1
|
Parisi S, Andrea B, Chiara DM, Alberto LG, Maddalena L, Palma S, Olga A, Massimo R, Marino P, Rosalba C, Elisa V, Rosario F, Giorgio A, Francesco DL, Ylenia DB, Roberta F, Antonella F, Francesco G, Simone B, Dario C, Gerolamo B, Matteo C, Romina A, Natalia M, Giulio F, Patrizia DM, Aldo MC, Veronica F, Francesco MC, Federica L, Gilda S, Carlo S, Marta P, Aurora I, Valeria N, Daniele S, Gianluca L, Adorni G, Eleonora DD, Elena B, Ilaria P, Eugenio A, Alessandra B, Cristina FM, Fabio M, Vincenzo B, Viviana R, Alessia F, Guido R, Rosetta V, Antonio M, Alessandro V, Francesca O, Alarico A, Enrico F. Analysis of survival rate and persistence predictors of baricitinib in real-world data from a large cohort of rheumatoid arthritis patients. CURRENT RESEARCH IN PHARMACOLOGY AND DRUG DISCOVERY 2024; 6:100178. [PMID: 38419949 PMCID: PMC10899020 DOI: 10.1016/j.crphar.2024.100178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2023] [Revised: 01/23/2024] [Accepted: 02/12/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Objectives The persistence in therapy of rheumatoid arthritis drugs and particularly bDMARD is a limiting factor for their long-term use. The randomized controlled trials (RCTs) may not reflect real-world contexts due to strict inclusion and exclusion criteria. Baricitinib, which targets both JAK1 and JAK2, has been used in Italy for several years. The aim of this multi-center study is to assess the real world persistence on therapy of baricitinib in RA patients and to identify predictive factors of baricitinib's survival rate. Methods This is a retrospective, multicentric, Italian, longitudinal study. All patients were enrolled according to the following criteria: a) age ≥ 18 years old; b) diagnosed with RA according 2010 ACR/EULAR classification criteria; c) treated with baricitinib. In order to describe baricitinib clinical efficacy, the survival rate was evaluated by The Kaplan-Meier curve. Then, predictive factors of drug retention rate were assessed by performing the Cox analysis, identifying which risk factors influenced treatment persistence. Results Overall, we included 478 patients treated with baricitinib. Among them, 380 (79.5%) were females. Baricitinib's survival rate was 94.6% at 6 months, 87.9% at 12 months, 81.7% at 24 months and 53.4% at 48 months. The Cox analysis regression showed that a higher bDMARDs/tsDMARD line of therapy seems to be a negative prognostic factor for the drug retention rate (HR 1.26 CI 95% 1.07-1.49, p = 0.006. Conclusion Real-life study confirms baricitinib effectiveness up to 4 years, but previous treatment with bDMARDs was a negative prognostic factor for its survival rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simone Parisi
- Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Rheumatology Unit, Turin, Italy
| | - Becciolini Andrea
- Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma, Department of Medicine, Internal Medicine and Rheumatology Unit, Parma, Italy
| | - Ditto Maria Chiara
- Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Rheumatology Unit, Turin, Italy
| | - Lo Gullo Alberto
- Azienda Ospedaliera di Rilievo Nazionale e di Alta Specializzazione Garibaldi Ospedale Garibaldi-Nesima, Rheumatology Unit, Catania, Italy
| | - Larosa Maddalena
- Azienda Sanitaria Locale 3 Genovese, Division of Rheumatology - Medical Specialties Department, Genoa, Italy
| | - Scolieri Palma
- Ospedale Nuovo Regina Margherita, Internal Medicine and Rheumatology Unit, Rome, Italy
| | - Addimanda Olga
- IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna Policlinico S Orsola, Department of Internal Medicine-Rheumatology, Bologna, Italy
| | - Reta Massimo
- IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna Policlinico S Orsola, Department of Internal Medicine-Rheumatology, Bologna, Italy
| | - Paroli Marino
- University of Rome La Sapienza, Department of Clinical, Anesthesiological and Cardiovascular Sciences, Polo Pontino, Latina, Italy
| | - Caccavale Rosalba
- University of Rome La Sapienza, Department of Clinical, Anesthesiological and Cardiovascular Sciences, Polo Pontino, Latina, Italy
| | - Visalli Elisa
- Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Policlinico Vittorio Emanuele Catania, Division of Rheumatology, A.O.U. "Policlinico San Marco", Catania, Italy
| | - Foti Rosario
- Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Policlinico Vittorio Emanuele Catania, Division of Rheumatology, A.O.U. "Policlinico San Marco", Catania, Italy
| | - Amato Giorgio
- Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Policlinico Vittorio Emanuele Catania, Division of Rheumatology, A.O.U. "Policlinico San Marco", Catania, Italy
| | - De Lucia Francesco
- Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Policlinico Vittorio Emanuele Catania, Division of Rheumatology, A.O.U. "Policlinico San Marco", Catania, Italy
| | - Dal Bosco Ylenia
- Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Policlinico Vittorio Emanuele Catania, Division of Rheumatology, A.O.U. "Policlinico San Marco", Catania, Italy
| | - Foti Roberta
- Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Policlinico Vittorio Emanuele Catania, Division of Rheumatology, A.O.U. "Policlinico San Marco", Catania, Italy
| | - Farina Antonella
- ASUR Area Vasta 4 Fermo, Ospedale A Murri, Internal Medicine Unit, Rheumatology outpatient clinic, Fermo, Italy
| | | | - Bernardi Simone
- Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Rheumatology Unit, Forlì, Italy
| | - Camellino Dario
- Azienda Sanitaria Locale 3 Genovese, Division of Rheumatology - Medical Specialties Department, Genoa, Italy
| | - Bianchi Gerolamo
- Azienda Sanitaria Locale 3 Genovese, Division of Rheumatology - Medical Specialties Department, Genoa, Italy
| | - Colina Matteo
- Azienda USL di Imola, Department of Internal Medicine and Oncology. Service of Rheumatology, Imola, Italy
- University of Bologna, Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, Imola, Italy
| | - Andracco Romina
- Hospital Santa Corona Pietra Ligure, Internal Medicine Unit, Rheumatology outpatient clinic, Unit of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Pietra Ligure, Italy
| | - Mansueto Natalia
- Hospital Santa Corona Pietra Ligure, Internal Medicine Unit, Rheumatology outpatient clinic, Unit of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Pietra Ligure, Italy
| | - Ferrero Giulio
- Hospital Santa Corona Pietra Ligure, Internal Medicine Unit, Rheumatology outpatient clinic, Unit of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Pietra Ligure, Italy
| | - Del Medico Patrizia
- Civitanova Marche Hospital, Rheumatology outpatient clinic, Internal Medicine Unit, Civitanova Marche, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | - Sandri Gilda
- University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Rheumatology Unit, Modena and Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Salvarani Carlo
- University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Rheumatology Unit, Modena and Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Priora Marta
- ASL 15 Cuneo, Rheumatology Day Hospital and outpatient clinic, Mondovì, Italy
| | | | - Nucera Valeria
- ASL 13 Novara, Rheumatology Outpatient Unit, Novara, Italy
| | - Santilli Daniele
- Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma, Department of Medicine, Internal Medicine and Rheumatology Unit, Parma, Italy
| | - Lucchini Gianluca
- Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma, Department of Medicine, Internal Medicine and Rheumatology Unit, Parma, Italy
| | - Giuditta Adorni
- Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma, Department of Medicine, Internal Medicine and Rheumatology Unit, Parma, Italy
| | - Di Donato Eleonora
- Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma, Department of Medicine, Internal Medicine and Rheumatology Unit, Parma, Italy
| | - Bravi Elena
- Guglielmo da Saliceto Hospital, Department of Medicine, Internal Medicine and Rheumatology Unit, Piacenza, Italy
| | - Platè Ilaria
- Guglielmo da Saliceto Hospital, Department of Medicine, Internal Medicine and Rheumatology Unit, Piacenza, Italy
| | - Arrigoni Eugenio
- Guglielmo da Saliceto Hospital, Department of Medicine, Internal Medicine and Rheumatology Unit, Piacenza, Italy
| | - Bezzi Alessandra
- ASL 13 Rimini, Internal Medicine and Rheumatology Unit, Rimini, Italy
| | | | - Mascella Fabio
- ASL 13 Rimini, Internal Medicine and Rheumatology Unit, Rimini, Italy
| | - Bruzzese Vincenzo
- Ospedale Nuovo Regina Margherita, Internal Medicine and Rheumatology Unit, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | - Rovera Guido
- PO S Andrea di Vercelli, Unit of Rheumatology, Vercelli, Italy
| | - Vitetta Rosetta
- PO S Andrea di Vercelli, Unit of Rheumatology, Vercelli, Italy
| | - Marchetta Antonio
- IRCCS Ospedale Sacro Cuore Don Calabria, Rheumatology Unit, Negrar, Italy
| | - Volpe Alessandro
- IRCCS Ospedale Sacro Cuore Don Calabria, Rheumatology Unit, Negrar, Italy
| | - Ometto Francesca
- Azienda ULSS 6 Euganea, Rheumatology Outpatient Clinic, Padova, Italy
| | - Ariani Alarico
- Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma, Department of Medicine, Internal Medicine and Rheumatology Unit, Parma, Italy
| | - Fusaro Enrico
- Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Rheumatology Unit, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Matsson A, Solomon DH, Crabtree MM, Harrison RW, Litman HJ, Johansson FD. Patterns in the Sequential Treatment of Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Starting a Biologic or Targeted Synthetic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drug: 10-Year Experience From a US-Based Registry. ACR Open Rheumatol 2024; 6:5-13. [PMID: 37885052 PMCID: PMC10789300 DOI: 10.1002/acr2.11621] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2023] [Accepted: 09/12/2023] [Indexed: 10/28/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Developing and evaluating new treatment guidelines for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) based on observational data requires a quantitative understanding of patterns in current treatment practice with biologic and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs). METHODS We used data from the CorEvitas RA registry to study patients starting their first b/tsDMARD therapy, defined as the first line of therapy, between 2012 and the end of 2021. We identified treatment patterns as unique sequences of therapy changes following and including the first-line therapy. Therapy cycling was defined as switching back to a treatment from a previously used therapeutic class. RESULTS A total of 6015 b/tsDMARD-naïve patients (77% female) were included in the analysis. Their median age was 58 years, and their median disease duration was 3 years. In 2012-2014, 80% of the patients started a tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) as their first b/tsDMARD. However, the use of TNFi decreased in favor of Janus kinase inhibitors since 2015. Although the number of treatment patterns was large, therapy cycling was relatively common. For example, 601 patterns were observed among 1133 patients who changed therapy at least four times, of whom 85.3% experienced therapy cycling. Furthermore, the duration of each of the first three lines of therapy decreased over the past decade. For example, the median duration of the first-line therapy was 153 days in 2018-2021 compared to 208 days in 2015-2017 (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION First-line therapy was almost always TNFi, but diversity in treatment choice was high after that. This practice variation allows for proposing and evaluating new guidelines for sequential treatment of RA. It also presents statistical challenges to compare patients with different treatment sequences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Margaux M. Crabtree
- (current address: Biogen Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts), CorEvitas, LLCWalthamMassachusetts
| | - Ryan W. Harrison
- (current address: Biogen Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts), CorEvitas, LLCWalthamMassachusetts
| | - Heather J. Litman
- (current address: Biogen Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts), CorEvitas, LLCWalthamMassachusetts
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hernández-Cruz B, Kiltz U, Avouac J, Treuer T, Haladyj E, Gerwien J, Gupta CD, Conti F. Systematic Literature Review of Real-World Evidence on Baricitinib for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis. Rheumatol Ther 2023; 10:1417-1457. [PMID: 37715917 PMCID: PMC10654279 DOI: 10.1007/s40744-023-00591-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2023] [Accepted: 08/03/2023] [Indexed: 09/18/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Baricitinib, an orally available small-molecule inhibitor of Janus kinase (JAK)1 and JAK2, is indicated to treat active moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA). OBJECTIVE This systematic review described the real-world clinical characteristics of baricitinib-treated patients with RA, prescription patterns, effectiveness, drug persistence, patient-reported outcomes (PROs; physical function, pain, health-related quality of life [HRQoL]), patient global assessment (PGA), and safety of baricitinib. METHODS A PRISMA systematic review of real-world studies was conducted to identify relevant literature published between January 2016 and September 2022 using MEDLINE®, EMBASE®, and evidence-based medicine review databases. Websites or online repositories of the American College of Rheumatology and the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology were searched manually to include relevant abstracts from conferences held between January 2016 and November 2022. RESULTS A total of 11,472 records were identified by searching online databases. Seventy studies were included in the study, of which 40 were abstracts. Most patients were older (51-71 years), female, and with mean RA duration of 4-19 years. Baricitinib was mostly used after the failure of one or more bDMARDs, and 4 mg dosing was prevalent in patients with RA (range 22-100%). Clinical effectiveness of baricitinib was reported in real-world settings regardless of prior biologic/targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) use and concomitant conventional synthetic DMARD use. Achievement of Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) remission was reported in 8.7-60% of patients at week 12 and CDAI low disease activity (LDA) in 20.2-81.6% at week 24. The proportion of patients attaining Simple Disease Activity Index (SDAI) remission was reported in 12% at week 4 to 45.4% at 24 weeks. Drug persistence was high, similar, or equal to anti-tumor necrosis factor drugs. No new safety signals were identified. CONCLUSION Baricitinib demonstrated effectiveness in the real-world setting with a consistent safety profile observed in clinical studies. Better persistence rates for baricitinib compared to bDMARDs with improvement in PROs were reported, although baricitinib-treated patients had RA with poor prognostic characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Uta Kiltz
- Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet, Claudiusstraße 45, 44649, Herne, Germany
| | - Jérôme Avouac
- AP-HP Centre, Université de Paris, Hôpital Cochin, Service de Rhumatologie, 27 Rue du Faubourg Saint Jacques, 75014, Paris, France
| | - Tamas Treuer
- Eli Lilly and Company, 893 S. Delaware Street, Indianapolis, IN, 46225, USA.
| | - Ewa Haladyj
- Eli Lilly and Company, 893 S. Delaware Street, Indianapolis, IN, 46225, USA
| | - Jens Gerwien
- Eli Lilly and Company, 893 S. Delaware Street, Indianapolis, IN, 46225, USA
| | | | - Fabrizio Conti
- AOU Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Taylor PC, Laedermann C, Alten R, Feist E, Choy E, Haladyj E, De La Torre I, Richette P, Finckh A, Tanaka Y. A JAK Inhibitor for Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis: The Baricitinib Experience. J Clin Med 2023; 12:4527. [PMID: 37445562 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12134527] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2023] [Revised: 06/22/2023] [Accepted: 06/26/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Baricitinib, an oral selective Janus kinase (JAK)1/JAK2 inhibitor, is approved as monotherapy or in combination with methotrexate for treating adults with moderate-to-severe active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and provides improvements in clinical signs, symptoms and patient-reported outcomes. Currently, baricitinib is approved for treating RA in more than 75 countries. In several pivotal Phase II and III RA trials (RA-BALANCE, RA-BEGIN, RA-BEAM, RA-BUILD, RA-BEACON, RA-BEYOND), up to seven years of baricitinib treatment was well tolerated and provided rapid and sustained efficacy, which was confirmed in real-world settings. Safety signals for another JAK inhibitor, tofacitinib, have emerged, as observed in the post-marketing Phase IIIb/IV trial Oral Rheumatoid Arthritis Trial (ORAL) Surveillance; safety signals were subsequently highlighted in a retrospective study of baricitinib and consequently new recommendations and warnings and precautions for all JAK inhibitors have been issued. Ongoing studies to further characterise and clarify the benefit:risk of JAK inhibitors include registries and controlled trials. This capstone review summarises clinical and real-world data outlining the benefit:risk profile of baricitinib, confirming that the improved disease activity and physical function of patients with RA treated with this JAK inhibitor observed in clinical trials is translated into effectiveness in clinical practice, with a low rate of discontinuations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter C Taylor
- Botnar Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology, and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LD, UK
| | | | - Rieke Alten
- Internal Medicine II, Rheumatology, SCHLOSSPARK-KLINIK, University Medicine Berlin, 14059 Berlin, Germany
| | - Eugen Feist
- Department of Rheumatology, Helios Clinic Vogelsang-Gommern, Cooperation Partner of the Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, 39245 Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Ernest Choy
- Division of Infection and Immunity, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff CF14 4YS, UK
| | - Ewa Haladyj
- Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN 46285, USA
| | | | - Pascal Richette
- Service de Rhumatologie, Hôpital Lariboisière, 75010 Paris, France
- Inserm, UMR-S 1132, Bioscar, Université de Paris, 75010 Paris, France
| | - Axel Finckh
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Yoshiya Tanaka
- First Department of Internal Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu 807-0804, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hernández-Cruz B, Rosas J, Díaz-Torné C, Belzunegui J, García-Vicuña R, Inciarte-Mundo J, Pons A, Millán AM, Jeria-Navarro S, Valero JA, García-Castañeda N, Valero C, Llorente I, Calvo A, Díaz-Cerezo S, Núñez M. Real-World Treatment Patterns and Clinical Outcomes of Baricitinib in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients in Spain: Results of a Multicenter, Observational Study in Routine Clinical Practice (The ORBIT-RA Study). Rheumatol Ther 2022; 9:589-608. [PMID: 35041155 PMCID: PMC8964893 DOI: 10.1007/s40744-021-00423-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2021] [Accepted: 12/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Baricitinib is an oral Janus kinase (JAK)1/JAK2 inhibitor approved to treat rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This study aimed to investigate patients' characteristics, prescription patterns, effectiveness, and treatment persistence in patients receiving baricitinib in real-world practice in Spain. METHODS This retrospective longitudinal cohort study conducted in five rheumatology units included adults with RA initiating baricitinib (Sep-2017-May-19) with at least a 6-month-follow-up. Demographic/clinical characteristics, prescription patterns, and changes in disease activity and pain level were collected until treatment discontinuation/end of follow-up. Treatment persistence was estimated by Kaplan-Meier methods. RESULTS Data from 182 patients were included (mean (SD)): 83.5% women, 62.2 (12.3) years, body mass index 26.8 (5.1), disease duration 13.2 (10.8) years and Charlson Comorbidity Index score 2.4 (2.0). All patients had received at least one conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARD) before starting baricitinib and 78.0% at least one biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARD). Furthermore, 90.1% started with baricitinib 4 mg/day; 43.4% in monotherapy. One hundred and twelve (61.5%) of patients continued baricitinib at data collection time; mean persistence was 14.1 (0.5) months. Overall treatment persistence was 79.7/64.8/59.1% at 6/12/18 months. Seventy (38.5%) patients discontinued baricitinib during follow-up due to loss of efficacy (68.6%) or adverse events (18.6%). In those patients with available scores at the different observed cut-off points, remission or low disease activity was reported in 71.6 and 76.3% of patients at 6/12 months at any index: Disease Activity Score 28 joints using erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) (73.1 and 73.5%), Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) (62.4 and 75.0%), and Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) (66.7 and 78.1%). Good or moderate European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)-response was noted in 80.0 and 78.2% of patients, respectively. Improvement from baseline in pain (Visual Analog Scale) was 2.5 cm and 3.0 cm at 6/12 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS This Spanish cohort of patients treated with baricitinib had a long-standing and refractory disease. Nevertheless, high persistence and improvements in disease activity and pain were found at 6 and 12 months after treatment initiation, independently of the composite disease activity measure used, reinforcing the effectiveness of baricitinib in routine clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Blanca Hernández-Cruz
- Rheumatology Department, University Hospital Virgen Macarena, Calle Dr. Fedriani, 3, 41009, Seville, Spain.
| | - José Rosas
- Rheumatology Department, Marina Baixa Hospital, Av. Alcalde En Jaume Botella Mayor, 7, Villajoyosa, 03570, Alicante, Spain
| | - César Díaz-Torné
- Arthritis Unit, Rheumatology and Autoimmune Diseases Department, Santa Creu i Sant Pau Hospital, Carrer de Sant Quintí, 89, 08041, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Joaquín Belzunegui
- Rheumatology Department, Donostia University Hospital, Begiristain Doktorea Pasealekua, 20014, Guipúzcoa, Spain
| | - Rosario García-Vicuña
- Rheumatology Department, University Hospital La Princesa, IIS-IP, Calle de Diego de León, 62, 28006, Madrid, Spain
| | - José Inciarte-Mundo
- Arthritis Unit, Rheumatology Department, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, C. de Villarroel, 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ana Pons
- Rheumatology Department, Marina Baixa Hospital, Av. Alcalde En Jaume Botella Mayor, 7, Villajoyosa, 03570, Alicante, Spain
| | - Ana M Millán
- Arthritis Unit, Rheumatology and Autoimmune Diseases Department, Santa Creu i Sant Pau Hospital, Carrer de Sant Quintí, 89, 08041, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Sicylle Jeria-Navarro
- Arthritis Unit, Rheumatology and Autoimmune Diseases Department, Santa Creu i Sant Pau Hospital, Carrer de Sant Quintí, 89, 08041, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jesús A Valero
- Rheumatology Department, Donostia University Hospital, Begiristain Doktorea Pasealekua, 20014, Guipúzcoa, Spain
| | - Noelia García-Castañeda
- Rheumatology Department, University Hospital La Princesa, IIS-IP, Calle de Diego de León, 62, 28006, Madrid, Spain
| | - Cristina Valero
- Rheumatology Department, University Hospital La Princesa, IIS-IP, Calle de Diego de León, 62, 28006, Madrid, Spain
| | - Irene Llorente
- Rheumatology Department, University Hospital La Princesa, IIS-IP, Calle de Diego de León, 62, 28006, Madrid, Spain
| | - Alberto Calvo
- Rheumatology Department, University Hospital La Princesa, IIS-IP, Calle de Diego de León, 62, 28006, Madrid, Spain
| | - Silvia Díaz-Cerezo
- Medical Department, Lilly Spain, Av de la Industria 30, Alcobendas, 28108, Madrid, Spain
| | - Mercedes Núñez
- Medical Department, Lilly Spain, Av de la Industria 30, Alcobendas, 28108, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Perrone V, Losi S, Rogai V, Antonelli S, Fakhouri W, Giovannitti M, Giacomini E, Sangiorgi D, Degli Esposti L. Treatment Patterns and Pharmacoutilization in Patients Affected by Rheumatoid Arthritis in Italian Settings. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:5679. [PMID: 34073179 PMCID: PMC8197884 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18115679] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2021] [Revised: 05/20/2021] [Accepted: 05/23/2021] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the treatment patterns and pharmacoutilization of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in real-world settings in Italy. This retrospective observational analysis was based on administrative databases of selected Italian entities. All adult patients with RA diagnosis confirmed by ≥1 discharge diagnosis of RA (ICD-9-CM code = 714.0) or an active exemption code (006.714.0) were enrolled in 2019. Two cohorts were created: one included patients prescribed baricitinib, the other those prescribed biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs). Overall, 47,711 RA patients were identified, most of them without DMARD prescription. As a first-line prescription, 43.2% of patients were prescribed conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs), 5.2% bDMARDs and 0.3% baricitinib. In 2019, 82.6% of csDMARD users continued with the same DMARD category, 15.9% had a bDMARD, while 1.5% had baricitinib as second-line therapy. Overall, 445 patients used baricitinib during 2019. During follow-up, baricitinib was prescribed as monotherapy to 31% of patients, as cotreatment with csDMARDs and corticosteroids to 27% of patients, with corticosteroids to 28% of patients and with csDMARDs to 14% of patients. In line with previous findings, a trend of bDMARD undertreatment was observed. The treatment patterns of baricitinib patients could help to better characterize patients eligible for new therapeutic options that will be available in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valentina Perrone
- CliCon S.r.l., Health Economics and Outcomes Research, 40141 Bologna, Italy; (E.G.); (D.S.); (L.D.E.)
| | - Serena Losi
- Eli Lilly Italy S.p.A., 50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Italy; (S.L.); (V.R.); (S.A.)
| | - Veronica Rogai
- Eli Lilly Italy S.p.A., 50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Italy; (S.L.); (V.R.); (S.A.)
| | - Silvia Antonelli
- Eli Lilly Italy S.p.A., 50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Italy; (S.L.); (V.R.); (S.A.)
| | | | | | - Elisa Giacomini
- CliCon S.r.l., Health Economics and Outcomes Research, 40141 Bologna, Italy; (E.G.); (D.S.); (L.D.E.)
| | - Diego Sangiorgi
- CliCon S.r.l., Health Economics and Outcomes Research, 40141 Bologna, Italy; (E.G.); (D.S.); (L.D.E.)
| | - Luca Degli Esposti
- CliCon S.r.l., Health Economics and Outcomes Research, 40141 Bologna, Italy; (E.G.); (D.S.); (L.D.E.)
| |
Collapse
|