A clinical risk matrix for obstructive sleep apnea using Bayesian network approaches

Advancements in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Diagnosis and Screening Through Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a prevalent yet underdiagnosed condition associated with a major healthcare burden. Current diagnostic tools, such as full-night polysomnography (PSG), pose a limited accessibility to diagnosis due to their elevated costs. Recent advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI), including Machine Learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) algorithms, offer novel potential tools for an accurate OSA screening and diagnosis. This systematic review evaluates articles employing AI-powered models for OSA screening and diagnosis in the last decade.

METHODS

A comprehensive electronic search was performed on PubMed/MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and SCOPUS databases. The included studies were original articles written in English, reporting the use of ML algorithms to diagnose and predict OSA in suspected patients. The last search was performed in June 2024. This systematic review is registered in PROSPERO (Registration ID: CRD42024563059).

RESULTS

Sixty-five articles, involving data from 109,046 patients, met the inclusion criteria. Due to the heterogeneity of the algorithms, outcomes were analyzed into six sections (anthropometric indexes, imaging, electrocardiographic signals, respiratory signals, and oximetry and miscellaneous signals). AI algorithms demonstrated significant improvements in OSA detection, with accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity often exceeding traditional tools. In particular, anthropometric indexes were most widely used, especially in logistic regression-powered algorithms.

CONCLUSIONS

The application of AI algorithms to OSA diagnosis and screening has great potential to improve patient outcomes, increase early detection, and lessen the load on healthcare systems. However, rigorous validation and standardization efforts must be made to standardize datasets.

Prospective Validation and Usability Evaluation of a Mobile Diagnostic App for Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Background/Objectives: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) classification relies on polysomnography (PSG) results. Current guidelines recommend the development of clinical prediction algorithms in screening prior to PSG. A recent intuitive and user-friendly tool (OSABayes), based on a Bayesian network model using six clinical variables, has been proposed to quantify the probability of OSA. Our aims are (1) to validate OSABayes prospectively, (2) to build a smartphone app based on the proposed model, and (3) to evaluate app usability. Methods: We prospectively included adult patients suspected of OSA, without suspicion of other sleep disorders, who underwent level I or III diagnostic PSG. Apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and OSABayes probabilities were obtained and compared using the area under the ROC curve (AUC [95%CI]) for OSA diagnosis (AHI ≥ 5/h) and higher severity levels (AHI ≥ 15/h) prediction. We built the OSABayes app on 'App Inventor 2', and the usability was assessed with a cognitive walkthrough method and a general evaluation. Results: 216 subjects were included in the validation cohort, performing PSG levels I (34%) and III (66%). OSABayes presented an AUC of 83.6% [77.3-90.0%] for OSA diagnosis and 76.3% [69.9-82.7%] for moderate/severe OSA prediction, showing good response for both types of PSG. The OSABayes smartphone application allows one to calculate the probability of having OSA and consult information about OSA and the tool. In the usability evaluation, 96% of the proposed tasks were carried out. Conclusions: These results show the good discrimination power of OSABayes and validate its applicability in identifying patients with a high pre-test probability of OSA. The tool is available as an online form and as a smartphone app, allowing a quick and accessible calculation of OSA probability.

Design of an Intelligent Decision Support System Applied to the Diagnosis of Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), characterized by recurrent episodes of partial or total obstruction of the upper airway during sleep, is currently one of the respiratory pathologies with the highest incidence worldwide. This situation has led to an increase in the demand for medical appointments and specific diagnostic studies, resulting in long waiting lists, with all the health consequences that this entails for the affected patients. In this context, this paper proposes the design and development of a novel intelligent decision support system applied to the diagnosis of OSA, aiming to identify patients suspected of suffering from the pathology. For this purpose, two sets of heterogeneous information are considered. The first one includes objective data related to the patient's health profile, with information usually available in electronic health records (anthropometric information, habits, diagnosed conditions and prescribed treatments). The second type includes subjective data related to the specific OSA symptomatology reported by the patient in a specific interview. For the processing of this information, a machine-learning classification algorithm and a set of fuzzy expert systems arranged in cascade are used, obtaining, as a result, two indicators related to the risk of suffering from the disease. Subsequently, by interpreting both risk indicators, it will be possible to determine the severity of the patients' condition and to generate alerts. For the initial tests, a software artifact was built using a dataset with 4400 patients from the Álvaro Cunqueiro Hospital (Vigo, Galicia, Spain). The preliminary results obtained are promising and demonstrate the potential usefulness of this type of tool in the diagnosis of OSA.

Novel method combining multiscale attention entropy of overnight blood oxygen level and machine learning for easy sleep apnea screening

Objective

Sleep apnea is a common sleep disorder affecting a significant portion of the population, but many apnea patients remain undiagnosed because existing clinical tests are invasive and expensive. This study aimed to develop a method for easy sleep apnea screening.

Methods

Three supervised machine learning algorithms, including logistic regression, support vector machine, and light gradient boosting machine, were applied to develop apnea screening models at two apnea-hypopnea index cutoff thresholds: ≥ 5 and ≥ 30 events/hours. The SpO2 recordings of the Sleep Heart Health Study database (N = 5786) were used for model training, validation, and test. Multiscale entropy analysis was performed to derive a set of multiscale attention entropy features from the SpO2 recordings. Demographic features including age, sex, body mass index, and blood pressure were also used. The dependency among the multiscale attention entropy features were handled with the independent component analysis.

Results

For cutoff ≥ 5/hours, logistic regression model achieved the highest Matthew's correlation coefficient (0.402) and area under the curve (0.747), and reasonably good sensitivity (75.38%), specificity (74.02%), and positive predictive value (92.94%). For cutoff ≥ 30/hours, support vector machine model achieved the highest Matthew's correlation coefficient (0.545) and area under the curve (0.823), and good sensitivity (82.00%), specificity (82.69%), and negative predictive value (95.53%).

Conclusions

Our models achieved better performance than existing methods and have the potential to be integrated with home-use pulse oximeters.

Helping early obstructive sleep apnea diagnosis with machine learning: A systematic review (Preprint)

Background

American Academy of Sleep Medicine guidelines suggest that clinical prediction algorithms can be used to screen patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) without replacing polysomnography, the gold standard.

Objective

We aimed to identify, gather, and analyze existing machine learning approaches that are being used for disease screening in adult patients with suspected OSA.

Methods

We searched the MEDLINE, Scopus, and ISI Web of Knowledge databases to evaluate the validity of different machine learning techniques, with polysomnography as the gold standard outcome measure and used the Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd) to assess risk of bias and applicability of each included study.

Results

Our search retrieved 5479 articles, of which 63 (1.15%) articles were included. We found 23 studies performing diagnostic model development alone, 26 with added internal validation, and 14 applying the clinical prediction algorithm to an independent sample (although not all reporting the most common discrimination metrics, sensitivity or specificity). Logistic regression was applied in 35 studies, linear regression in 16, support vector machine in 9, neural networks in 8, decision trees in 6, and Bayesian networks in 4. Random forest, discriminant analysis, classification and regression tree, and nomogram were each performed in 2 studies, whereas Pearson correlation, adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system, artificial immune recognition system, genetic algorithm, supersparse linear integer models, and k-nearest neighbors algorithm were each performed in 1 study. The best area under the receiver operating curve was 0.98 (0.96-0.99) for age, waist circumference, Epworth Somnolence Scale score, and oxygen saturation as predictors in a logistic regression.

Conclusions

Although high values were obtained, they still lacked external validation results in large cohorts and a standard OSA criteria definition.

Trial Registration

PROSPERO CRD42021221339; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=221339