1
|
Kannuthurai V, Gaffo A. Management of Patients with Gout and Kidney Disease: A Review of Available Therapies and Common Missteps. KIDNEY360 2023; 4:e1332-e1340. [PMID: 37526648 PMCID: PMC10550007 DOI: 10.34067/kid.0000000000000221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2023] [Accepted: 07/13/2023] [Indexed: 08/02/2023]
Abstract
Gout, a common form of inflammatory arthritis, is characterized by deposition of monosodium urate crystals in articular and periarticular tissues. Repeated flares of gout cause joint damage as well as significant health care utilization and decreased quality of life. Patients with CKD have a higher prevalence of gout. Treating Patients with CKD and gout is challenging because of the lack of quality data to guide management in this specific population. This often leads to suboptimal treatment of patients with gout and impaired renal function because concerns regarding the efficacy and safety of available gout therapies in this population often result in significant interphysician variability in treatment regimens and dosages. Acute gout flares are treated with various agents, including nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, colchicine, glucocorticoids, and-more recently-IL-1 inhibitors. These medications can also be used as prophylaxis if urate-lowering therapy (ULT) is initiated. While these drugs can be used in patients with gout and CKD, there are often factors that complicate treatment, such as the numerous medication interactions involving colchicine and the effect of glucocorticoids on common comorbidities, such as diabetes and hypertension. ULT is recommended to treat recurrent flares, tophaceous deposits, and patients with moderate-to-severe CKD with a serum urate goal of <6 mg/dl recommended to prevent flares. While many misconceptions exist around the risks of using urate-lowering agents in patients with CKD, there is some evidence that these medications can be used safely in Patients with renal impairment. Additional questions exist as to whether gout treatment is indicated for Patients on RRT. Furthermore, there are conflicting data on whether ULT can affect renal function and cardiovascular disease in patients. All of these factors contribute to the unique challenges physicians face when treating patients with gout and CKD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vijay Kannuthurai
- Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Angelo Gaffo
- Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
- Birmingham VA Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pisaniello HL, Fisher MC, Farquhar H, Vargas-Santos AB, Hill CL, Stamp LK, Gaffo AL. Efficacy and safety of gout flare prophylaxis and therapy use in people with chronic kidney disease: a Gout, Hyperuricemia and Crystal-Associated Disease Network (G-CAN)-initiated literature review. Arthritis Res Ther 2021; 23:130. [PMID: 33910619 PMCID: PMC8080370 DOI: 10.1186/s13075-021-02416-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2020] [Accepted: 01/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Gout flare prophylaxis and therapy use in people with underlying chronic kidney disease (CKD) is challenging, given limited treatment options and risk of worsening renal function with inappropriate treatment dosing. This literature review aimed to describe the current literature on the efficacy and safety of gout flare prophylaxis and therapy use in people with CKD stages 3-5. A literature search via PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and EMBASE was performed from 1 January 1959 to 31 January 2018. Inclusion criteria were studies with people with gout and renal impairment (i.e. estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) or creatinine clearance (CrCl) < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2), and with exposure to colchicine, interleukin-1 inhibitors, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and glucocorticoids. All study designs were included. A total of 33 studies with efficacy and/or safety analysis stratified by renal function were reviewed-colchicine (n = 20), anakinra (n = 7), canakinumab (n = 1), NSAIDs (n = 3), and glucocorticoids (n = 2). A total of 58 studies reported these primary outcomes without renal function stratification-colchicine (n = 29), anakinra (n = 10), canakinumab (n = 6), rilonacept (n = 2), NSAIDs (n = 1), and glucocorticoids (n = 10). Most clinical trials excluded study participants with severe CKD (i.e. eGFR or CrCl of < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2). Information on the efficacy and safety outcomes of gout flare prophylaxis and therapy use stratified by renal function is lacking. Clinical trial results cannot be extrapolated for those with advanced CKD. Where possible, current and future gout flare studies should include patients with CKD and with study outcomes reported based on renal function and using standardised gout flare definition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huai Leng Pisaniello
- Discipline of Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, the University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Mark C Fisher
- Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Prima CARE, Fall River, MA, USA
| | - Hamish Farquhar
- Department of Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | | | - Catherine L Hill
- Discipline of Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, the University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.,Rheumatology Unit, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville South, South Australia, Australia
| | - Lisa K Stamp
- Department of Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Angelo L Gaffo
- Division of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University of Alabama, 1720 2nd Avenue South, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA. .,Birmingham VA Medical Center, Birmingham, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hassan M, Karkhur S, Bae JH, Halim MS, Ormaechea MS, Onghanseng N, Nguyen NV, Afridi R, Sepah YJ, Do DV, Nguyen QD. New therapies in development for the management of non-infectious uveitis: A review. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2020; 47:396-417. [PMID: 30938012 DOI: 10.1111/ceo.13511] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2018] [Revised: 03/16/2019] [Accepted: 03/24/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Uveitis is a spectrum of inflammatory disorders characterized by ocular inflammation and is one of the leading causes of preventable visual loss. The main aim of the treatment of uveitis is to control the inflammation, prevent recurrences of the disease and preserve vision while minimizing the adverse effects associated with the therapeutic agents. Initial management of uveitis relies heavily on the use of corticosteroids. However, monotherapy with high-dose corticosteroids is associated with side effects and cannot be maintained long term. Therefore, steroid-sparing agents are needed to decrease the burden of steroid therapy. Currently, the therapeutic approach for non-infectious uveitis (NIU) consists of a step-ladder strategy with the first-line option being corticosteroids in various formulations followed by the use of first-, second- and third-line agents in cases with suboptimal steroid response. Unfortunately, the agents currently at our disposal have limitations such as having a narrow therapeutic window along with their own individual potential side-effect profiles. Therefore, research has been targeted to identify newer drugs as well as new uses for older drugs that target specific pathways in the inflammatory response. Such efforts are made in order to provide targeted and safer therapy with reduced side effects and greater efficacy. Several specially designed molecular antibodies are currently in various phases of investigations that can potentially halt the inflammation in patients with NIU. In the review, we have provided a comprehensive overview of the current and upcoming therapeutic options for patients with NIU.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad Hassan
- Byers Eye Institute, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California
| | - Samendra Karkhur
- Byers Eye Institute, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.,Department of Ophthalmology, Sadguru Netra Chikitsalaya, Chitrakoot, India
| | - Jeong H Bae
- Byers Eye Institute, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.,Department of Ophthalmology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | | | - Maria S Ormaechea
- Byers Eye Institute, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.,Department of Ophthalmology, Hospital Universitario Austral, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Neil Onghanseng
- Byers Eye Institute, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California
| | - Nam V Nguyen
- Byers Eye Institute, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California
| | - Rubbia Afridi
- Byers Eye Institute, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California
| | - Yasir J Sepah
- Byers Eye Institute, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California
| | - Diana V Do
- Byers Eye Institute, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California
| | - Quan D Nguyen
- Byers Eye Institute, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
A significant part of patients with gout has contraindications to taking nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, colchicine and glucocorticoids. Such therapy is often ineffective, particularly in patients with the severe tophaceous gout what hampers treatment of acute arthritis attack assuming the need for other methods of therapy. During the last years several medications have been introduced the mechanism of anti-inflammatory action of which is associated with inhibition of interleukin 1 (IL1) playing a key role in the development of acute gouty arthritis. To date, the most well-studied and the only registered drug for relief of acute arthritis attack is canakinumab, recommended for use in situations where other therapy options are unacceptable. Despite these limitations, the use of IL1 inhibitors, in particular canakinumab, seems promising due to the high efficiency of the drug, the ability to use it in patients with comorbid diseases, as well as a favorable effect on the risk of cardiovascular disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - E. L. Nasonov
- V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology; I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Ministry of Health of Russia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ebersberger A. The analgesic potential of cytokine neutralization with biologicals. Eur J Pharmacol 2018; 835:19-30. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2018.07.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2018] [Revised: 06/26/2018] [Accepted: 07/19/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|