State of the art review of new technologies in spine deformity surgery-robotics and navigation

Development of a classification system for potential sources of error in robotic-assisted spine surgery

PURPOSE

Robotic-assisted spine surgery (RASS) has increased in prevalence over recent years, and while much work has been done to analyze differences in outcomes when compared to the freehand technique, little has been done to characterize the potential pitfalls associated with using robotics. This study's goal was to leverage expert opinion to develop a classification system of potential sources of error that may be encountered when using robotics in spine surgery. This not only provides practitioners, particularly those in the early stages of robotic adoption, with insight into possible sources of error but also provides the community at large with a more standardized language through which to communicate.

METHODS

The Delphi method, which is a validated system of developing consensus, was utilized. The method employed an iterative presentation of classification categories that were then edited, removed, or elaborated upon during several rounds of discussion. Voting took place to accept or reject the individual classification categories with consensus defined as ≥ 80% agreement.

RESULTS

After a three-round iterative survey and video conference Delphi process, followed by an in-person meeting at the Safety in Spine Surgery Summit, consensus was achieved on a classification system that includes four key types of potential sources of error in RASS as well as a list of the most commonly identified sources within each category. Initial sources of error that were considered included: cannula skidding/skive, penetration, screw misplacement, registration failure, and frame shift. After completion of the Delphi process, the final classification included four major types of pitfalls including: Reference/Navigation, Patient Factors, Technique, and Equipment Factors (available at https://safetyinspinesurgery.com/ ).

CONCLUSION

This work provides expert insight into potential sources of error in the setting of robotic spine surgery. The working group established four discrete categories while providing a standardized language to unify communication.

Comparison Between Resident and Attending Surgeons as Assistants on Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Surgery: No Differences in Outcomes, Complications Rate, or Pedicle Screw Placement Accuracy

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to determine if the level of training of the first assistant (resident or attending surgeon) has an influence on the radiographic outcome of AIS surgery and on the accuracy rate of the pedicle screws placement.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) surgery is a challenging procedure that requires a dedicated team of skilled professionals. Therefore, understanding the learning curve is of outstanding importance to guarantee the best outcomes and the highest safety to the patients.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent surgery for AIS with a minimum follow-up of 2 years was conducted. All patients were operated by an experienced spine surgeon, assisted by and attending surgeon (group A) or a senior resident (group B). Radiographic outcomes were assessed. Through postoperative CT scan, accuracy of pedicle screw placement was measured (using Gertzbein-Robbins classification). Groups were then statistically compared.

RESULTS

A total of 120 patients were included (mean age 15.3±3.39 y, major curve Cobb 60.7±11.9 degrees). No difference was found between groups in terms of preoperative characteristics and postoperative radiographic (correction rate, thoracic kyphosis, screw density) outcomes or complications. Operative time and estimated blood loss were significantly higher in Group B ( P =0.045 and P =0.024, respectively). Of the 2746 pedicle screws inserted (1319 group A and 1427 group B), 2452 had a perfect intrapedicular trajectory (absolute accuracy of 89.29%) and 2697 had a breach <2 mm (relative accuracy of 97.56%). No difference was found among groups in terms of absolute or relative accuracy ( P =0.06 and P =0.23, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

AIS cases assisted by senior residents have longer operative time and higher blood loss, but this does not negatively affect the overall radiographic outcome and does not place the patient at increased risk of complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Robot-Assisted Spine Surgery: The Pearls and Pitfalls

Robot-assisted spine surgery has gained notable popularity among surgeons because of recent advancements in technology. These innovations provide several key benefits, including high screw accuracy rates, reduced radiation exposure, customized preoperative and intraoperative planning options, and improved ergonomics for surgeons. Despite the promising outcomes reported in literature, potential technical challenges remain across various robotic platforms. It is crucial for surgeons to remember that robotic platforms are shared-control systems, requiring the surgeon to maintain primary control throughout the procedure. To ensure patient safety, surgeons should be well versed in common technical pitfalls and strategies to mitigate these limitations.

Practice Pattern Variations in the Use of Neuromonitoring, Image Guidance, and Robotics for Lumbar Pedicle Screw Placement Based on a Nationwide Neurosurgery Survey

OBJECTIVE

Lumbar pedicle screw placement surgery involves various assistive technologies, including fluoroscopic, stereotactic, or robotic navigation and intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM). We aimed to discern neurosurgeons' preferences for screw placement techniques and IONM utility, while also considering the influence of experience.

METHODS

A survey was distributed to members of the Congress of Neurological Surgeons using REDCap software, collecting demographic data and querying preferred techniques for screw placement and IONM modalities. Opinions on IONM use during stereotactic or robotic navigation were also obtained. Responses were analyzed using Pearson's Chi-square and analysis of variance tests via R software.

RESULTS

Of 188 responses, 35.5% (n = 67) reported 1-10 years of experience and 64.5% (n = 121) reported ≥ 11 years. Less experienced neurosurgeons used stereotactic navigation more than those with greater experience (P < 0.001). Seasoned neurosurgeons used fluoroscopic guidance more often (P = 0.038). Less experienced neurosurgeons employed 1.69 (± 0.11) techniques for their fixation surgeries compared to 1.50 (± 0.0.8) for more experienced neurosurgeons. Robotic navigation utilization was low and comparable between the groups. Surgeons employing multiple techniques used triggered electromyography the most (62.1%, P = 0.024). No strong opinions emerged on the necessity of multimodality IONM with robotic or stereotactic navigation.

CONCLUSIONS

This national survey shows that stereotactic navigation is the predominant technique for pedicle screw placement among less experienced neurosurgeons, with seasoned neurosurgeons leaning toward fluoroscopic guidance. Robotic guidance was the least used technique with no observed difference based on experience. Neurosurgeons employing multiple techniques use IONM the most, compared with surgeons who only use stereotactic navigation and/or robotic guidance.

Evaluating the Status and Promising Potential of Robotic Spinal Surgery Systems

The increasing frequency of cervical and lumbar spine disorders, driven by aging and evolving lifestyles, has led to a rise in spinal surgeries using pedicle screws. Robotic spinal surgery systems have emerged as a promising innovation, offering enhanced accuracy in screw placement and improved surgical outcomes. We focused on literature of this field from the past 5 years, and a comprehensive literature search was performed using PubMed and Google Scholar. Robotic spinal surgery systems have significantly impacted spinal procedures by improving pedicle screw placement accuracy and supporting various techniques. These systems facilitate personalized, minimally invasive, and low-radiation interventions, leading to greater precision, reduced patient risk, and decreased radiation exposure. Despite advantages, challenges such as high costs and a steep learning curve remain. Ongoing advancements are expected to further enhance these systems' role in spinal surgery.

Accurate placement of thoracolumbar pedicle screws using a handheld iOS-based navigation device: a prospective intra-patient agreement study

BACKGROUND

Accurate pedicle screw placement is a challenge with reported misplacement rates of 10% and higher. A handheld navigation device (HND) may provide accuracy equal to CT-based navigation (CT-Nav) but without the cost and complexity.

OBJECTIVE

To study the accuracy of a handheld navigation device for pedicle screw placement.

STUDY DESIGN

This prospective cross-sectional study with consistently applied reference standard enrolled 20 patients undergoing 92 pedicle screw placements.

PATIENTS

Patients who underwent pedicle screw placement between May 2022 and September 2022.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Pedicle screw placement accuracy per Gertzbein-Robbins.

METHODS

Once the screw pilot hole was established, the proposed trajectory of the HND was compared with that proposed by CT-Nav. Postoperatively, screw accuracy was graded according to Gertzbein-Robbins by a blinded radiologist based on CT scans. Accuracy was compared between the two systems and published control for fluoroscopy assisted and CT-Nav placement using Bayesian posterior distribution.

RESULTS

The trajectory proposed by the HND and CT-Nav were in agreement in 98.9% (95% Exact CI; 94.09%-99.97%). The HND accuracy was 98.9% with 91 screws rated "A" and 1 rated "C". Noninferiority to fluoroscopic placement was achieved because the one-sided normal-approximation 95% CI Lower Bound (LB) of 95.3% is greater than the Performance Goal (PG) of 83.4%. Posthoc analysis demonstrated that the probability of superiority of the HND relative to the historical accuracy rate of 91.5% for fluoroscopy assisted procedures is >0.999 and that the HND's accuracy rate is within 4.5% of CT-Nav of 95.5% is >0.999. No adverse events or intra-operative complications associated with HND were observed. There was 1 (1.1%) intra-operative repositioning and no reoperations for any reason.

CONCLUSIONS

The accuracy rate of the HND was 98.9%, and the proposed trajectory matched with CT-Nav in 98.9% of the time. This is superior to the historical published accuracy rate for fluoroscopy-assisted procedures and equivalent to the historical published accuracy rate for CT-Nav.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Dutch trial register NL74268.058.20.

Robot-assisted pedicle screw insertion versus navigation-based and freehand techniques for posterior spinal fusion in scoliosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The role of robotics in spine surgery remains controversial, especially for scoliosis correction surgery. This study aims to assess the safety and efficacy of robotic-assisted (RA) surgery specifically for scoliosis surgery by comparing RA to both navigation systems (NS) and conventional freehand techniques (CF).

METHODS

As per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted via an electronic search of the following databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). All papers comparing RA to either NS or CF for posterior spinal fusion in scoliosis were included. Fixed and random effects models of analysis were utilised based on analysis heterogeneity.

RESULTS

10 observational studies were included in total. RA had significantly greater odds of accurate pedicle screw placement relative to both NS (OR = 2.02, CI = 1.52-2.67, p < 0.00001) and CF (OR = 3.06, CI = 1.79-5.23, p < 0.00001). The downside of RA was the significantly greater operation duration relative to NS (MD = 10.74, CI = 3.52-17.97, p = 0.004) and CF (MD = 40.27, CI = 20.90, p < 0.0001). Perioperative outcomes including estimated blood loss, radiation exposure, length of hospital stay, cobb angle correction rate, postoperative SRS score, VAS pain score, JOA score, as well as rates of neurological injury and revision surgery, were comparable between the groups (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

RA offers significantly greater pedicle screw placement accuracy relative to NS and CF, however, surgery can take longer. In terms of perioperative outcomes, all three techniques are comparable.

The Impact of Navigation in Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Study of Historical Aspects, Current Techniques and Future Directions

Background/Objectives: We sought to improve accuracy while minimizing radiation hazards, improving surgical outcomes, and preventing potential complications. Despite the increasing popularity of these systems, a limited number of papers have been published addressing the historical evolution, detailing the areas of use, and discussing the advantages and disadvantages, of this increasingly popular system in lumbar spine surgery. Our objective was to offer readers a concise overview of navigation system history in lumbar spine surgeries, the techniques involved, the advantages and disadvantages, and suggestions for future enhancements to the system. Methods: A comprehensive review of the literature was conducted, focusing on the development and implementation of navigation systems in lumbar spine surgeries. Our sources include PubMed-indexed peer-reviewed journals, clinical trial data, and case studies involving technologies such as computer-assisted surgery (CAS), image-guided surgery (IGS), and robotic-assisted systems. Results: To develop more practical, effective, and accurate navigation techniques for spine surgery, consistent advancements have been made over the past four decades. This technological progress began in the late 20th century and has since encompassed image-guided surgery, intraoperative imaging, advanced navigation combined with robotic assistance, and artificial intelligence. These technological advancements have significantly improved the accuracy of implant placement, reducing the risk of misplacement and related complications. Navigation has also been found to be particularly useful in tumor resection and minimally invasive surgery (MIS), where conventional anatomic landmarks are lacking or, in the case of MIS, not visible. Additionally, these innovations have led to shorter operative times, decreased radiation exposure for patients and surgical teams, and lower rates of reoperation. As navigation technology continues to evolve, future innovations are anticipated to further enhance the capabilities and accessibility of these systems, ultimately leading to improved patient outcomes in lumbar spine surgery. Conclusions: The initial limited utilization of navigation system in spine surgery has further expanded to encompass almost all fields of lumbar spine surgeries. As the cost-effectiveness and number of trained surgeons improve, a wider use of the system will be ensured so that the navigation system will be an indispensable tool in lumbar spine surgery. However, continued research and development, along with training programs for surgeons, are essential to fully realize the potential of these technologies in clinical practice.

Fully automated determination of robotic pedicle screw accuracy and precision utilizing computer vision algorithms

Historically, pedicle screw accuracy measurements have relied on CT and expert visual assessment of the position of pedicle screws relative to preoperative plans. Proper pedicle screw placement is necessary to avoid complications, cost and morbidity of revision procedures. The aim of this study was to determine accuracy and precision of pedicle screw insertion via a novel computer vision algorithm using preoperative and postoperative computed tomography (CT) scans. Three cadaveric specimens were utilized. Screw placement planning on preoperative CT was performed according to standard clinical practice. Two experienced surgeons performed bilateral T2-L4 instrumentation using robotic-assisted navigation. Postoperative CT scans of the instrumented levels were obtained. Automated segmentation and computer vision techniques were employed to align each preoperative vertebra with its postoperative counterpart and then compare screw positions along all three axes. Registration accuracy was assessed by preoperatively embedding spherical markers (tantalum beads) to measure discrepancies in landmark alignment. Eighty-eight pedicle screws were placed in 3 cadavers' spines. Automated registrations between pre- and postoperative CT achieved sub-voxel accuracy. For the screw tip and tail, the mean three-dimensional errors were 1.67 mm and 1.78 mm, respectively. Mean angular deviation of screw axes from plan was 1.58°. For screw mid-pedicular accuracy, mean absolute error in the medial-lateral and superior-inferior directions were 0.75 mm and 0.60 mm, respectively. This study introduces automated algorithms for determining accuracy and precision of planned pedicle screws. Our accuracy outcomes are comparable or superior to recent robotic-assisted in vivo and cadaver studies. This computerized workflow establishes a standardized protocol for assessing pedicle screw placement accuracy and precision and provides detailed 3D translational and angular accuracy and precision for baseline comparison.

A novel method to evaluate the transverse pedicle angles of the lower lumbar vertebrae using digital radiography

To investigate a novel approach for establishing the transverse pedicle angle (TPA) of the lower lumbar spine using preoperative digital radiography (DR). Computed Tomography (CT) datasets of the lower lumbar were reconstructed using MIMICS 17.0 software and then imported into 3-matic software for surgical simulation and anatomical parameter measurement. A mathematical algorithm of TPA based on the Pythagorean theorem was established, and all obtained data were analyzed by SPSS software. The CT dataset from 66 samples was reconstructed as a digital model of the lower lumbar vertebrae (L3-L5), and the AP length/estimated lateral length for L3 between the right and left sides was statistically significant (P = 0.015, P = 0.005). The AP length of the right for L4 was smaller than that of the left after a paired t test was executed (P = 0.006). Both the width of the pedicle and the length of the pedicle (P2C1) were consistent with TPA (L3 Collapse

Key Words Collapse

MESH Headings

• Humans
• Lumbar Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging
• Male
• Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods
• Female
• Middle Aged
• Adult
• Aged
• Algorithms
• Radiographic Image Enhancement/methods

Collapse

Grants

• Social Development Science and Technology Project of Shaanxi Province
• Education Department of Shaanxi Province
• Key Research and Development Projects of Shaanxi Province

Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Shixun Wu Department of Orthopedics Surgery, Shaanxi Provincial People’s Hospital, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China Key Laboratory of Bone Joint Disease Basic and Clinical Translation of Shaanxi Province, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China
Shizhang Liu Department of Orthopedics Surgery, Shaanxi Provincial People’s Hospital, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China Key Laboratory of Bone Joint Disease Basic and Clinical Translation of Shaanxi Province, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China
Ming Ling Department of Orthopedics Surgery, Shaanxi Provincial People’s Hospital, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China Key Laboratory of Bone Joint Disease Basic and Clinical Translation of Shaanxi Province, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China
Minggang Huang Department of Computed Tomography, Shaanxi Provincial People’s Hospital, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China
Zhe Liu Department of Computed Tomography, Shaanxi Provincial People’s Hospital, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China
Xianglong Duan Key Laboratory of Bone Joint Disease Basic and Clinical Translation of Shaanxi Province, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China Second Department of General Surgery, Shaanxi Provincial People’s Hospital, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China Institute of Medical Research, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an Shaanxi, China Second Department of General Surgery, Third Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China

Collapse

Effects of robot-assisted percutaneous kyphoplasty on osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

This study systemically reviewed the effects of robot-assisted percutaneous kyphoplasty (R-PKP) on the clinical outcomes and complications of patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF). The articles published from the establishment of the database to 19 April 2024 were searched in PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Chinese biomedical literature service system (SinoMed). Meta-analysis was employed to evaluate the status of pain relief and complications between the control and R-PKP groups. Standardized mean difference (SMD) or mean difference (MD), risk ratios (RR), and 95% confidence interval (CI) were selected for analysis, and a common or random effect model was adopted to merge the data. Eight studies involving 773 patients with OCVFs were included. R-PKP could effectively Cobb's angles (MD = -1.00, 95% CI -1.68 to -0.33, P = 0.0034), and decrease the occurrence of cement leakage (RR = 0.36, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.60, P < 0.0001). However, there was no significant effect on the results of visual analog scale (MD = -0.09, 95% CI -0.20 to 0.02, P = 0.1145), fluoroscopic frequency (SMD = 5.31, 95% CI -7.24 to 17.86, P = 0.4072), and operation time (MD = -0.72, 95% CI -7.47 to 6.03, P = 0.8342). R-PKP could significantly correct vertebral angle and reduce cement leakage. Thus, R-PKP maybe an effective choice for correction vertebral Angle and reducing postoperative complications, while its impact on relieving pain, decreasing fluoroscopic frequency, and shortening operation time need further exploration.

Advances and Challenges in Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery

Minimally invasive spine surgery continues to grow and develop. Over the past 50 years, there has been immense growth within this subspecialty of neurosurgery. A deep understanding of the historical context and future directions of this subspecialty is imperative to developing safe adoption and targeted innovation. This review aims to describe the advancements, and challenges that we face today in minimally invasive spine surgery.

Artificial intelligence: a new cutting-edge tool in spine surgery

The purpose of this narrative review was to comprehensively elaborate the various components of artificial intelligence (AI), their applications in spine surgery, practical concerns, and future directions. Over the years, spine surgery has been continuously transformed in various aspects, including diagnostic strategies, surgical approaches, procedures, and instrumentation, to provide better-quality patient care. Surgeons have also augmented their surgical expertise with rapidly growing technological advancements. AI is an advancing field that has the potential to revolutionize many aspects of spine surgery. We performed a comprehensive narrative review of the various aspects of AI and machine learning in spine surgery. To elaborate on the current role of AI in spine surgery, a review of the literature was performed using PubMed and Google Scholar databases for articles published in English in the last 20 years. The initial search using the keywords "artificial intelligence" AND "spine," "machine learning" AND "spine," and "deep learning" AND "spine" extracted a total of 78, 60, and 37 articles and 11,500, 4,610, and 2,270 articles on PubMed and Google Scholar. After the initial screening and exclusion of unrelated articles, duplicates, and non-English articles, 405 articles were identified. After the second stage of screening, 93 articles were included in the review. Studies have shown that AI can be used to analyze patient data and provide personalized treatment recommendations in spine care. It also provides valuable insights for planning surgeries and assisting with precise surgical maneuvers and decisionmaking during the procedures. As more data become available and with further advancements, AI is likely to improve patient outcomes.

Comparison of the Accuracy of Pedicle Screw Placement Using a Fluoroscopy-Assisted Free-Hand Technique with Robotic-Assisted Navigation Using an O-Arm or 3D C-Arm in Scoliosis Surgery

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective.

OBJECTIVES

To report and compare the application of robotic-assisted navigation with an O-arm or three-dimensional (3D) C-arm-assisted pedicle screw insertion in scoliosis surgery, and compare with free-hand technique.

METHODS

One hundred and forty-four scoliosis patients were included in this study. Ninety-two patients underwent robotic-assisted pedicle screw insertion (Group A), and 52 patients underwent freehand fluoroscopy-guided pedicle screw insertion (Group B). Group A was further divided into Subgroup AI (n = 48; robotic-assisted navigation with an O-arm) and Subgroup AII (n = 44; robotic-assisted navigation with a 3D C-arm). The evaluated clinical outcomes were operation time, blood loss, radiation exposure, postoperative hospital stay, and postoperative complications. The clinical outcomes, coronal and sagittal scoliosis parameters and the accuracy of the pedicle screw placement were assessed.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in blood loss and postoperative hospital stay between Groups A and B (P = .406, P = .138, respectively). Radiation exposure for patients in Group A (Subgroups AI or AII) was higher than that in Group B (P < .005), and Subgroup AI had higher patient radiation exposure compared with Subgroup AII (P < .005). The operation time in Subgroup AII was significantly longer than that in Subgroup AI and Group B (P = .016, P = .032, respectively). The proportion of clinically acceptable screws was higher in Group A (Subgroups AI or AII) compared with Group B (P < .005).

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic-assisted navigation with an O-arm or 3D C-arm effectively increased the accuracy and safety in scoliosis surgery. Compared with robotic-assisted navigation with a 3D C-arm, robotic-assisted navigation with an O-arm was more efficient intraoperatively.

Effectiveness and safety of robot-assisted versus fluoroscopy-assisted pedicle screw implantation in scoliosis surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of robot-assisted versus fluoroscopy-assisted pedicle screw implantation in scoliosis surgery. The study was registered in the PROSPERO (CRD42023471837). Two independent researchers searched PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure. The outcomes included operation time, pedicle screw implantation time, blood loss, number of fluoroscopic, accuracy of pedicle screw position, hospital stays, postoperative hospital stays, Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, Scoliosis Research Society-22(SRS-22), cobb angle, cobb angle correction rate, sagittal vertical axis (SVA), and complications. Eight papers involving 473 patients met all the criteria. There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding the reduction in operation time. The effect of reducing the pedicle screw implantation time in the RA group was significant (WMD = -1.28; 95% CI: -1.76 to -0.80; P < 0.00001). The effect of reducing the blood loss in the RA group was significant (WMD=-105.57; 95% CI: -206.84 to -4.31; P = 0.04). The effect of reducing the number of fluoroscopic in the RA group was significant (WMD=-5.93; 95% CI: -8.24 to -3.62; P < ). The pedicle screw position of Grade A was significantly more in the RA group according to both the Gertzbein-Robbins scale and the Rampersaud scale. Compared with the FA group, the difference in the hospital stays in the RA group was not statistically significant, but the effect of reducing the postoperative hospital stays in the RA group was significant (WMD = -2.88; 95% CI: -4.13 to -1.63; P < 0.00001). The difference in the VAS, JOA, SRS-22, Cobb angle and Cobb angle correction rate, SVA, and complications between the two groups was not statistically significant. The robot-assisted technique achieved statistically significant results in terms of pedicle screw placement time, blood loss, number of fluoroscopies, accuracy of pedicle screw position, and postoperative hospital stay.

20-year Inflation-Adjusted Medicare Reimbursements (Years: 2000-2020) For Common Lumbar and Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease Procedures

OBJECTIVE

Reimbursement trends for common procedures have persistently declined over the past 2 decades. Spinal instrumentational and fusion procedures are increasingly utilized and have increased in clinical complexity, yet longitudinal inflation-adjusted data for Medicare reimbursements of these procedures have not been evaluated.

METHODS

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Physician Fee Schedule Look-Up Tool was used to extract Medicare reimbursements for the 5 most common spinal procedures and associated instrumentations from 2000-2020. Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes include 22551, 22600, 22633, 63030, and 63047 as well as instrumentation CPT codes 22840 and 22842-6. The nominal values were adjusted for inflation according to the latest consumer price index (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics; reported as 2020 USD) and used to calculate average annual percent changes and compound annual growth rates (CAGRs) in reimbursements.

RESULTS

After inflation adjustment, the physician fee reimbursement decreased by 11.05% ± 8.46% (mean ± s.d., from $2,009.89 in 2011 to $1,787.85 in 2020) for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), 28.38% ± 8.42% (from $1,889.38 in 2000 to $1,353.14 in 2020) for posterior cervical fusion, 7.85% ± 8.20% (from $2,111.20 in 2012 to $1,945.49 in 2020) for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), 28.17% ± 13.88% (from $1,421.78 in 2000 to $1,021.22 in 2020) for lower back disc surgery, and 31.88% ± 8.22% (from $1,700.38 in 2000 to $1,158.25 in 2020) for lumbar laminectomy. Instrumentation reimbursements showed an average decrease of 33.43% ± 8.4% over this period. Average CAGR was -1.7% ± .41% for procedures and -2.02% ± .14% for instrumentation.

CONCLUSION

Our analysis reveals a persistent decline in reimbursement rates of the most common spine procedures and instrumentation since the year 2000. If unaddressed, this trend can serve as a substantial disincentive for physicians to perform these procedures and can significantly limit access to spinal care at the population level.

Emerging Technologies within Spine Surgery

New innovations within spine surgery continue to propel the field forward. These technologies improve surgeons' understanding of their patients and allow them to optimize treatment planning both in the operating room and clinic. Additionally, changes in the implants and surgeon practice habits continue to evolve secondary to emerging biomaterials and device design. With ongoing advancements, patients can expect enhanced preoperative decision-making, improved patient outcomes, and better intraoperative execution. Additionally, these changes may decrease many of the most common complications following spine surgery in order to reduce morbidity, mortality, and the need for reoperation. This article reviews some of these technological advancements and how they are projected to impact the field. As the field continues to advance, it is vital that practitioners remain knowledgeable of these changes in order to provide the most effective treatment possible.

Safety and accuracy of cannulated pedicle screw placement in scoliosis surgery: a comparison of robotic-navigation, O-arm-based navigation, and freehand techniques

PURPOSE

To compare the safety and accuracy of cannulated pedicle screw placement using a robotic-navigation technique, O-arm-based navigation technique, or freehand technique.

METHODS

This study analyzed 106 consecutive patients who underwent scoliosis surgery. Thirty-two patients underwent robotic-navigation-assisted pedicle screw insertion (Group 1), 34 patients underwent O-arm-based navigation-guided pedicle screw insertion (Group 2), and 40 patients underwent freehand pedicle screw insertion (Group 3). The primary outcome measure was the accuracy of screw placement. Secondary outcome parameters included operation time, blood loss, radiation exposure, and postoperative stay.

RESULTS

A total of 2035 cannulated pedicle screws were implanted in 106 patients. The accuracy rate of the first pedicle screw placement during operation was significantly greater in Group 1 (94.7%) than in Group 2 (89.2%; P < 0.001). The accuracy rate of pedicle screw placement postoperatively decreased in the order of Group 1 (96.7%) > Group 2 (93.0%) > Group 3 (80.4%; P < 0.01). There were no significant differences in blood loss or postoperative stay among the three groups (P > 0.05). The operation times of Group 1 and Group 2 were significantly longer than that of Group 3 (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The robotic-navigation and O-arm-based navigation techniques effectively increased the accuracy and safety of pedicle screw insertion alternative to the freehand technique in scoliosis surgery. Compared with the O-arm-based navigation technique, the robotic-navigation technique increases the mean operation time, but also increases the accuracy of pedicle screw placement. A three-dimensional scan after insertion of the K-wire may increase the accuracy of pedicle screw placement in the O-arm-based navigation technique.

Effects of robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery on osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression of retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a systematic review on the effect of robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery (R-MIS) on the clinical outcomes and complications of patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs).

METHODS

The researchers searched the papers published on PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, Ovid MEDLINE, Wiley Online Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chinese biomedical literature service system (SinoMed), and China Medical Association Data. The standardized mean difference (SMD) or mean difference (MD), relative risk (RR), and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. Besides, the data was merged through the random-effect model or common-effect model. A meta-regression mixed-effects single-factor model was utilized to analyze the sources of heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Twelve studies were included, involving 1042 OVCFs cases. The prognosis of patients treated with R-MIS was significantly improved, such as Oswestry disability index (ODI) score (MD = -0.65, P = 0.0171), Cobb's angles (MD = -1.03, P = 0.0027), X-ray fluoroscopy frequency (SMD = -2.41, P < 0.0001), Length of hospital stay (MD = -0.33, P = 0.0002), and Cement leakage (RR = 0.37, P < 0.0001). However, no obvious improvement was found in the results of Visual analog scale (VAS) score (MD = -0.16, P = 0.1555), Volume of bone cement (MD = 0.22, P = 0.8339), and Operation time (MD = -3.20, P = 0.3411) after being treated by R-MIS. The meta-regression analysis demonstrated that R-MIS presented no significant impact on the covariates of VAS and Operation time.

CONCLUSION

R-MIS can significantly reduce the patients' ODI, Cobb's angles, X-ray fluoroscopy frequency, and Cement leakage ratio, and shorten the Length of hospital stay. Therefore, R-MIS may be an effective method to promote the patients' functional recovery, correct spinal deformity, reduce the X-ray fluoroscopy frequency, shorten the Length of hospital stay, and reduce the complications of OVCFs bone Cement leakage.

Accuracies of various types of spinal robot in robot-assisted pedicle screw insertion: a Bayesian network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

With the popularization of robot-assisted spinal surgeries, it is still uncertain whether robots with different designs could lead to different results in the accuracy of pedicle screw placement. This study aimed to compare the pedicle screw inserting accuracies among the spinal surgeries assisted by various types of robot and estimate the rank probability of each robot-assisted operative technique involved.

METHODS

The electronic literature database of PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, CNKI, WANFANG and the Cochrane Library was searched in November 2021. The primary outcome was the Gertzbein-Robbins classification of pedicle screws inserted with various operative techniques. After the data extraction and direct meta-analysis process, a network model was established in the Bayesian framework and further analyses were carried out.

RESULTS

Among all the 15 eligible RCTs, 4 types of robot device, namely Orthbot, Renaissance, SpineAssist and TiRobot, were included in this study. In the network meta-analysis, the Orthbot group (RR 0.27, 95% CI 0.13-0.58), the Renaissance group (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.14-0.86), the SpineAssist group (RR 0.14, 95% CI 0.06-0.34) and the conventional surgery group (RR 0.21, 95% CI 0.13-0.31) were inferior to the TiRobot group in the proportion of grade A pedicle screws. Moreover, the results of rank probabilities revealed that in terms of accuracy, the highest-ranked robot was TiRobot, followed by Renaissance and Orthbot.

CONCLUSIONS

In general, current RCT evidence indicates that TiRobot has an advantage in the accuracy of the pedicle screw placement, while there is no significant difference among the Orthbot-assisted technique, the Renaissance-assisted technique, the conventional freehand technique, and the SpineAssist-assisted technique in accuracy.

Single-Position Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation under O-Arm Navigation: A Retrospective Comparative Study

The insertion of pedicle screws in the lateral position without a position change has been reported. We completed a retrospective comparison of the radiologic and clinical outcomes of 36 patients who underwent either single-position oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion (SP-OLIF) using the O-arm (36 cases) or conventional OLIF (C-OLIF) using the C-arm (20 cases) for L2-5 single-level lumbar degenerative diseases. Radiological parameters were analyzed, including screw accuracy (Gertzbein-Robbins classification system; GRS), segmental instability, and fusion status. Screw misplacement was defined as a discrepancy of ≥2 mm. Clinical outcomes, including visual analog scale, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), and postoperative complications, were assessed. The spinal fusion rate was not different between the SP-OLIF and C-OLIF groups one year after surgery (p = 0.536). The ODI score was lower (p = 0.015) in the SP-OLIF than the C-OLIF group. Physical (p = 0.000) and mental component summaries (p = 0.000) of the SF-36 were significantly higher in the SP-OLIF group. Overall complication rates, including revision, surgical site infection, ipsilateral weakness, and radicular pain/numbness, were not significantly different. SP-OLIF using the O-arm procedure is feasible, with acceptable accuracy, fusion rate, and complication rate. This may be an alternative to conventional two-stage operations.

Posterior Surgery in the Treatment of Craniovertebral Junction Deformity with Torticollis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the clinical effect of posterior surgery in the treatment of craniovertebral junction (CVJ) deformities with torticollis and methods for preventing and treating complications in order to obtain a reasonable treatment strategy.

METHODS

From January 2007 to December 2017, 78 patients who suffered from CVJ deformities with torticollis treated by posterior surgery were analyzed. The surgical techniques were all posterior correction and fusion to restore the anatomical alignment of the craniovertebral junction. The visual analog score (VAS) and Short Form-36 (SF-36) health survey questionnaire were utilized to evaluate preoperative and postoperative neck pain, and changes in the torticollis angle and atlas-dens interval (ADI) were evaluated through anteroposterior X-ray and computed tomography. Intra- and postoperative complications were all recorded. One-way ANOVA, LSD-t test, and χ² test were performed to evaluate the difference between the preoperative and postoperative data.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up time was 37.4 ± 15.7 months, the average operation time was 115.6 ± 12.8 min, and the average blood loss was 170.8 ± 26.3 mL. According to the deformity site, the range of posterior correction and fusion was as follows: 38 cases of C₁ -C₂ , 33 cases of C₀ -C₂ , and seven cases of C₀ -C₃ . The preoperative SF-36, VAS, torticollis angle, and ADI were 42.6 ± 8.8, 4.8 ± 1.1, 37.2 ± 11.2°, and 4.9 ± 2.3 mm, respectively. The difference was significant at 3 months post operation (p < 0.05), and there was no significant difference at the final follow-up compared with 3 months post operation (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

It can objectively achieve favorable correction and satisfactory clinical effects under posterior correction and fixation for CVJ deformities with torticollis. Intra- and postoperative complications can be settled by proper management.