nathaniel TI. Effective Feedback Strategy for Formative Assessment in an Integrated Medical Neuroscience Course. MEDICAL SCIENCE EDUCATOR 2023; 33:747-753. [PMID: 37501810 PMCID: PMC10368590 DOI: 10.1007/s40670-023-01801-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/28/2023] [Indexed: 07/29/2023]
Abstract
Purpose Despite the different benefits of formative assessments in an integrated medical curriculum, the effective strategies to provide feedback to medical students to benefit from the different merits of formative assessment are not fully understood. This study aims to determine the effect of different strategies of formative feedback on students' outcomes in a medical neuroscience course. Method We compared medical students' performance in summative examinations in the academic year that formative feedback was provided using in-person discussion and compared such performances with the academic year when the feedback was provided by written rationales or a combination of written rationales and in-person discussion. We also surveyed medical students' preferences for whether written or in-person formative feedback is a better strategy to provide feedback at the end of each course. Results ANOVA found a significant difference in summative performance scores for those scoring ≥ 70% when formative feedback was provided by providing a rationale, in-person, and a combination of both ([F (2,80) = 247.60, P < 0.001]. Post hoc analysis revealed a significant and highest performance when feedback was provided using the written rationale approach (***P < 0.05), followed by in-person (**P < 0.05). In contrast, the least performance was recorded when formative feedback was provided using a combination of providing a written rationale for the answers to the questions and in-person discussion of the questions (*P < 0.05). Students' preferred approach for receiving formative feedback for their formative assessment was highest for written rationale (***P < 0.05), followed by in-person or a combination of in-person and written rationale (**P < 0.05). Conclusion Our results found that medical students preferred a written formative feedback approach, which was associated with better student performance on the summative examination. This study reveals the importance of developing effective strategies to provide formative feedback to medical students for medical students to fully benefit from the merits of formative assessment in an integrated medical school curriculum.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard L. Goodwin
- University of South Carolina School of Medicine Greenville, 29605 Greenville, SC USA
| | - Thomas I. Nathaniel
- University of South Carolina School of Medicine Greenville, 29605 Greenville, SC USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Joshi S, P.J. P. A Collaborative Metaverse based A-La-Carte Framework for Tertiary Education (CO-MATE). Heliyon 2023; 9:e13424. [PMID: 36825184 PMCID: PMC9941942 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13424] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2022] [Revised: 10/13/2022] [Accepted: 01/30/2023] [Indexed: 02/09/2023] Open
Abstract
The paper aims to propose a futuristic educational and learning framework called CO-MATE (Collaborative Metaverse-based A-La-Carte Framework for Tertiary Education). The architectural framework of CO-MATE was conceptualized in a four-layered approach which depicts various infrastructure and service layer functionalities. CO-MATE is a technologically driven educational metaverse environment involving loosely coupled building blocks to provide an a-la-carte model for platform designers. For this, the authors had undertaken a systematic mapping study of the pre/post-COVID period to review the application of various emerging technologies. Further, the paper also discusses the core attributes and component offerings of CO-MATE for a technology-driven and automated immersive-learning environment and exemplifies the same through various use cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Swati Joshi
- Centre for Development of Advanced Computing (C-DAC), Hyderabad, India
| | - Pramod P.J.
- Centre for Development of Advanced Computing (C-DAC), Hyderabad, India
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Henze SM, Fellmer F, Wittenberg S, Höppner S, Märdian S, Willy C, Back DA. Digital adaptation of teaching disaster and deployment medicine under COVID-19 conditions: a comparative evaluation over 5 years. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION 2022; 22:717. [PMID: 36224618 PMCID: PMC9554383 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-022-03783-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2021] [Accepted: 09/29/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The COVID-19 pandemic has not only brought many aspects of disaster medicine into everyday awareness but also led to a massive change in medical teaching due to the necessity of contact restrictions. This study aimed to evaluate student acceptance of a curricular elective module on disaster and deployment medicine over a 5-year period and to present content adjustments due to COVID-19 restrictions. METHODS Since 2016, 8 semesters of the curricular elective module took place in face-to-face teaching (pre-COVID-19 group). From the summer semester of 2020 to the summer semester of 2021, 3 semesters took place as online and hybrid courses (mid-COVID-19 group). Student attitudes and knowledge gains were measured using pretests, posttests, and final evaluations. These data were statistically compared across years, and new forms of teaching under COVID-19 conditions were examined in more detail. RESULTS A total of 189 students participated in the module from the summer semester of 2016 through the summer semester of 2021 (pre-COVID-19: n = 138; mid-COVID-19: n = 51). There was a high level of satisfaction with the module across all semesters, with no significant differences between the groups. There was also no significant difference between the two cohorts in terms of knowledge gain, which was always significant (p < 0.05). COVID-19 adaptations included online seminars using Microsoft Teams or Zoom, the interactive live-streaming of practical training components, and digital simulation games. CONCLUSION The high level of satisfaction and knowledge gained during the module did not change even under a digital redesign of the content offered. The curricular elective module was consistently evaluated positively by the students, and the adaptation to online teaching was well accepted. Experiences with digital forms of teaching should also be used after the COVID-19 pandemic to create digitally supported blended learning concepts in the field of deployment and disaster medicine and thus further promote the expansion of teaching in this important medical field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S M Henze
- Clinic for Traumatology and Orthopedics, Military Academic Hospital Berlin, Scharnhorststrasse 13, 10115, Berlin, Germany
| | - F Fellmer
- Clinic for Traumatology and Orthopedics, Military Academic Hospital Berlin, Scharnhorststrasse 13, 10115, Berlin, Germany
| | - S Wittenberg
- Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - S Höppner
- Clinic for Anesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency Medicine and Rescue Service, Military Academic Hospital Berlin, Scharnhorststrasse 13, 10115, Berlin, Germany
| | - S Märdian
- Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - C Willy
- Clinic for Traumatology and Orthopedics, Military Academic Hospital Berlin, Scharnhorststrasse 13, 10115, Berlin, Germany
| | - D A Back
- Clinic for Traumatology and Orthopedics, Military Academic Hospital Berlin, Scharnhorststrasse 13, 10115, Berlin, Germany.
- Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
- Dieter Scheffner Center for Medical Education and Educational Research, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Charité Platz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|