A randomized, controlled comparison of electrical versus pharmacological cardioversion for emergency department patients with acute atrial flutter

Hypotension and respiratory events related to electrical cardioversion for atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter in the emergency department

INTRODUCTION

Electrical cardioversion for atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter (AF/AFL) is common in the ED. Our previous work showed that hypotension and respiratory events were important adverse events that occurred in patients undergoing electrical cardioversion for AF/AFL. The purpose of this study was to examine if (1) beta-blockers or calcium channel blocker use prior to ECV were associated with hypotension and (2) medications used for procedural sedation were associated with respiratory events.

METHODS

This was a secondary analysis of pooled study data from four previous multicentred studies on AF/AFL. We conducted a multivariable logistic regression to examine predictors of hypotension and respiratory adverse events.

RESULTS

There were 1736 patients who received ECV. A hypotensive event occurred in 62 (3.6%) patients. There was no significant difference in the odds of a hypotensive event in patients who received a beta-blocker or calcium channel blocker in the ED compared to no rate control. Procedural sedation with fentanyl (OR 2.01 95% CI 1.15-3.51) and home beta-blocker use (OR 1.92, 95% CI 1.14-3.21) were significantly associated with hypotensive events. A respiratory event occurred in 179 (10.3%) patients. Older age (OR 2.02, 95% CI 1.30- 3.15) and receiving midazolam for procedural sedation were found to be significantly associated with respiratory events (OR 1.99, 95% CI 1.02-3.88).

CONCLUSION

Beta-blocker or calcium channel blocker use prior to ECV for AF/AFL was not associated with hypotension. However, sedation with fentanyl and home beta-blocker use was associated with hypotension. The use of midazolam for procedural sedation was significantly associated with respiratory events.

Clinical decision support to Optimize Care of patients with Atrial Fibrillation or flutter in the Emergency department: protocol of a stepped-wedge cluster randomized pragmatic trial (O'CAFÉ trial)

BACKGROUND

Management of adults with atrial fibrillation (AF) or atrial flutter in the emergency department (ED) includes rate reduction, cardioversion, and stroke prevention. Different approaches to these components of care may lead to variation in frequency of hospitalization and stroke prevention actions, with significant implications for patient experience, cost of care, and risk of complications. Standardization using evidence-based recommendations could reduce variation in management, preventable hospitalizations, and stroke risk.

METHODS

We describe the rationale for our ED-based AF treatment recommendations. We also describe the development of an electronic clinical decision support system (CDSS) to deliver these recommendations to emergency physicians at the point of care. We implemented the CDSS at three pilot sites to assess feasibility and solicit user feedback. We will evaluate the impact of the CDSS on hospitalization and stroke prevention actions using a stepped-wedge cluster randomized pragmatic clinical trial across 13 community EDs in Northern California.

DISCUSSION

We hypothesize that the CDSS intervention will reduce hospitalization of adults with isolated AF or atrial flutter presenting to the ED and increase anticoagulation prescription in eligible patients at the time of ED discharge and within 30 days. If our hypotheses are confirmed, the treatment protocol and CDSS could be recommended to other EDs to improve management of adults with AF or atrial flutter.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05009225 .  Registered on 17 August 2021.

Body Weight Counts—Cardioversion with Vernakalant or Ibutilide at the Emergency Department

Aim: Medication for the pharmacological cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter (AFL) is applied either in a fixed dose or adapted to body weight. Individual body weight might be a relevant confounder for anti-arrhythmic treatment success. Therefore, the aim of this study was to elucidate the impact of body weight on pharmacological cardioversion success, comparing weight adapted (Vernakalant) and fixed dose (Ibutilide) pharmacotherapeutic cardioversion regimes. Methods: Within this prospective observational trial, a total of 316 episodes of AF and AFL were enrolled. Patients were stratified in either a Vernakalant (n = 181) or Ibutilide (n = 135) treatment arm, based on the chosen regime, for direct comparison of treatment efficacy. Results: Conversion to sinus rhythm was achieved in 76.3% of all cases. Of note, there was no difference comparing the Vernakalant and Ibutilide treatment arms (Vernakalant 76.2% vs. Ibutilide 76.3%; p = 0.991). Within the whole study population, decreasing conversion rates with increasing body weight (adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 0.69 (0.51–0.94); p = 0.018) were observed. An independent effect of body weight within the Ibutilide treatment arm was noted, which remained stable after adjustment for potential confounders (adjusted OR = 0.55 (0.38–0.92), p = 0.022. Conclusion: Both, the Vernakalant and Ibutilide treatment arms showed comparable rates of treatment success in pharmacotherapeutic cardioversion of AF and AFL. Of utmost importance, we observed that the fixed dose of Ibutilide—as compared to the weight-adapted dose of Vernakalant—showed a reduced treatment success with increasing body weight.

Adverse Events Associated With Electrical Cardioversion in Patients With Acute Atrial Fibrillation and Atrial Flutter

BACKGROUND

We sought to evaluate safety of electrical cardioversion (ECV) for patients with acute atrial fibrillation (AF) or atrial flutter (AFL) in the emergency department (ED).

METHODS

This was an analysis of data from 4 multicentre AF/AFL studies conducted from 2008 to 2019 at 23 large EDs. We included adult patients who received attempts at ECV and who had presented acutely after symptom onset. Staff manually reviewed study and clinical records to abstract data.

RESULTS

We evaluated 1736 ECV cases with a mean age of 60.1 years and 67.1% male. The overall success of ECV was 90.2% (95% confidence interval 88.7%-91.6%), with 4.9% of patients admitted. ED physicians performed the ECV in 95.2% and provided sedation in 96.5%; 13.9% (12.3%-15.7%) of cases experienced important adverse events that required treatment, and 0.4% were classified as life threatening. Another 5.6% had adverse events that did not require treatment. Logistic regression found that the RAFF-3 study cohort (odds ratio [OR] 2.0), age ≥ 85 years (OR 2.1), coronary artery disease (OR 1.5), midazolam (OR 1.9), and fentanyl (OR 1.5) were associated with important adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

This large evaluation of the safety of ECV for acute AF/AFL in the ED found that while serious adverse events were rare, there were a concerning number of events following sedation that required intervention. Physicians should be aware that older age, coronary artery disease, and fentanyl are associated with higher risks of important adverse events. This study provides more information for shared decision making discussions with patients when choosing between drug-shock and shock-only cardioversion strategies.