1
|
De Groot JD, Brokelman RBG, Lammers PG, Van Stralen GMJ, Kooijman CM, Hokwerda ST. Performance of medial pivot, posterior stabilized and rotating platform total knee arthroplasty based on anteroposterior stability and patient-reported outcome measures; a multicentre double-blinded randomized controlled trial of 210 knees. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2024; 144:2327-2335. [PMID: 38653837 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-024-05340-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 04/14/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite advancements in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), 10-20% of patients remain dissatisfied after surgery. Improved anteroposterior (AP) stability provided by medial pivot (MP) implants may theoretically lead to higher patient satisfaction. METHODS AP stability and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) at one-year postsurgery were compared between patients who underwent TKA with MP- (n = 121), posterior stabilized (PS; n = 53) and rotating platform (RP; n = 57) implants in a double-blind multicentre randomized controlled trial (Dutch Trial Register: NL6856, 21-02-2018). AP stability was assessed at 30°, 60° and 90° of knee flexion using a KT-2000 arthrometer. PROMs were measured preoperative and one-year postsurgery. RESULTS MP-TKA provided significant better AP stability at early flexion (30°) compared to PS- and RP-TKA (median [IQR]; 1.79 [1.14-2.77] mm vs. 3.31 [2.51-4.08] mm vs. 2.82 [1.80-4.03] mm, p < 0.001). Additionally, MP-TKA provided significant better AP stability at mid-flexion (60°) compared to PS-TKA (1.75 [1.23-2.36] mm vs. 2.14 [1.49-2.83] mm, p = 0.014). PROM improvements were comparable between implant designs. AP laxity of ≥ 4 mm at early flexion was independently of implant design associated with significantly worse Kujala scores. The incidence of ≥ 4 mm AP laxity at any knee angle was however not significantly different between implant designs. CONCLUSION MP-, PS- and RP-TKA all provide excellent and comparable results. Although MP-TKA provided better AP stability at early flexion compared to PS- and RP-TKA, this was found to be unrelated to improved PROMs in favour of MP-TKA. More studies focusing on early and mid-flexion performance based differences between MP and other TKA designs are required to confirm our findings. Other non-implant related factors may play a more important role in the performance of TKA and are potentially worthwhile examining.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J D De Groot
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, OCON, Geerdinksweg 141, Hengelo, 7555 DL, The Netherlands.
| | - R B G Brokelman
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, OCON, Geerdinksweg 141, Hengelo, 7555 DL, The Netherlands
| | - P G Lammers
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Jansdal, Wethouder Jansenlaan 90, Harderwijk, 3844 DG, The Netherlands
| | - G M J Van Stralen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nij Smellinghe, Compagnonsplein 1, Drachten, 9202 NN, The Netherlands
| | - C M Kooijman
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nij Smellinghe, Compagnonsplein 1, Drachten, 9202 NN, The Netherlands
| | - S T Hokwerda
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Antonius, Bolwarderbaan 1, Sneek, 8601 ZK, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cacciola G, Giustra F, Bosco F, Sabatini L, Risitano S, De Meo F, Braconi L, Cavaliere P, Massè A, Solarino G. Long-Term Follow-Up of Medial Pivot Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review of the Current Evidence. PROSTHESIS 2023; 5:622-634. [DOI: 10.3390/prosthesis5030044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/23/2025]
Abstract
Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a popular treatment for end-stage knee osteoarthritis. Advances in understanding knee biomechanics have led to the development of medial pivot (MP) prostheses, which aim to replicate natural knee kinematics. While short- and mid-term studies have shown favorable outcomes for MP-TKA, long-term follow-up studies are limited. This systematic review aims to analyze the available evidence on long-term outcomes of MP-TKA, including survivorship, complications, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for English language studies reporting long-term outcomes of primary MP-TKA. Nine studies with an average follow-up of 12.4 years were included. Data on survivorship, complications, and PROMs were collected and analyzed. The overall survivorship of MP-TKA was 98.2% at an average follow-up of 12.4 years. Aseptic loosening and periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) were the most common reasons for revision, with a revision rate of 0.4% for each. The overall complication rate was 6.6%, with secondary anterior knee pain and PJI being the most frequent complications. The reoperation rate was 3.1%, primarily due to PJI and knee instability. PROMs significantly improved postoperatively. MP-TKA demonstrates favorable long-term outcomes with high survivorship, low complication rates, and enhanced PROMs. The procedure provides reliable management for end-stage osteoarthritis, offering patients improved knee function and pain relief. Further research with standardized reporting and larger sample sizes is needed to validate and compare these findings to other implant designs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giorgio Cacciola
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University of Turin, CTO, 10124 Turin, Italy
| | - Fortunato Giustra
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University of Turin, CTO, 10124 Turin, Italy
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Ospedale San Giovanni Bosco di Torino-ASL Città di Torino, 10154 Turin, Italy
| | - Francesco Bosco
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University of Turin, CTO, 10124 Turin, Italy
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Ospedale San Giovanni Bosco di Torino-ASL Città di Torino, 10154 Turin, Italy
| | - Luigi Sabatini
- Ortopedia Protesica e Robotica–Humanitas Gradenigo, 10153 Turin, Italy
| | - Salvatore Risitano
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University of Turin, CTO, 10124 Turin, Italy
| | - Federico De Meo
- Orthopaedic Institute of Southern Italy “Franco Scalabrino”, 98100 Messina, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Braconi
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University of Turin, CTO, 10124 Turin, Italy
| | - Pietro Cavaliere
- Orthopaedic Institute of Southern Italy “Franco Scalabrino”, 98100 Messina, Italy
| | - Alessandro Massè
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University of Turin, CTO, 10124 Turin, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Solarino
- Orthopaedic & Trauma Unit, Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Neuroscience and Sense Organs, School of Medicine, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”-AOU Policlinico Consorziale, 70121 Bari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|