Healthcare Resource Uses and Out-of-Pocket Expenses Associated with Pulmonary TB Treatment in Thailand

Direct out-of-pocket expenditure of tuberculosis treatment in intensive phase in Kalutara District, Sri Lanka

BACKGROUND

Tuberculosis (TB) is a communicable disease. Financial risk protection is a key target to achieve in end TB strategy. Out-Of-Pocket Expenditure (OOPE) consisted of expenses bore by patients for their illnesses after subtracting third-party payments such as insurance. Despite the free health care in Sri Lanka, TB patients have to pay for various expenses (e.g., expenses for travel, food, drugs, medical investigations, and cost of accompanied person/bystander).

OBJECTIVES

The main objective of this study was to estimate direct OOPE and find the association between direct OOPE and noncompliance to TB treatment in intensive phase.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted with TB patients who were registered in Kalutara-district chest clinic for period of six months (n = 267). Interviewer-administered questionnaire (consisted of sections on socio-demographic characteristics, treatment compliance, sources and amount of OOPE, etc.) was used to collect data. Mean median, minimum, maximum and interquartile range were calculated in each component of OOPE.

RESULTS

Questionnaire were administered for 252 patients (male = 160, 63.5%). Mean total direct non-medical cost for one DOTS visit (without accompanied person) was 435.40 (IQR = 420.00) Sri Lankan Rupees (SLR) (i.e., 2.45 United State Dollars (USD)). A patient without an accompanying person spent 26124.00 SLR (435.40 per day into 60 days) (i.e., 146.76 USD) for transport and food during the intensive phase. During the intensive phase, the mean medical cost for one patient was 6444.66 LKR (IQR = 6400) (i.e., 36.21 USD). OOPE was not associated with noncompliance to TB treatment in intensive phase (p = 0.29).

CONCLUSIONS

There was no association between OOPE and noncompliance. The direct OOPE for TB treatment in the intensive phase was high. Therefore, it is necessary to develop strategies to reduce OOPE during TB treatment especially in intensive phase.

Analysis of the economic burden of diagnosis and treatment on patients with tuberculosis in Bao'an district of Shenzhen City, China

BACKGROUND

Illness-related costs experienced by tuberculosis patients produce a severe economic impact on households, especially poor families. Few studies have investigated the full costs, including direct and indirect costs, at the patient and household levels in south-east China.

METHODS

A case follow-up study was conducted in the Bao'an district of Shenzhen City, China. Eligible new and previously treated individuals with pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) during January 1st 2013 to June 30th 2013 were enrolled. Medical and non-medical costs as well as income loss were calculated in diagnosis and treatment periods, respectively. Factors associated with costs due to TB diagnosis, treatment and TB care (diagnosis + treatment) were explored respectively with a linear regression model.

RESULTS

Of the total 514 TB patients enrolled, 95% were from the migrant population, and 65% were males, with a mean age of 32.25 (±10.11). The median costs due to TB diagnosis and TB treatment were 79 United States dollar (USD), 748USD (6.2897 China Yuan (CNY) = 1USD, 2013) per patient, respectively. The median costs due to TB care (diagnosis and treatment) per patient was 1218USD, corresponding to 26% of patients' annual income pre-illness. Those who visited more times to health facilities, hospitalized, received higher education, or occupied in national civil servant/services/retired staff might expense more before diagnosis. Costs due to TB treatment was significantly higher among migrant patients, sputum smear positive patients, and widowed/divorced population. Factors associated with less total costs were native patients, fewer times of visiting to health-care facilities and those with no hospitalization history due to TB.

CONCLUSIONS

Although a free TB control policy is in force, patients with TB are still facing a heavy economic burden. More available interventions to reduce the financial burden on tuberculosis patients are urgently needed.

Out-of-Pocket Expenditures, Indirect Costs and Health-Related Quality of Life of Patients with Pulmonary Tuberculosis in Thailand

BACKGROUND

Thailand's hospitals may adopt different supervision approaches to improve tuberculosis (TB) treatment adherence.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare out-of-pocket (OOP) expenditures, indirect costs, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) among TB patients who received pharmaceutical care (pharmacist-led patient education and telephone consultation), home visit, and self-administered therapy (SAT) in Thailand.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective study to collect OOP expenditures, indirect costs, and HRQoL from a subsample of 104 adult pulmonary TB patients who started treatment between January and May 2014 in three hospitals. The three sources of data included patient interviews, patient medical records, and the hospital billing database. Patients were followed from January 2014 to March 2015. Relevant OOP expenditures collected during the interviews included (1) healthcare costs and other medications costs (e.g. vitamins, antibiotics, anti-cough) occurring in private healthcare units; and (2) costs of transportation, food, and accommodation. Productivity loss was measured using the self-reported amount of time a patient was unable to work due to TB, travel time to and from the hospital, time spent at the hospital (waiting time, consultation time, and hospitalizations), and time spent accompanying family members on outpatient visits or during hospitalizations. Cost differences among treatment strategies were adjusted for baseline characteristics by generalized linear models (GLMs). All costs were converted to international dollars (I$).

RESULTS

A total of 256 eligible patients who started pulmonary TB treatment during the specified period were approached, with 104 patients being included in the analysis (29, 38, and 37 patients receiving pharmaceutical care, home visit, and SAT, respectively). Mean OOP expenditures per patient receiving pharmaceutical care, home visit, and SAT were I$907.56 [confidence interval (CI) I$603.80-I$1269.41], I$148.47 (CI I$109.49-I$194.89), and I$95.35 (CI I$69.11-I$129.63), respectively. The GLM indicated statistically significantly lower OOP expenditures for patients receiving either home visit or SAT (ratio of mean costs 0.247, CI 0.142-0.427; and 0.318, CI 0.187-0.540, respectively) than those receiving pharmaceutical care. Patient's indirect costs for receiving pharmaceutical care, home visit, and SAT were I$1925.68 (CI I$922.06-I$3284.94), I$2393.66 (CI I$1435.01-I$3501.98), and I$833.33 (CI I$453.87-I$1263.45), respectively. The GLM found no statistically significant differences in indirect costs for the home visit and SAT groups (ratio of mean costs 1.904, CI 0.754-4.802; and 0.792, CI 0.289-2.175, respectively) when pharmaceutical care was set as the reference. Mean utility scores [EuroQol five-dimensional three-level (EQ-5D-3L)] at baseline and treatment end were 0.679 and 0.830, 0.713 and 0.905, and 0.708 and 0.913 for patients receiving pharmaceutical care, home visit, and SAT, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Pharmaceutical care patients experienced the highest OOP expenditures, compared with home visit and SAT patients. Home-visit patients reached the highest indirect costs and utility score improvements. A large-scale prospective study is required in order to strengthen evidence to support policy making regarding the most efficient use of limited resources for the management of TB.