Digital Technology Combined with 3D Printing to Evaluate the Matching Performance of AO Clavicular Hook Plates

Optimizing hook implantation angle of the clavicular hook plate: a cadaveric study

PURPOSE

While Clavicle hook plates have demonstrated favorable results regarding bone and shoulder function, their design can potentially lead to complications due to pressure concentration at the plate's tip. This study aims to investigate the impact of different hook implantation angles on the contact surface area between the hook plate and acromion, with the goal of minimizing mismatch and maximizing contact surface area.

METHODS

Twenty soft shoulder cadavers were included in the study, and the contact surface area of the hook plate was measured in different positions based on the hook implantation angle.

RESULTS

The results showed variations in compatibility, width, and length of the contact surface area depending on the hook implantation angle and the medial or lateral row placement. The lateral row generally demonstrated superior compatibility (84.0% vs 46.67%, p-value < 0.001), with a broader contact area (3.55 ± 0.08 mm vs 3.09 ± 0.10 mm, p-value = 0.004) and a longer contact area (7.36 ± 0.19 mm vs 5.10 ± 0.23 mm, p-value < 0.001) at specific angles. A detailed analysis of the lateral position revealed that the zero angle of implantation resulted in the greatest contact surface area, measuring 3.91 ± 0.70 mm in width (p value = 0.083) and 8.85 ± 1.24 mm in length (p value < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Placing the hook laterally and at the zero position according to the hook implantation angle can maximize contact surface area, may reduce stress concentration, and minimize complications in hook plate fixation. Further research and consideration of anatomical variations are warranted to refine the placement technique and enhance patient outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level V evidence.

Clinical application of digital technology in the use of anterolateral thigh lobulated perforator flaps to repair complex soft tissue defects of the limbs

Background

It is challenging to repair wide or irregular defects with traditional skin flaps, and anterolateral thigh (ALT) lobulated perforator flaps are an ideal choice for such defects. However, there are many variations in perforators, so good preoperative planning is very important. This study attempted to explore the feasibility and clinical effect of digital technology in the use of ALT lobulated perforator flaps for repairing complex soft tissue defects in limbs.

Methods

Computed tomography angiography (CTA) was performed on 28 patients with complex soft tissue defects of the limbs, and the CTA data were imported into Mimics 20.0 software in DICOM format. According to the perforation condition of the lateral circumflex femoral artery and the size of the limb defect, one thigh that had two or more perforators from the same source vessel was selected for 3D reconstruction of the ALT lobulated perforator flap model. Mimics 20.0 software was used to visualize the vascular anatomy, virtual design and harvest of the flap before surgery. The intraoperative design and excision of the ALT lobulated perforator flap were guided by the preoperative digital design, and the actual anatomical observations and measurements were recorded.

Results

Digital reconstruction was successfully performed in all patients before surgery; this reconstruction dynamically displayed the anatomical structure of the flap vasculature and accurately guided the design and harvest of the flap during surgery. The parameters of the harvested flaps were consistent with the preoperative parameters. Postoperative complications occurred in 7 patients, but all flaps survived uneventfully. All of the donor sites were closed directly. All patients were followed up for 13-27 months (mean, 19.75 months). The color and texture of each flap were satisfactory and each donor site exhibited a linear scar.

Conclusions

Digital technology can effectively and precisely assist in the design and harvest of ALT lobulated perforator flaps, provide an effective approach for individualized evaluation and flap design and reduce the risk and difficulty of surgery.

Three-dimensional morphometric analysis of the lateral clavicle and acromion: Implications for surgical treatment using subacromial support

Objectives:

Dislocations and periarticular fractures of the acromioclavicular joint are common injuries of the shoulder girdle. When surgical intervention is indicated, subacromial support is one option to restore the alignment between scapula and the distal/lateral clavicle. Devices used for subacromial support rely on a form of subacromial ‘hook’. The shape, inclination and orientation of which is often mismatched to the anatomy of the inferior surface of the acromion, which may lead to painful acromial osteolysis and rotator cuff abrasion causing impingement. The primary goal of this study was to characterize the geometrical parameters of the acromion and distal clavicle, and their orientation at the acromioclavicular joint.

Methods:

Computed tomography scans of 120 shoulders were converted into digital three-dimensional models. Measurements of the acromion inclination and acromion width relative to the torsional angle as well as the clavicle depth were taken. A numerical optimization of the anatomical parameters (including torsional and inclination angles, height and width) was performed to find the combination of those parameters with the lowest interpatient variability.

Results:

The mean clavicle depth was found to be 11.1 mm. The mean acromion width was 27 mm. The combination of torsional and inclination angles with lowest interpatient variability was found at 80° and 16°, respectively.

Conclusion:

There is a high interpatient variability in the morphology of the inferior surface of the acromion. Subacromial support using a ‘hook’ can be optimized for contact surface area, which should lead to fewer complications after the restoration of acromioclavicular orientation using acromial support strategies.

Comparison of open reduction and fixation with hook plate and modified closed reduction and fixation with tightrope loop plate for treatment of rockwood type III acromioclavicular joint dislocation

Objective

To compare the outcomes of open reduction and hook plate fixation (ORHPF) and modified TightRope loop plate fixation (MTRLPF) in the treatment of Rockwood type III acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

Methods

This was a retrospective study. Data on 71 patients with Rockwood type III acromioclavicular joint dislocation who underwent either ORHPF (n = 39) or MTRLPF (n = 32) between January 2016 and October 2019 were extracted and analyzed. Baseline data at injury were compared to evaluate the balance. The disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) score, Constant-Murley score and visual analog scores (VAS) score at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after operation were compared; further, at 12 months coracoclavicular distance and related complications were evaluated and compared.

Results

Both groups did not differ for any baseline data. At 1 and 3 months after operation, MTRLPF group exhibited a significantly better performance than the ORHPF group in VAS (1 month: 2.4 ± 1.8 vs 3.0 ± 1.7; 3 months: 1.2 ± 1.4 vs 1.8 ± 1.6), Constant-Murley (1 month: 75.2 ± 11.2 vs 63.8 ± 13.7; 3 months: 81.4 ± 9.8 vs 75.8 ± 10.6), DASH (1 month: 33.6 ± 6.8 vs 40.6 ± 6.1; 3 months: 21.2 ± 7.4 vs 25.6 ± 6.6). At 6 months, only Constant-Murley remained marginally significant (p = 0.048). At 12 months, no statistical difference was observed for any outcome variable (all P > 0.05 for VAS, Constant-Murley and DASH), coracoclavicular distance (12.7 ± 1.6 mm vs 12.2 ± 1.6 mm; P = 0.374), or overall complication rate (P = 0.763).

Conclusions

For Rockwood type III acromioclavicular joint dislocation, both methods can achieve satisfactory 1-year results, but modified minimally invasive TightRope treatment is more advantageous in early functional recovery at 1 and 3-month follow-ups.

Clinical and radiological outcome of acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint dislocation: A retrospective cohort study on Hook plate versus arthroscopic assisted single coracoclavicular tunnel with DogBone™ button dual FiberTape® construct

Purpose

Hook plate (HP) is a popular implant of choice in the management of highgrade acute acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocations. Recently, suspensory loop systems have drawn significant interest with comparable results and additionally does not warrant implant removal. However, no studies have compared the outcomes of HP vis-a-vis Dog Bone TM Button with dual FiberTape® (DB).

Methods

38 patients who underwent HP or Arthroscopic assisted single tunnel DB fixation to stabilize high-grade ACJ dislocations were retrospectively included in study for clinically and radiological evaluation at a minimum follow up of one year. American Shoulder and Elbow Society and Constant Murley scores were used for clinical assessment. The radiological evaluation was done by assessing quality of reduction, measuring coracoclavicular distance (CCD), and extent of subacromial erosion.

Results

For final follow up evaluation, both HP and DB group had 16 patients each. The mean follow-up was 55.38 ± 10.9 and 32.88 ± 14.0 months in HP and DB group, respectively. No significant difference in mean ASES (p=0.71) and CM score (p=0.62) was found between the two groups. The DB group revealed higher CCD at the final follow-up compared to the HP group (p=0.01). Although statistically insignificant, there were more subluxations and dislocations in the DB group (37.5%) compared to the HP group (25%). The subacromial erosion was noted in all cases of the HP group at time of implant removal.

Conclusion

Both groups revealed satisfactory functional and radiological outcome. However, the DB group showed a higher tendency of loss of reduction.

Different internal fixation methods for unstable distal clavicle fractures in adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Surgical treatment is advised for unstable distal clavicle fractures (UDCFs). Various kinds of internal fixation methods have been used, but the best fixation is still controversial.

METHODS

We systematically searched all studies comparing postoperative outcomes of coracoclavicular (CC) reconstruction (TightRope, EndoButton, Mersilene tape, suture anchor or suture), fracture osteosynthesis (clavicular hook plate (HP), locking compression plate (LCP), Kirschner wire and tension band (KWTB), Kirschner wire (KW)), and a combination of the two methods (LCP + CC or KWTB + CC) for UDCF in PubMed, Web of Science Core Collection via Ovid, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and China Biology Medicine (CBM) databases up to September 16, 2021, with no language restrictions. A network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted to integrate direct and indirect evidence and assess the relative effects of the internal fixation methods. The probability of being the best treatment was assessed by the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA).

RESULTS

A total of 41 studies were included, involving 1969 patients and seven internal fixation methods. The NMA showed that LCP + CC fixation was associated with better efficacy (odds ratio (OR) 0.60, 95% CI 0.19-1.02, probability rank = 0.93) and fewer complications (odds ratio (OR) 0.22, 95% CI 0.09-0.51, probability rank = 0.69) than any other internal fixation method for UDCFs. The SUCRA probabilities of LCP + CC fixation were 98.6% for the Constant-Murley score and 93.9% for total complications.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study indicate that LCP + CC appears to be the best internal fixation method for UDCF. Limited to the quality and quantity of the included studies, much larger and higher-quality RCTs are required to confirm these conclusions.