Current Surgical Antibiotic Prophylaxis Practices: A Survey of Orthopaedic Surgeons in India

Surgical Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Orthopedic Implant Surgeries: An Analysis of Practices, Outcomes, and Costs

Purpose

To characterize various regimens used for surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) in patients undergoing orthopedic implant surgeries (OISs).

Method

A prospective observational study was conducted in patients undergoing OISs to identify various antimicrobial regimens used for SAP. Patients were followed up for a month to detect signs of surgical site infections (SSIs). Risk factors that increase the likelihood of SSIs were determined. Adherence to standard guidelines for SAP was evaluated. Cost analysis and adverse drug reaction (ADR) profiling of each of the regimens used were also done.

Results

Among the 264 patients included, 11 regimens for SAP were followed. Ceftriaxone + amikacin given for 1-5 days was the most common regimen employed (37.87%). One-day regimens (< 24 h) were more commonly prescribed (34.84%) than all other durations (2-5 days). SSIs were observed in 2.37% of the included patients. Gender, presence of cardiovascular comorbidities, low preoperative Hb, and the choice of antimicrobial regimen selected for SAP were associated with SSIs. The adherence rate to standard guidelines for SAP was 35.5%. In our study, ceftriaxone given for < 24 h was the most cost-effective regimen, with the lowest cost per patient (0.28 USD) and no infections. Procurement of ceftriaxone and amikacin contributed to > 70% of the total cost of SAP. Vomiting, epigastric pain, and thrombophlebitis were the common ADRs observed.

Conclusion

SAP practices for patients undergoing OISs are highly variable, with low adherence to standard guidelines. Development of evidence-based national and institution-specific guidelines, along with regular antibiotic stewardship activities, could help curb the heterogeneity in SAP practices.

Perioperative Infection Prophylaxis With Vancomycin is a Significant Risk Factor for Deep Surgical Site Infection in Spine Surgery

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of cefazolin versus vancomycin for perioperative infection prophylaxis.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The relative efficacy of cefazolin alternatives for perioperative infection prophylaxis is poorly understood.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was a single-center multisurgeon retrospective review of all patients undergoing primary spine surgery from an institutional registry. Postoperative infection was defined by the combination of three criteria: irrigation and debridement within 3 months of the index procedure, clinical suspicion for infection, and positive intraoperative cultures. Microbiology records for all infections were reviewed to assess the infectious organism and organism susceptibilities. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 10,122 patients met inclusion criteria. The overall incidence of infection was 0.78%, with an incidence of 0.73% in patients who received cefazolin and 2.03% in patients who received vancomycin (OR: 2.83, 95% CI: 1.35-5.91, P= 0.004). Use of IV vancomycin (OR: 2.83, 95% CI: 1.35-5.91, P =0.006), BMI (MD: 1.56, 95% CI: 0.32-2.79, P =0.014), presence of a fusion (OR: 1.62, 95% CI: 1.04-2.52, P =0.033), and operative time (MD: 42.04, 95% CI: 16.88-67.21, P =0.001) were significant risk factors in the univariate analysis. In the multivariate analysis, only noncefazolin antibiotics (OR: 2.48, 95% CI: 1.18-5.22, P =0.017) and BMI (MD: 1.56, 95% CI: 0.32-2.79, P =0.026) remained significant independent risk factors. Neither IV antibiotic regimen nor topical vancomycin significantly impacted Gram type, organism type, or antibiotic resistance ( P >0.05). The most common reason for antibiosis with vancomycin was a penicillin allergy (75.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Prophylactic antibiosis with IV vancomycin leads to a 2.5 times higher risk of infection compared with IV cefazolin in primary spine surgery. We recommend the routine use of IV cefazolin for infection prophylaxis, and caution against the elective use of alternative regimens like IV vancomycin unless clinically warranted.

Ten-year trends of antibiotic prescribing in surgery departments of two private sector hospitals in Central India: a prospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Inappropriate antibiotic use contributes to the global rise of antibiotic resistance, prominently in low- and middle-income countries, including India. Despite the considerable risk of surgical site infections, there is a lack of antibiotic prescribing guidelines and long-term studies about antibiotic prescribing in surgery departments in India. Therefore, this study aimed to analyse 10 years' antibiotic prescribing trends at surgery departments in two tertiary-care hospitals in Central India.

METHODS

Data was prospectively collected from 2008 to 2017 for surgery inpatients in the teaching (TH-15,016) and the non-teaching hospital (NTH-14,499). Antibiotics were classified based on the World Health Organization (WHO) Access Watch Reserve system and analysed against the diagnoses and adherence to the National List of Essential Medicines India (NLEMI) and the WHO Model List of Essential Medicines (WHOMLEM). Total antibiotic use was calculated by DDD/1000 patient days. Time trends of antibiotic prescribing were analysed by polynomial and linear regressions.

RESULTS

The most common indications for surgery were inguinal hernia (TH-12%) and calculus of the kidney and ureter (NTH-13%). The most prescribed antibiotics were fluoroquinolones (TH-20%) and 3rd generation cephalosporins (NTH-41%), and as antibiotic prophylaxis, norfloxacin (TH-19%) and ceftriaxone (NTH-24%). Access antibiotics were mostly prescribed (57%) in the TH and Watch antibiotics (66%) in the NTH. Culture and susceptibility tests were seldom done (TH-2%; NTH-1%). Adherence to the NLEMI (TH-80%; NTH-69%) was higher than adherence to the WHOMLEM (TH-77%; NTH-66%). Mean DDD/1000 patient days was two times higher in the NTH than in the TH (185 vs 90). Overall antibiotic prescribing significantly increased in the TH (β1 =13.7) until 2012, and in the NTH (β2 =0.96) until 2014, and after that decreased (TH, β2= -0.01; NTH, β3= -0.0005). The proportion of Watch antibiotic use significantly increased in both hospitals (TH, β=0.16; NTH, β=0.96).

CONCLUSION

Total antibiotic use decreased in the last three (NTH) and five years (TH), whereas consumption of Watch antibiotics increased over 10 years in both hospitals. The choice of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis was often inappropriate and antibiotic prescribing was mostly empirical. The results of this study confirmed the need for antibiotic prescribing guidelines and implementation of antimicrobial stewardship programs.

Intraoperative Surgical Wound Contamination May Not Lead to Surgical-Site Infection in Patients Undergoing Clean Orthopaedic Procedures: A Prospective Clinical Study

Objectives  Surgical-site infections (SSIs) can complicate virtually any surgical procedure. While SSI can result from numerous causes, contamination of the surgical field can also contribute to it. Intraoperative bacterial contamination during clean orthopaedic procedures can be detected using perioperative cultures. We hypothesized that perioperative cultures could be used to predict possibility of development of SSI in patients undergoing clean orthopaedic surgeries.

Materials and Methods  We conducted a prospective cohort study at a tertiary care hospital over a 2-year period. Intraoperative surgical wound lavage fluid and closed suction drain tip obtained in the postoperative period were sent for aerobic culture. All patients were followed up to look for the development of SSI for a period of at least 30 days for those undergoing nonimplant surgery, and 90 days for those with implant surgery.

Statistical Analysis  Means with standard deviation of the continuous data were calculated. Fisher's exact test and chi-square test were used for the analysis of the categorical variables. Relative risk and odds ratio were calculated to evaluate the association of the parameters under study with SSI.

Results  A total of 384 patients satisfying the inclusion and exclusion criteria were included. Perioperative cultures detected surgical wound contamination in 39 patients (10.1%). Forty-five patients (11.7%) developed SSI during the follow-up period. Skin commensals constituted 59% of perioperative contaminants and accounted for 20% of the SSIs. The relative risk of developing SSI with perioperative contamination was 0.41 (95% confidence interval: 0.09–1.63).

Conclusion  Intraoperative surgical-site contaminants could be detected using perioperative cultures. However, these contaminants did not lead to SSI. Timely treatment of perioperative contamination with appropriate antibiotics and local wound care probably helped in the reduction of SSI.

Current pathogens infecting open fracture tibia and their antibiotic susceptibility at a tertiary care teaching hospital in South East Asia

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion