Discharge destination after hip fracture: findings from the Irish hip fracture database

The role of depression in the association between physiotherapy frequency and duration and outcomes after hip fracture surgery: secondary analysis of the physiotherapy hip fracture sprint audit

PURPOSE

It is not known whether the association between the frequency and duration of physiotherapy and patient outcomes varies for those with and without depression. This study aims to evaluate whether the associations between the frequency and duration of physiotherapy after hip fracture surgery and discharge home, surviving at 30 days post-admission, and being readmitted 30 days post discharge vary by depression diagnosis.

METHODS

Data were from 5005 adults aged 60 and over included in the UK Physiotherapy Hip Fracture Sprint Audit who had undergone surgery for a nonpathological first hip fracture. Logistic regression models were used to estimate the unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios and their 95% confidence intervals for the associations between physiotherapy frequency and duration and outcomes.

RESULTS

Physiotherapy frequency and duration were comparable between patients with and without depression (42.1% and 44.6%). The average adjusted odds for a 30-min increase in physiotherapy duration for those with and without depression for discharge home were 1.05 (95% CI 0.85-1.29) vs 1.16 (95% CI 1.05-1.28, interaction p = 0.36), for 30-day survival were 1.26 (95% CI 1.06-1.50) vs 1.11 (95% CI 1.05-1.17, interaction p = 0.45) and for readmission were 0.89 (95% CI 0.81-0.98) vs 0.97 (95% CI 0.93-1.00, interaction p = 0.09). None of the interaction tests reached formal significance, but the readmission models were close (p = 0.09).

CONCLUSION

Results suggest physiotherapy duration may be negatively associated with readmission in those with depression but not those without depression, while no clear difference in the other outcomes was noted.

A standardized clinical pathway for hip fracture patients is associated with reduced mortality: data from the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register

PURPOSE

A standardized clinical pathway is recommended for hip fracture patients. We aimed to survey standardization of treatment in Norwegian hospitals and to investigate whether this affected 30-day mortality and quality of life after hip fracture surgery.

METHODS

Based on the national guidelines for interdisciplinary treatment of hip fractures, nine criteria for a standardized clinical pathway were identified. A questionnaire was sent to all Norwegian hospitals treating hip fractures in 2020 to survey compliance with these criteria. A standardized clinical pathway was defined as a minimum of eight criteria fulfilled. Thirty-day mortality for patients treated in hospitals with and without a standardized clinical pathway was compared using data in the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register (NHFR).

RESULTS

29 out of 43 hospitals (67%) answered the questionnaire. Of these, 20 hospitals (69%) had a standardized clinical pathway. Compared to these hospitals, there was a significantly higher 30-day mortality in hospitals without a standardized clinical pathway in the period 2016-2020 (HR 1.13, 95% CI 1.04-1.23; p = 0.005). 4 months postoperatively, patients treated in hospitals with a standardized clinical pathway and patients treated in hospitals without a standardized clinical pathway reported an EQ-5D index score of 0.58 and 0.57 respectively (p = 0.038). Significantly more patients treated in hospitals with a standardized clinical pathway were 4 months postoperatively able to perform usual activities (29% vs 27%) and self-care (55% vs 52%) compared to hospitals without a standardized clinical pathway.

CONCLUSION

A standardized clinical pathway for hip fracture patients was associated with reduced 30-day mortality, but no clinically important difference in quality of life compared to a non-standardized clinical pathway.

Using pre-fracture mobility to augment prediction of post-operative outcomes in hip fracture

Purpose

Pre-operative scores based on patient characteristics are commonly used to predict hip fracture outcomes. Mobility, an indicator of pre-operative function, has been neglected as a potential predictor. We assessed the ability of pre-fracture mobility to predict post-operative outcomes following hip fracture.

Methods

We analysed prospectively collected data from hip fracture surgery patients at a large-volume trauma unit. Mobility was classified into four groups. Post-operative outcomes studied were mortality and residence at 30 days, medical complications within 30- or 60-days post-operatively, and prolonged length of stay (LOS, ≥ 28 days). We performed multivariate regression analyses adjusting for age and sex to assess the discriminative ability of the Nottingham Hip Fracture Score (NHFS), with and without mobility, for predicting outcomes using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC).

Results

1919 patients were included, mean age 82.6 (SD 8.2); 1357 (70.7%) were women. Multivariate analysis demonstrated patients with worse mobility had a 1.7–5.5-fold higher 30-day mortality (p ≤ 0.001), and 1.9–3.2-fold higher likelihood of prolonged LOS (p ≤ 0.001). Worse mobility was associated with a 2.3–3.8-fold higher likelihood of living in a care home at 30-days post-operatively (p < 0.001) and a 1.3–2.0-fold higher likelihood of complications within 30 days (p ≤ 0.001). Addition of mobility improved NHFS discrimination for discharge location, AUROC NHFS 0.755 [0.733–0.777] to NHFS + mobility 0.808 [0.789–0.828], and LOS, AUROC NHFS 0.584 [0.557–0.611] to NHFS + mobility 0.616 [0.590–0.643].

Conclusion

Incorporating mobility assessment into risk scores may improve casemix adjustment, prognostication following hip fracture, and identify high-risk patient groups requiring enhanced post-operative care at admission.

Factors associated with non-home discharge of patients hospitalized for hip fracture: A nationwide retrospective study using the Japanese diagnostic procedure combination database

In Japan, the length of stay in acute care hospitals has been shortened, home medical care has been promoted following national policy. However, many issues remain in promoting home medical care. The aim of this study was to clarify the profiles of patients with hip fractures, aged ≥ 65 years, who were hospitalized in acute care institutions at the time of discharge and the influence on nonhome discharge. This study used data from patients who satisfied all the following conditions: Patients aged ≥ 65 years who were hospitalized and discharged between April 2018 and March 2019; Patients with hip fractures, and; Patients who were admitted from home. The patients were classified into the home discharge and nonhome discharge groups. Multivariate analysis was conducted by comparing socio-demographic status, patient background factors, patient status at discharge, and hospital function. This study included 31,752 patients (73.7%) and 11,312 patients (26.3%) in the nonhome discharge group and home discharge group, respectively. Overall, the proportions of males and females were 22.2% and 77.8%, respectively. The average (standard deviation) age of the patients was 84.1 years (7.4) and 81.3 years (8.5) in the nonhome discharge and home discharge groups, respectively (P < .01). The following factors affected nonhome discharge: 75 to 84 years (odds ratio [OR] = 1.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.68-1.96), ≥85 years (OR = 2.17, 95% CI = 2.01-2.36), electrocardiography or respiratory treatment "(Factor A3) (OR = 1.44, 95% CI = 1.23-1.68), level of assistance with activities of daily living "(Factor B1)" (OR = 4.56, 95% CI = 4.22-4.92), and hospital where the patient-to-nurse ratio is 7:1 (OR = 2.12, 95% CI = 1.91-2.35). The results suggested that support from activities of daily living caregivers and implementing medical treatments such as respiratory care are required to advance home medical care. This study's method enables analysis focusing on aspiration pneumonia and cerebral infarction, which are common among older adults. Furthermore, specific measures for promoting home medical care for patients who are highly dependent on medical and long-term care may be developed.

Osteoporotic fracture admissions compared to other major medical admissions in Irish public hospitals

Multinational reports suggest Ireland has one of the greatest illness burdens related to osteoporosis. Hospital care represents the costliest portion of health services. We found public hospital bed days for fragility fractures in Ireland increased by 43% between 2008 and 2017 which exceeded those for other common diseases.

INTRODUCTION

Recent multinational reports suggest Ireland has one of the greatest illness burdens related to osteoporosis, manifesting clinically as fragility fractures (FF). International reports show that FF incidence, rate of hospital admission and cost are similar or greater than those for breast cancer, myocardial infarction and stroke. Studies addressing the illness burden of osteoporosis in Ireland are few, and none compares fragility fractures to other common chronic diseases.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of national administrative data for all public hospital admissions was performed on adults aged 50 years and older from January 2008 to December 2017.

RESULTS

In 2017, public hospital bed days for FF totalled 249,887 outnumbering Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD): 131,897; 6 solid cancers (CA): 118,098; myocardial infarction (MI): 83,477; and diabetes mellitus (DM): 31,044. Bed days for FF increased by 43% between 2008 and 2017, in contrast to a 32%, 28% and 31% reduction for CA, MI and DM, respectively, and a 12% increase for COPD. Public hospital bed days for FF in 2016 were greater than MI, stroke, atrial fibrillation and chest pain combined but less than a combination of COPD, pneumonia and lower respiratory tract infection.

CONCLUSION

Osteoporotic fractures represent a large and rapidly increasing illness burden amongst older Irish adults, with substantial care requirements and the resulting onus on our healthcare system. Urgent action is needed to address this public health issue and the services for those at risk of fracture.

Cost of hospitalisation for hip fracture-findings from the Irish hip fracture database

The authors utilised the Irish Hip Fracture Database (IHFD) to quantify the impact of hip fracture on the health service in terms of incidence, bed days and financial costs. The absolute number of hip fracture cases recorded by the IHFD has increased, as has the associated costs of hospitalisation.

INTRODUCTION

Hip fracture places a considerable clinical and financial burden on the healthcare system, with acute hospitalisation accounting for a substantial proportion of the costs incurred. This paper aimed to quantify the cost of hospitalisation for hip fracture in Ireland in terms of bed days and direct hospital costs.

METHODS

The authors analysed 23,494 cases in the Irish Hip Fracture Database (IHFD) from 2014 to 2020. Case numbers and length of stay were analysed annually. Hospital costs for hip fracture were described using the 2020 Activity-Based Funding Price List, which outlines the fees paid to public hospitals for inpatient activity.

RESULTS

For the time period 2014-2020, the total cost of hospitalisation for hip fracture was approximately €296 million, equating to approximately €11,700 per episode of care. The annual cost of hospitalisation increased from approximately €34 million in 2014 to €44 million in 2020. In 2020, the mean length of stay for hip fracture was 17 days accounting for > 62,600 acute hospital bed days.

CONCLUSION

The absolute number of hip fracture cases recorded by the IHFD has increased, as has the cost of hospitalisation. Given the current capacity issues and economic constraints, there is a growing need to prioritise time spent in the most expensive acute hospital setting to the immediate perioperative period and maximise the use of community services and early supportive discharge for the rehabilitation phase.